Top

Osteoporosis International

Published in:

01-12-2010 | Original Article

Detection of vertebral fractures in DXA VFA images using statistical models of appearance and a semi-automatic segmentation

Authors: M. G. Roberts, E. M. B. Pacheco, R. Mohankumar, T. F. Cootes, J. E. Adams

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 12/2010

Abstract

Summary

Morphometric methods of vertebral fracture diagnosis lack specificity. We used detailed shape and image texture model parameters to improve the specificity of quantitative fracture identification. Two radiologists visually classified all vertebrae for system training and evaluation. The vertebral endplates were located by a semi-automatic segmentation method to obtain classifier inputs.

Introduction

Vertebral fractures are common osteoporotic fractures, but current quantitative detection methods (morphometry) lack specificity. We used detailed shape and texture information to develop more specific quantitative classifiers of vertebral fracture to improve the objectivity of vertebral fracture diagnosis. These classifiers require a detailed segmentation of the vertebral endplate, and so we investigated the use of semi-automated segmentation methods as part of the diagnosis.

Methods

The vertebrae in a training set of 360 dual energy X-ray absorptiometry images were manually segmented. The shape and image texture of vertebrae were statistically modelled using Appearance Models. The vertebrae were given a gold standard classification by two radiologists. Linear discriminant classifiers to detect fractures were trained on the vertebral appearance model parameters. Classifier performance was evaluated by cross-validation for manual and semi-automatic segmentations, the latter derived using Active Appearance Models (AAM). Results were compared with a morphometric algorithm using the signs test.

Results

With manual segmentation, the false positive rates (FPR) at 95% sensitivity were: 5% (appearance) and 18% (morphometry). With semi-automatic segmentations the sensitivities at 5% FPR were: 88% (appearance) and 79% (morphometry).

Conclusion

Specificity and sensitivity are improved by using an appearance-based classifier compared to standard height ratio morphometry. An overall sensitivity loss of 7% occurs (at 95% specificity) when using a semi-automatic (AAM) segmentation compared to expert annotation, due to segmentation error. However, the classifier sensitivity is still adequate for a computer-assisted diagnosis system for vertebral fracture, especially if used in a triage approach.

Cooper C, O’Neill T, Silman A (1993) The epidemiology of vertebral fractures. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. Bone 14(Suppl 1):S89–S97CrossRefPubMed

Melton LJ III, Atkinson EJ, Cooper C et al (1999) Vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures. Osteoporosis Int 10(3):214–221CrossRef

Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L et al (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14(5):821–828CrossRefPubMed

Ensrud KE, Nevitt MC, Palermo L et al (1999) What proportion of incident morphometric vertebral fractures are clinically diagnosed and vice versa? J Bone Miner Res 14(S1):S138

Gehlbach SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M et al (2000) Recognition of vertebral fractures in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 11(7):577–582CrossRefPubMed

Delmas PD, van de Langerijt L, Watts NB et al (2005) Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 20(4):557–563CrossRefPubMed

Ferrar L, Jiang G, Adams J, Eastell R (2005) Identification of vertebral fractures: an update. Osteoporos Int 16(7):717–728CrossRefPubMed

Guermazi A, Mohr A, Grigorian M et al (2002) Identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6(3):241–252CrossRefPubMed

Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C et al (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semi-quantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8(9):1137–1148CrossRefPubMed

10.

Black DM, Cummings SR, Stone K et al (1991) A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions. J Bone Miner Res 6(8):883–892CrossRefPubMed

11.

Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW et al (1991) Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 6(3):207–215CrossRefPubMed

12.

McCloskey E, Spector T, Eyres K et al (1993) The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials. Osteoporos Int 3(3):138–147CrossRefPubMed

13.

Guglielmi G, Diacinti D, van Kuijk C et al (2008) Vertebral morphometry: current methods and recent advances. Eur Radiol 18(7):1484–1496CrossRefPubMed

14.

Wu CY, Li J, Jergas M et al (1995) Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 5(5):354–370CrossRefPubMed

15.

Black D, Palermo L, Nevitt MC et al (1995) Comparison of methods for defining prevalent vertebral deformities: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 10(6):890–902CrossRefPubMed

16.

Jiang G, Eastell R, Barrington NA, Ferrar L (2004) Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 15(11):887–896CrossRefPubMed

17.

Rea JA, Steiger P, Blake GM et al (1998) Optimizing data acquisition and analysis of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 8(2):177–183CrossRefPubMed

18.

Rea JA, Li J, Blake GM et al (2000) Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: a highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity. Osteoporos Int 11(8):660–668CrossRefPubMed

19.

Cootes TF, Edwards GJ, Taylor CJ (1998) Active appearance models. In: Burkhardt H, Neumann B (eds) Proc. 5th European conference on computer vision. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 484–498

20.

Cootes TF, Edwards GJ, Taylor CJ (2001) Active appearance models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Matching and Machine Intelligence 23(6):681–885CrossRef

21.

Roberts MG, Cootes TF, Pacheco E, Adams JE (2007) Quantitative vertebral fracture detection on DXA images using shape and appearance models. Acad Radiol 14(10):1166–1178CrossRefPubMed

22.

Roberts MG, Cootes TF, Adams JE (2006) Vertebral morphometry: semiautomatic determination of detailed shape from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images using active appearance models. Invest Radiol 41(12):849–859CrossRefPubMed

23.

Blake GM, Rea JA, Fogelman I (1997) Vertebral morphometry studies using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Semin Nucl Med 27(3):276–290CrossRefPubMed

24.

Ferrar L, Jiang G, Eastell R, Peel NF (2003) Visual identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: using morphometric x-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 18(5):933–938CrossRefPubMed

25.

Binkley N, Krueger D, Gangnon R et al (2005) Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 16(12):1513–1518CrossRefPubMed

26.

McCloskey E, Selby P, de Takats D et al (2001) Effects of clodronate on vertebral fracture risk in osteoporosis: a 1-year interim analysis. Bone 28(3):310–315CrossRefPubMed

27.

Smyth PP, Taylor CJ, Adams JE (1999) Vertebral shape: automatic measurement with active shape models. Radiology 211(2):571–578PubMed

28.

Vokes T, Bachman D, Baim S et al (2006) (2006) Vertebral fracture assessment: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom 9(1):37–46CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ferrar L, Jiang G, Armbrecht G et al (2007) Is short vertebral height always an osteoporotic fracture? The osteoporosis and ultrasound study (OPUS). Bone 41:5–12CrossRefPubMed

30.

Ferrar L, Jiang G, Clowes GA et al (2008) Comparison of densitometric and radiographic vertebral fracture assessment using the algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ) method in postmenopausal women at low and high risk of fracture. J Bone Miner Res 23(1):103–111CrossRefPubMed

31.

Scott IM, Cootes TF, Taylor CJ (2003) Improving active appearance model matching using local image structure. In: Proceedings of 18th Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging 258–269

32.

Rea J, Steiger P, Blake GM et al (1998) Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry: reference data for vertebral dimensions. J Bone Miner Res 13(3):464–474CrossRefPubMed

33.

Roberts MG (2008). Automatic detection and classification of vertebral fracture using statistical models of appearance, PhD Thesis, University of Manchester

34.

Fleiss JL (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 76(5):378–382CrossRef

35.

de Bruijne M, Lund M, Tanko L et al (2007) Quantitative vertebral morphometry using neighbour-conditional shape models. Med Image Anal 11(5):503–512CrossRefPubMed

Title: Detection of vertebral fractures in DXA VFA images using statistical models of appearance and a semi-automatic segmentation
Authors: M. G. Roberts
E. M. B. Pacheco
R. Mohankumar
T. F. Cootes
J. E. Adams
Publication date: 01-12-2010
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Osteoporosis International / Issue 12/2010
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-1169-6

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Detection of vertebral fractures in DXA VFA images using statistical models of appearance and a semi-automatic segmentation

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 12/2010

Functional data modelling approach for analysing and predicting trends in incidence rates—an application to falls injury

Birth weight and adult bone mass: a systematic literature review

Baseline atherosclerosis parameter could assess the risk of bone loss during pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density in women aged 65–71 years: a 3-year randomized population-based trial (OSTPRE-FPS)

Risk of subsequent fracture and mortality within 5 years after a non-vertebral fracture

Reduced cortical bone density with normal trabecular bone density in girls with Turner syndrome