Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2013

01-08-2013

Detection of Breast Cancer with a Computer-Aided Detection Applied to Full-Field Digital Mammography

Authors: Ryusuke Murakami, Shinichiro Kumita, Hitomi Tani, Tamiko Yoshida, Kenichi Sugizaki, Tomoyuki Kuwako, Tomonari Kiriyama, Kenta Hakozaki, Emi Okazaki, Keiko Yanagihara, Shinya Iida, Shunsuke Haga, Shinichi Tsuchiya

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

A study was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of computer-aided detection (CAD) with full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancer, based on mammographic appearance and histopathology. Retrospectively, CAD sensitivity was assessed in total group of 152 cases for subgroups based on breast density, mammographic presentation, lesion size, and results of histopathological examination. The overall sensitivity of CAD was 91 % (139 of 152 cases). CAD detected 100 % (47/47) of cancers manifested as microcalcifications; 98 % (62/63) of those manifested as non-calcified masses; 100 % (15/15) of those manifested as mixed masses and microcalcifications; 75 % (12/16) of those manifested as architectural distortions, and 69 % (18/26) of those manifested as focal asymmetry. CAD sensitivity was 83 % (10/12) for cancers measuring 1–10 mm, 92 % (37/40) for those measuring 11–20 mm, and 92 % (92/100) for those measuring >20 mm. There was no significant difference in CAD detection efficiency between cancers in dense breasts (88 %; 69/78) and those in non-dense breasts (95 %; 70/74). CAD showed a high sensitivity of 91 % (139/152) for the mammographic appearance of cancer and 100 % sensitivity for identifying cancers manifested as microcalcifications. Sensitivity was not influenced by breast density or lesion size. CAD should be effective for helping radiologists detect breast cancer at an earlier stage.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shtern F: Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. Radiology 183:629–630, 1992PubMed Shtern F: Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. Radiology 183:629–630, 1992PubMed
3.
go back to reference Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ, Im JG: Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology 244:104–111, 2007PubMedCrossRef Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ, Im JG: Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology 244:104–111, 2007PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference The JS, Schilling KJ, Hoffmeister JW, Friedmann E, McGinnis R, Holcomb RG: Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:337–340, 2009PubMedCrossRef The JS, Schilling KJ, Hoffmeister JW, Friedmann E, McGinnis R, Holcomb RG: Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:337–340, 2009PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Baum F, Fischer U, Obenauer S, Grabbe E: Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results. Eur Radiol 12:3015–3017, 2002PubMed Baum F, Fischer U, Obenauer S, Grabbe E: Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results. Eur Radiol 12:3015–3017, 2002PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG: Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views. Radiology 241:695–701, 2006PubMedCrossRef Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG: Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views. Radiology 241:695–701, 2006PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA: Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:377–384, 2007PubMedCrossRef Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA: Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:377–384, 2007PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG: Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Radiology 246:71–80, 2008PubMedCrossRef Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG: Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Radiology 246:71–80, 2008PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brancato B, Houssami N, Francesca D, Bianchi S, Risso G, Catarzi S, Taschini R, Rosselli Del Turco M, Ciatto S: Does computer-aided detection (CAD) contribute to the performance of digital mammography in a self-referred population? Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:373–376, 2008PubMedCrossRef Brancato B, Houssami N, Francesca D, Bianchi S, Risso G, Catarzi S, Taschini R, Rosselli Del Turco M, Ciatto S: Does computer-aided detection (CAD) contribute to the performance of digital mammography in a self-referred population? Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:373–376, 2008PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference van den Biggelaar FJ, Kessels AG, van Engelshoven JM, Boetes C, Flobbe K: Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:499–506, 2010PubMedCrossRef van den Biggelaar FJ, Kessels AG, van Engelshoven JM, Boetes C, Flobbe K: Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:499–506, 2010PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: mammography. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS Atlas, fourth ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology: 2003 American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: mammography. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS Atlas, fourth ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology: 2003
12.
go back to reference Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D’Orsi CJ, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O’Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, Tabar L, Vyborny CJ, Castellino RA: Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215:554–562, 2000PubMed Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D’Orsi CJ, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O’Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, Tabar L, Vyborny CJ, Castellino RA: Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215:554–562, 2000PubMed
13.
go back to reference Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Mohtashemi K, Jindal G, Disimio MP, Rogers SK: Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:439–444, 2005PubMedCrossRef Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Mohtashemi K, Jindal G, Disimio MP, Rogers SK: Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:439–444, 2005PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bolivar AV, Gomez SS, Merino P, Alonso-Bartolomé P, Garcia EO, Cacho PM, Hoffmeister JW: Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Acta Radiol 51:1086–1092, 2010PubMedCrossRef Bolivar AV, Gomez SS, Merino P, Alonso-Bartolomé P, Garcia EO, Cacho PM, Hoffmeister JW: Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Acta Radiol 51:1086–1092, 2010PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sadaf A, Crystal P, Scaranelo A, Helbich T: Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 77:457–461, 2011PubMedCrossRef Sadaf A, Crystal P, Scaranelo A, Helbich T: Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 77:457–461, 2011PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Hoffmeister JW, Desimio MP: Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology. Cancer 104:931–935, 2005PubMedCrossRef Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Hoffmeister JW, Desimio MP: Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology. Cancer 104:931–935, 2005PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Pfleiderer SO, Fleck M, Kaiser WA: Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 228:851–856, 2003PubMedCrossRef Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Pfleiderer SO, Fleck M, Kaiser WA: Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 228:851–856, 2003PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Evans WP, Warren Burhenne LJ, Laurie L, O’Shaughnessy KF, Castellino RA: Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic characteristics and computer-aided detection. Radiology 225:182–189, 2002PubMedCrossRef Evans WP, Warren Burhenne LJ, Laurie L, O’Shaughnessy KF, Castellino RA: Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic characteristics and computer-aided detection. Radiology 225:182–189, 2002PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sickles EA: Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:661–663, 1986PubMedCrossRef Sickles EA: Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:661–663, 1986PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kopans D: Breast imaging, 2nd edition. Lippincott-Ravan, Philadelphia, 1998 Kopans D: Breast imaging, 2nd edition. Lippincott-Ravan, Philadelphia, 1998
21.
go back to reference Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, Soo MS: Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1083–1088, 2003PubMedCrossRef Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, Soo MS: Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1083–1088, 2003PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Detection of Breast Cancer with a Computer-Aided Detection Applied to Full-Field Digital Mammography
Authors
Ryusuke Murakami
Shinichiro Kumita
Hitomi Tani
Tamiko Yoshida
Kenichi Sugizaki
Tomoyuki Kuwako
Tomonari Kiriyama
Kenta Hakozaki
Emi Okazaki
Keiko Yanagihara
Shinya Iida
Shunsuke Haga
Shinichi Tsuchiya
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9564-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2013 Go to the issue