Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Study protocol

Design and rationale of the ATtune Knee Outcome Study (ATKOS): multicenter prospective evaluation of a novel uncemented rotating platform knee system

Authors: Rachid Rassir, Inger N. Sierevelt, Marjolein Schager, Peter A. Nolte, the ATKOS group

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) remains the gold standard for treatment of debilitating symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Even though providing satisfactory results for the majority of patients, some studies report dissatisfaction after TKA to be as high as 20%. Among other things, pain catastrophising and self-efficacy are thought to compromise results of TKA. Implant manufacturers keep improving upon their designs in an attempt to improve functional outcomes. One of these novel knee systems is the Attune. To our knowledge, there are no clinical follow-up studies reporting results of the uncemented version. The main objective of this multicentre prospective observational study is to evaluate revision rate, complications, radiographic outcomes (i.e. alignment and radiolucent lines) and patient reported outcomes of the uncemented Attune mobile bearing TKA. Secondary objectives are (1) to assess physical function, return to sport and return to work after TKA and (2) to evaluate the long-term effect of preoperative psychological factors on satisfaction after TKA.

Methods

All patients presenting in the participating centres with knee pathology warranting joint replacement therapy will be considered for inclusion, an absolute indication for cemented fixation is the only exclusion criterium. Evaluation of clinical and radiographic performance (e.g. radiolucent lines) is done at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years after surgery using validated patient reported outcome measures. Cumulative revision rates are calculated after 5 and 10 years using Kaplan–Meier methods. Physical function is assessed with performance based measurements before and 1 year after surgery. Return to sports is assessed using the Tegner and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity rating scale before and 1 year after surgery. Return to work is evaluated by inviting patients of working age to complete a short questionnaire 1 year after surgery. Psychologic factors are assessed using questionnaires for pain catastrophising, pain self-efficacy and mental health before, 5 years and 10 years after surgery. Preoperative psychologic scores are correlated to functional outcomes.

Discussion

The current study aims to report the clinical performance of a novel implant and can help provide insight in factors that play a role in satisfaction after TKA.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04247672 (January 30, 2020)
Literature
1.
go back to reference Klug A, et al. The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020: 1–12. Klug A, et al. The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020: 1–12.
2.
go back to reference Gunaratne R, et al. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3854–60.PubMedCrossRef Gunaratne R, et al. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3854–60.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Baert IA, et al. Does pre-surgical central modulation of pain influence outcome after total knee replacement? A systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24(2):213–23.PubMedCrossRef Baert IA, et al. Does pre-surgical central modulation of pain influence outcome after total knee replacement? A systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24(2):213–23.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brander V, et al. Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:21–6.PubMedCrossRef Brander V, et al. Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:21–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tolk JJ, et al. The influence of expectation modification in knee arthroplasty on satisfaction of patients: a randomized controlled trial: the EKSPECT study. Bone Joint J. 2021;103(4):619–26.PubMedCrossRef Tolk JJ, et al. The influence of expectation modification in knee arthroplasty on satisfaction of patients: a randomized controlled trial: the EKSPECT study. Bone Joint J. 2021;103(4):619–26.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Clary CW, et al. The influence of total knee arthroplasty geometry on mid-flexion stability: an experimental and finite element study. J Biomech. 2013;46(7):1351–7.PubMedCrossRef Clary CW, et al. The influence of total knee arthroplasty geometry on mid-flexion stability: an experimental and finite element study. J Biomech. 2013;46(7):1351–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Saffarini M, et al. Evolution of trochlear compartment geometry in total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(1):7.PubMedPubMedCentral Saffarini M, et al. Evolution of trochlear compartment geometry in total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(1):7.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Webb JE, et al. The evolution of implant design decreases the incidence of lateral release in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(5):1505–9.PubMedCrossRef Webb JE, et al. The evolution of implant design decreases the incidence of lateral release in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(5):1505–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Piepers MJ, et al. Do refinements to original designs improve outcome of total knee replacement? A retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Piepers MJ, et al. Do refinements to original designs improve outcome of total knee replacement? A retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Indelli PF, et al. Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of a classic and its evolutional design. Arthroplast Today. 2016;2(4):193–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Indelli PF, et al. Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of a classic and its evolutional design. Arthroplast Today. 2016;2(4):193–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Martin JR, et al. Femoral implant design modification decreases the incidence of patellar crepitus in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(4):1310–3.PubMedCrossRef Martin JR, et al. Femoral implant design modification decreases the incidence of patellar crepitus in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(4):1310–3.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, et al. Clinical and radiographic results of attune and PFC sigma knee designs at 2-year follow-up: a prospective matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(2):431–6.PubMedCrossRef Ranawat CS, et al. Clinical and radiographic results of attune and PFC sigma knee designs at 2-year follow-up: a prospective matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(2):431–6.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Toomey SD, et al. Comparative incidence of patellofemoral complications between 2 total knee arthroplasty systems in a multicenter, prospective clinical study. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(9s):S187-s192.PubMedCrossRef Toomey SD, et al. Comparative incidence of patellofemoral complications between 2 total knee arthroplasty systems in a multicenter, prospective clinical study. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(9s):S187-s192.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Behrend H, et al. No difference in joint awareness after TKA: a matched-pair analysis of a classic implant and its evolutional design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(7):2124–9.PubMedCrossRef Behrend H, et al. No difference in joint awareness after TKA: a matched-pair analysis of a classic implant and its evolutional design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(7):2124–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chua JL, et al. Modern TKA implants are equivalent to traditional TKA implants in functional and patellofemoral joint-related outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(4):1116–23.PubMedCrossRef Chua JL, et al. Modern TKA implants are equivalent to traditional TKA implants in functional and patellofemoral joint-related outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(4):1116–23.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hamilton W, et al. Early patient reported outcomes with new primary vs. contemporary total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of two worldwide, multi-center prospective studies. International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA): e-Poster, 2016: p. 5–8. Hamilton W, et al. Early patient reported outcomes with new primary vs. contemporary total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of two worldwide, multi-center prospective studies. International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA): e-Poster, 2016: p. 5–8.
18.
go back to reference Carey BW, Harty J. A comparison of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of the cemented ATTUNE and PFC sigma fixed bearing cruciate sacrificing knee systems in patients who underwent total knee replacement with both prostheses in opposite knees. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Carey BW, Harty J. A comparison of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of the cemented ATTUNE and PFC sigma fixed bearing cruciate sacrificing knee systems in patients who underwent total knee replacement with both prostheses in opposite knees. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Song SJ, et al. Comparison of clinical results and risk of patellar injury between attune and PFC sigma knee systems. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018;30(4):334–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Song SJ, et al. Comparison of clinical results and risk of patellar injury between attune and PFC sigma knee systems. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018;30(4):334–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Becher C, et al. Posterior stabilized TKA reduce patellofemoral contact pressure compared with cruciate retaining TKA in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(10):1159–65.PubMedCrossRef Becher C, et al. Posterior stabilized TKA reduce patellofemoral contact pressure compared with cruciate retaining TKA in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(10):1159–65.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hadi M, et al. Does malalignment affect patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1201.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hadi M, et al. Does malalignment affect patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1201.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12.
23.
go back to reference Fransen M, Edmonds J. Reliability and validity of the EuroQol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology. 1999;38(9):807–13.PubMedCrossRef Fransen M, Edmonds J. Reliability and validity of the EuroQol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology. 1999;38(9):807–13.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dawson J, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):63–9.PubMedCrossRef Dawson J, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):63–9.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Haverkamp D, et al. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(3):347–52.PubMedCrossRef Haverkamp D, et al. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(3):347–52.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Behrend H, et al. The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(3):430-436.e1.PubMedCrossRef Behrend H, et al. The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(3):430-436.e1.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Shadid MB, et al. The Dutch version of the forgotten joint score: test-retesting reliability and validation. Acta Orthop Belg. 2016;82(1):112–8.PubMed Shadid MB, et al. The Dutch version of the forgotten joint score: test-retesting reliability and validation. Acta Orthop Belg. 2016;82(1):112–8.PubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Crossley KM, et al. Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):815–22.PubMedCrossRef Crossley KM, et al. Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):815–22.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kievit AJ, et al. Dutch translation of the Kujala anterior knee pain scale and validation in patients after knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(11):2647–53.PubMedCrossRef Kievit AJ, et al. Dutch translation of the Kujala anterior knee pain scale and validation in patients after knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(11):2647–53.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Witjes S, et al. Return to sports and physical activity after total and unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2016;46(2):269–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Witjes S, et al. Return to sports and physical activity after total and unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2016;46(2):269–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10(3):150–4.PubMedCrossRef Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10(3):150–4.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;198:43–9. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;198:43–9.
34.
go back to reference Kessel T, van Engelen E. Uitgebreide toelichting van het meetinstrument. Kessel T, van Engelen E. Uitgebreide toelichting van het meetinstrument.
35.
go back to reference Wild D, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.PubMedCrossRef Wild D, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference de Vlieger JCN, et al. Validation of the super simple hip score combined with the University of California, Los Angeles activity scale for younger patients. Hip Int. 2020;30(2):181–6.PubMedCrossRef de Vlieger JCN, et al. Validation of the super simple hip score combined with the University of California, Los Angeles activity scale for younger patients. Hip Int. 2020;30(2):181–6.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Dobson F, et al. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(8):1042–52.PubMedCrossRef Dobson F, et al. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(8):1042–52.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(2):153–63.PubMedCrossRef Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(2):153–63.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference van der Maas LC, et al. Psychometric properties of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ). Eur J Psychol Assess. 2012;28:68–75.CrossRef van der Maas LC, et al. Psychometric properties of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ). Eur J Psychol Assess. 2012;28:68–75.CrossRef
41.
43.
go back to reference Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(4):524.CrossRef Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(4):524.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Van Damme S. Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Dutch version (PCS-DV). Gent: Universiteit Gent; 2002. Van Damme S. Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Dutch version (PCS-DV). Gent: Universiteit Gent; 2002.
45.
go back to reference Hopley CD, Crossett LS, Chen AF. Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship after total knee arthroplasty using a rotating platform knee prosthesis: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(1):68-77.e3.PubMedCrossRef Hopley CD, Crossett LS, Chen AF. Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship after total knee arthroplasty using a rotating platform knee prosthesis: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(1):68-77.e3.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Chow S-C et al., Sample size calculations in clinical research. 2017: Chapman and Hall/CRC. Chow S-C et al., Sample size calculations in clinical research. 2017: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
48.
go back to reference Verduijn M, et al. The analysis of competing events like cause-specific mortality–beware of the Kaplan-Meier method. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(1):56–61.PubMedCrossRef Verduijn M, et al. The analysis of competing events like cause-specific mortality–beware of the Kaplan-Meier method. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(1):56–61.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Drexler M, et al. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: down the boulevard of broken dreams - opposes. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(11 Suppl A):85–9.PubMedCrossRef Drexler M, et al. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: down the boulevard of broken dreams - opposes. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(11 Suppl A):85–9.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Yang JH, et al. Hybrid component fixation in total knee arthroplasty: minimum of 10-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(6):1111–8.PubMedCrossRef Yang JH, et al. Hybrid component fixation in total knee arthroplasty: minimum of 10-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(6):1111–8.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, et al. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: down the boulevard of broken dreams - affirms. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(11 Suppl A):82–4.PubMedCrossRef Ranawat CS, et al. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: down the boulevard of broken dreams - affirms. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(11 Suppl A):82–4.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Gandhi R, et al. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(7):889–95.PubMedCrossRef Gandhi R, et al. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(7):889–95.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Mont MA, et al. Long-term implant survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(5):369–76.PubMed Mont MA, et al. Long-term implant survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(5):369–76.PubMed
54.
go back to reference Nakama GY, et al. Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:Cd006193.PubMed Nakama GY, et al. Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:Cd006193.PubMed
55.
go back to reference Park JW, Kim YH. Simultaneous cemented and cementless total knee replacement in the same patients: a prospective comparison of long-term outcomes using an identical design of NexGen prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(11):1479–86.PubMedCrossRef Park JW, Kim YH. Simultaneous cemented and cementless total knee replacement in the same patients: a prospective comparison of long-term outcomes using an identical design of NexGen prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(11):1479–86.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Wang H, et al. Similar survival between uncemented and cemented fixation prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic comparative analysis using registers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(12):3191–7.PubMedCrossRef Wang H, et al. Similar survival between uncemented and cemented fixation prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic comparative analysis using registers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(12):3191–7.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Cross MJ, Parish EN. A hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: prospective analysis of 1000 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(8):1073–6.PubMedCrossRef Cross MJ, Parish EN. A hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: prospective analysis of 1000 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(8):1073–6.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Kamath AF, et al. Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(8):1390–5.PubMedCrossRef Kamath AF, et al. Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(8):1390–5.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Nelissen RG, Valstar ER, Rozing PM. The effect of hydroxyapatite on the micromotion of total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(11):1665–72.PubMedCrossRef Nelissen RG, Valstar ER, Rozing PM. The effect of hydroxyapatite on the micromotion of total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(11):1665–72.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Tai CC, Cross MJ. Five- to 12-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in young, active patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(9):1158–63.PubMedCrossRef Tai CC, Cross MJ. Five- to 12-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in young, active patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(9):1158–63.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Robertsson O, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(3):262–7.PubMedCrossRef Robertsson O, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(3):262–7.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Noble PC, et al. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35–43.PubMedCrossRef Noble PC, et al. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35–43.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(12):2415–8.PubMedCrossRef Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(12):2415–8.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Kim TK, et al. Causes and predictors of patient’s dissatisfaction after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(2):263–71.PubMedCrossRef Kim TK, et al. Causes and predictors of patient’s dissatisfaction after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(2):263–71.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Baker P, et al. Patient satisfaction with total knee replacement cannot be predicted from pre-operative variables alone: a cohort study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(10):1359–65.PubMedCrossRef Baker P, et al. Patient satisfaction with total knee replacement cannot be predicted from pre-operative variables alone: a cohort study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(10):1359–65.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Bonnin MP, Basiglini L, Archbold HA. What are the factors of residual pain after uncomplicated TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(9):1411–7.PubMedCrossRef Bonnin MP, Basiglini L, Archbold HA. What are the factors of residual pain after uncomplicated TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(9):1411–7.PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Vissers MM, et al. Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41(4):576–88.PubMedCrossRef Vissers MM, et al. Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41(4):576–88.PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Sorel JC, et al. The influence of preoperative psychological distress on pain and function after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-b(1):7–14.PubMedCrossRef Sorel JC, et al. The influence of preoperative psychological distress on pain and function after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-b(1):7–14.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Metadata
Title
Design and rationale of the ATtune Knee Outcome Study (ATKOS): multicenter prospective evaluation of a novel uncemented rotating platform knee system
Authors
Rachid Rassir
Inger N. Sierevelt
Marjolein Schager
Peter A. Nolte
the ATKOS group
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04493-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021 Go to the issue