Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Dementia | Study protocol

Exploring the experiences of people living with dementia in Dementia Friendly Communities (DFCs) in Northern Ireland: a realist evaluation protocol

Authors: Stephanie Craig, Gary Mitchell, Peter O’ Halloran, Patrick Stark, Christine Brown Wilson

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to 1) explore the experiences of people living with dementia interacting with DFCs and 2) identify factors that influence empower and support people living with dementia to live successfully in DFCs. The main elements of a DFC are related to people; communities; organisations and partnerships. There are over 200 organisations recognised as dementia-friendly in Northern Ireland (NI). This realist evaluation is to understand how DFCs work for people living with dementia, how positive outcomes are achieved, for whom and in what contexts do DFCs work best.

Methods

A realist evaluation using case study methodology. The process evaluation includes a realist review of the literature, non-participant observation of people living with dementia in their local communities, semi-structured interviews to explore the facilitators and barriers to living well in DFCs and focus groups comprised of people living with dementia, family caregivers and people working in DFCs to support Context- Mechanisms and Outcomes (CMOs). This four-stage realist assessment cycle is used, including iterative rounds of theory development, data gathering, and theory testing. In the end, analysis will reveal context mechanisms that influence how dementia-friendly communities operate and present an initial theory of how people think, which, if adopted, may be able to alter current contexts so that "key" mechanisms are activated to generate desired outcomes.

Discussion

To give confidence in moving from hypothetical constructions about how DFCs could function to explanations of possible or observable causal mechanisms, the realist evaluation of a complex intervention incorporates a variety of evidence and perspectives. Despite playing a significant role in a person with dementia's everyday life, it appears that little is known about how communities function to achieve intended results. Even though there has been a lot of work to pinpoint the fundamentals and crucial phases of building DFCs, it is still unclear how people living with dementia benefit the most from these communities. This study intends to advance our understanding of how outcomes are produced for people living with dementia by contributing to the underlying theory of DFCs as well as addressing the primary research objectives.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
go back to reference Alzheimer’s Society. Dementia Friendly Communities (Online). Supporting people to live well with dementia. 2017. Alzheimer’s Society. Dementia Friendly Communities (Online). Supporting people to live well with dementia. 2017.
13.
go back to reference Phillipson L, Hall D, Cridland E. Dementia-friendly Kiama pilot project final evaluation report. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2016. Phillipson L, Hall D, Cridland E. Dementia-friendly Kiama pilot project final evaluation report. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2016.
14.
go back to reference Smith K, Gee S, Sharrock T, Croucher M. Developing a dementia-friendly Christchurch: perspectives of people with dementia. Australas J Ageing. 2016;35:188–92.CrossRef Smith K, Gee S, Sharrock T, Croucher M. Developing a dementia-friendly Christchurch: perspectives of people with dementia. Australas J Ageing. 2016;35:188–92.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Corry D and Leavey G. An independent evaluation of the Dementia Friendly Communities Programme 2013-2017 in Northern Ireland. Londonderry: The Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing; 2017. Corry D and Leavey G. An independent evaluation of the Dementia Friendly Communities Programme 2013-2017 in Northern Ireland. Londonderry: The Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing; 2017.
18.
go back to reference Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications; 1997. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications; 1997.
19.
go back to reference Marchal B, Van Belle S, Van Olmen J, Hoerée T, Kegels G. Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research. Evaluation. 2012;18(2):192–212.CrossRef Marchal B, Van Belle S, Van Olmen J, Hoerée T, Kegels G. Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research. Evaluation. 2012;18(2):192–212.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science. York: Books; 1975. Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science. York: Books; 1975.
24.
go back to reference Pawson R. The Science of Evaluation. London: Sage Publications; 2013. Pawson R. The Science of Evaluation. London: Sage Publications; 2013.
25.
go back to reference Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2017. PMID: 29072890. Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2017. PMID: 29072890.
27.
go back to reference Westhorp G. Realist impact evaluation- an introduction. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2014. Westhorp G. Realist impact evaluation- an introduction. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2014.
30.
go back to reference Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses – Evolving Standards) project. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2014. PMID: 25642521. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses – Evolving Standards) project. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2014. PMID: 25642521.
31.
go back to reference Corry D. An independent evaluating of the Dementia Friendly communities Programme 2013-2017 in Northern Ireland. The Bamford Centre. Derry.NI; 2019. Corry D. An independent evaluating of the Dementia Friendly communities Programme 2013-2017 in Northern Ireland. The Bamford Centre. Derry.NI; 2019. 
36.
go back to reference Rooney T, Lawlor K, Rohan E. Telling tales: Storytelling as a methodological approach in research. InECRM2016-Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business Management": ECRM2016 2016 May 20 (p. 225). Academic Conferences and publishing limited. Rooney T, Lawlor K, Rohan E. Telling tales: Storytelling as a methodological approach in research. InECRM2016-Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business Management": ECRM2016 2016 May 20 (p. 225). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
38.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist synthesis: an introduction. Manchester: ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester; 2004. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist synthesis: an introduction. Manchester: ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester; 2004.
44.
go back to reference Dewing J. Process consent research and older people with dementia 2008; 2018. Dewing J. Process consent research and older people with dementia 2008; 2018.
45.
go back to reference Best P, McConnell T, Sturm T, Stevenson M, McCorry N, Donnelly M, Taylor M. A translational case study of empowerment into practice: An evaluation of the Dementia NI Service: Final Report to the Atlantic Philanthropies. QUB. 2018. Best P, McConnell T, Sturm T, Stevenson M, McCorry N, Donnelly M, Taylor M. A translational case study of empowerment into practice: An evaluation of the Dementia NI Service: Final Report to the Atlantic Philanthropies. QUB. 2018.
46.
go back to reference Mitchell G, McTurk V, Carter G, Brown Wilson C. Exploring perceptions of pementia in Northern Ireland. Review BMC Geriatrics. 2020. Mitchell G, McTurk V, Carter G, Brown Wilson C. Exploring perceptions of pementia in Northern Ireland. Review BMC Geriatrics. 2020.
49.
go back to reference Burns N and Grove S. The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis and generation of evidence, 6th edn. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier. 2009. Burns N and Grove S. The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis and generation of evidence, 6th edn. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier. 2009.
50.
Metadata
Title
Exploring the experiences of people living with dementia in Dementia Friendly Communities (DFCs) in Northern Ireland: a realist evaluation protocol
Authors
Stephanie Craig
Gary Mitchell
Peter O’ Halloran
Patrick Stark
Christine Brown Wilson
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Dementia
Dementia
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04090-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Geriatrics 1/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine