Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 2/2019

Open Access 01-08-2019 | Dabigatran

Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population

Authors: Alpesh Amin, Allison Keshishian, Oluwaseyi Dina, Amol Dhamane, Anagha Nadkarni, Eric Carda, Cristina Russ, Lisa Rosenblatt, Jack Mardekian, Huseyin Yuce, Christine L. Baker

Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases with age; > 80% of US adults with AF are aged ≥ 65 years. Compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), net clinical outcome (NCO), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) Medicare patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin. NVAF patients aged ≥ 65 years who initiated DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin were selected from 01JAN2013-31DEC2015 in CMS Medicare data. Propensity score matching was used to balance DOAC and warfarin cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the risk of stroke/SE, MB, NCO, and MACE. 37,525 apixaban–warfarin, 18,131 dabigatran–warfarin, and 55,359 rivaroxaban–warfarin pairs were included. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (HR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.59–0.81) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.91) had lower risk of stroke/SE, and dabigatran (HR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.72–1.07) had similar risk of stroke/SE. Apixaban (MB: HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.57–0.67; NCO: HR: 0.64; 95% CI 0.60–0.69) and dabigatran (MB: HR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.71–0.89; NCO: HR: 0.84; 95% CI 0.76–0.93) had lower risk of MB and NCO, and rivaroxaban had higher risk of MB (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 1.02–1.14) and similar risk of NCO (HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.99–1.09). Compared to warfarin, apixaban had a lower risk for stroke/SE, MB, and NCO; dabigatran had a lower risk of MB and NCO; and rivaroxaban had a lower risk of stroke/SE but higher risk of MB. All DOACs had lower risk of MACE compared to warfarin.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K et al (2014) Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a global burden of disease 2010 Study. Circulation 129(8):837–847CrossRef Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K et al (2014) Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a global burden of disease 2010 Study. Circulation 129(8):837–847CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Colilla S, Crow A, Petkun W et al (2013) Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U.S. adult population. Am J Cardiol 112(8):1142–1147CrossRef Colilla S, Crow A, Petkun W et al (2013) Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U.S. adult population. Am J Cardiol 112(8):1142–1147CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Naccarelli GV, Varker H, Lin J, Schulman KL (2009) Increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and flutter in the United States. Am J Cardiol 104(11):1534–1539CrossRef Naccarelli GV, Varker H, Lin J, Schulman KL (2009) Increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and flutter in the United States. Am J Cardiol 104(11):1534–1539CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Björck S, Palaszewski B, Friberg L, Bergfeldt L (2013) Atrial fibrillation, stroke risk, and warfarin therapy revisited: a population-based study. Stroke 44(11):3103–3108CrossRef Björck S, Palaszewski B, Friberg L, Bergfeldt L (2013) Atrial fibrillation, stroke risk, and warfarin therapy revisited: a population-based study. Stroke 44(11):3103–3108CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137(2):263–272CrossRef Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137(2):263–272CrossRef
6.
go back to reference January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 130(23):2071–2104CrossRef January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 130(23):2071–2104CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sardar P, Chatterjee S, Chaudhari S, Lip GY (2014) New oral anticoagulants in elderly adults: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Geriatr Soc 62(5):857–864CrossRef Sardar P, Chatterjee S, Chaudhari S, Lip GY (2014) New oral anticoagulants in elderly adults: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Geriatr Soc 62(5):857–864CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim IS, Kim HJ, Kim TH et al (2018) Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiol 72(2):105–112CrossRef Kim IS, Kim HJ, Kim TH et al (2018) Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiol 72(2):105–112CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E et al (2014) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 383(9921):955–962CrossRef Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E et al (2014) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 383(9921):955–962CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wehling M, Collins R, Gil VM et al (2017) Appropriateness of oral anticoagulants for the long-term treatment of atrial fibrillation in older people: results of an evidence-based review and international consensus validation process (OAC-FORTA 2016). Drugs Aging 34(7):499–507CrossRef Wehling M, Collins R, Gil VM et al (2017) Appropriateness of oral anticoagulants for the long-term treatment of atrial fibrillation in older people: results of an evidence-based review and international consensus validation process (OAC-FORTA 2016). Drugs Aging 34(7):499–507CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Amin A, Keshishian A, Trocio J et al (2017) Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population. Curr Med Res Opin 33(9):1595–1604CrossRef Amin A, Keshishian A, Trocio J et al (2017) Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population. Curr Med Res Opin 33(9):1595–1604CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR et al (2016) Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 5(6):e003725CrossRef Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR et al (2016) Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 5(6):e003725CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Thigpen JL, Dillon C, Forster KB et al (2015) Validity of international classification of disease codes to identify ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage among individuals with associated diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 8(1):8–14CrossRef Thigpen JL, Dillon C, Forster KB et al (2015) Validity of international classification of disease codes to identify ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage among individuals with associated diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 8(1):8–14CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cunningham A, Stein CM, Chung CP et al (2011) An automated database case definition for serious bleeding related to oral anticoagulant use. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 20(6):560–566CrossRef Cunningham A, Stein CM, Chung CP et al (2011) An automated database case definition for serious bleeding related to oral anticoagulant use. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 20(6):560–566CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Austin PC (2014) The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat Med 33(7):1242–1258CrossRef Austin PC (2014) The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat Med 33(7):1242–1258CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Austin PC (2009) Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 28:3083–3107CrossRef Austin PC (2009) Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 28:3083–3107CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361(12):1139–1151CrossRef Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361(12):1139–1151CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al (2011) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365(10):883–891CrossRef Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al (2011) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365(10):883–891CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ et al (2011) Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365(11):981–992CrossRef Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ et al (2011) Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365(11):981–992CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ et al (2011) Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation 123(21):2363–2372CrossRef Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ et al (2011) Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation 123(21):2363–2372CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Halperin JL, Hankey GJ, Wojdyla DM et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the rivaroxaban once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation (ROCKET AF). Circulation 130(2):138–146CrossRef Halperin JL, Hankey GJ, Wojdyla DM et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the rivaroxaban once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation (ROCKET AF). Circulation 130(2):138–146CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Halvorsen S, Atar D, Yang H et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin according to age for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: observations from the ARISTOTLE trial. Eur Heart J 35(28):1864–1872CrossRef Halvorsen S, Atar D, Yang H et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin according to age for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: observations from the ARISTOTLE trial. Eur Heart J 35(28):1864–1872CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M et al (2015) Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation 131(2):157–164CrossRef Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M et al (2015) Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation 131(2):157–164CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Deitelzweig S, Luo X, Gupta K et al (2017) Comparison of effectiveness and safety of treatment with apixaban vs. other oral anticoagulants among elderly nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Curr Med Res Opin 33(10):1745–1754CrossRef Deitelzweig S, Luo X, Gupta K et al (2017) Comparison of effectiveness and safety of treatment with apixaban vs. other oral anticoagulants among elderly nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Curr Med Res Opin 33(10):1745–1754CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Avgil-Tsadok M, Jackevicius CA, Essebag V et al (2016) Dabigatran use in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 115(1):152–160CrossRef Avgil-Tsadok M, Jackevicius CA, Essebag V et al (2016) Dabigatran use in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 115(1):152–160CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Coleman CI, Weeda ER, Nguyen E, Bunz TJ, Sood NA (2018) Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients 80+ years of age with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 4(4):328–329CrossRef Coleman CI, Weeda ER, Nguyen E, Bunz TJ, Sood NA (2018) Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients 80+ years of age with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 4(4):328–329CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Seeger JD, Bykov K, Bartels DB et al (2015) Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in routine care of patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 114(6):1277–1289PubMed Seeger JD, Bykov K, Bartels DB et al (2015) Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in routine care of patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 114(6):1277–1289PubMed
31.
go back to reference Norby FL, Bengtson LG, Lutsey PL et al (2017) Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin or dabigatran for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 17(1):238CrossRef Norby FL, Bengtson LG, Lutsey PL et al (2017) Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin or dabigatran for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 17(1):238CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Li XS, Deitelzweig S, Keshishian A et al (2017) Effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in “real-world” clinical practice. a propensity-matched analysis of 76,940 patients. Thromb Haemost 117(6):1072–1082CrossRef Li XS, Deitelzweig S, Keshishian A et al (2017) Effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in “real-world” clinical practice. a propensity-matched analysis of 76,940 patients. Thromb Haemost 117(6):1072–1082CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Patel PA, Zhao X, Fonarow GC et al (2015) Novel oral anticoagulant use among patients with atrial fibrillation hospitalized with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 8(4):383–392CrossRef Patel PA, Zhao X, Fonarow GC et al (2015) Novel oral anticoagulant use among patients with atrial fibrillation hospitalized with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 8(4):383–392CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Di Minno MN, Ambrosino P, Dentali F (2017) Safety of warfarin in “high-risk” populations: a meta-analysis of randomized and controlled trials. Thromb Res 150:1–7CrossRef Di Minno MN, Ambrosino P, Dentali F (2017) Safety of warfarin in “high-risk” populations: a meta-analysis of randomized and controlled trials. Thromb Res 150:1–7CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population
Authors
Alpesh Amin
Allison Keshishian
Oluwaseyi Dina
Amol Dhamane
Anagha Nadkarni
Eric Carda
Cristina Russ
Lisa Rosenblatt
Jack Mardekian
Huseyin Yuce
Christine L. Baker
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0929-5305
Electronic ISSN: 1573-742X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01838-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 2/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine