Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Cancer
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Cytostatic Therapy | Research article

Physical activity, return to work self-efficacy, and work status among employees undergoing chemotherapy for cancer - a prospective study with 12 months follow-up

Authors: Rikke Rosbjerg, Robert Zachariae, Dorte Gilså Hansen, Inger Hoejris, Saskia Duijts, Nina Lykkegaard Gehr, Irene Dyhrberg Andersen, Merete Labriola

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Numerous studies emphasize the positive effects of physical activity on health and well-being in cancer patients. The effects of physical activity on the working lives of cancer patients have received less attention. The aim of the present study was to examine the association between physical activity and work status in employees with cancer, and the mediating role of return to work self-efficacy (RTWSE) in this association.

Methods

Data from questionnaires (physical activity, RTWSE, performance status, sociodemographic), patient records, and Danish national registries (work status, education) were collected for 217 employees initiating chemotherapy for cancer. The associations of physical activity at baseline with work status at baseline and at twelve months follow-up, respectively, were estimated with logistic regression. The mediating role of RTWSE was investigated using the Sobel Goodmann test.

Results

Employees with moderate (> 30 min/day) or high (> 150 min/day) levels of current daily activity at baseline had significantly increased odds for working at baseline (OR = 2.83, 95%CI = 0.73–10.96 and OR = 6.13, 95%CI = 1.68–22.40, respectively) and at twelve months (OR = 3.90, 95%CI = 1.19–12.77 and OR = 3.43, 95%CI = 1.12–10.51, respectively), compared to sedentary employees. Likewise, employees, physically active in their leisure time (light or vigorous psychical activity) for 2–4 h/week or > 4 h/week of light activity at baseline, had increased odds for working at twelve months (OR range = 1.20 (95%CI = 0.40–3.61)–5.39(95%CI = 0.78–37.32)), compared to sedentary employees. RTWSE was not found to mediate the observed associations.

Conclusions

Physical activity appears positively associated with work status in employees undergoing treatment for cancer in the twelve months period after initiating chemotherapy.
Literature
1.
Fuller JT, Hartland MC, Maloney LT, Davison K. Therapeutic effects of aerobic and resistance exercises for cancer survivors: a systematic review of meta-analyses of clinical trials. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(20):1311 2017-098285. Epub 2018 Mar 16.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Stout NL, Baima J, Swisher AK, Winters-Stone KM, Welsh J. A Systematic Review of Exercise Systematic Reviews in the Cancer Literature (2005–2017). PM R. 2017;9(9S2):S347–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Buffart LM, Kalter J, Sweegers MG, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK, et al. Effects and moderators of exercise on quality of life and physical function in patients with cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 34 RCTs. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;52:91–104.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Mijwel S, Jervaeus A, Bolam KA, Norrbom J, Bergh J, Rundqvist H, et al. High-intensity exercise during chemotherapy induces beneficial effects 12 months into breast cancer survivorship. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(2):244–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Duncan M, Moschopoulou E, Herrington E, Deane J, Roylance R, Jones L, et al. Review of systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life in cancer survivors. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e015860 -2017-015860.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Oberoi S, Robinson PD, Cataudella D, Culos-Reed SN, Davis H, Duong N, et al. Physical activity reduces fatigue in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018;122:52–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Adamsen L, Quist M, Andersen C, Moller T, Herrstedt J, Kronborg D, et al. Effect of a multimodal high intensity exercise intervention in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;339:b3410.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Midtgaard J, Hammer NM, Andersen C, Larsen A, Bruun DM, Jarden M. Cancer survivors' experience of exercise-based cancer rehabilitation - a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(5):609–17.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
Duijts SF, van Egmond MP, Spelten E, van Muijen P, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. Physical and psychosocial problems in cancer survivors beyond return to work: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2014;23(5):481–92.PubMedCrossRef
11.
de Boer AG, Taskila T, Ojajarvi A, van Dijk FJ, Verbeek JH. Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA. 2009;301(7):753–62.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Sun Y, Shigaki CL, Armer JM. Return to work among breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(3):709–18.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, Bruns GL, Stoler MR, Nassif T, et al. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(4):415–37.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Mehnert A, de Boer A, Feuerstein M. Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(Suppl 11):2151–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Carlsen K, Oksbjerg Dalton S, Frederiksen K, Diderichsen F, Johansen C. Cancer and the risk for taking early retirement pension: a Danish cohort study. Scand J Public Health. 2008;36(2):117–25.PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
Fong CJ, Murphy KM, Westbrook JD, Markle MM. Behavioral, psychological, educational, and vocational interventions to facilitate employment outcomes for Cancer survivors: a systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev. 2015;5:1–81.
18.
19.
Groeneveld IF, de Boer AG, Frings-Dresen MH. Physical exercise and return to work: cancer survivors' experiences. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(2):237–46.PubMedCrossRef
20.
van Waart H, Stuiver MM, van Harten WH, Geleijn E, Kieffer JM, Buffart LM, et al. Effect of low-intensity physical activity and moderate- to high-intensity physical exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy on physical fitness, fatigue, and chemotherapy completion rates: results of the PACES randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(17):1918–27.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Thijs KM, de Boer AG, Vreugdenhil G, van de Wouw AJ, Houterman S, Schep G. Rehabilitation using high-intensity physical training and long-term return-to-work in cancer survivors. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(2):220–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Kampshoff CS, Chinapaw MJ, Brug J, Twisk JW, Schep G, Nijziel MR, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of high intensity and low-to-moderate intensity exercise on physical fitness and fatigue in cancer survivors: results of the Resistance and Endurance exercise After ChemoTherapy (REACT) study. BMC Med. 2015;13:275 015–0513-2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Leensen MCJ, Groeneveld IF, Heide IV, Rejda T, van Veldhoven PLJ, Berkel SV, et al. Return to work of cancer patients after a multidisciplinary intervention including occupational counselling and physical exercise in cancer patients: a prospective study in the Netherlands. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e014746 -2016-014746.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Lee MK, Kang HS, Lee KS, Lee ES. Three-year prospective cohort study of factors associated with return to work after breast Cancer diagnosis. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(4):547–58.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Bjorneklett HG, Rosenblad A, Lindemalm C, Ojutkangas ML, Letocha H, Strang P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of support group intervention after breast cancer treatment: results on sick leave, health care utilization and health economy. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(1):38–47.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Rogers LQ, Hopkins-Price P, Vicari S, Pamenter R, Courneya KS, Markwell S, et al. A randomized trial to increase physical activity in breast cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(4):935–46.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Berglund G, Bolund C, Gustavsson UL, Sjoden PO. Starting again--a comparison study of a group rehabilitation program for cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 1993;32(1):15–21.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Hubbard G, Gray NM, Ayansina D, Evans JM, Kyle RG. Case management vocational rehabilitation for women with breast cancer after surgery: a feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:175–6215 14-175.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Shaw WS, Reme SE, Linton SJ, Huang YH, Pransky G. 3rd place, PREMUS best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire--psychometric properties and predictive validity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(2):109–19.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Shaw WS, Huang YH. Concerns and expectations about returning to work with low back pain: identifying themes from focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(21):1269–81.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Brouwer S, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S, Lee H, Krause N, Shaw WS. Return-to-work self-efficacy: development and validation of a scale in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):244–58.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freemann and Company; 1997.
33.
Lagerveld S, Blonk R, Schaufeli W, Brenninkmeijer V. Return to work among employees with mental health problems: development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire. Work Stress. 2010;24(4):359–75.CrossRef
34.
Brouwer S, Amick BC 3rd, Lee H, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S. The predictive validity of the return-to-work self-efficacy scale for return-to-work outcomes in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(4):725–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
36.
Richard S, Dionne CE, Nouwen A. Self-efficacy and health locus of control: relationship to occupational disability among workers with back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):421–30.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Nieuwenhuijsen K, Noordik E, van Dijk FJ, van der Klink JJ. Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):290–9.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Wolvers MDJ, Leensen MCJ, Groeneveld IF, Frings-Dresen MHW, De Boer AGEM. Predictors for earlier return to work of cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv. 2018;12(2):169–77.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Bains M, Munir F, Yarker J, Bowley D, Thomas A, Armitage N, et al. The impact of colorectal cancer and self-efficacy beliefs on work ability and employment status: a longitudinal study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012;21(5):634–41.CrossRef
40.
Shieh C, Weaver MT, Hanna KM, Newsome K, Mogos M. Association of Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation with nutrition and exercise behaviors in a community sample of adults. J Community Health Nurs. 2015;32(4):199–211.PubMedCrossRef
41.
David P, Pennell ML, Foraker RE, Katz ML, Buckworth J, Paskett ED. How are previous physical activity and self-efficacy related to future physical activity and self-efficacy? Health Educ Behav. 2014;41(6):573–6.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Elavsky S, McAuley E, Motl RW, Konopack JF, Marquez DX, Hu L, et al. Physical activity enhances long-term quality of life in older adults: efficacy, esteem, and affective influences. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30(2):138–45.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Phillips SM, McAuley E. Social cognitive influences on physical activity participation in long-term breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2013;22(4):783–91.PubMedCrossRef
44.
45.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Spence RR, Heesch KC, Brown WJ. Colorectal cancer survivors' exercise experiences and preferences: qualitative findings from an exercise rehabilitation programme immediately after chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011;20(2):257–66.CrossRef
47.
48.
49.
Islam T, Dahlui M, Majid HA, Nahar AM, Mohd Taib NA, Su TT, et al. Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14 Suppl 3:S8 2458-14-S3-S8. Epub 2014 Nov 24.PubMedCrossRef
50.
51.
Hjollund NH, Larsen FB, Andersen JH. Register-based follow-up of social benefits and other transfer payments: accuracy and degree of completeness in a Danish interdepartmental administrative database compared with a population-based survey. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(5):497–502.PubMedCrossRef
52.
The Danish Agency for Labour Market and Recruitment (STAR). DREAM codebook, version 43. Copenhagen: STAR; 2019.
53.
Saltin B, Grimby G. Physiological analysis of middle-aged and old former athletes. Comparison with still active athletes of the same ages. Circulation. 1968;38(6):1104–15.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Grimby G, Borjesson M, Jonsdottir IH, Schnohr P, Thelle DS, Saltin B. The "Saltin-Grimby physical activity level scale" and its application to health research. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(Suppl 4):119–25.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Matthiessen J, Biltoft-Jensen A, Rasmussen LB, Hels O, Fagt S, Groth MV. Comparison of the Danish physical activity questionnaire with a validated position and motion instrument. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(5):311–22.PubMedCrossRef
56.
57.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Hansen AW, Dahl-Petersen I, Helge JW, Brage S, Gronbaek M, Flensborg-Madsen T. Validation of an internet-based long version of the international physical activity questionnaire in Danish adults using combined accelerometry and heart rate monitoring. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(3):654–64.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Momsen AM, Rosbjerg R, Stapelfeldt CM, Lund T, Jensen C, Johansen T, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the 19-item return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016;42(4):338–45.PubMedCrossRef
60.
De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in Medicine: A practical guide. Campbridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016.
61.
Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–55.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Jensen VM, Rasmussen AW. Danish education registers. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):91–4.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ, Biscardi M, Ammendolia C, Myburgh C, et al. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):32 016-0113-z. eCollection 2016.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2017.
65.
Pearce N. A short introduction to epidemiology. 2nd ed. New Zealand, Wellington: Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University Wellington Campus; 2005.
66.
Sedgwick P. Prospective cohort studies: advantages and disadvantages. BMJ. 2013;347:347–8.
67.
Losina E, Yang HY, Deshpande BR, Katz JN, Collins JE. Physical activity and unplanned illness-related work absenteeism: data from an employee wellness program. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176872.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Storm V, Paech J, Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S. Physical exercise, sickness absence and subjective employability: an 8-year longitudinal observational study among musculoskeletal patients. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(6):541–6.PubMedCrossRef
69.
70.
Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):1423–34.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Kessels E, Husson O, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM. The effect of exercise on cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:479–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
Porro B, Michel A, Zinzindohoue C, Bertrand P, Monrigal E, Trentini F, et al. Quality of life, fatigue and changes therein as predictors of return to work during breast cancer treatment. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019;33(2):467–77.PubMedCrossRef
73.
74.
Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710–8.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Rzewnicki R, Vanden Auweele Y, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Addressing overreporting on the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6(3):299–305.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physical activity, return to work self-efficacy, and work status among employees undergoing chemotherapy for cancer - a prospective study with 12 months follow-up
Authors
Rikke Rosbjerg
Robert Zachariae
Dorte Gilså Hansen
Inger Hoejris
Saskia Duijts
Nina Lykkegaard Gehr
Irene Dyhrberg Andersen
Merete Labriola
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07824-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Cancer 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research article

Gene expression and immune infiltration in melanoma patients with different mutation burden

Research

Precision treatment exploration of breast cancer based on heterogeneity analysis of lncRNAs at the single-cell level

Research article

Determining transition readiness in Swiss childhood cancer survivors – a feasibility study

Research

PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Research

Nomogram to predict survival of patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic Cancer

Research

High regional mortality due to malignant melanoma in Eastern Finland may be explained by the increase in aggressive melanoma types
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits