Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2024

22-11-2023 | Cytostatic Therapy | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Pre- and Post-treatment Double-Sequential-Point Dynamic Radiomic Model in the Response Prediction of Gastric Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 3-Year Survival Analysis

Authors: Yinkui Wang, MD, Lei Tang, MD, Xiangji Ying, MPH. MS, Jiazheng Li, MD, Fei Shan, MD, Shuangxi Li, MD, Yongning Jia, MD, Kan Xue, MD, Rulin Miao, MD, Zhemin Li, MD, Ziyu Li, MD, Jiafu Ji, MD, PhD, DrPH

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prognosis prediction of patients with gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is suboptimal. This study aims to develop and validate a dynamic radiomic model for prognosis prediction of patients with gastric cancer on the basis of baseline and posttreatment features.

Patients and methods

This single-center cohort study included patients with gastric adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy from June 2009 to July 2015 in the Gastrointestinal Cancer Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital. Their clinicopathological data, pre-treatment and post-treatment computed tomography (CT) images, and pathological reports were retrieved and analyzed. Four prediction models were developed and validated using tenfold cross-validation, with death within 3 years as the outcome. Model discrimination was compared by the area under the curve (AUC). The final radiomic model was evaluated for calibration and clinical utility using Hosmer–Lemeshow tests and decision curve analysis.

Results

The study included 205 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma [166 (81%) male; mean age 59.9 (SD 10.3) years], with 71 (34.6%) deaths occurring within 3 years. The radiomic model alone demonstrated better discrimination than the pathological T stage (ypT) stage model alone (cross-validated AUC 0.598 versus 0.516, P = 0.009). The final radiomic model, which incorporated both radiomic and clinicopathological characteristics, had a significantly higher cross-validated AUC (0.769) than the ypT stage model (0.516), the radiomics alone model (0.598), and the ypT plus other clinicopathological characteristics model (0.738; all P < 0.05). Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of the final radiomic model.

Conclusions

The developed radiomic model had good accuracy and could be used as a decision aid tool in clinical practice to differentiate prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–32.CrossRefPubMed Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–32.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jaffer A. Ajani M, Thomas A. D'Amico, MD, David J. Bentrem, MD, et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 4.2021. 2021. Jaffer A. Ajani M, Thomas A. D'Amico, MD, David J. Bentrem, MD, et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 4.2021. 2021.
4.
go back to reference Grimaldi S, Terroir M, Caramella C. Advances in oncological treatment: limitations of RECIST 1.1 criteria. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;62(2):129–39. Grimaldi S, Terroir M, Caramella C. Advances in oncological treatment: limitations of RECIST 1.1 criteria. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;62(2):129–39.
5.
go back to reference Blackham AU, Greenleaf E, Yamamoto M, Hollenbeak C, Gusani N, Coppola D, et al. Tumor regression grade in gastric cancer: predictors and impact on outcome. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(4):434–9.CrossRefPubMed Blackham AU, Greenleaf E, Yamamoto M, Hollenbeak C, Gusani N, Coppola D, et al. Tumor regression grade in gastric cancer: predictors and impact on outcome. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(4):434–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tschandl P, Codella N, Akay BN, Argenziano G, Braun RP, Cabo H, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin lesion classification: an open, web-based, international, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(7):938–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tschandl P, Codella N, Akay BN, Argenziano G, Braun RP, Cabo H, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin lesion classification: an open, web-based, international, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(7):938–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Dong D, Tang L, Li ZY, Fang MJ, Gao JB, Shan XH, et al. Development and validation of an individualized nomogram to identify occult peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2019;30(3):431–8.CrossRef Dong D, Tang L, Li ZY, Fang MJ, Gao JB, Shan XH, et al. Development and validation of an individualized nomogram to identify occult peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2019;30(3):431–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wang W, Peng Y, Feng X, Zhao Y, Seeruttun SR, Zhang J, et al. Development and validation of a computed tomography-based radiomics signature to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8):e2121143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang W, Peng Y, Feng X, Zhao Y, Seeruttun SR, Zhang J, et al. Development and validation of a computed tomography-based radiomics signature to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8):e2121143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Chen Y, Wei K, Liu D, Xiang J, Wang G, Meng X, et al. A machine learning model for predicting a major response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:675458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen Y, Wei K, Liu D, Xiang J, Wang G, Meng X, et al. A machine learning model for predicting a major response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:675458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Becker K, Langer R, Reim D, Novotny A, Meyer zum Buschenfelde C, Engel J, et al. Significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinomas: a summary of 480 cases. Ann Surg. 2011;253(5):934–9. Becker K, Langer R, Reim D, Novotny A, Meyer zum Buschenfelde C, Engel J, et al. Significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinomas: a summary of 480 cases. Ann Surg. 2011;253(5):934–9.
11.
go back to reference Ott K, Blank S, Becker K, Langer R, Weichert W, Roth W, et al. Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10% residual tumor. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2013;398(2):239–49.CrossRef Ott K, Blank S, Becker K, Langer R, Weichert W, Roth W, et al. Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10% residual tumor. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2013;398(2):239–49.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference In H, Solsky I, Palis B, Langdon-Embry M, Ajani J, Sano T. Validation of the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer using the national cancer database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(12):3683–91. In H, Solsky I, Palis B, Langdon-Embry M, Ajani J, Sano T. Validation of the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer using the national cancer database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(12):3683–91.
13.
go back to reference Li Z, Wang Y, Shan F, Ying X, Wu Z, Xue K, et al. ypTNM staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Chinese gastric cancer population: an evaluation on the prognostic value of the AJCC eighth edition cancer staging system. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(6):977–87. Li Z, Wang Y, Shan F, Ying X, Wu Z, Xue K, et al. ypTNM staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Chinese gastric cancer population: an evaluation on the prognostic value of the AJCC eighth edition cancer staging system. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(6):977–87.
14.
go back to reference Jiang Y, Chen C, Xie J, Wang W, Zha X, Lv W, et al. Radiomics signature of computed tomography imaging for prediction of survival and chemotherapeutic benefits in gastric cancer. EBioMedicine. 2018;36:171–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jiang Y, Chen C, Xie J, Wang W, Zha X, Lv W, et al. Radiomics signature of computed tomography imaging for prediction of survival and chemotherapeutic benefits in gastric cancer. EBioMedicine. 2018;36:171–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Xu Q, Sun Z, Li X, Ye C, Zhou C, Zhang L, et al. Advanced gastric cancer: CT radiomics prediction and early detection of downstaging with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(11):8765–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xu Q, Sun Z, Li X, Ye C, Zhou C, Zhang L, et al. Advanced gastric cancer: CT radiomics prediction and early detection of downstaging with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(11):8765–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990). 2009;45(2):228–47. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990). 2009;45(2):228–47.
17.
go back to reference Xu X, Zheng G, Zhang T, Zhao Y, Zheng Z. Is pathologic tumor regression grade after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy a promising prognostic indicator for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer? A cohort study evaluating tumor regression response. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019;84(3):635–46.CrossRefPubMed Xu X, Zheng G, Zhang T, Zhao Y, Zheng Z. Is pathologic tumor regression grade after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy a promising prognostic indicator for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer? A cohort study evaluating tumor regression response. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019;84(3):635–46.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kurokawa Y, Shibata T, Sasako M, Sano T, Tsuburaya A, Iwasaki Y, et al. Validity of response assessment criteria in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer (JCOG0507-A). Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(3):514–21.CrossRefPubMed Kurokawa Y, Shibata T, Sasako M, Sano T, Tsuburaya A, Iwasaki Y, et al. Validity of response assessment criteria in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer (JCOG0507-A). Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(3):514–21.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Seevaratnam R, Cardoso R, McGregor C, Lourenco L, Mahar A, Sutradhar R, et al. How useful is preoperative imaging for tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging of gastric cancer? A Meta Anal Gastric Cancer. 2012;15(Suppl 1):S3–18.CrossRef Seevaratnam R, Cardoso R, McGregor C, Lourenco L, Mahar A, Sutradhar R, et al. How useful is preoperative imaging for tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging of gastric cancer? A Meta Anal Gastric Cancer. 2012;15(Suppl 1):S3–18.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bando E, Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tanizawa Y, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Validation of the prognostic impact of the new tumor-node-metastasis clinical staging in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22(1):123–9.CrossRefPubMed Bando E, Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tanizawa Y, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Validation of the prognostic impact of the new tumor-node-metastasis clinical staging in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22(1):123–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Cardoso R, Coburn N, Seevaratnam R, Sutradhar R, Lourenco LG, Mahar A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of EUS for preoperative staging for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15(Suppl 1):S19–26.CrossRefPubMed Cardoso R, Coburn N, Seevaratnam R, Sutradhar R, Lourenco LG, Mahar A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of EUS for preoperative staging for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15(Suppl 1):S19–26.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chai R, Ma H, Xu M, Arefan D, Cui X, Liu Y, et al. Differentiating axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer patients: a comparison of radiomic signatures from multiparametric breast MR sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(4):1125–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chai R, Ma H, Xu M, Arefan D, Cui X, Liu Y, et al. Differentiating axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer patients: a comparison of radiomic signatures from multiparametric breast MR sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(4):1125–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Kan Y, Dong D, Zhang Y, Jiang W, Zhao N, Han L, et al. Radiomic signature as a predictive factor for lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(1):304–10.CrossRefPubMed Kan Y, Dong D, Zhang Y, Jiang W, Zhao N, Han L, et al. Radiomic signature as a predictive factor for lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(1):304–10.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Li C, Zhang S, Zhang H, Pang L, Lam K, Hui C, et al. Using the K-nearest neighbor algorithm for the classification of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Comput Math Methods Med. 2012;2012:876545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li C, Zhang S, Zhang H, Pang L, Lam K, Hui C, et al. Using the K-nearest neighbor algorithm for the classification of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Comput Math Methods Med. 2012;2012:876545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Pre- and Post-treatment Double-Sequential-Point Dynamic Radiomic Model in the Response Prediction of Gastric Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 3-Year Survival Analysis
Authors
Yinkui Wang, MD
Lei Tang, MD
Xiangji Ying, MPH. MS
Jiazheng Li, MD
Fei Shan, MD
Shuangxi Li, MD
Yongning Jia, MD
Kan Xue, MD
Rulin Miao, MD
Zhemin Li, MD
Ziyu Li, MD
Jiafu Ji, MD, PhD, DrPH
Publication date
22-11-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14478-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2024 Go to the issue