Skip to main content
Top

18-03-2024 | Cytostatic Therapy | Gastrointestinal

Irreversible electroporation to bring initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma to surgery: the IRECAP phase II study

Authors: Jean-Pierre Tasu, Guillaume Herpe, Jérôme Damion, Jean-Pierre Richer, Bertrand Debeane, Mathilde Vionnet, Laetitia Rouleau, Michel Carretier, Aurélie Ferru, Pierre Ingrand, David Tougeron

Published in: European Radiology

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the IRECAP study was to evaluate the rate of locally advanced pancreas cancer patients (LAPC) who could undergo R0 or R1 surgery after irreversible electroporation (IRE).

Materials and methods

IRECAP study is a phase II, single-center, open-label, prospective, non-randomized trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03105921). Patients with LAPC were first treated by 3-month neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in order to avoid inclusion of either patients with LAPC having become resectable after chemotherapy or patients with rapid disease progression. In cases of stable disease, IRE was performed percutaneously under CT guidance. Surgery was planned between 28 and 90 days after IRE. Tumor specimens were studied to evaluate the resection margins (R0/R1/R2).

Results

Six men and 11 women were included (median age 61 years, range 37–77 years). No IRE-related death was observed. Ten patients (58%, 10/17) experienced 25 serious adverse events related to IRE. Four patients progressed between IRE and surgery and were excluded from surgery. Thirteen patients were finally operated, six withheld for pancreas resection, three for diffuse peritoneal carcinosis, two for massive vascular entrapment, and one for hepato-cellular carcinoma not diagnosed before surgery. Rate of R1-R0 was 35% (n = 6/17). Median overall survival was 31 months (95% CI; 4–undefined) for the six patients with R0/R1 resection and 21 months (95% CI; 4–25) for the 11 patients without resection or R2 resection (logrank p = 0.044).

Conclusion

After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, IRE could provide R0 or R1 resection in 35% of LAPC, which seems to be associated with higher OS.

Clinical relevance statement

After induction chemotherapy, stable locally advanced pancreatic cancers can be treated by irreversible electroporation, which could lead to a secondary 35% rate of R0 or R1 surgical resection which may be associated with a significantly higher overall survival.

Key Points

• In cases of unresectable LAPC (locally advanced pancreatic cancer), percutaneous irreversible electroporation (pIRE) is feasible (100% success rate of the procedure), but is associated with a 58% rate of grade 3–4 adverse events.
• In patients with unresectable LAPC, pIRE could lead 35% of patients to R0-R1 surgical resection.
• From IRE, median overall survival was 31 months (95% CI; 4–undefined) for the patients with R0/R1 resection and 21 months (95% CI; 4–25) for the patients without resection or R2 resection (logrank p = 0.044).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249CrossRefPubMed Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Halperin DM, Varadhachary GR (2014) Resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: what does it matter? Curr Oncol Rep 16:366CrossRefPubMed Halperin DM, Varadhachary GR (2014) Resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: what does it matter? Curr Oncol Rep 16:366CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R et al (2010) A prospective study on radiofrequency ablation locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 9:306–311PubMed Casadei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R et al (2010) A prospective study on radiofrequency ablation locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 9:306–311PubMed
6.
go back to reference D’Onofrio M, Barbi E, Girelli R et al (2010) Radiofrequency ablation of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an overview. World J Gastroenterol 16:3478–3483CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral D’Onofrio M, Barbi E, Girelli R et al (2010) Radiofrequency ablation of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an overview. World J Gastroenterol 16:3478–3483CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Girelli R, Frigerio I, Salvia R, Barbi E, Tinazzi Martini P, Bassi C (2010) Feasibility and safety of radiofrequency ablation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 97:220–225CrossRefPubMed Girelli R, Frigerio I, Salvia R, Barbi E, Tinazzi Martini P, Bassi C (2010) Feasibility and safety of radiofrequency ablation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 97:220–225CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Vogel JA, van Veldhuisen E, Agnass P et al (2016) Time-dependent impact of irreversible electroporation on pancreas, liver, blood vessels and nerves: a systematic review of experimental studies. PLoS One 11:e0166987CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vogel JA, van Veldhuisen E, Agnass P et al (2016) Time-dependent impact of irreversible electroporation on pancreas, liver, blood vessels and nerves: a systematic review of experimental studies. PLoS One 11:e0166987CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Vroomen L, Petre EN, Cornelis FH, Solomon SB, Srimathveeravalli G (2017) Irreversible electroporation and thermal ablation of tumors in the liver, lung, kidney and bone: what are the differences? Diagn Interv Imaging 98:609–617CrossRefPubMed Vroomen L, Petre EN, Cornelis FH, Solomon SB, Srimathveeravalli G (2017) Irreversible electroporation and thermal ablation of tumors in the liver, lung, kidney and bone: what are the differences? Diagn Interv Imaging 98:609–617CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yarmush ML, Golberg A, Sersa G, Kotnik T, Miklavcic D (2014) Electroporation-based technologies for medicine: principles, applications, and challenges. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16:295–320CrossRefPubMed Yarmush ML, Golberg A, Sersa G, Kotnik T, Miklavcic D (2014) Electroporation-based technologies for medicine: principles, applications, and challenges. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16:295–320CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tasu JP, Tougeron D, Rols MP (2022) Irreversible electroporation and electrochemotherapy in oncology: state of the art. Diagn Interv Imaging 103:499–509CrossRefPubMed Tasu JP, Tougeron D, Rols MP (2022) Irreversible electroporation and electrochemotherapy in oncology: state of the art. Diagn Interv Imaging 103:499–509CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ansari D, Kristoffersson S, Andersson R, Bergenfeldt M (2017) The role of irreversible electroporation (IRE) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Scand J Gastroenterol 52:1165–1171CrossRefPubMed Ansari D, Kristoffersson S, Andersson R, Bergenfeldt M (2017) The role of irreversible electroporation (IRE) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Scand J Gastroenterol 52:1165–1171CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, Ingaldi C et al (2020) Intraoperative electrochemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: indications, techniques and results-a single-center experience. Updates Surg 72:1089–1096CrossRefPubMed Casadei R, Ricci C, Ingaldi C et al (2020) Intraoperative electrochemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: indications, techniques and results-a single-center experience. Updates Surg 72:1089–1096CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Martin RCG 2nd (2015) Irreversible electroporation of stage 3 locally advanced pancreatic cancer: optimal technique and outcomes. J Vis Surg 1:4PubMedPubMedCentral Martin RCG 2nd (2015) Irreversible electroporation of stage 3 locally advanced pancreatic cancer: optimal technique and outcomes. J Vis Surg 1:4PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Narayanan G, Hosein PJ, Arora G et al (2012) Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for downstaging and control of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:1613–1621CrossRefPubMed Narayanan G, Hosein PJ, Arora G et al (2012) Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for downstaging and control of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:1613–1621CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Paiella S, De Pastena M, D’Onofrio M et al (2018) Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer-interventional treatment with radiofrequency ablation/irreversible electroporation. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:80CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paiella S, De Pastena M, D’Onofrio M et al (2018) Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer-interventional treatment with radiofrequency ablation/irreversible electroporation. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:80CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Auclin E, Marthey L, Abdallah R et al (2021) Role of FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update of the AGEO cohort. Br J Cancer 124:1941–1948CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Auclin E, Marthey L, Abdallah R et al (2021) Role of FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update of the AGEO cohort. Br J Cancer 124:1941–1948CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL et al (2006) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1035–1046CrossRefPubMed Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL et al (2006) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1035–1046CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nielsen K, Scheffer HJ, Vieveen JM et al (2014) Anaesthetic management during open and percutaneous irreversible electroporation. Br J Anaesth 113:985–992CrossRefPubMed Nielsen K, Scheffer HJ, Vieveen JM et al (2014) Anaesthetic management during open and percutaneous irreversible electroporation. Br J Anaesth 113:985–992CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIoH, National Cancer Institute. (2009) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIoH, National Cancer Institute. (2009) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
21.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ducreux MP, Desgrippes R, Rinaldi Y et al (2022) PRODIGE 29 – NEOPAN. A randomized phase III trial comparing folfirinox (FFX) to gemcitabine in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (PC)ESMO, Paris Ducreux MP, Desgrippes R, Rinaldi Y et al (2022) PRODIGE 29 – NEOPAN. A randomized phase III trial comparing folfirinox (FFX) to gemcitabine in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (PC)ESMO, Paris
23.
go back to reference Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M et al (2018) FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 379:2395–2406CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M et al (2018) FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 379:2395–2406CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Scheffer HJ, Vroomen LG, de Jong MC et al (2017) Ablation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer with percutaneous irreversible electroporation: results of the phase I/II PANFIRE study. Radiology 282:585–597CrossRefPubMed Scheffer HJ, Vroomen LG, de Jong MC et al (2017) Ablation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer with percutaneous irreversible electroporation: results of the phase I/II PANFIRE study. Radiology 282:585–597CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Suker M, Beumer BR, Sadot E et al (2016) FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 17:801–810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suker M, Beumer BR, Sadot E et al (2016) FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 17:801–810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F et al (2008) Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000–01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol 19:1592–1599CrossRefPubMed Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F et al (2008) Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000–01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol 19:1592–1599CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Petrelli F, Coinu A, Borgonovo K et al (2015) FOLFIRINOX-based neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer: a meta-analytical review of published studies. Pancreas 44:515–521CrossRefPubMed Petrelli F, Coinu A, Borgonovo K et al (2015) FOLFIRINOX-based neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer: a meta-analytical review of published studies. Pancreas 44:515–521CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Ruarus AH, Vroomen L, Geboers B et al (2020) Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced and Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer (PANFIRE-2): a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase II study. Radiology 294:212–220CrossRefPubMed Ruarus AH, Vroomen L, Geboers B et al (2020) Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced and Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer (PANFIRE-2): a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase II study. Radiology 294:212–220CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Sutter O, Calvo J, N’Kontchou G et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of irreversible electroporation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to thermal ablation techniques: a retrospective single-center case series. Radiology 284:877–886CrossRefPubMed Sutter O, Calvo J, N’Kontchou G et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of irreversible electroporation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to thermal ablation techniques: a retrospective single-center case series. Radiology 284:877–886CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Tasu JP, Vesselle G, Herpe G et al (2016) Irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Diagn Interv Imaging 97:1297–1304CrossRefPubMed Tasu JP, Vesselle G, Herpe G et al (2016) Irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Diagn Interv Imaging 97:1297–1304CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Fritz S, Sommer CM, Vollherbst D et al (2015) Irreversible electroporation of the pancreas is feasible and safe in a porcine survival model. Pancreas 44:791–798CrossRefPubMed Fritz S, Sommer CM, Vollherbst D et al (2015) Irreversible electroporation of the pancreas is feasible and safe in a porcine survival model. Pancreas 44:791–798CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Charpentier KP, Wolf F, Noble L, Winn B, Resnick M, Dupuy DE (2010) Irreversible electroporation of the pancreas in swine: a pilot study. HPB (Oxford) 12:348–351CrossRefPubMed Charpentier KP, Wolf F, Noble L, Winn B, Resnick M, Dupuy DE (2010) Irreversible electroporation of the pancreas in swine: a pilot study. HPB (Oxford) 12:348–351CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Irreversible electroporation to bring initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma to surgery: the IRECAP phase II study
Authors
Jean-Pierre Tasu
Guillaume Herpe
Jérôme Damion
Jean-Pierre Richer
Bertrand Debeane
Mathilde Vionnet
Laetitia Rouleau
Michel Carretier
Aurélie Ferru
Pierre Ingrand
David Tougeron
Publication date
18-03-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10613-x