Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements 1/2012

Open Access 01-06-2012

Current view: indications for extracorporeal lipid apheresis treatment

Authors: Priv. Doz. Dr. med. Volker Schettler, C. L. Neumann, M. Hulpke-Wette, G. C. Hagenah, E. G. Schulz, E. Wieland, The German Apheresis Working Group

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements | Special Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

One of the first investigations concerning extracorporeal treatment of hypercholesterolemia was performed in 1967 by plasma exchange in patients with homozygous or severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). In the following decades, several specific lipid apheresis systems were developed to efficiently eliminate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and Lp(a) cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic patients. In the early 1980s, the main clinical indication has been homozygous FH including mainly children and pregnant women. In consideration of the current development of lipid-lowering regimens and scientific knowledge of preventing progression of cardiovascular diseases, the spectrum of indications to initiate lipid apheresis was extended due to still insufficient lipid-lowering therapy in some clinical cases. However, a generally accepted indication for lipid apheresis treatment is still under discussion. In Germany, the target-oriented distribution of increasingly limited healthcare resources demand data which support the benefit of established treatment procedures such as lipid apheresis. In recent years, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), a paramount decision-making body of the German Healthcare System, issued to reassess the approval of chronic lipid apheresis therapy for regular reimbursement. Therefore, in 2005, an interdisciplinary German Apheresis Working Group has been established by members of both the German societies of nephrology. One of the first goals of this working group was a revision of the indications for lipid apheresis corresponding to current guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of lipid disorders. In addition, recently new pathophysiological perceptions of the impact of lipoproteins on atherogenesis and thrombosis were also considered.

Methods and Results

Since 2005, the working group met on a regular basis to substantiate the first defined goals. The indications for lipid apheresis were critically revised with respect to actual results from clinical investigations, cardiovascular guidelines, and scientific knowledge and were accepted by the members of the apheresis working group.

Conclusions

There is consensus between the medical societies and health insurance funds regarding the need for general accepted guidelines for lipid apheresis. Recommendations for the indications of lipid apheresis were developed, but additionally these results should be confirmed by medical societies to transform them to guidelines. However, due to limited data showing that lipid apheresis has effects on the progression of cardiovascular diseases all members of the apheresis working group support a project for creating a lipid apheresis registry. This apheresis registry has been developed and recently started. The primary goal is to substantiate prospective long-term data on clinical outcome of chronic lipid apheresis treatment and to support additional clinical research activities in this field. In addition, this registry should comply with the actual requests of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA).
Literature
1.
go back to reference de Gennes JL, Touraine R, Maunand B et al (1967) Homozygous cutaneo-tendinous forms of hypercholesteremic xanthomatosis in an exemplary familial case. Trial of plasmapheresis as heroic treatment. Bull Mem Soc Med Hop Paris 118:1377–1402PubMed de Gennes JL, Touraine R, Maunand B et al (1967) Homozygous cutaneo-tendinous forms of hypercholesteremic xanthomatosis in an exemplary familial case. Trial of plasmapheresis as heroic treatment. Bull Mem Soc Med Hop Paris 118:1377–1402PubMed
2.
go back to reference Richter WO, Jacob BG, Ritter MM et al (1993) Three-year treatment of familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia by extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein immunoadsorption with polyclonal apolipoprotein B antibodies. Metabolism 42:888–894PubMedCrossRef Richter WO, Jacob BG, Ritter MM et al (1993) Three-year treatment of familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia by extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein immunoadsorption with polyclonal apolipoprotein B antibodies. Metabolism 42:888–894PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gordon BR, Kelsey SF, Dau PC et al (1998) Long-term effects of low-density lipoprotein apheresis using an automated dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption system. Liposorber Study Group. Am J Cardiol 81:407–411PubMedCrossRef Gordon BR, Kelsey SF, Dau PC et al (1998) Long-term effects of low-density lipoprotein apheresis using an automated dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption system. Liposorber Study Group. Am J Cardiol 81:407–411PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stoffel W, Borberg H, Greve V (1981) Application of specific extracorporeal removal of low density lipoprotein in familial hypercholesterolemia. Lancet 2:1005–1007PubMedCrossRef Stoffel W, Borberg H, Greve V (1981) Application of specific extracorporeal removal of low density lipoprotein in familial hypercholesterolemia. Lancet 2:1005–1007PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yokoyama S, Hayashi R, Satani M et al (1985) Selective removal of low density lipoprotein by plasmapheresis in familial hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis 5:613–622PubMedCrossRef Yokoyama S, Hayashi R, Satani M et al (1985) Selective removal of low density lipoprotein by plasmapheresis in familial hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis 5:613–622PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mabuchi H, Michishita I, Takeda M et al (1987) A new low density lipoprotein apheresis system using two dextran sulfate cellulose columns in an automated column regenerating unit (LDL continuous apheresis). Atherosclerosis 68:19–25PubMedCrossRef Mabuchi H, Michishita I, Takeda M et al (1987) A new low density lipoprotein apheresis system using two dextran sulfate cellulose columns in an automated column regenerating unit (LDL continuous apheresis). Atherosclerosis 68:19–25PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Eisenhauer T, Armstrong VW, Wieland H et al (1987) Selective removal of low density lipoproteins (LDL) by precipitation at low pH: first clinical application of the HELP system. Klin Wochenschr 65:161–168PubMedCrossRef Eisenhauer T, Armstrong VW, Wieland H et al (1987) Selective removal of low density lipoproteins (LDL) by precipitation at low pH: first clinical application of the HELP system. Klin Wochenschr 65:161–168PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Klingel R, Mausfeld P, Fassbender C et al (2004) Lipidfiltration—safe and effective methodology to perform lipid apheresis. Transfus Apher Sci 30:245–254PubMedCrossRef Klingel R, Mausfeld P, Fassbender C et al (2004) Lipidfiltration—safe and effective methodology to perform lipid apheresis. Transfus Apher Sci 30:245–254PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bosch T, Schmidt B, Kleophas W et al (1997) LDL hemoperfusion—a new procedure for LDL apheresis: first clinical application of an LDL adsorber compatible with human whole blood. Int J Artif Organs 21:977–982CrossRef Bosch T, Schmidt B, Kleophas W et al (1997) LDL hemoperfusion—a new procedure for LDL apheresis: first clinical application of an LDL adsorber compatible with human whole blood. Int J Artif Organs 21:977–982CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kobayashi A, Nakatani M, Furuyoshi S et al (2002) In vitro evaluation of dextran sulfate cellulose beads for whole blood infusion low-density lipoprotein hemoperfusion. Ther Apher 6:365–371PubMedCrossRef Kobayashi A, Nakatani M, Furuyoshi S et al (2002) In vitro evaluation of dextran sulfate cellulose beads for whole blood infusion low-density lipoprotein hemoperfusion. Ther Apher 6:365–371PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Krebs A, Krebs K, Keller F (2004) Retrospective comparison of 5 different methods for long-term LDL-apheresis in 20 patients between 1986 and 2001. Int J Artif Organs 27:137–148PubMed Krebs A, Krebs K, Keller F (2004) Retrospective comparison of 5 different methods for long-term LDL-apheresis in 20 patients between 1986 and 2001. Int J Artif Organs 27:137–148PubMed
12.
go back to reference Julius U, Metzler W, Pietzsch J et al (2002) Intraindividual comparison of two extracorporeal LDL apheresis methods: lipidfiltration and HELP. Int J Artif Organs 25:1180–1188PubMed Julius U, Metzler W, Pietzsch J et al (2002) Intraindividual comparison of two extracorporeal LDL apheresis methods: lipidfiltration and HELP. Int J Artif Organs 25:1180–1188PubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Steinberg D (2006) Thematic review series: the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. An interpretive history of the cholesterol controversy, part V: the discovery of the statins and the end of the controversy. J Lipid Res 47:1339–1351PubMedCrossRef Steinberg D (2006) Thematic review series: the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. An interpretive history of the cholesterol controversy, part V: the discovery of the statins and the end of the controversy. J Lipid Res 47:1339–1351PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Erqou S, Kaptoge S, Perry PL et al (2009) Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality. JAMA 302:412–423PubMedCrossRef Erqou S, Kaptoge S, Perry PL et al (2009) Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality. JAMA 302:412–423PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Robinson JG, Wang S, Smith BJ et al (2009) Meta-analysis of the relationship between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and coronary heart disease risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:316–322PubMedCrossRef Robinson JG, Wang S, Smith BJ et al (2009) Meta-analysis of the relationship between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and coronary heart disease risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:316–322PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pasternak R (2002) Adult treatment panel II versus adult treatment panel III: what has changed and why? Am J Cardiol 89:3C–7CPubMedCrossRef Pasternak R (2002) Adult treatment panel II versus adult treatment panel III: what has changed and why? Am J Cardiol 89:3C–7CPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN et al (2004) Implications of recent clinical trials for the national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel III guidelines. Circulation 110:227–239PubMedCrossRef Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN et al (2004) Implications of recent clinical trials for the national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel III guidelines. Circulation 110:227–239PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Thompson GR, Catapano A, Saheb S et al (2010) Severe hypercholesterolaemia: therapeutic goals and eligibility criteria for LDL apheresis in Europe. Curr Opin Lipidol 21:492–498PubMedCrossRef Thompson GR, Catapano A, Saheb S et al (2010) Severe hypercholesterolaemia: therapeutic goals and eligibility criteria for LDL apheresis in Europe. Curr Opin Lipidol 21:492–498PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schettler V, Jaeger BR, Klingel R (2009) The German lipid apheresis registry—remaining to be established. Atheroscler Suppl 10:59–61PubMedCrossRef Schettler V, Jaeger BR, Klingel R (2009) The German lipid apheresis registry—remaining to be established. Atheroscler Suppl 10:59–61PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schettler V, Wieland E, Armstrong VW et al (2002) First steps toward the establishment of a German low-density lipoprotein-apheresis registry: recommendations for the indication and for quality management. Ther Apher 6:381–383PubMedCrossRef Schettler V, Wieland E, Armstrong VW et al (2002) First steps toward the establishment of a German low-density lipoprotein-apheresis registry: recommendations for the indication and for quality management. Ther Apher 6:381–383PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gemeinsamer-Bundesausschuss (2003) Bekanntmachung des Bundesausschusses der Ärzte und Krankenkassen über eine Änderung der Richtlinien über die Bewertung ärztlicher Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethoden gemäß § 135 Abs. 1 des Fünften Buches Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB V; BUB-Richtlinien). BAnz:14486 Gemeinsamer-Bundesausschuss (2003) Bekanntmachung des Bundesausschusses der Ärzte und Krankenkassen über eine Änderung der Richtlinien über die Bewertung ärztlicher Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethoden gemäß § 135 Abs. 1 des Fünften Buches Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB V; BUB-Richtlinien). BAnz:14486
24.
go back to reference Gemeinsamer-Bundesausschuss (2009) Bekanntmachung eines Beschlusses des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über eine Änderung der Richtlinie Methoden vertragsärztliche Versorgung: Apherese bei isolierter Lp(a)-Erhöhung für Studienteilnehmer. BAnz 128:3005 Gemeinsamer-Bundesausschuss (2009) Bekanntmachung eines Beschlusses des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über eine Änderung der Richtlinie Methoden vertragsärztliche Versorgung: Apherese bei isolierter Lp(a)-Erhöhung für Studienteilnehmer. BAnz 128:3005
25.
go back to reference Schettler V, Wieland E (2003) LDL-Aphereseverfahren. In: Hörl WH, Wanner C (eds) Dialyseverfahren in Klinik und Praxis, 6 edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 116–133 Schettler V, Wieland E (2003) LDL-Aphereseverfahren. In: Hörl WH, Wanner C (eds) Dialyseverfahren in Klinik und Praxis, 6 edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 116–133
26.
go back to reference Ito MK, McGowan MP, Moriarty PM (2011) Management of familial hypercholesterolemias in adult patients: recommendations from the national lipid association expert panel on familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol 5:S38–45CrossRef Ito MK, McGowan MP, Moriarty PM (2011) Management of familial hypercholesterolemias in adult patients: recommendations from the national lipid association expert panel on familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol 5:S38–45CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Goldberg AC, Hopkins PN, Toth PP et al (2011) Familial hypercholesterolemia: screening, diagnosis and management of pediatric and adult patients: clinical guidance from the national lipid association expert panel on familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol 5:S1–8CrossRef Goldberg AC, Hopkins PN, Toth PP et al (2011) Familial hypercholesterolemia: screening, diagnosis and management of pediatric and adult patients: clinical guidance from the national lipid association expert panel on familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol 5:S1–8CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Moriarty PM, Gibson CA (2001) Low-density lipoprotein apheresis in the treatment of atherosclerosis and other potential uses. Curr Atheroscler Rep 3:156–162PubMedCrossRef Moriarty PM, Gibson CA (2001) Low-density lipoprotein apheresis in the treatment of atherosclerosis and other potential uses. Curr Atheroscler Rep 3:156–162PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bosch T, Wendler T (2004) State of the art of low-density lipoprotein apheresis in the year 2003. Ther Apher Dial 8:76–79PubMedCrossRef Bosch T, Wendler T (2004) State of the art of low-density lipoprotein apheresis in the year 2003. Ther Apher Dial 8:76–79PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Thompsen J, Thompson PD (2006) A systematic review of LDL apheresis in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis 189:31–38PubMedCrossRef Thompsen J, Thompson PD (2006) A systematic review of LDL apheresis in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis 189:31–38PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mabuchi H, Higashikata T, Kawashiri MA (2004) Clinical applications of long-term LDL apheresis on and beyond refractory hypercholesterolemia. Transfus Apher Sci 30:233–243PubMedCrossRef Mabuchi H, Higashikata T, Kawashiri MA (2004) Clinical applications of long-term LDL apheresis on and beyond refractory hypercholesterolemia. Transfus Apher Sci 30:233–243PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Vella A, Pineda AA, O’Brien T (2001) Low-density lipoprotein apheresis for the treatment of refractory hyperlipidemia. Mayo Clin Proc 76:1039–1046PubMedCrossRef Vella A, Pineda AA, O’Brien T (2001) Low-density lipoprotein apheresis for the treatment of refractory hyperlipidemia. Mayo Clin Proc 76:1039–1046PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Clarke R, Peden JF, Hopewell JC et al (2009) Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease. N Engl J Med 361:2518–2528PubMedCrossRef Clarke R, Peden JF, Hopewell JC et al (2009) Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease. N Engl J Med 361:2518–2528PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Akdim F, Visser ME, Tribble DL et al (2010) Effect of mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 105:1413–1419PubMedCrossRef Akdim F, Visser ME, Tribble DL et al (2010) Effect of mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 105:1413–1419PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Stegmayr B, Ptak J, Wikstrom B et al (2008) World apheresis registry 2003–2007 data. Transfus Apher Sci 39:247–254PubMedCrossRef Stegmayr B, Ptak J, Wikstrom B et al (2008) World apheresis registry 2003–2007 data. Transfus Apher Sci 39:247–254PubMedCrossRef
36.
37.
go back to reference Korach JM, Guillevin L, Petitpas D et al (2000) Apheresis registry in France: indications, techniques, and complications. French registry study group. Ther Apher 4:207–210PubMedCrossRef Korach JM, Guillevin L, Petitpas D et al (2000) Apheresis registry in France: indications, techniques, and complications. French registry study group. Ther Apher 4:207–210PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Current view: indications for extracorporeal lipid apheresis treatment
Authors
Priv. Doz. Dr. med. Volker Schettler
C. L. Neumann
M. Hulpke-Wette
G. C. Hagenah
E. G. Schulz
E. Wieland
The German Apheresis Working Group
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements / Issue Special Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1861-0706
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11789-012-0046-6

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2012

Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements 1/2012 Go to the issue

EditorialNotes

Editorial