Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 12/2016

01-12-2016 | Original Paper

Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty

Authors: Markus Weber, Michael Woerner, Benjamin Craiovan, Florian Voellner, Michael Worlicek, Hans-Robert Springorum, Joachim Grifka, Tobias Renkawitz

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In this prospective study of 135 patients undergoing cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) we asked whether six current definitions of combined anteversion prevent impingement and increase postoperative patient individual impingement-free range-of-motion (ROM).

Methods

Implant position was measured by an independent, external institute on 3D-CT performed six weeks post-operatively. Post-operative ROM was calculated using a CT-based algorithm detecting osseous and/or prosthetic impingement by virtual hip movement. Additionally, clinical ROM was evaluated pre-operatively and one-year post-operatively by a blinded observer.

Results

Combined component position of cup and stem according to the definitions of Ranawat, Widmer, Dorr, Hisatome and Yoshimine inhibited prosthetic impingement in over 90 %, while combined osseous and prosthetic impingement still occurred in over 40 % of the cases. The recommendations by Jolles, Widmer, Dorr, Yoshimine and Hisatome enabled higher flexion (p ≤ 0.001) and internal rotation (p ≤ 0.006). Clinically, anteversion rules of Widmer and Yoshimine provided one-year post-operatively statistically but not clinically relevant higher internal rotation (p ≤0.034).

Conclusion

Standard rules of combined anteversion detect prosthetic but fail to prevent combined osseous and prosthetic impingement in THA. Future models will have to account for the patient-individual anatomic situation to ensure impingement-free ROM.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Widmer KH (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19:387–390CrossRefPubMed Widmer KH (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19:387–390CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McKibbin B (1970) Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip joint in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 52:148–159 McKibbin B (1970) Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip joint in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 52:148–159
6.
go back to reference Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 17:282–288CrossRefPubMed Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 17:282–288CrossRefPubMed
8.
11.
go back to reference Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Coleman-Wood K, Kaufman KR, Berry DJ (2009) The 2008 Frank Stinchfield award: variation in postoperative pelvic tilt may confound the accuracy of hip navigation systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:43–49. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0521-z CrossRefPubMed Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Coleman-Wood K, Kaufman KR, Berry DJ (2009) The 2008 Frank Stinchfield award: variation in postoperative pelvic tilt may confound the accuracy of hip navigation systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:43–49. doi:10.​1007/​s11999-008-0521-z CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Weber M, Weber T, Woerner M, Craiovan B, Worlicek M, Winkler S, Grifka J, Renkawitz T (2015) The impact of standard combined anteversion definitions on gait and clinical outcome within one year after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39(12):2323–33. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2777-8 Weber M, Weber T, Woerner M, Craiovan B, Worlicek M, Winkler S, Grifka J, Renkawitz T (2015) The impact of standard combined anteversion definitions on gait and clinical outcome within one year after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39(12):2323–33. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-015-2777-8
14.
go back to reference Renkawitz T, Haimerl M, Dohmen L, Gneiting S, Wegner M, Ehret N, Buchele C, Schubert M, Lechler P, Woerner M, Sendtner E, Schuster T, Ulm K, Springorum R, Grifka J (2011) Minimally invasive computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty, following the concept of femur first and combined anteversion: design of a blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:192. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-192 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Renkawitz T, Haimerl M, Dohmen L, Gneiting S, Wegner M, Ehret N, Buchele C, Schubert M, Lechler P, Woerner M, Sendtner E, Schuster T, Ulm K, Springorum R, Grifka J (2011) Minimally invasive computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty, following the concept of femur first and combined anteversion: design of a blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:192. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2474-12-192 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Pijls BG, Dekkers OM, Middeldorp S, Valstar ER, van der Heide HJ, Van der Linden-Van der Zwaag HM, Nelissen RG (2011) AQUILA: assessment of quality in lower limb arthroplasty. An expert Delphi consensus for total knee and total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:173. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-173 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pijls BG, Dekkers OM, Middeldorp S, Valstar ER, van der Heide HJ, Van der Linden-Van der Zwaag HM, Nelissen RG (2011) AQUILA: assessment of quality in lower limb arthroplasty. An expert Delphi consensus for total knee and total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:173. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2474-12-173 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Michel MC, Witschger P (2007) MicroHip: a minimally invasive procedure for total hip replacement surgery using a modified Smith-Peterson approach. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 9:46–51PubMed Michel MC, Witschger P (2007) MicroHip: a minimally invasive procedure for total hip replacement surgery using a modified Smith-Peterson approach. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 9:46–51PubMed
17.
go back to reference Renkawitz T, Haimerl M, Dohmen L, Woerner M, Springorum HR, Sendtner E, Heers G, Weber M, Grifka J (2012) Development and evaluation of an image-free computer-assisted impingement detection technique for total hip arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 226:911–918. doi:10.1177/0954411912460815 CrossRefPubMed Renkawitz T, Haimerl M, Dohmen L, Woerner M, Springorum HR, Sendtner E, Heers G, Weber M, Grifka J (2012) Development and evaluation of an image-free computer-assisted impingement detection technique for total hip arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 226:911–918. doi:10.​1177/​0954411912460815​ CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Renkawitz T, Weber M, Springorum HR, Sendtner E, Woerner M, Ulm K, Weber T, Grifka J (2015) Impingement-free range of movement, acetabular component cover and early clinical results comparing 'femur-first' navigation and 'conventional' minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 97-B:890–898. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.97B7.34729 CrossRefPubMed Renkawitz T, Weber M, Springorum HR, Sendtner E, Woerner M, Ulm K, Weber T, Grifka J (2015) Impingement-free range of movement, acetabular component cover and early clinical results comparing 'femur-first' navigation and 'conventional' minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 97-B:890–898. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620X.​97B7.​34729 CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Turley GA, Ahmed SM, Williams MA, Griffin DR (2011) Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 225:769–782CrossRefPubMed Turley GA, Ahmed SM, Williams MA, Griffin DR (2011) Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 225:769–782CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Weber M, Lechler P, von Kunow F, Vollner F, Keshmiri A, Hapfelmeier A, Grifka J, Renkawitz T (2015) The validity of a novel radiological method for measuring femoral stem version on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 97-B:306–311. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.34618 CrossRefPubMed Weber M, Lechler P, von Kunow F, Vollner F, Keshmiri A, Hapfelmeier A, Grifka J, Renkawitz T (2015) The validity of a novel radiological method for measuring femoral stem version on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 97-B:306–311. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620X.​97B3.​34618 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 75:228–232CrossRef Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 75:228–232CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Park KK, Tsai TY, Dimitriou D, Kwon YM (2016) Three-dimensional in vivo difference between native acetabular version and acetabular component version influences iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-3055-5 Park KK, Tsai TY, Dimitriou D, Kwon YM (2016) Three-dimensional in vivo difference between native acetabular version and acetabular component version influences iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-015-3055-5
27.
go back to reference Tsuda K, Haraguchi K, Koyanagi J, Takahashi S, Sugama R, Fujiwara K (2016) A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-3095-x PubMed Tsuda K, Haraguchi K, Koyanagi J, Takahashi S, Sugama R, Fujiwara K (2016) A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system. Int Orthop. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-015-3095-x PubMed
29.
go back to reference Renkawitz T, Haimerl M, Dohmen L, Gneiting S, Lechler P, Woerner M, Springorum HR, Weber M, Sussmann P, Sendtner E, Grifka J (2012) The association between Femoral Tilt and impingement-free range-of-motion in total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:65. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-65 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Renkawitz T, Haimerl M, Dohmen L, Gneiting S, Lechler P, Woerner M, Springorum HR, Weber M, Sussmann P, Sendtner E, Grifka J (2012) The association between Femoral Tilt and impingement-free range-of-motion in total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:65. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2474-13-65 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Müller M, Duda G, Perka C, Tohtz S (2016) The sagittal stem alignment and the stem version clearly influence the impingement-free range of motion in total hip arthroplasty: a computer model-based analysis. Int Orthop 40(3):473–80. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2845-0 CrossRefPubMed Müller M, Duda G, Perka C, Tohtz S (2016) The sagittal stem alignment and the stem version clearly influence the impingement-free range of motion in total hip arthroplasty: a computer model-based analysis. Int Orthop 40(3):473–80. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-015-2845-0 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty
Authors
Markus Weber
Michael Woerner
Benjamin Craiovan
Florian Voellner
Michael Worlicek
Hans-Robert Springorum
Joachim Grifka
Tobias Renkawitz
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3171-x

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

International Orthopaedics 12/2016 Go to the issue