Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2014

01-12-2014

CT severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis: results from a single tertiary medical center

Authors: Ryan W. Woods, Venkata S. Akshintala, Vikesh K. Singh, Abeer Almulla, Vinshi Naz Khan, Rukshana Cader, Elliot K. Fishman, Atif Zaheer

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the CT severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and determine the association between radiographic and clinical severity.

Methods

There were 1332 patients admitted to the hospital with suspicion for PEP after undergoing ERCP as outpatients over a 10-year period, of whom 84 (6.3%) patients underwent at least one contrast-enhanced CT scan while hospitalized were evaluated. All CT scans were evaluated by two radiologists, and the modified CT severity index (MCTSI) score was calculated. Demographic, clinical, and procedural data as well as clinical severity parameters including systemic inflammatory response syndrome, organ failure, need for ICU, need for intervention, length of hospital stay, and mortality were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ 2 and Student’s t test or ANOVA and logistic regression analysis.

Results

Patients were predominantly females (70%) with a mean age of 46.5 years (range 20–86). The most common indication for ERCP was sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. MCTSI was graded as mild in 45 (53.6%), moderate in 36 (42.8%), and severe in 3 (3.6%) patients. The interobserver agreement was excellent (κ: 0.91, p < 0.0001) for MCTSI. The duration of ERCP (p = 0.005) was the only risk factor for PEP that significantly correlated with the MCTSI score. Increasing MCTSI was significantly associated with hospital length of stay.

Conclusions

PEP is typically a mild disease by radiologic and clinical criteria. Longer duration of ERCP is a risk factor for severe radiologic PEP. Severe radiographic PEP is associated with significantly longer hospital length of stay.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parsi MA (2011) Peroral cholangioscopy in the new millennium. World J Gastroenterol WJG 17:1–6CrossRef Parsi MA (2011) Peroral cholangioscopy in the new millennium. World J Gastroenterol WJG 17:1–6CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Varadarajulu S, Kilgore ML, Wilcox CM, Eloubeidi MA (2006) Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 64:338–347PubMedCrossRef Varadarajulu S, Kilgore ML, Wilcox CM, Eloubeidi MA (2006) Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 64:338–347PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Freeman M, Guda N (2004) Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 59:845–864PubMedCrossRef Freeman M, Guda N (2004) Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 59:845–864PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393PubMedCrossRef Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, et al. (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:139–147PubMedCrossRef Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, et al. (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:139–147PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Artifon EL, Chu A, Freeman M, et al. (2010) A comparison of the consensus and clinical definitions of pancreatitis with a proposal to redefine post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Pancreas 39:530–535PubMedCrossRef Artifon EL, Chu A, Freeman M, et al. (2010) A comparison of the consensus and clinical definitions of pancreatitis with a proposal to redefine post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Pancreas 39:530–535PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829PubMedCrossRef Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lankisch PG, Weber-Dany B, Hebel K, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB (2009) The harmless acute pancreatitis score: a clinical algorithm for rapid initial stratification of nonsevere disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:702PubMedCrossRef Lankisch PG, Weber-Dany B, Hebel K, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB (2009) The harmless acute pancreatitis score: a clinical algorithm for rapid initial stratification of nonsevere disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:702PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, et al. (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139:69–81PubMed Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, et al. (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139:69–81PubMed
10.
go back to reference Wu BU (2011) Prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Can Med Assoc J 183:673–677CrossRef Wu BU (2011) Prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Can Med Assoc J 183:673–677CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Singh VK, Bollen TL, Wu BU, et al. (2011) An assessment of the severity of interstitial pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc 9:1098–1103 Singh VK, Bollen TL, Wu BU, et al. (2011) An assessment of the severity of interstitial pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc 9:1098–1103
12.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223:603–613PubMedCrossRef Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223:603–613PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1261–1265PubMedCrossRef Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1261–1265PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. (2011) Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:386–392PubMedCrossRef Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. (2011) Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:386–392PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Abdel Aziz AM, Lehman GA (2007) Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. World J Gastroenterol WJG 13:2655–2668CrossRef Abdel Aziz AM, Lehman GA (2007) Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. World J Gastroenterol WJG 13:2655–2668CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bhatia V, Garg PK, Tandon RK, Madan K (2006) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-induced acute pancreatitis often has a benign outcome. J Clin Gastroenterol 40:726–731PubMedCrossRef Bhatia V, Garg PK, Tandon RK, Madan K (2006) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-induced acute pancreatitis often has a benign outcome. J Clin Gastroenterol 40:726–731PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, et al. (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:139–147PubMedCrossRef Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, et al. (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:139–147PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, et al. (2009) Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 104:31–40PubMedCrossRef Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, et al. (2009) Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 104:31–40PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. (2001) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54:425–434PubMedCrossRef Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. (2001) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54:425–434PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. (2012) Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62:102–111PubMedCrossRef Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. (2012) Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62:102–111PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. (2001) SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 2003(31):1250–1256 Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. (2001) SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 2003(31):1250–1256
22.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Leung WD, Sherman S (2013) Endoscopic approach to the patient with motility disorders of the bile duct and sphincter of Oddi. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 23:405–434PubMedCrossRef Leung WD, Sherman S (2013) Endoscopic approach to the patient with motility disorders of the bile duct and sphincter of Oddi. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 23:405–434PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lee TH, Moon JH, Choi HJ, et al. (2012) Prophylactic temporary 3F pancreatic duct stent to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with a difficult biliary cannulation: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 76:578–585PubMedCrossRef Lee TH, Moon JH, Choi HJ, et al. (2012) Prophylactic temporary 3F pancreatic duct stent to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with a difficult biliary cannulation: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 76:578–585PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mazaki T, Mado K, Masuda H, Shiono M (2014) Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol 49(2):343–355 Mazaki T, Mado K, Masuda H, Shiono M (2014) Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol 49(2):343–355
26.
go back to reference Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice parameters committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2379–2400PubMedCrossRef Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice parameters committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2379–2400PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Amano Y, Oishi T, Takahashi M, Kumazaki T (2001) Nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging of mild acute pancreatitis. Abdom Imaging 26:59–63PubMedCrossRef Amano Y, Oishi T, Takahashi M, Kumazaki T (2001) Nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging of mild acute pancreatitis. Abdom Imaging 26:59–63PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lecesne R, Taourel P, Bret PM, Atri M, Reinhold C (1999) Acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome. Radiology 211:727–735PubMedCrossRef Lecesne R, Taourel P, Bret PM, Atri M, Reinhold C (1999) Acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome. Radiology 211:727–735PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
CT severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis: results from a single tertiary medical center
Authors
Ryan W. Woods
Venkata S. Akshintala
Vikesh K. Singh
Abeer Almulla
Vinshi Naz Khan
Rukshana Cader
Elliot K. Fishman
Atif Zaheer
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0147-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Abdominal Radiology 6/2014 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.