Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 6/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

CT pulmonary angiogram quality comparison between early and later pregnancy

Authors: Yoel Siegel, Russ Kuker, James Banks, Gary Danton

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Pregnancy increases the risk for thromboembolic disease. CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is widely used for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolus (PE); however, a significant number of scans are suboptimal or non-diagnostic in pregnant patients. This phenomenon is attributed to physiology during the gravid state. The aim of this study is to examine whether all stages of pregnancy are similarly at risk for suboptimal scans.

Methods

Pregnant patients who had CTPA scans between February 2008 and November 2014 were included. The attenuation in the major pulmonary arteries was compared among patients and controls. An attenuation of 200 Hounsfield units (HU) was used as a cutoff between adequate and suboptimal studies. Statistical analysis compared attenuation means and number of arteries with adequate versus suboptimal attenuation.

Results

Forty patients were included in the study. Nine were at or below 13 weeks of pregnancy and 31 between week 14 and term. A control group of 14 non-pregnant women of similar age were also included. All arteries showed a significantly higher attenuation in early pregnancy and in the control group compared to later in pregnancy, p < 0.05. Fewer suboptimal opacified arteries were found in early pregnancy (11.1%) and controls (5.7%) compared to later in pregnancy (33.3%), p < 0.01.

Conclusion

Patients in early pregnancy are more likely to have a technically successful CTPA scan compared to later in pregnancy and show similar opacification to non-pregnant women. This suggests a possible paradigm shift from the current approach to suspected PE in pregnant patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lindqvist P, Dahlbäck B, Marŝál K (1999) Thrombotic risk during pregnancy: a population study. Obstet Gynecol 94(4):595–599PubMed Lindqvist P, Dahlbäck B, Marŝál K (1999) Thrombotic risk during pregnancy: a population study. Obstet Gynecol 94(4):595–599PubMed
2.
go back to reference Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Melton LJ III (2005) Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med 143:697–706CrossRefPubMed Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Melton LJ III (2005) Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med 143:697–706CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chang J, Elam-Evans LD, Berg CJ, Herndon J, Flowers L, Seed KA, Syverson CJ (2003) Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance—United States, 1991--1999. MMWR Surveill Summ 52(2):1–8PubMed Chang J, Elam-Evans LD, Berg CJ, Herndon J, Flowers L, Seed KA, Syverson CJ (2003) Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance—United States, 1991--1999. MMWR Surveill Summ 52(2):1–8PubMed
4.
go back to reference Coche E, Verschuren F, Keyeux A et al (2003) Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: comparison of thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 229:757–765CrossRefPubMed Coche E, Verschuren F, Keyeux A et al (2003) Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: comparison of thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 229:757–765CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Winer-Muram HT, Rydberg J, Johnson MS et al (2004) Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. Radiology 233(3):806–815CrossRefPubMed Winer-Muram HT, Rydberg J, Johnson MS et al (2004) Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. Radiology 233(3):806–815CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wang F, Fang W, Lv B, Lu JG et al (2009) Comparison of lung scintigraphy with multi-slice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin Nucl Med 34(7):424–427CrossRefPubMed Wang F, Fang W, Lv B, Lu JG et al (2009) Comparison of lung scintigraphy with multi-slice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin Nucl Med 34(7):424–427CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Revel MP, Cohen S, Sanchez O, Collignon MA et al (2011) Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: diagnosis with lung scintigraphy or CT angiography? Radiology 258(2):590–598CrossRefPubMed Revel MP, Cohen S, Sanchez O, Collignon MA et al (2011) Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: diagnosis with lung scintigraphy or CT angiography? Radiology 258(2):590–598CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Perisinakis K, Seimenis I, Tzedakis A et al (2014) Perfusion scintigraphy versus 256-slice CT angiography in pregnant patients suspected of pulmonary embolism: comparison of radiation risks. J Nucl Med 55(8):1273–1280CrossRefPubMed Perisinakis K, Seimenis I, Tzedakis A et al (2014) Perfusion scintigraphy versus 256-slice CT angiography in pregnant patients suspected of pulmonary embolism: comparison of radiation risks. J Nucl Med 55(8):1273–1280CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference U-King-Im JM, Freeman SJ, Boylan T et al (2008) Quality of CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy. Eur Radiol 18(12):2709–2715CrossRefPubMed U-King-Im JM, Freeman SJ, Boylan T et al (2008) Quality of CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy. Eur Radiol 18(12):2709–2715CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Andreou AK, Curtin JJ, Wilde S, Clark A (2008) Does pregnancy affect vascularenhancement in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography? Eur Radiol 18(12):2716–2722CrossRefPubMed Andreou AK, Curtin JJ, Wilde S, Clark A (2008) Does pregnancy affect vascularenhancement in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography? Eur Radiol 18(12):2716–2722CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Leung AN, Bull TM, Jaeschke R et al (2012) ATS/STR Committee on Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy. American Thoracic Society documents: an official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology Clinical Practice guideline—Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy. Radiology 262(2):635–646CrossRefPubMed Leung AN, Bull TM, Jaeschke R et al (2012) ATS/STR Committee on Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy. American Thoracic Society documents: an official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology Clinical Practice guideline—Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy. Radiology 262(2):635–646CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ridge CA, McDermott S, Freyne BJ, Brennan DJ, Collins CD, Skehan SJ (2009) Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: comparison of pulmonary CT angiography and lung scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(5):1223–1227CrossRefPubMed Ridge CA, McDermott S, Freyne BJ, Brennan DJ, Collins CD, Skehan SJ (2009) Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: comparison of pulmonary CT angiography and lung scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(5):1223–1227CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Weiss BM, Hess OM (2000) Pulmonary vascular disease and pregnancy: current controversies, management strategies, and perspectives. Eur Heart J 21(2):104–115 ReviewCrossRefPubMed Weiss BM, Hess OM (2000) Pulmonary vascular disease and pregnancy: current controversies, management strategies, and perspectives. Eur Heart J 21(2):104–115 ReviewCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chapman AB, Abraham WT, Zamudio S et al (1998) Temporal relationships between hormonal and hemodynamic changes in early human pregnancy. Kidney Int 54(6):2056–2063CrossRefPubMed Chapman AB, Abraham WT, Zamudio S et al (1998) Temporal relationships between hormonal and hemodynamic changes in early human pregnancy. Kidney Int 54(6):2056–2063CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Abbas AE, Lester SJ, Connolly H (2005) Pregnancy and the cardiovascular system. Int J Cardiol 98(2):179–189 ReviewCrossRefPubMed Abbas AE, Lester SJ, Connolly H (2005) Pregnancy and the cardiovascular system. Int J Cardiol 98(2):179–189 ReviewCrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Clapp JF 3rd, Capeless E (1997) Cardiovascular function before, during, and after the first and subsequent pregnancies. Am J Cardiol 80(11):1469–1473CrossRefPubMed Clapp JF 3rd, Capeless E (1997) Cardiovascular function before, during, and after the first and subsequent pregnancies. Am J Cardiol 80(11):1469–1473CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Shahir K, Goodman LR, Tali A, Thorsen KM, Hellman RS (2010) Pulmonary embolismin pregnancy: CT pulmonary angiography versus perfusion scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(3):W214–W220CrossRefPubMed Shahir K, Goodman LR, Tali A, Thorsen KM, Hellman RS (2010) Pulmonary embolismin pregnancy: CT pulmonary angiography versus perfusion scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(3):W214–W220CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Jones SE, Wittram C (2005) The indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: imaging characteristics and patient clinical outcome. Radiology 237(1):329–337CrossRefPubMed Jones SE, Wittram C (2005) The indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: imaging characteristics and patient clinical outcome. Radiology 237(1):329–337CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Cahill AG, Stout MJ, Macones GA, Bhalla S (2009) Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy using computed-tomographic angiography or ventilation-perfusion. ObstetGynecol 114(1):124–129 Cahill AG, Stout MJ, Macones GA, Bhalla S (2009) Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy using computed-tomographic angiography or ventilation-perfusion. ObstetGynecol 114(1):124–129
20.
go back to reference Ridge CA, Mhuircheartaigh JN, Dodd JD, Skehan SJ (2011) Pulmonary CT angiography protocol adapted to the hemodynamic effects of pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(5):1058–1063CrossRefPubMed Ridge CA, Mhuircheartaigh JN, Dodd JD, Skehan SJ (2011) Pulmonary CT angiography protocol adapted to the hemodynamic effects of pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(5):1058–1063CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jordan EJ, Godelman A, Levsky JM, Zalta B, Haramati LB (2015) CT pulmonary angiography in pregnant and postpartum women: low yield, high dose. Clin Imaging 39(2):251–253 Jordan EJ, Godelman A, Levsky JM, Zalta B, Haramati LB (2015) CT pulmonary angiography in pregnant and postpartum women: low yield, high dose. Clin Imaging 39(2):251–253
22.
go back to reference Litmanovich D, Boiselle PM, Bankier AA et al (2009) Dose reduction in computed tomographic angiography of pregnant patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33(6):961–966CrossRefPubMed Litmanovich D, Boiselle PM, Bankier AA et al (2009) Dose reduction in computed tomographic angiography of pregnant patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33(6):961–966CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mayo J, Thakur Y (2013) Pulmonary CT angiography as first-line imaging for PE: image quality and radiation dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(3):522–528CrossRefPubMed Mayo J, Thakur Y (2013) Pulmonary CT angiography as first-line imaging for PE: image quality and radiation dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(3):522–528CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pontana F, Henry S, Duhamel A, Faivre JB, Tacelli N, Pagniez J, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2015) Impact of iterative reconstruction on the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) on reduced-dose chest CT angiograms. Eur Radiol 25(4):1182–1189CrossRefPubMed Pontana F, Henry S, Duhamel A, Faivre JB, Tacelli N, Pagniez J, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2015) Impact of iterative reconstruction on the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) on reduced-dose chest CT angiograms. Eur Radiol 25(4):1182–1189CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
CT pulmonary angiogram quality comparison between early and later pregnancy
Authors
Yoel Siegel
Russ Kuker
James Banks
Gary Danton
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1506-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Emergency Radiology 6/2017 Go to the issue