Top

Published in:

01-12-2008 | Chest

Does pregnancy affect vascular enhancement in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography?

Authors: Adrian K. Andreou, John J. Curtin, Sue Wilde, Allan Clark

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2008

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pregnancy affects contrast enhancement within the pulmonary arteries during computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). This was a retrospective analysis of the CTPA examinations of 16 pregnant and 16 non-pregnant female patients, suspected of having an acute pulmonary embolus (PE), during the same time period. Pulmonary vascular enhancement was evaluated by measuring the CT density within the pulmonary arteries. In a blinded evaluation, subjective grading of contrast enhancement within the pulmonary arteries was also performed. There was a significant difference in arterial enhancement between the two groups, with pregnant patients having a mean pulmonary arterial density 112 HU less than patients in the control group [mean attenuation of 259.79 ± 59.31 HU in pregnant patients versus 371.88 ± 60.63 HU in non-pregnant patients (p < 0.001)]. The mean subjective pulmonary arterial enhancement score in the pregnant group was 8.19 ± 2.51 versus 13.69 ± 3.07 in the control group (p < 0.001). Pregnant women undergoing CTPA have significantly decreased pulmonary arterial enhancement compared to non-pregnant patients, probably due to the increase in cardiac output in pregnancy. We may need to reconsider how we perform CTPA in this group in order to ensure adequate opacification for diagnosis.

Rochat RW, Koonin LM, Atrash HK, Jewett JF (1988) Maternal mortality in the United States: report from the Maternal Mortality Collaborative. Obstet Gynecol 72:91–97PubMed

Atrash HK, Rowley D, Hogue CJR (1992) Maternal and perinatal mortality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 4:61–71PubMed

Prevention of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (1986) NIH Consensus Development. JAMA 256:744–749CrossRef

Toglia MR, Weg JG (1996) Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 335:108–114PubMedCrossRef

Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, Valli N, Couffinhal T, Raherisson C, Leccia F, Laurent F (2000) Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1041–1047PubMed

Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Baghaie F, Fribourg M, Artaud D, Duhamel A (2000) Clinical value in the thin collimation diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:407–411PubMed

Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, Kipfmueller F, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ, Schoepf UJ (2005) Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 293:2012–2017PubMedCrossRef

Bates SM, Ginsberg JS (2002) How we manage venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Blood 100:3470–3478PubMedCrossRef

Goodman LR (2000) CT diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. RadioGraphics 1201–1205

10.

Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, Subber SW, Russ PD, Johnston RJ, Durham JD, Lynch DA (1998) Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning–correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Radiology 208:201–208PubMed

11.

Ryu JH, Swensen SJ, Olson EJ, Pellikka PA (2001) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with use of computed tomographic angiography. Mayo Clin Proc 76:59–65PubMedCrossRef

12.

Hartmann IJ, Lo RT, Bakker J, de Monye W, van Waes PF, Pattynama PT (2002) Optimal scan delay in spiral CT for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:21–25PubMedCrossRef

13.

Gotway MB, Patel RA, Webb WR (2000) Helical CT for the evaluation of suspected acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic pitfalls. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:267–273PubMedCrossRef

14.

Sahagun O, Wittram C (2005) A population-controlled comparison of fixed delay and Smart-Prep enhancement for CT pulmonary angiography. (abstr) RSNA scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Chicago, IL: RSNA 2005:546

15.

Chang SA, Matthews CC, Kay D (2005) CT pulmonary angiography for the evaluation of pulmonary embolus: fixed delay versus bolus tracking techniques of contrast administration.(abstr) RSNA scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Chicago, IL: RSNA 2005:639

16.

Rubin GD, Lane MJ, Bloch DA, Leung AN, Stark P (1996) Optimization of thoracic spiral CT: effects of iodinated contrast medium concentration. Radiology 201:785–791PubMed

17.

Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M (2006) CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. Radiology 241:899–907PubMedCrossRef

18.

Robson SC, Hunter S, Boys RJ, Dunlop W (1989) Serial study of factors influencing changes in cardiac output during human pregnancy. Am J Physiol 256:H1060PubMed

19.

Capeless EL, Clapp JF (1989) Cardiovascular changes in early phase of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:1449PubMed

20.

Mabie WC, DiSessa TG, Crocker LG, Sibai BM, Arheart KL (1994) A longitudinal study of cardiac output in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:849–856PubMed

21.

Duvekot JJ, Peeters LL (1994) Maternal cardiovascular hemodynamic adaptation to pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 49(Suppl 12):S1–S14PubMedCrossRef

22.

Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA (1998) Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology 207:657–662PubMed

23.

Bae KT (2003) Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: When does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 227:809–816PubMedCrossRef

24.

Schoellnast H, Deutschmann HA, Berghold A, Fritz GA, Schaffler GJ, Tillich M (2006) MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: influence of body weight, body mass index and scan length on arterial enhancement at different iodine flow rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1074–1078PubMedCrossRef

25.

Bae KT, Tao C, Gürel S, Hong C, Zhu F, Gebke TA, Milite M, Hildebolt CF (2007) Effect of patient weight and scanning duration on contrast enhancement during pulmonary multidetector CT angiography. Radiology 242:582–589PubMedCrossRef

26.

Arakawa H, Kohno T, Hiki T, Kaji Y (2007) CT pulmonary angiography and CT venography: factors associated with vessel enhancement. AJR 189:156–161PubMedCrossRef

27.

De Simone G, Daniels SR, Mureddu G, Kimball TR, Witt S (1997) Stroke volume and cardiac output in normotensive children and adults: assessment of relations with body size and impact of overweight. Circulation 95:1837–1843PubMed

28.

Kuzo RS, Pooley RA, Crook JE, Heckman MG, Gerber TC (2007) Measurement of caval blood flow with MRI during respiratory maneuvers: implications for vascular contrast opacification on pulmonary CT angiography studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:839–842PubMedCrossRef

29.

Henk CB, Grampp S, Linnau K, Thurnher MM, Czerny C, Herold CJ, Mostbeck GH (2003) Suspected pulmonary embolism: enhancement of pulmonary arteries at deep-inspiration CT angiography – influence of patent foramen ovale and atrial-septal defect. Radiology 226:749–755PubMedCrossRef

30.

Boiselle PM, Reddy SS, Villas PA, Liu A, Seibyl JP (1998) Pulmonary embolus in pregnant patients: survey of ventilation-perfusion imaging policies and practices. Radiology 207:201–206PubMed

31.

Chan WS, Ray JG, Murray S, Coady GE, Coates G, Ginsberg JS (2002) Suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy: clinical presentation, results of lung scanning, and subsequent maternal and pediatric outcomes. Arch Intern Med 162:1170–1175PubMedCrossRef

32.

Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J, Rainbow AJ, Coates G (1989) Risk to the fetus of radiological procedures used in the diagnosis of maternal venous thromboembolic disease. Thromb Haemost 61:189–196PubMed

33.

Russell JR, Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Watson E (1997) Radiation absorbed dose to the embryo/fetus from radiopharmaceuticals. Health Phys 73:756–769PubMedCrossRef

34.

Winer-Muram HT, Boone JM, Brown HL, Jennings SG, Mabie WC, Lombardo GT (2002) Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: Fetal radiation dose with helical CT. Radiology 224:487–492PubMedCrossRef

35.

Cook JV, Kyriou J (2005) Radiation from CT and perfusion scanning [letter]. BMJ 331:350PubMedCrossRef

36.

Remy-Jardin M, Remy J (1999) Spiral CT angiography of the pulmonary circulation. Radiology 212:615–636PubMed

37.

Fleischmann D (2003) Use of high concentration contrast media: principles and rationale. Eur J Radiol 45(supp 1):S88–S93PubMedCrossRef

38.

Schoellnast H, Deutschmann HA, Fritz GA, Stessel U, Schaffler GJ, Tillich M (2005) MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: influence of iodine flow concentration on vessel attenuation and visualisation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1935–1939PubMed

Title: Does pregnancy affect vascular enhancement in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography?
Authors: Adrian K. Andreou
John J. Curtin
Sue Wilde
Allan Clark
Publication date: 01-12-2008
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Radiology / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1114-7

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Does pregnancy affect vascular enhancement in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography?

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

Preoperative staging of biliary carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET: prospective comparison with PET+CT, MDCT and histopathology

Quality of CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy

Which Iodine concentration in chest CT? – A prospective study in 300 patients

CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism during pregnancy

Automated lobar quantification of emphysema in patients with severe COPD

Patient selection guidelines in MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine fibroids: a pictorial guide to relevant findings in screening pelvic MRI