Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2006

01-06-2006 | PERSPECTIVE

CT colonography: screening in individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer

Authors: T. M. Gallo, G. Galatola, C. Laudi, D. Regge

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The use of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) as a screening test for colorectal cancer is being advocated with growing enthusiasm by physicians and the public as stronger evidence of its validity and limited invasiveness emerges from the literature. Because the approach to surveillance of colorectal cancer depends on an individual’s degree of risk category, which depends on familial and personal histories, it seems logical that the diagnostic performance and cost efficacy of screening CTC may differ according to the characteristics of the target population. Although CTC seems a valid option in low- to average-risk populations, pending a careful assessment of its cost and estimates of its cost efficacy, there are some important issues that should be addressed when it comes to considering its use in high-risk patients. The expected larger number of induced colonoscopies and higher false-positive rates are likely to have a great influence on CTC costs, but if its implementation causes a dramatic increase in the number of patients willing to undergo screening, thanks to its acceptability, then the cost efficacy ratio may ultimately become competitive with all other screening strategies for colorectal cancer. We strongly feel that large and well-conducted trials are needed to clarify the role of CTC in screening patients at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Sankila R, Ferlay J, Parkin DM (2002) Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995. Eur J Cancer 38:99–166CrossRefPubMed Bray F, Sankila R, Ferlay J, Parkin DM (2002) Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995. Eur J Cancer 38:99–166CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al. (2002) American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 52:8–22PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al. (2002) American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 52:8–22PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Rex D, et al. (2003) Colorectal screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124:544–560CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Rex D, et al. (2003) Colorectal screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124:544–560CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wagner JL, Tunis S, Brown M, et al. (1996) The cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adults. In: Young G, Levin B, Rozen A, eds. Prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer. London: WB Saunders, 321–256 Wagner JL, Tunis S, Brown M, et al. (1996) The cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adults. In: Young G, Levin B, Rozen A, eds. Prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer. London: WB Saunders, 321–256
5.
6.
go back to reference Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, et al. (1994) A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 331:1669–1674CrossRefPubMed Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, et al. (1994) A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 331:1669–1674CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H, et al. (1996) Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Eng J Med 334:82–87CrossRef Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H, et al. (1996) Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Eng J Med 334:82–87CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Henry LG, Condon RE, Schulte WJ, et al. (1975) Risk of recurrence of colon polyps. Ann Surg 182:511–515PubMed Henry LG, Condon RE, Schulte WJ, et al. (1975) Risk of recurrence of colon polyps. Ann Surg 182:511–515PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kirsner JB, Rider JA, Moeller HC, et al. (1960) Polyps of the colon and rectum: statistical analysis of a long-term follow-up study. Gastroenterology 39:178–182PubMed Kirsner JB, Rider JA, Moeller HC, et al. (1960) Polyps of the colon and rectum: statistical analysis of a long-term follow-up study. Gastroenterology 39:178–182PubMed
10.
go back to reference Waye JD, Braunfeld SF (1982) Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic polypectomy. Endoscopy 14:79–81PubMed Waye JD, Braunfeld SF (1982) Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic polypectomy. Endoscopy 14:79–81PubMed
11.
go back to reference Fowler DL, Hedberg SE (1980) Follow-up colonoscopy after polypectomy [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 26:67 Fowler DL, Hedberg SE (1980) Follow-up colonoscopy after polypectomy [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 26:67
12.
go back to reference Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzman I, Demling L (1985) Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas. Endoscopy 17:175–181PubMedCrossRef Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzman I, Demling L (1985) Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas. Endoscopy 17:175–181PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J (1992) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326:658–662PubMedCrossRef Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J (1992) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326:658–662PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gillespie PE, Chambers RJ, Chan KW, et al. (1979) Colonic adenomas: a colonoscopy survey. Gut 20:240–245PubMed Gillespie PE, Chambers RJ, Chan KW, et al. (1979) Colonic adenomas: a colonoscopy survey. Gut 20:240–245PubMed
15.
go back to reference Winawer S, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. (1993) Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med 328:901–906CrossRefPubMed Winawer S, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. (1993) Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med 328:901–906CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA, et al. (1998) Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. Gastroenterology 115:13–18CrossRefPubMed Van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA, et al. (1998) Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. Gastroenterology 115:13–18CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Winawer SJ (1997) Initial management and follow-up surveillance of patients with colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 26:85–101CrossRefPubMed Zauber AG, Winawer SJ (1997) Initial management and follow-up surveillance of patients with colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 26:85–101CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Choi PM, Nugent FW, Schoetz DJJ, et al. (1993) Colonoscopic surveillance reduces mortality from colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 105:418–424PubMed Choi PM, Nugent FW, Schoetz DJJ, et al. (1993) Colonoscopic surveillance reduces mortality from colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 105:418–424PubMed
19.
go back to reference Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, et al. (2001) The Italian Multicentre Study Group. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 48:812–815CrossRefPubMed Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, et al. (2001) The Italian Multicentre Study Group. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 48:812–815CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, et al. (2003) Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:230–236PubMedCrossRef Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, et al. (2003) Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:230–236PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Bechtold RE, et al. (1994) Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality [abstract]. AJR 62(suppl 104):104a Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Bechtold RE, et al. (1994) Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality [abstract]. AJR 62(suppl 104):104a
22.
go back to reference Halligan S, Fenlon HM (1999) Virtual colonoscopy. BMJ 319(7219):1249–1252PubMed Halligan S, Fenlon HM (1999) Virtual colonoscopy. BMJ 319(7219):1249–1252PubMed
23.
go back to reference Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M, et al. (2002) Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 225:391–399PubMed Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M, et al. (2002) Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 225:391–399PubMed
24.
go back to reference Yoshida H, Nappi J, MacEneaney P, et al. (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics 22:963–979PubMed Yoshida H, Nappi J, MacEneaney P, et al. (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics 22:963–979PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kiss G, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Thomeer M, et al. (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol 12:77–81CrossRefPubMed Kiss G, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Thomeer M, et al. (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol 12:77–81CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Ahlquist DA (1999) Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening. Gut 44:301–305PubMedCrossRef Johnson CD, Ahlquist DA (1999) Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening. Gut 44:301–305PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Morrin MM, LaMont JT (2003) Screening virtual colonoscopy—ready for prime time? N Engl J Med 349:2261–2264CrossRefPubMed Morrin MM, LaMont JT (2003) Screening virtual colonoscopy—ready for prime time? N Engl J Med 349:2261–2264CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:311–319CrossRefPubMed Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:311–319CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, et al. (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–692PubMed Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, et al. (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–692PubMed
30.
go back to reference Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, et al. (2001) Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 96:394–400CrossRefPubMed Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, et al. (2001) Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 96:394–400CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Gallo TM, Galatola G, Fracchia M, et al. (2003) Computed tomography colonography in routine clinical practice. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:1323–1331CrossRefPubMed Gallo TM, Galatola G, Fracchia M, et al. (2003) Computed tomography colonography in routine clinical practice. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:1323–1331CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, et al. (2003) CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR 181:1593–1598PubMed Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, et al. (2003) CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR 181:1593–1598PubMed
33.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:311–319CrossRefPubMed Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:311–319CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al. (2004) Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230:629–636PubMed Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al. (2004) Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230:629–636PubMed
36.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291:1772–1774CrossRef Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291:1772–1774CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127:41–48CrossRefPubMed Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127:41–48CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC III, et al. (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341:1496–1503CrossRefPubMed Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC III, et al. (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341:1496–1503CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, et al. (2003) A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom. Am J Gastroenterol 98:2543–2549CrossRefPubMed Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, et al. (2003) A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom. Am J Gastroenterol 98:2543–2549CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, et al. (2004) Efficacy of high magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum: a prospective analysis. Gut 53:284–290CrossRefPubMed Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, et al. (2004) Efficacy of high magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum: a prospective analysis. Gut 53:284–290CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ (2005) CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) for primary colorectal screening: challenges facing clinical implementation. Abdom Imaging 30:1–4CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ (2005) CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) for primary colorectal screening: challenges facing clinical implementation. Abdom Imaging 30:1–4CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference van Gelder RE, Florie J, Stoker J (2005) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance with CT colonography: current controversies and obstacles. Abdom Imaging 30:5–12CrossRefPubMed van Gelder RE, Florie J, Stoker J (2005) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance with CT colonography: current controversies and obstacles. Abdom Imaging 30:5–12CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. In: Smith H, (ed). Annals of the ICRP 21 (nos. 1–3). International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 60. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. In: Smith H, (ed). Annals of the ICRP 21 (nos. 1–3). International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 60. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991
44.
go back to reference van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al. (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25–33PubMed van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al. (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25–33PubMed
45.
go back to reference Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. (2003) Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 13:1297–1302PubMed Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. (2003) Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 13:1297–1302PubMed
46.
go back to reference van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Florie J, et al. (2004) CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction—comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. Radiology 232:611–620PubMed van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Florie J, et al. (2004) CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction—comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. Radiology 232:611–620PubMed
47.
go back to reference Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Bauerfeind P (1999) Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol 94:2268–2274CrossRefPubMed Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Bauerfeind P (1999) Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol 94:2268–2274CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
CT colonography: screening in individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer
Authors
T. M. Gallo
G. Galatola
C. Laudi
D. Regge
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-005-0368-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Abdominal Radiology 3/2006 Go to the issue