Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2019

01-01-2019

CT colonography screening in extracolonic cancer survivors: impact on rates of colorectal and extracolonic findings by cancer type

Authors: Matthew E. Larson, Perry J. Pickhardt

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the rates of colorectal and extracolonic findings at CT colonography (CTC) screening between patients with and without a personal prior history of other.

Methods

Over a 160-month interval, 349 adults (mean age, 60.3 years; 67% female) with a positive history of extracolonic cancer [Ca(+)], excluding 271 patients with isolated non-melanoma skin cancers, underwent CTC screening. This study cohort was compared against 8859 controls (mean age, 57.0 years; 53% female) without a prior cancer history [Ca(−)]. Primary outcome measures included the rates of relevant colorectal (C-RADS C2–C4) and extracolonic (C-RADS E3-E4) findings at CTC. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test for statistical significance with post-hoc analysis by relative rate (RR).

Results

Both colorectal (C2–C4) and extracolonic (E3–E4) findings were significantly increased in the Ca(+) group versus Ca(−) control group (p = 0.0283 and 0.0236, respectively). Positive colorectal findings were most notably increased among survivors of non-small cell lung cancer (RR 3.1), head/neck cancers (RR, 3.4), and bladder cancers (RR 2.2). The proportion of C2–C4 patients undergoing intervention in the Ca(+) cohort was not significantly different than the Ca(−). Potentially relevant extracolonic findings (E3) were increased in survivors of hematogenous malignancies (RR 2.0), while likely important extracolonic findings (E4) were increased in survivors of female gynecological malignancies (RR 3.4).

Conclusions

Relevant colorectal and extracolonic findings at CTC screening are increased in patients with a previous extracolonic cancer history, particularly among certain cancer subsets. These results may have important implications for choice of colorectal test in these patients.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Curtis R, Freedman D, Ron E, Ries L, Hacker D, Edwards B, Tucker M, Faumeni J (2006) New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000, vol NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD Curtis R, Freedman D, Ron E, Ries L, Hacker D, Edwards B, Tucker M, Faumeni J (2006) New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000, vol NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
6.
7.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357(14):1403–1412CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357(14):1403–1412CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Borden ZS, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. (2010) Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis. Radiology 254(1):138–144CrossRefPubMed Borden ZS, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. (2010) Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis. Radiology 254(1):138–144CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Jones DA, Olsen CH (2006) Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1491–1496CrossRef Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Jones DA, Olsen CH (2006) Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1491–1496CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT Colonography. Am J Roentgenol 189(6):1451–1456CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT Colonography. Am J Roentgenol 189(6):1451–1456CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Nugent PA, Schindler WR (2004) The effect of diagnostic confidence on the probability of optical colonoscopic confirmation of potential polyps detected on CT colonography: prospective assessment in 1339 asymptomatic adults. Am J Roentgenol 183(6):1661–1665CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Nugent PA, Schindler WR (2004) The effect of diagnostic confidence on the probability of optical colonoscopic confirmation of potential polyps detected on CT colonography: prospective assessment in 1339 asymptomatic adults. Am J Roentgenol 183(6):1661–1665CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236(1):3–9CrossRefPubMed Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236(1):3–9CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD, et al. (2013) Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 14(8):711–720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD, et al. (2013) Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 14(8):711–720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Brown L, McCarron P, Freedman D (2006) New Malignancies Following Cancer of the Buccal Cavity and Pharynx. In: New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000, vol Publ. No. 05-5302. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD Brown L, McCarron P, Freedman D (2006) New Malignancies Following Cancer of the Buccal Cavity and Pharynx. In: New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000, vol Publ. No. 05-5302. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
17.
go back to reference Caporaso N, Dodd K, Tucker M (2006) New Malignancies Following Cancer of the Respiratory Tract. In: New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000, vol NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD Caporaso N, Dodd K, Tucker M (2006) New Malignancies Following Cancer of the Respiratory Tract. In: New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000, vol NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
19.
go back to reference Wilson R, Silverman D, Fraument J, Curtis R (2006) New Malignancies Following Cancer of the Urinary Tract. In: New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000, vol NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD Wilson R, Silverman D, Fraument J, Curtis R (2006) New Malignancies Following Cancer of the Urinary Tract. In: New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000, vol NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
20.
go back to reference Dores G, Coté T, Travis L (2006) New Malignancies Following Hodgkin Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, and Myeloma. In: New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000, vol NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD Dores G, Coté T, Travis L (2006) New Malignancies Following Hodgkin Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, and Myeloma. In: New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000, vol NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Metadata
Title
CT colonography screening in extracolonic cancer survivors: impact on rates of colorectal and extracolonic findings by cancer type
Authors
Matthew E. Larson
Perry J. Pickhardt
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1708-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Abdominal Radiology 1/2019 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

Calyceal crescents (of Dunbar and Nogrady)

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.