Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2016

01-01-2016

CT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination

Authors: Jake Theis, David H. Kim, Meghan G. Lubner, Alejandro Muñoz del Rio, Perry J. Pickhardt

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To objectively compare the volume, density, and distribution of luminal fluid for same-day oral-contrast-enhanced CTC following incomplete optical colonoscopy (OC) vs. deferred CTC on a separate day utilizing a dedicated CTC bowel preparation.

Methods

HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved retrospective study compared 103 same-day CTC studies after incomplete OC (utilizing 30 mL oral diatrizoate) against 151 CTC examinations performed on a separate day after failed OC using a dedicated CTC bowel preparation (oral magnesium citrate/dilute barium/diatrizoate the evening before). A subgroup of 15 patients who had both same-day CTC and separate-day routine CTC was also identified and underwent separate analysis. CTC exams were analyzed for opacified fluid distribution within the GI tract, as well as density and volume. Data were analyzed utilizing Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests.

Results

Opacified luminal fluid extended to the rectum in 56% (58/103) of same-day CTC vs. 100% (151/151) of deferred separate-day CTC (p < 0.0001). For same-day CTC, contrast failed to reach the colon in 11% (11/103) and failed to reach the left colon in 26% (27/103). Volumetric colonic fluid segmentation for fluid analysis (successful in 80 same-day and 147 separate-day cases) showed significantly more fluid in the same-day cohort (mean, 227 vs. 166 mL; p < 0.0001); the actual difference is underestimated due to excluded cases. Mean colonic fluid attenuation was significantly lower in the same-day cohort (545 vs. 735 HU; p < 0.0001). Similar findings were identified in the smaller cohort with direct intra-patient CTC comparison.

Conclusions

Dedicated CTC bowel preparation on a separate day following incomplete OC results in a much higher quality examination compared with same-day CTC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Laghi A, et al. (2008) Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med. 168(7):696–705CrossRefPubMed Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Laghi A, et al. (2008) Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med. 168(7):696–705CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. New England Journal of Medicine. 359(12):1207–1217PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. New England Journal of Medicine. 359(12):1207–1217PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. New England Journal of Medicine. 357(14):1403–1412CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. New England Journal of Medicine. 357(14):1403–1412CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. New England Journal of Medicine. 349(23):2191–2200CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. New England Journal of Medicine. 349(23):2191–2200CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, et al. (2007) Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer. 109(11):2213–2221CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, et al. (2007) Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer. 109(11):2213–2221CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, et al. (2007) CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology. 244(2):471–478CrossRefPubMed Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, et al. (2007) CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology. 244(2):471–478CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR (2007) Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 189(4):774–779CrossRefPubMed Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR (2007) Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 189(4):774–779CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Iafrate F, Hassan C, Zullo A, et al. (2008) CT colonography with reduced bowel preparation after incomplete colonoscopy in the elderly. Eur Radiol. 18(7):1385–1395CrossRefPubMed Iafrate F, Hassan C, Zullo A, et al. (2008) CT colonography with reduced bowel preparation after incomplete colonoscopy in the elderly. Eur Radiol. 18(7):1385–1395CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, Milano A, Megibow AJ (1999) Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. American Journal of Roentgenology. 173(3):561–564CrossRefPubMed Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, Milano A, Megibow AJ (1999) Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. American Journal of Roentgenology. 173(3):561–564CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, et al. (1999) Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. American Journal of Roentgenology. 172(4):913–918CrossRefPubMed Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, et al. (1999) Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. American Journal of Roentgenology. 172(4):913–918CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, et al. (2013) Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 381(9873):1185–1193CrossRefPubMed Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, et al. (2013) Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 381(9873):1185–1193CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tolan DJM, Armstrong EM, Chapman AH (2007) Replacing barium enema with CT Colonography in patients older than 70 years: the importance of detecting extracolonic abnormalities. Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1104–1111CrossRef Tolan DJM, Armstrong EM, Chapman AH (2007) Replacing barium enema with CT Colonography in patients older than 70 years: the importance of detecting extracolonic abnormalities. Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1104–1111CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Duszak R Jr, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2011) Expanding utilization and regional coverage of diagnostic CT colonography: early medicare claims experience. J Am Coll Radiol 8(4):235–241CrossRefPubMed Duszak R Jr, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2011) Expanding utilization and regional coverage of diagnostic CT colonography: early medicare claims experience. J Am Coll Radiol 8(4):235–241CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Siegel R, DeSantis C, Jemal A (2014) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. Ca-a Cancer J Clin 64(2):104–117CrossRef Siegel R, DeSantis C, Jemal A (2014) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. Ca-a Cancer J Clin 64(2):104–117CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Beebe TJ, Johnson CD, Stoner SM, Anderson KJ, Limburg PJ (2007) Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin Proc 82(6):666–671CrossRefPubMed Beebe TJ, Johnson CD, Stoner SM, Anderson KJ, Limburg PJ (2007) Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin Proc 82(6):666–671CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ (2007) Colonic preparation for computed tomographic colonography: understanding the relative advantages and disadvantages of a noncathartic approach. Mayo Clin Proc 82(6):659–661CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ (2007) Colonic preparation for computed tomographic colonography: understanding the relative advantages and disadvantages of a noncathartic approach. Mayo Clin Proc 82(6):659–661CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chang KJ, Rekhi SS Jr, Anderson SW, Soto JA (2011) Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(1):91–95CrossRefPubMed Chang KJ, Rekhi SS Jr, Anderson SW, Soto JA (2011) Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(1):91–95CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bannas P, Bakke J, del Rio AM, Pickhardt PJ (2014) Intra-individual comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for bowel preparation at CT colonography: automated volumetric analysis of residual fluid for quality assessment. Clin Radiol 69(11):1171–1177PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bannas P, Bakke J, del Rio AM, Pickhardt PJ (2014) Intra-individual comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for bowel preparation at CT colonography: automated volumetric analysis of residual fluid for quality assessment. Clin Radiol 69(11):1171–1177PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bannas P, Bakke J, Patrick JL, Pickhardt PJ (2015) Automated volumetric analysis for comparison of oral sulfate solution (SUPREP) with established cathartic agents at CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 40(1):11–18PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bannas P, Bakke J, Patrick JL, Pickhardt PJ (2015) Automated volumetric analysis for comparison of oral sulfate solution (SUPREP) with established cathartic agents at CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 40(1):11–18PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Patrick JL, Bakke JR, Bannas P, et al. (2015) Objective volumetric comparison of room air versus carbon dioxide for colonic distention at screening CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 40(2):231–236CrossRefPubMed Patrick JL, Bakke JR, Bannas P, et al. (2015) Objective volumetric comparison of room air versus carbon dioxide for colonic distention at screening CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 40(2):231–236CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Bakke J, Kuo J, et al. (2014) Volumetric analysis of colonic distention according to patient position at CT colonography: diagnostic value of the right lateral decubitus series. Am J Roentgenol 203(6):W623–W628CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Bakke J, Kuo J, et al. (2014) Volumetric analysis of colonic distention according to patient position at CT colonography: diagnostic value of the right lateral decubitus series. Am J Roentgenol 203(6):W623–W628CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Borden ZS, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. (2010) Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis. Radiology 254(1):138–144CrossRefPubMed Borden ZS, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. (2010) Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis. Radiology 254(1):138–144CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Jones DA, Olsen CH (2006) Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1491–1496CrossRef Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Jones DA, Olsen CH (2006) Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1491–1496CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JHR (2003) Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. Am J Roentgenol 181(3):799–805CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi JHR (2003) Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. Am J Roentgenol 181(3):799–805CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Slater A, Taylor SA, Burling D, et al. (2006) Colonic polyps: effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on conspicuity and measurement in vitro experiment with porcine colonic specimen. Radiology 240(1):101–109CrossRefPubMed Slater A, Taylor SA, Burling D, et al. (2006) Colonic polyps: effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on conspicuity and measurement in vitro experiment with porcine colonic specimen. Radiology 240(1):101–109CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL, et al. (2007) Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):672–680CrossRefPubMed Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL, et al. (2007) Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):672–680CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ (2000) Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Am J Roentgenol 174(6):1543–1549CrossRef Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ (2000) Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Am J Roentgenol 174(6):1543–1549CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. (2006) Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology 239(3):759–767CrossRefPubMed Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. (2006) Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology 239(3):759–767CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT Colonography. Am J Roentgenol 189(6):1451–1456CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT Colonography. Am J Roentgenol 189(6):1451–1456CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Gopal DV (2006) Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection. Gastroenterology 130(6):1582–1587CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Gopal DV (2006) Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection. Gastroenterology 130(6):1582–1587CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Kim DH, Matkowskyj KA, Lubner MG, et al. (in press) Serrated polyps at CT colonography-based colorectal cancer screening: prevalence and characteristics of the serrated polyp spectrum. Radiology Kim DH, Matkowskyj KA, Lubner MG, et al. (in press) Serrated polyps at CT colonography-based colorectal cancer screening: prevalence and characteristics of the serrated polyp spectrum. Radiology
33.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Hinshaw JL, et al. (2007) Prospective blinded trial comparing 45-mL and 90-mL doses of oral sodium phosphate for bowel preparation before computed tomographic colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31(1):53–58CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Hinshaw JL, et al. (2007) Prospective blinded trial comparing 45-mL and 90-mL doses of oral sodium phosphate for bowel preparation before computed tomographic colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31(1):53–58CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I, et al. (2001) Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218(1):274–277CrossRefPubMed Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I, et al. (2001) Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218(1):274–277CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Park SH, Ha HK, Kim MJ, et al. (2005) False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Radiology 235(2):495–502CrossRefPubMed Park SH, Ha HK, Kim MJ, et al. (2005) False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Radiology 235(2):495–502CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
CT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination
Authors
Jake Theis
David H. Kim
Meghan G. Lubner
Alejandro Muñoz del Rio
Perry J. Pickhardt
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0595-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Abdominal Radiology 1/2016 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.