Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Imaging 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | CT Angiography | Research

An adaptive optimal viewing angle determination algorithm for TEVAR operation

Authors: Weiya Sun, Guanyu Yang, Yang Chen, Huazhong Shu

Published in: BMC Medical Imaging | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The determination of the right x-ray angiography viewing angle is an important issue during the treatment of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). An inaccurate projection angle (manually determined today by the physicians according to their personal experience) may affect the placement of the stent and cause vascular occlusion or endoleak.

Methods

Based on the acquisition of a computed tomography angiography (CTA) image before TEVAR, an adaptive optimization algorithm is proposed to determine the optimal viewing angle of the angiogram automatically. This optimal view aims at avoiding any overlapping between the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery. Moreover, the proposed optimal procedure exploits the patient-specific morphology to adaptively reduce the potential foreshortening effect.

Results

Experimental results conducted on thirty-five patients demonstrate that the optimal angiographic viewing angle based on the proposed method has no significant difference when compared with the expert practice (p = 0.0678).

Conclusion

We propose a method that utilizes the CTA image acquired before TEVAR to automatically calculate the optimal C-arm angle. This method has the potential to assist surgeons during their interventional procedure by providing a shorter procedure time, less radiation exposure, and less contrast injection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Qin YL, Deng G, Li TX, Wang W, Teng GJ. Treatment of acute type-b aortic dissection thoracic endovascular aortic repair or medical management alone? Jacc Cardiovasc Inte. 2012;6:185–91.CrossRef Qin YL, Deng G, Li TX, Wang W, Teng GJ. Treatment of acute type-b aortic dissection thoracic endovascular aortic repair or medical management alone? Jacc Cardiovasc Inte. 2012;6:185–91.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fattori R, Cao P, Rango PD, Czerny M, Evangelista A, Nienaber C, Rousseau H, Schepens M. Interdisciplinary expert consensus document on management of type b aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1661–78.CrossRef Fattori R, Cao P, Rango PD, Czerny M, Evangelista A, Nienaber C, Rousseau H, Schepens M. Interdisciplinary expert consensus document on management of type b aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1661–78.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Afifi RO, Sandhu HK, Leake SS, Boutrous ML, Kumar V, Azizzadeh A, Charlton-Ouw KM, Saqib NU, Nguyen TC, Miller CC, Safi HJ, Estrera AL. Outcomes of patients with acute type b (DeBakey III) aortic dissection: a 13-Year, single-center experience. Circulation. 2015;132:748–54.CrossRef Afifi RO, Sandhu HK, Leake SS, Boutrous ML, Kumar V, Azizzadeh A, Charlton-Ouw KM, Saqib NU, Nguyen TC, Miller CC, Safi HJ, Estrera AL. Outcomes of patients with acute type b (DeBakey III) aortic dissection: a 13-Year, single-center experience. Circulation. 2015;132:748–54.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nienaber CA, Clough RE, Sakalihasan N, Suzuki T, Gibbs R, Mussa F, Jenkins MP, Thompson MM, Evangelista A, Yeh JSM, Cheshire N, Rosendahl U, Pepper J. Aortic dissection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;6:16053.CrossRef Nienaber CA, Clough RE, Sakalihasan N, Suzuki T, Gibbs R, Mussa F, Jenkins MP, Thompson MM, Evangelista A, Yeh JSM, Cheshire N, Rosendahl U, Pepper J. Aortic dissection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;6:16053.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fattori R, Mineo G, Eusanio MD. Acute type b aortic dissection: current management strategies. Curr Opin in Cardiol. 2011;6:488–93.CrossRef Fattori R, Mineo G, Eusanio MD. Acute type b aortic dissection: current management strategies. Curr Opin in Cardiol. 2011;6:488–93.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Andersen ND, Keenan JE, Ganapathi AM, Gaca JG, Hughes GC. Current management and outcome of chronic type b aortic dissection: results with open and endovascular repair since the advent of thoracic endografting. Ann Cardiothorac Sur. 2014;3:264–74. Andersen ND, Keenan JE, Ganapathi AM, Gaca JG, Hughes GC. Current management and outcome of chronic type b aortic dissection: results with open and endovascular repair since the advent of thoracic endografting. Ann Cardiothorac Sur. 2014;3:264–74.
7.
go back to reference Sato Y, Araki T, Hanayama M, Naito H, Tamura S. A viewpoint determination system for stenosis diagnosis and quantification in coronary angiographic image acquisition. IEEE T Med Imaging. 1998;17:121–37.CrossRef Sato Y, Araki T, Hanayama M, Naito H, Tamura S. A viewpoint determination system for stenosis diagnosis and quantification in coronary angiographic image acquisition. IEEE T Med Imaging. 1998;17:121–37.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sakamoto S, Kiura Y, Shibukawa M, Ohba S, Arita K, Kurisu K. Subtracted 3d ct angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery aneurysms: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1332–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Sakamoto S, Kiura Y, Shibukawa M, Ohba S, Arita K, Kurisu K. Subtracted 3d ct angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery aneurysms: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1332–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Canaud L, Ozdemir BA, Patterson BO. Retrograde aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:3889–95. Canaud L, Ozdemir BA, Patterson BO. Retrograde aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:3889–95.
10.
go back to reference Dumay A, Reiber J, Gerbrands JJ. Determination of optimal angiographic viewing angles: basic principles and evaluation study. IEEE T Med Imaging. 1994;13:13–24.CrossRef Dumay A, Reiber J, Gerbrands JJ. Determination of optimal angiographic viewing angles: basic principles and evaluation study. IEEE T Med Imaging. 1994;13:13–24.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Christiaens J, Walle R V D, Lemahieu I. A simple determination system for optimal angiographic viewing angles and QCA parameters. International conference on image processing. 2001. p. 327–330. Christiaens J, Walle R V D, Lemahieu I. A simple determination system for optimal angiographic viewing angles and QCA parameters. International conference on image processing. 2001. p. 327–330.
12.
go back to reference Tu S, Hao P, Koning G, Wei X, Reiber JHC. In vivo assessment of optimal viewing angles from x-ray coronary angiography. EuroIntervention. 2011;7:112–20.CrossRef Tu S, Hao P, Koning G, Wei X, Reiber JHC. In vivo assessment of optimal viewing angles from x-ray coronary angiography. EuroIntervention. 2011;7:112–20.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Reiber J H C, Marquering H A, Kitslaar P H, Jukema W J, Koning G, Vossepoel A M, Nieber M, Bax J J. Automated determination of optimal angiographic viewing angles for coronary artery bifurcations from cta data. Conference on medical imaging. 2008. Reiber J H C, Marquering H A, Kitslaar P H, Jukema W J, Koning G, Vossepoel A M, Nieber M, Bax J J. Automated determination of optimal angiographic viewing angles for coronary artery bifurcations from cta data. Conference on medical imaging. 2008.
14.
go back to reference Wang X, Yang J, Chen Y, Ai D, Hu Y, Wang Y. Optimal viewing angle determination for multiple vessel segments in coronary angiographic image. IEEE T Nucl Sci. 2014;61:1290–303.CrossRef Wang X, Yang J, Chen Y, Ai D, Hu Y, Wang Y. Optimal viewing angle determination for multiple vessel segments in coronary angiographic image. IEEE T Nucl Sci. 2014;61:1290–303.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wang X, Yang J, Yang T, Wang Y. Global optimization of optimal angiographic viewing angles for coronary arteries with multiple segments. Conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. 2013. p. 2640–2643. Wang X, Yang J, Yang T, Wang Y. Global optimization of optimal angiographic viewing angles for coronary arteries with multiple segments. Conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. 2013. p. 2640–2643.
16.
go back to reference Koka V, Theriault-Lauzier P, Xiong TY, Ben-Shoshan J, Petr R, Laboš M, Buithieu J, Mousavi N, Pilgrim T, Praz F. Optimal fluoroscopic projections of coronary ostia and bifurcations defined by computed tomography coronary angiography. JACC-Cardiovasc Inte. 2020;13:2560–70.CrossRef Koka V, Theriault-Lauzier P, Xiong TY, Ben-Shoshan J, Petr R, Laboš M, Buithieu J, Mousavi N, Pilgrim T, Praz F. Optimal fluoroscopic projections of coronary ostia and bifurcations defined by computed tomography coronary angiography. JACC-Cardiovasc Inte. 2020;13:2560–70.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chen SJ, Carroll JD. 3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;19:318–36.CrossRef Chen SJ, Carroll JD. 3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;19:318–36.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhao X R, Yang G Y, Chen, Y, Lv T L, Sun W Y, Shu H, Haigron P. Segmentation of aorta dissection ct images using convolution neural networks. In 33rd international congress and exhibition of computer assisted radiology and surgery. 2019. Zhao X R, Yang G Y, Chen, Y, Lv T L, Sun W Y, Shu H, Haigron P. Segmentation of aorta dissection ct images using convolution neural networks. In 33rd international congress and exhibition of computer assisted radiology and surgery. 2019.
19.
go back to reference Stanley GA, Murphy EH, Knowles M, Ilves M, Jessen ME, Dimaio M, Modrall JG, Arko FR. Volumetric analysis of type b aortic dissections treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:985–92.CrossRef Stanley GA, Murphy EH, Knowles M, Ilves M, Jessen ME, Dimaio M, Modrall JG, Arko FR. Volumetric analysis of type b aortic dissections treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:985–92.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nienaber CA, Kische S, Rousseau H. Endovascular repair of type b aortic dissection: long-term results of the randomized investigation of stent grafts in aortic dissection trial. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:554.CrossRef Nienaber CA, Kische S, Rousseau H. Endovascular repair of type b aortic dissection: long-term results of the randomized investigation of stent grafts in aortic dissection trial. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:554.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Totaro M, Miraldi F, Fanelli F, Mazzesi G. Emergency surgery for retrograde extension of type b dissection after endovascular stent graft repair. Eur J Cardio-Thorac. 2001;20:1057–8.CrossRef Totaro M, Miraldi F, Fanelli F, Mazzesi G. Emergency surgery for retrograde extension of type b dissection after endovascular stent graft repair. Eur J Cardio-Thorac. 2001;20:1057–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Neuhauser B, Greiner A, Jaschke W, Andreas C, Gustav F. Serious complications following endovascular thoracic aortic stent-graft repair for type b dissection. Eur J Cardio-Thorac. 2008;33:58–63.CrossRef Neuhauser B, Greiner A, Jaschke W, Andreas C, Gustav F. Serious complications following endovascular thoracic aortic stent-graft repair for type b dissection. Eur J Cardio-Thorac. 2008;33:58–63.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tipper G, U-King-Im J, Price S J, Trivedi R A, Cross J J, Higgins N J, Farmer R, Wat J, Kirollos R, Kirkpatrick P J, Antoun N M. Detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 16-row multislice ct angiography. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60: 565–572. Tipper G, U-King-Im J, Price S J, Trivedi R A, Cross J J, Higgins N J, Farmer R, Wat J, Kirollos R, Kirkpatrick P J, Antoun N M. Detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 16-row multislice ct angiography. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60: 565–572.
24.
go back to reference Hyde DE, Fox AJ, Gulka I, Kalapos P, Holdsworth DW. Internal carotid artery stenosis measurement: comparison of 3d computed rotational angiography and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Stroke. 2004;35:2776–81.CrossRef Hyde DE, Fox AJ, Gulka I, Kalapos P, Holdsworth DW. Internal carotid artery stenosis measurement: comparison of 3d computed rotational angiography and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Stroke. 2004;35:2776–81.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An adaptive optimal viewing angle determination algorithm for TEVAR operation
Authors
Weiya Sun
Guanyu Yang
Yang Chen
Huazhong Shu
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00676-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Medical Imaging 1/2021 Go to the issue