Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Child's Nervous System 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Craniosynostosis | Original Article

Proatlas anomalies in craniofacial malformations: 5-year experience in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Authors: Rattabhorn Montrisaet, Sasitorn Petcharunpaisan

Published in: Child's Nervous System | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To review the prevalences of proatlas anomalies in craniofacial malformations and evaluate the relation between craniofacial malformation and proalast anomalies.

Methods

The 221 patients with craniofacial malformation who underwent CT facial bone and 3D brain in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH). Then, the craniofacial malformed patients are classified into six groups composed of craniosynostosis, cephalocele, midface anomaly, facial and branchial arch syndrome, facial cleft face, and others. Reviewing image finding by the researcher and the radiologist advisor was done separately and gave the consensus in the case with disagreement. Qualitative analysis of the prevalence of proatlas anomalies was achieved. In addition, assessment of the relationship between craniofacial malformation and proatlas anomalies was conducted using Pearson’s chi-square test to determine statistical significance.

Result

The proatlas anomalies were presented in 26 patients of 221 craniofacial malformed patients. Details of frequentative proatlas anomalies consist of pre-basioccipital arch in eight patients, os odontoideum in five patients, bony mass along the margin of foramen magnum in three patients, atlas assimilation in two patients, hypertrophic occipital condyle in one patient, third occipital condyle in one patient, and mixed characteristic of proatlas anomalies in six patients. These results represented pre-basioccipital arch and os odontoideum as the two most common presentations among proatlas anomalies and also showed significant existence of proatlas diseases in craniofacial malformation (p value = 0.006).

Conclusion

Our results emphasize the existence of proatlas anomalies which should be carefully looked for, particularly in craniofacial malformed patients due to significant statistical correlation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pang D, Thompson DN (2011) Embryology and bony malformations of the craniovertebral junction. Childs Nerv Syst 27(4):523–564CrossRef Pang D, Thompson DN (2011) Embryology and bony malformations of the craniovertebral junction. Childs Nerv Syst 27(4):523–564CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Muhleman M, Charran O, Matusz P, Shoja MM, Tubbs RS, Loukas M (2010) The proatlas: a comprehensive review with clinical implications. Childs Nerv Syst 28(3):349–356CrossRef Muhleman M, Charran O, Matusz P, Shoja MM, Tubbs RS, Loukas M (2010) The proatlas: a comprehensive review with clinical implications. Childs Nerv Syst 28(3):349–356CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smoker WR, Khanna G (2008) Imaging the craniocervical junction. Childs Nerv Syst 24(10):1123–1145CrossRef Smoker WR, Khanna G (2008) Imaging the craniocervical junction. Childs Nerv Syst 24(10):1123–1145CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Menezes AH, Fenoy KA (2009) Remnants of occipital vertebrae: proatlas segmentation abnormalities. Neurosurgery 64(5):945–953CrossRef Menezes AH, Fenoy KA (2009) Remnants of occipital vertebrae: proatlas segmentation abnormalities. Neurosurgery 64(5):945–953CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Menezes AH, Vogel TW (2008) Specific entities affecting the craniocervical region: syndromes affecting the craniocervical junction. Childs Nerv Syst 24(10):1155–1163CrossRef Menezes AH, Vogel TW (2008) Specific entities affecting the craniocervical region: syndromes affecting the craniocervical junction. Childs Nerv Syst 24(10):1155–1163CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kessel M, Balling R, Gruss P (1990) Variations of cervical vertebrae after expression of a Hox-1.1 transgene in mice. Cell 61(2):301–308CrossRef Kessel M, Balling R, Gruss P (1990) Variations of cervical vertebrae after expression of a Hox-1.1 transgene in mice. Cell 61(2):301–308CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Baxter DJ, Shroff M (2011) Congenital midface abnormalities. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 21(3):563–584CrossRef Baxter DJ, Shroff M (2011) Congenital midface abnormalities. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 21(3):563–584CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nunez S, Mantilla MT, Bermudez S (2011) Midline congenital malformations of the brain and skull. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 21(3):429–482CrossRef Nunez S, Mantilla MT, Bermudez S (2011) Midline congenital malformations of the brain and skull. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 21(3):429–482CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Figueroa A, Friede H (1985) Craniovertebral malformations in hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1:167–178 Figueroa A, Friede H (1985) Craniovertebral malformations in hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1:167–178
10.
go back to reference O'Brien WT Sr, Shen P, Lee P (2015) The dens: normal development, developmental variants and anomalies, and traumatic injuries. J Clin Imaging Sci 5:38CrossRef O'Brien WT Sr, Shen P, Lee P (2015) The dens: normal development, developmental variants and anomalies, and traumatic injuries. J Clin Imaging Sci 5:38CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Karwacki GM, Schneider JF (2012) Normal ossification patterns of atlas and axis: a CT study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(10):1882–1887CrossRef Karwacki GM, Schneider JF (2012) Normal ossification patterns of atlas and axis: a CT study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(10):1882–1887CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Proatlas anomalies in craniofacial malformations: 5-year experience in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Authors
Rattabhorn Montrisaet
Sasitorn Petcharunpaisan
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Child's Nervous System / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0256-7040
Electronic ISSN: 1433-0350
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04599-2

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Child's Nervous System 11/2020 Go to the issue