Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Child's Nervous System 6/2021

Open Access 01-06-2021 | Craniosynostosis | Technical Notes

Biparietal meander expansion technique for sagittal suture synostosis in patients older than 1 year of age—technical note

Authors: Y. S. Kang, V. Pennacchietti, M. Schulz, K. Schwarz, U-W. Thomale

Published in: Child's Nervous System | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Sagittal suture synostosis (SSS) is the most common form of craniosynostosis. For older patients, the strategy for surgical correction needs to consider diminished growth dynamics of the skull and an active reconstruction cranioplasty aims to sustain stability for the active child. We describe our technique of biparietal meander expansion (BME) technique for SSS for patients older than 1 year and retrospectively reviewed the perioperative course as well as the subjective experience of patients and caregivers during follow-up.

Methods

The BME technique incorporates bilateral serpentine craniotomies and fixation of the consecutively expanded bone tongues with crossing sutures for patients with SSS older than 12 months of age at surgery. We reviewed patients undergoing this surgical technique for correction of SSS and collected data about the clinical course and performed a patients reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients or caregivers to evaluate subjective experience and outcome after surgical treatment.

Results

BME was performed in 31 patients (8 females; median age: 43 months; range 13–388). The mean length of operation was 172.7±43 minutes (range 115–294). Patients experienced no immediate complications or neurological morbidity after surgery. Considering a total of 21 completed PROM questionnaires, the head shape after surgery was evaluated as either “better” (57%) or “much better” (43%) compared to preoperatively. Eighty-one percent of patients or caregivers answered that the patient experiences no limitation in daily activities. Although 42.8% perceived the hospital as strenuous, 90.5% would choose to undergo this treatment again.

Conclusion

BME is a feasible technique for older SSS patients resulting in immediate stability of the remodelled calvarium with a more normal head shape. The survey among caregivers or patients revealed a favourable subjectively experienced outcome after this type of surgical treatment of SSS in the more complex context of an older patient cohort.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Albright AL (1985) Operative normalization of skull shape in sagittal synostosis. Neurosurgery 17:329–331CrossRef Albright AL (1985) Operative normalization of skull shape in sagittal synostosis. Neurosurgery 17:329–331CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Massimi L, Caldarelli M, Tamburrini G, Paternoster G, Di Rocco C (2012) Isolated sagittal craniosynostosis: definition, classification, and surgical indications. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1311–1317CrossRef Massimi L, Caldarelli M, Tamburrini G, Paternoster G, Di Rocco C (2012) Isolated sagittal craniosynostosis: definition, classification, and surgical indications. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1311–1317CrossRef
3.
go back to reference French LR, Jackson IT, Melton L Jr (1990) A population-based study of craniosynostosis. J Clin Epidemol 43:69–73CrossRef French LR, Jackson IT, Melton L Jr (1990) A population-based study of craniosynostosis. J Clin Epidemol 43:69–73CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Di Rocco F, Gleizal A, Szathmari A, Beuriat PA, Paulus C, Mottolese C (2019) Sagittal suture craniosynostosis or craniosynostoses? The heterogeneity of the most common premature fusion of the cranial sutures. Neurochirurgie 65:232–238CrossRef Di Rocco F, Gleizal A, Szathmari A, Beuriat PA, Paulus C, Mottolese C (2019) Sagittal suture craniosynostosis or craniosynostoses? The heterogeneity of the most common premature fusion of the cranial sutures. Neurochirurgie 65:232–238CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kaiser G (1988) Sagittal synostosis e its clinical significance and the results of three different methods of craniectomy. Childs Nerv Syst 4:223–230CrossRef Kaiser G (1988) Sagittal synostosis e its clinical significance and the results of three different methods of craniectomy. Childs Nerv Syst 4:223–230CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shipster C, Hearst D, Somerville A, Stackhouse J, Hayward R, Wade A (2003) Speech, language and cognitive development in children with isolated sagittal synostosis. Dev Med Child Neurol 45:34–43CrossRef Shipster C, Hearst D, Somerville A, Stackhouse J, Hayward R, Wade A (2003) Speech, language and cognitive development in children with isolated sagittal synostosis. Dev Med Child Neurol 45:34–43CrossRef
7.
go back to reference van de Beeten SDC, Mathijssen IMJ, Kamst NW, van Veelen MC (2019) Headache in Postoperative Isolated Sagittal Synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 143:798e–805eCrossRef van de Beeten SDC, Mathijssen IMJ, Kamst NW, van Veelen MC (2019) Headache in Postoperative Isolated Sagittal Synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 143:798e–805eCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Berry-Candelario J, Ridgway EB, Grondin RT, Rogers GF, Proctor MR (2011) Endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy for treatment of craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Focus 31:E5CrossRef Berry-Candelario J, Ridgway EB, Grondin RT, Rogers GF, Proctor MR (2011) Endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy for treatment of craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Focus 31:E5CrossRef
9.
go back to reference David LR, Plikaitis CM, Couture D, Glazier SS, Argenta LC (2010) Outcome analysis of our first 75 spring-assisted surgeries for scaphocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 21:3–9CrossRef David LR, Plikaitis CM, Couture D, Glazier SS, Argenta LC (2010) Outcome analysis of our first 75 spring-assisted surgeries for scaphocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 21:3–9CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jane JA, Edgerton MT, Futrell JW, Park TS (1978) Immediate correction of sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg 49:705–710CrossRef Jane JA, Edgerton MT, Futrell JW, Park TS (1978) Immediate correction of sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg 49:705–710CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jimenez DF, Barone CM (1998) Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 88:77–81CrossRef Jimenez DF, Barone CM (1998) Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 88:77–81CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Paternoster G, Jing XL, Haber SE, James S, Legros C, Liu XX, Khonsari HR, Zerah M, Meyer P, Arnaud E (2020) Forehead widening in nonsyndromic scaphocephaly operated after 12 months of age. J Craniofac Surg Paternoster G, Jing XL, Haber SE, James S, Legros C, Liu XX, Khonsari HR, Zerah M, Meyer P, Arnaud E (2020) Forehead widening in nonsyndromic scaphocephaly operated after 12 months of age. J Craniofac Surg
13.
go back to reference Venes JL, Sayers MP (1976) Sagittal synostectomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 44:390–392CrossRef Venes JL, Sayers MP (1976) Sagittal synostectomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 44:390–392CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Arts S, Delye H, van Lindert EJ (2018) Intraoperative and postoperative complications in the surgical treatment of craniosynostosis: minimally invasive versus open surgical procedures. J Neurosurg Pediatr 21:112–118CrossRef Arts S, Delye H, van Lindert EJ (2018) Intraoperative and postoperative complications in the surgical treatment of craniosynostosis: minimally invasive versus open surgical procedures. J Neurosurg Pediatr 21:112–118CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Meyer P, Renier D, Arnaud E, Jarreau MM, Charron B, Buy E, Buisson C, Barrier G (1993) Blood loss during repair of craniosynostosis. Br J Anaesth 71:854–857CrossRef Meyer P, Renier D, Arnaud E, Jarreau MM, Charron B, Buy E, Buisson C, Barrier G (1993) Blood loss during repair of craniosynostosis. Br J Anaesth 71:854–857CrossRef
16.
go back to reference White N, Marcus R, Dover S, Solanki G, Nishikawa H, Millar C, Carver ED (2009) Predictors of blood loss in fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. J Craniofac Surg 20:378–381CrossRef White N, Marcus R, Dover S, Solanki G, Nishikawa H, Millar C, Carver ED (2009) Predictors of blood loss in fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. J Craniofac Surg 20:378–381CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Buchanan EP, Xue Y, Xue AS, Olshinka A, Lam S (2017) Multidisciplinary care of craniosynostosis. J Multidiscip Healthc 10:263–270CrossRef Buchanan EP, Xue Y, Xue AS, Olshinka A, Lam S (2017) Multidisciplinary care of craniosynostosis. J Multidiscip Healthc 10:263–270CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kluba S, Rohleder S, Wolff M, Haas-Lude K, Schuhmann MU, Will BE, Reinert S, Krimmel M (2016) Parental perception of treatment and medical care in children with craniosynostosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:1341–1346CrossRef Kluba S, Rohleder S, Wolff M, Haas-Lude K, Schuhmann MU, Will BE, Reinert S, Krimmel M (2016) Parental perception of treatment and medical care in children with craniosynostosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:1341–1346CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Seruya M, Oh AK, Boyajian MJ, Posnick JC, Keating RF (2011) Treatment for delayed presentation of sagittal synostosis: challenges pertaining to occult intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:40–48CrossRef Seruya M, Oh AK, Boyajian MJ, Posnick JC, Keating RF (2011) Treatment for delayed presentation of sagittal synostosis: challenges pertaining to occult intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:40–48CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zipfel J, Jager B, Collmann H, Czosnyka Z, Schuhmann MU, Schweitzer T (2020) The role of ICP overnight monitoring (ONM) in children with suspected craniostenosis. Childs Nerv Syst 36:87–94CrossRef Zipfel J, Jager B, Collmann H, Czosnyka Z, Schuhmann MU, Schweitzer T (2020) The role of ICP overnight monitoring (ONM) in children with suspected craniostenosis. Childs Nerv Syst 36:87–94CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Biparietal meander expansion technique for sagittal suture synostosis in patients older than 1 year of age—technical note
Authors
Y. S. Kang
V. Pennacchietti
M. Schulz
K. Schwarz
U-W. Thomale
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Child's Nervous System / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0256-7040
Electronic ISSN: 1433-0350
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05105-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Child's Nervous System 6/2021 Go to the issue