Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Craniomandibular Dysfunction and Stress | Case report

Unconventional implant strategy for patients with a limited interocclusal space in the posterior region: a case report

Authors: Yi Wang, Wen Cen, Jiang-Qin Huang, Hong-Wu Wei

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Implant prostheses require sufficient interocclusal space. In cases of limited interocclusal space, reducing or extracting over-erupted opposing teeth, orthodontic intrusion, or surgical reconstruction of the edentulous space are commonly used to restore the interocclusal space. However, there are disadvantages to these approaches.

Case presentation

The present case report describes a patient with a limited interocclusal space managed using an unconventional implant strategy.

Conclusions

The patient presented satisfactory outcomes without any signs of implant failure, suggesting that the unconventional implant treatment strategy is a useful option for patients with a limited interocclusal space in the posterior region. This unconventional implant surgery provides a minimally invasive treatment alternative.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, et al. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60:12–9.CrossRef Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, et al. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60:12–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza ES. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:377–88.CrossRef Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza ES. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:377–88.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Karoussis IK, Bragger U, Salvi GE, et al. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI dental implant system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:8–17.CrossRef Karoussis IK, Bragger U, Salvi GE, et al. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI dental implant system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:8–17.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. Mosby. 2005:165–6. Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. Mosby. 2005:165–6.
5.
go back to reference Geckili O, Sakar O, Yurdakuloglu T, et al. Multidisciplinary management of limited interocclusal space: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2011;20:329–32.CrossRef Geckili O, Sakar O, Yurdakuloglu T, et al. Multidisciplinary management of limited interocclusal space: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2011;20:329–32.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kini SK, Muliya VS. Restoration of an endodontically treated premolar with limited interocclusal clearance. Indian J Dent Res. 2013;24(4):518–23.CrossRef Kini SK, Muliya VS. Restoration of an endodontically treated premolar with limited interocclusal clearance. Indian J Dent Res. 2013;24(4):518–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Baeg S, On S, Lee J, Song S. Posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy for management of insufficient intermaxillary vertical space and intermolar width discrepancy: a case report. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;38:28–28. Baeg S, On S, Lee J, Song S. Posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy for management of insufficient intermaxillary vertical space and intermolar width discrepancy: a case report. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;38:28–28.
8.
go back to reference Lee HE, Lee KT, Tseng YC, et al. Interdisciplinary management of unfavorable posterior intermaxillary space. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:413–5.CrossRef Lee HE, Lee KT, Tseng YC, et al. Interdisciplinary management of unfavorable posterior intermaxillary space. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:413–5.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chun YS, Row J, Yang SJ, et al. Management of extruded maxillary molars to accommodate a mandibular restoration: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:604–6.CrossRef Chun YS, Row J, Yang SJ, et al. Management of extruded maxillary molars to accommodate a mandibular restoration: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:604–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference ÖZTÜRK Ö, Sipahi C, Yeşil H. The restoration of mandibular posterior edentulousness with limited interocclusal space with screw-retained custom made abutments: Two case reports. 2015; 25–25. ÖZTÜRK Ö, Sipahi C, Yeşil H. The restoration of mandibular posterior edentulousness with limited interocclusal space with screw-retained custom made abutments: Two case reports. 2015; 25–25.
11.
go back to reference Chen DL, Xu JM, Wu ZQ, et al. A clinical analysis of screw-retained implant-supported casted integrated abutment crowns in the molar region with limited interocclusal space. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2017;26:419–24.PubMed Chen DL, Xu JM, Wu ZQ, et al. A clinical analysis of screw-retained implant-supported casted integrated abutment crowns in the molar region with limited interocclusal space. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2017;26:419–24.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Huang B, Meng H, Zhu W, et al. Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implants: a histologic study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:942–9.CrossRef Huang B, Meng H, Zhu W, et al. Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implants: a histologic study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:942–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee EH, Ryu SM, Kim JY, et al. Effects of installation depth on survival of an hydroxyapatite-coated Bicon implant for single-tooth restoration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1345–52.CrossRef Lee EH, Ryu SM, Kim JY, et al. Effects of installation depth on survival of an hydroxyapatite-coated Bicon implant for single-tooth restoration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1345–52.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lombardo G, Corrocher G, Pighi J, et al. The impact of subcrestal placement on short locking-taper implants placed in posterior maxilla and mandible: a retrospective evaluation on hard and soft tissues stability after 2 years of loading. Minerva Stomatol. 2014;63:391–402.PubMed Lombardo G, Corrocher G, Pighi J, et al. The impact of subcrestal placement on short locking-taper implants placed in posterior maxilla and mandible: a retrospective evaluation on hard and soft tissues stability after 2 years of loading. Minerva Stomatol. 2014;63:391–402.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Determinants of correct clinical reporting. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:517–517. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Determinants of correct clinical reporting. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:517–517.
16.
go back to reference Frisch E, Ratka-Kruger P, Weigl P, et al. Extraoral cementation technique to minimize cement-associated Peri-implant marginal bone loss: can a thin layer of zinc oxide cement provide sufficient retention? Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:360–2.CrossRef Frisch E, Ratka-Kruger P, Weigl P, et al. Extraoral cementation technique to minimize cement-associated Peri-implant marginal bone loss: can a thin layer of zinc oxide cement provide sufficient retention? Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:360–2.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wilson TG. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol. 2009;80:1388–92.CrossRef Wilson TG. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol. 2009;80:1388–92.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, et al. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1379–84.CrossRef Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, et al. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1379–84.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Henrikson T, Nilner M. Temporomandibular disorders, occlusion and orthodontic treatment. J Orthod. 2003;30:129–37.CrossRef Henrikson T, Nilner M. Temporomandibular disorders, occlusion and orthodontic treatment. J Orthod. 2003;30:129–37.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cioffi I, Farella M, Festa P, et al. Short-term sensorimotor effects of experimental occlusal interferences on the wake-time masseter muscle activity of females with masticatory muscle pain. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2015;29:331–9.CrossRef Cioffi I, Farella M, Festa P, et al. Short-term sensorimotor effects of experimental occlusal interferences on the wake-time masseter muscle activity of females with masticatory muscle pain. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2015;29:331–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Moreno-Hay I, Okeson JP. Does altering the occlusal vertical dimension produce temporomandibular disorders? A literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:875–82.CrossRef Moreno-Hay I, Okeson JP. Does altering the occlusal vertical dimension produce temporomandibular disorders? A literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:875–82.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Michelotti A, Iodice G. The role of orthodontics in temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:411–29.CrossRef Michelotti A, Iodice G. The role of orthodontics in temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:411–29.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Unconventional implant strategy for patients with a limited interocclusal space in the posterior region: a case report
Authors
Yi Wang
Wen Cen
Jiang-Qin Huang
Hong-Wu Wei
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0907-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Oral Health 1/2019 Go to the issue