Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dermatology and Therapy 3/2023

Open Access 08-02-2023 | COVID-19 | Original Research

Teledermatology May Benefit Marginalized Populations: National and Institutional Trends during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors: Akash D. Patel, Chandler W. Rundle, Beiyu Liu, Cynthia L. Green, Christian L. Bailey-Burke, Meenal Kheterpal

Published in: Dermatology and Therapy | Issue 3/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Limited data exist regarding demographic-specific teledermatology (TD) utilization during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to determine TD utilization trends during the pandemic.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study for national and institutional populations was conducted. Patient encounters in the American Academy of Dermatology’s DataDerm registry (DataDerm) were analyzed from 1 April 2020 through 30 June 2021. All dermatological patients seen by Duke University Health Systems (DUHS) were analyzed from 1 March 2020 through 30 April 2021. In-person clinic visits versus TD encounters (national and institutional) and no-show rates (institutional only) were collected for visit type (i.e., TD versus in-person), sex, race, age/generation, and in- versus out-of-state location (national only). TD utilization is defined as the cohort of interest using TD (e.g., females, whites) within a demographic group (i.e., sex, race) as a percentage of total TD users. This was compared with in-person utilization during the identical timeframe.

Results

For US national data, 13,964,816 encounters were analyzed. Sex, race, age, and location each had a significant association with TD utilization (adjusted p < 0.001). For institutional data, 54,400 encounters were analyzed. Sex, race, and age had a significant association with TD utilization (adjusted p < 0.001). Both datasets revealed majority female populations for telehealth visits (DataDerm 66.0%; DUHS 61.7%). Non-white populations accounted for a higher percentage of TD utilizers (DataDerm 15.0%; DUHS 37.3%) when compared with in-person utilizers (DataDerm 11.7%; DUHS 22.3%). Younger patients utilized TD (DataDerm 63.6%; DUHS 62.6%) more than in-person services (DataDerm 26.3%; DUHS 43.8%). Institutional no-show rates between telehealth and in-person visits were lower for Black patients (11.8% versus 19.2%), other non-white races (10.6% versus 13.6%), and younger ages/generations (9.8% versus 12.8%), respectively. TD utilization decreased over time nationally as a percentage of total visits (2.9% versus 0.3%) in 2020 versus 2021, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

During the COVID-19 pandemic, certain populations (females, younger patients, non-white races) showed higher TD utilization. Understanding TD utilization trends is critical in defining the role of virtual care for improving universal care access, optimizing resources, and informing future healthcare models for all patient populations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Perkins S, Cohen JM, Nelson CA, Bunick CG. Teledermatology in the era of COVID-19: experience of an academic department of dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):e43–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Perkins S, Cohen JM, Nelson CA, Bunick CG. Teledermatology in the era of COVID-19: experience of an academic department of dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):e43–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Lee I, Kovarik C, Tejasvi T, Pizarro M, Lipoff JB. Telehealth: helping your patients and practice survive and thrive during the COVID-19 crisis with rapid quality implementation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(5):1213.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee I, Kovarik C, Tejasvi T, Pizarro M, Lipoff JB. Telehealth: helping your patients and practice survive and thrive during the COVID-19 crisis with rapid quality implementation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(5):1213.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Landow SM, Mateus A, Korgavkar K, Nightingale D, Weinstock MA. Teledermatology: key factors associated with reducing face-to-face dermatology visits. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(3):570–6.CrossRefPubMed Landow SM, Mateus A, Korgavkar K, Nightingale D, Weinstock MA. Teledermatology: key factors associated with reducing face-to-face dermatology visits. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(3):570–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pak HS, Datta SK, Triplett CA, Lindquist JH, Grambow SC, Whited JD. Cost minimization analysis of a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(2):160–5.CrossRefPubMed Pak HS, Datta SK, Triplett CA, Lindquist JH, Grambow SC, Whited JD. Cost minimization analysis of a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(2):160–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cwalina TB, Jella TK, Zheng DX, Tripathi R, Levoska MA, Bordeaux JS, Scott JF. Utilization of health information technology among skin cancer patients: a cross-sectional study of the national health interview survey from 2011 to 2018. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(4):899–902.CrossRefPubMed Cwalina TB, Jella TK, Zheng DX, Tripathi R, Levoska MA, Bordeaux JS, Scott JF. Utilization of health information technology among skin cancer patients: a cross-sectional study of the national health interview survey from 2011 to 2018. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(4):899–902.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Loccoh EC, Nguyen A, Kim G, Warraich HJ. Geospatial analysis of access to health care and internet services in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(11): e2243792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Loccoh EC, Nguyen A, Kim G, Warraich HJ. Geospatial analysis of access to health care and internet services in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(11): e2243792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Hadeler E, Prose N, Floyd LP. Teledermatology: how it is impacting the underserved. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38(6):1597–600.CrossRefPubMed Hadeler E, Prose N, Floyd LP. Teledermatology: how it is impacting the underserved. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38(6):1597–600.CrossRefPubMed
9.
11.
go back to reference Uscher-Pines L, Malsberger R, Burgette L, Mulcahy A, Mehrotra A. Effect of teledermatology on access to dermatology care among Medicaid enrollees. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(8):905–12.CrossRefPubMed Uscher-Pines L, Malsberger R, Burgette L, Mulcahy A, Mehrotra A. Effect of teledermatology on access to dermatology care among Medicaid enrollees. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(8):905–12.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Naka F. The use of eConsults to improve access to dermatological care for underserved populations in connecticut. 2018. Naka F. The use of eConsults to improve access to dermatological care for underserved populations in connecticut. 2018.
Metadata
Title
Teledermatology May Benefit Marginalized Populations: National and Institutional Trends during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Authors
Akash D. Patel
Chandler W. Rundle
Beiyu Liu
Cynthia L. Green
Christian L. Bailey-Burke
Meenal Kheterpal
Publication date
08-02-2023
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Dermatology and Therapy / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 2193-8210
Electronic ISSN: 2190-9172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-00900-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

Dermatology and Therapy 3/2023 Go to the issue