Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 11/2014

01-11-2014 | Original Article

Cost of practice in a tertiary/quaternary referral center: Is it sustainable?

Authors: K. G. Cologne, G. S. Hwang, A. J. Senagore

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Third-party payers are moving toward a bundled care payment system. This means that there will need to be a warranty cost of care—where the cost of complexity and complication rates is built into the bundled payment. The theoretical benefit of this system is that providers with lower complication rates will be able to provide care with lower warranty costs and lower overall costs. This may also result in referring riskier patients to tertiary or quaternary referral centers. Unless the payment model truly covers the higher cost of managing such referred cases, the economic risk may be unsustainable for these centers.

Methods

We took the last seven patients that were referred by other surgeons as “too high risk” for colectomy at other centers. A contribution margin was calculated using standard Medicare reimbursement rates at our institution and cost of care based on our administrative database. We then recalculated a contribution margin assuming a 3 % reduction in payment for a higher than average readmission rate, like that which will take effect in 2014. Finally, we took into account the cost of any readmissions.

Results

Seven patients with diagnosis related group (DRG) 330 were reviewed with an average age of 66.8 ± 16 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists score 2.3 ± 1.0, body mass index 31.6 ± 9.8 kg/m2 (range 22–51 kg/m2). There was a 57 % readmission rate, 29 % reoperation rate, 10.8 ± 7.7 day average initial length of stay with 14 ± 8.6 day average readmission length of stay. Forty-two percent were discharged to a location other than home. Seventy-one percent of these patients had Medicare insurance. The case mix index was 2.45. Average reimbursement for DRG 330 was $17,084 (based on Medicare data) for our facility in 2012, with the national average being $12,520. The total contribution margin among all cases collectively was −$19,122 ± 13,285 (average per patient −$2,731, range −$21,905–$12,029). Assuming a 3 % reimbursement reduction made the overall contribution margin −$22,122 ± 13,285 (average −$3,244). Including the cost of readmission in the variable cost made the contribution margin −$115,741 ± 16,023 (average −$16,534).

Conclusions

Care of high-risk patients at tertiary and quaternary referral centers is a very expensive proposition and can lead to financial ruin under the current reimbursement system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hackbarth JD, Reischauer R, Mutti A (2008) Collective accountability for medical care—toward bundled medicare payments. N Engl J Med 359:3–5PubMedCrossRef Hackbarth JD, Reischauer R, Mutti A (2008) Collective accountability for medical care—toward bundled medicare payments. N Engl J Med 359:3–5PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Baser O et al (2010) Medicare payments for common inpatient procedures: implications for episode-based payment bundling. Health Serv Res 45:1783–1795PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Baser O et al (2010) Medicare payments for common inpatient procedures: implications for episode-based payment bundling. Health Serv Res 45:1783–1795PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Dimick JB, Weeks WB, Karia RJ, Das S, Campbell DA Jr (2006) Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg 202:933–937PubMedCrossRef Dimick JB, Weeks WB, Karia RJ, Das S, Campbell DA Jr (2006) Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg 202:933–937PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Miller DC, Ye Z, Birkmeyer JD (2013) Anticipating the effects of accountable care organizations for inpatient surgery. JAMA Surg 148:549–554PubMedCrossRef Miller DC, Ye Z, Birkmeyer JD (2013) Anticipating the effects of accountable care organizations for inpatient surgery. JAMA Surg 148:549–554PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Calfee RP, Shah CM, Canham CD (2012) The influence of insurance status on access to and utilization of a tertiary hand surgery referral center. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2177–2184PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Calfee RP, Shah CM, Canham CD (2012) The influence of insurance status on access to and utilization of a tertiary hand surgery referral center. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2177–2184PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
9.
10.
go back to reference Vonlanthen R, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S et al (2011) The impact of complications on cost of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients. Ann Surg 254:907–913PubMedCrossRef Vonlanthen R, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S et al (2011) The impact of complications on cost of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients. Ann Surg 254:907–913PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA et al (2003) Complications and costs after high-risk surgery: where should we focus quality improvement initiatives? J Am Coll Surg 196:671–678PubMedCrossRef Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA et al (2003) Complications and costs after high-risk surgery: where should we focus quality improvement initiatives? J Am Coll Surg 196:671–678PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Eappen S, Lane BH, Rosenberg B et al (2013) Relationship between occurrence of surgical complications and hospital finances. JAMA 309:1599–1606PubMedCrossRef Eappen S, Lane BH, Rosenberg B et al (2013) Relationship between occurrence of surgical complications and hospital finances. JAMA 309:1599–1606PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rona K, Choi J, Sigle G, Kidd S, Ault G, Senagore AJ (2012) Enhanced recovery protocol: implementation at a county institution with limited resources. Am Surg 78:1041–1044PubMed Rona K, Choi J, Sigle G, Kidd S, Ault G, Senagore AJ (2012) Enhanced recovery protocol: implementation at a county institution with limited resources. Am Surg 78:1041–1044PubMed
16.
go back to reference Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ, Robinson B, Halverson AL, Remzi FH (2001) ‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high-comorbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1533–1538PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ, Robinson B, Halverson AL, Remzi FH (2001) ‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high-comorbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1533–1538PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ et al (2005) Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:975–981PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ et al (2005) Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:975–981PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Blee TH, Belzer GE, Lambert PJ (2002) Obesity: is there an increase in perioperative complications in those undergoing elective colon and rectal resection for carcinoma? Am Surg 68:163–166PubMed Blee TH, Belzer GE, Lambert PJ (2002) Obesity: is there an increase in perioperative complications in those undergoing elective colon and rectal resection for carcinoma? Am Surg 68:163–166PubMed
19.
go back to reference Choban PS, Flancbaum L (1997) The impact of obesity on surgical outcomes: a review. J Am Coll Surg 185:593–603PubMedCrossRef Choban PS, Flancbaum L (1997) The impact of obesity on surgical outcomes: a review. J Am Coll Surg 185:593–603PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lane JC, Burch J, Burling D, Kennedy RH, Jenkins JT (2013) Requirement for postoperative imaging in an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 15:231–235PubMedCrossRef Lane JC, Burch J, Burling D, Kennedy RH, Jenkins JT (2013) Requirement for postoperative imaging in an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 15:231–235PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wolff BG, Michelassi F, Gerkin TM et al (2004) Alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting u opioid antagonist: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of major abdominal surgery and postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 240:728–734PubMedPubMedCentral Wolff BG, Michelassi F, Gerkin TM et al (2004) Alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting u opioid antagonist: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of major abdominal surgery and postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 240:728–734PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Steel M, Garafalo T, Fazio VW (2004) Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 198:877–883PubMedCrossRef Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Steel M, Garafalo T, Fazio VW (2004) Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 198:877–883PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference O’Brien DP, Senagore A, Merlino J, Brady K, Delaney C (2007) Predictors and outcome of readmission after laparoscopic intestinal surgery. World J Surg 31:2430–2435PubMedCrossRef O’Brien DP, Senagore A, Merlino J, Brady K, Delaney C (2007) Predictors and outcome of readmission after laparoscopic intestinal surgery. World J Surg 31:2430–2435PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Azimuddin K, Rosen L, Reed JF III, Stasik JJ, Riether RD, Khubchandani IT (2001) Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted. Dis Colon Rectum 44:942–946PubMedCrossRef Azimuddin K, Rosen L, Reed JF III, Stasik JJ, Riether RD, Khubchandani IT (2001) Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted. Dis Colon Rectum 44:942–946PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lawrence JK, Keller DS, Samia H et al (2013) Discharge within 24 to 72 hours of colorectal surgery is associated with low readmission rates when using enhanced recovery pathways. J Am Coll Surg 216:390–394PubMedCrossRef Lawrence JK, Keller DS, Samia H et al (2013) Discharge within 24 to 72 hours of colorectal surgery is associated with low readmission rates when using enhanced recovery pathways. J Am Coll Surg 216:390–394PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Brannigan A, Kiran RP, Brady K, Delaney CP (2005) Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1016–1020PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Brannigan A, Kiran RP, Brady K, Delaney CP (2005) Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1016–1020PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference (2006) DRG handbook 2006 ed. Solucient LLC, Evanston (2006) DRG handbook 2006 ed. Solucient LLC, Evanston
Metadata
Title
Cost of practice in a tertiary/quaternary referral center: Is it sustainable?
Authors
K. G. Cologne
G. S. Hwang
A. J. Senagore
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1175-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

Techniques in Coloproctology 11/2014 Go to the issue