Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Breast Oncology

Cost Implications of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer

Authors: Rachel A. Greenup, MD, MPH, Jeffrey Peppercorn, MD, MPH, Mathias Worni, MD, MHS, E. Shelley Hwang, MD, MPH

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Over $125 billion is spent annually in the United States for cancer treatment.1 Among women in this country, breast cancer remains the most common nondermatologic cancer diagnosis and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. In 2010, breast cancer treatment costs were estimated at $16.5 billion, comprising 13 % of the burden of total cancer-related costs.2,3 Health care spending varies throughout the phases of breast cancer treatment, with ~23 % of total expenditures allocated during the initial episode of treatment (diagnosis and management during the first year), 41 % during continuing care, and 36 % during the last year of life.3,4 It has been estimated that surgical costs account for 25 % of breast cancer treatment expenditure among Medicare patients.5
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures, 2013–2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2013. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures, 2013–2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2013.
2.
go back to reference Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, et al. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:117–28.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, et al. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:117–28.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hassett MJ, Elkin EB. What does breast cancer treatment cost and what is it worth? Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2013;27:829–41.CrossRef Hassett MJ, Elkin EB. What does breast cancer treatment cost and what is it worth? Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2013;27:829–41.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yabroff KR, Lund J, Kepka D, et al. Economic burden of cancer in the United States: estimates, projections, and future research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:2006–14.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Yabroff KR, Lund J, Kepka D, et al. Economic burden of cancer in the United States: estimates, projections, and future research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:2006–14.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Warren JL, Yabroff, Meekins A, et al. Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:888–97. Warren JL, Yabroff, Meekins A, et al. Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:888–97.
6.
go back to reference McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45.PubMedCrossRef McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brooks GA, Li L, Sharma DB, et al. Regional variation in spending and survival for older adults with advanced cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:634–42.PubMedCrossRef Brooks GA, Li L, Sharma DB, et al. Regional variation in spending and survival for older adults with advanced cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:634–42.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, et al. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending, part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:288–98.PubMedCrossRef Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, et al. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending, part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:288–98.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zuckermann S, Waidmann T, Berenson R, Hadley J. Clarifying sources of geographic differences in Medicare spending. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:54–62.CrossRef Zuckermann S, Waidmann T, Berenson R, Hadley J. Clarifying sources of geographic differences in Medicare spending. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:54–62.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Berry SA, Doll MC, McKinley KE, Casale AS, Bothe A. ProvenCare: quality improvement model for designing highly reliable care in cardiac surgery. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:360–8.PubMedCrossRef Berry SA, Doll MC, McKinley KE, Casale AS, Bothe A. ProvenCare: quality improvement model for designing highly reliable care in cardiac surgery. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:360–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fisher E, Anderson S, Tan-Chiu E, et al. Fifteen-year prognostic discriminants for invasive breast carcinoma: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol-06. Cancer. 2001;91:1679–87.PubMedCrossRef Fisher E, Anderson S, Tan-Chiu E, et al. Fifteen-year prognostic discriminants for invasive breast carcinoma: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol-06. Cancer. 2001;91:1679–87.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:665–73.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:665–73.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Veronisi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, et al. Conservative treatment of early breast cancer: long-term results of 1232 cases treated with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy. Ann Surg. 1990;211:250–6. Veronisi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, et al. Conservative treatment of early breast cancer: long-term results of 1232 cases treated with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy. Ann Surg. 1990;211:250–6.
14.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Volterrani F, Luini A, et al. Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1990;26:671–3.PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Volterrani F, Luini A, et al. Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1990;26:671–3.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Taghian A, Mohiuddin M, Jagsi R, Goldberg S, Ceilley E, Powell S. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2005;241:629–39.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Taghian A, Mohiuddin M, Jagsi R, Goldberg S, Ceilley E, Powell S. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2005;241:629–39.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Azu M, Abrahamse P, Katz SJ, Jagsi R, Morrow M. What is adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Surgeon attitudes and correlates. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:558–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Azu M, Abrahamse P, Katz SJ, Jagsi R, Morrow M. What is adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Surgeon attitudes and correlates. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:558–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Morrow M, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ. Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer. Bigger is not better. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:79–82.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ. Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer. Bigger is not better. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:79–82.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference MacDonald S, Taghian AG. Prognostic factors for local control after breast conservation: does margin status still matter? J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4929–30.PubMedCrossRef MacDonald S, Taghian AG. Prognostic factors for local control after breast conservation: does margin status still matter? J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4929–30.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3481-4. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-014-3481-4.
20.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinellu N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002:347:1227–32.PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Cascinellu N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002:347:1227–32.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hwang ES, Lichtensztajn DY, Gomez SL, Fowble B, Clarke CA. Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: the effect of age and hormone receptor status. Cancer. 2013;119:1402–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hwang ES, Lichtensztajn DY, Gomez SL, Fowble B, Clarke CA. Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: the effect of age and hormone receptor status. Cancer. 2013;119:1402–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, Kokeny K, Agarwal J. Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2013. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3049. Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, Kokeny K, Agarwal J. Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2013. doi:10.​1001/​jamasurg.​2013.​3049.
24.
go back to reference McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Variability in re-excision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012:307:467–75.PubMedCrossRef McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Variability in re-excision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012:307:467–75.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference McCahill LE, Privette A, James T, et al. Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons. Arch Surg. 2009;144:455–62.PubMedCrossRef McCahill LE, Privette A, James T, et al. Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons. Arch Surg. 2009;144:455–62.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kotwall C, Ranson M, Stiles A, Hamann MS. Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision. Am Surg. 2007;73:337–43.PubMed Kotwall C, Ranson M, Stiles A, Hamann MS. Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision. Am Surg. 2007;73:337–43.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1297–303.PubMedCrossRef Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1297–303.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Menes TS, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss I, Godbold JH, Estabrook A, Smith SR. The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:881–5.PubMedCrossRef Menes TS, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss I, Godbold JH, Estabrook A, Smith SR. The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:881–5.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman AK, et al. Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA. 2009;302:1551–6.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman AK, et al. Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA. 2009;302:1551–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Meropol NJ, Schulman KA. Cost of cancer care: issues and implications. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:180–6.PubMedCrossRef Meropol NJ, Schulman KA. Cost of cancer care: issues and implications. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:180–6.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Greenup RA, Camp MS, Taghian AG, et al. Cost comparison of radiation treatment options after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3275–81.PubMedCrossRef Greenup RA, Camp MS, Taghian AG, et al. Cost comparison of radiation treatment options after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3275–81.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Camp MS, Greenup RA, Taghian AG, et al. Application of ACOSOG Z011 criteria reduces perioperative costs. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;220:836–41.CrossRef Camp MS, Greenup RA, Taghian AG, et al. Application of ACOSOG Z011 criteria reduces perioperative costs. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;220:836–41.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Brody H. Medicine’s ethical responsibility for health care reform—the top five list. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:283–5. Brody H. Medicine’s ethical responsibility for health care reform—the top five list. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:283–5.
34.
go back to reference Hassett MJ, Neville BA, Weeks JC. The relationship between cost, quality and outcomes among women with breast cancer in SEER/Medicare (abstract). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:6001. Hassett MJ, Neville BA, Weeks JC. The relationship between cost, quality and outcomes among women with breast cancer in SEER/Medicare (abstract). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:6001.
35.
Metadata
Title
Cost Implications of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer
Authors
Rachel A. Greenup, MD, MPH
Jeffrey Peppercorn, MD, MPH
Mathias Worni, MD, MHS
E. Shelley Hwang, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3605-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2014 Go to the issue