Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 3/2017

Open Access 01-06-2017 | Original Research

Cost-Effectiveness of Liraglutide Versus Dapagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the UK

Authors: Gabriela Vega-Hernandez, Radek Wojcik, Max Schlueter

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

To date there is a lack of economic analysis comparing glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) to sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Liraglutide and dapagliflozin are the most commonly prescribed GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i in the UK. This analysis investigated the cost-effectiveness of liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg/day compared to dapagliflozin 10 mg/day for the treatment of T2DM in the UK in patients on dual and triple antidiabetic therapy.

Methods

Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted in the QuintilesIMS CORE Diabetes Model (CDM). The model estimated expected costs and outcomes over a lifetime horizon using the UK national payer perspective. Liraglutide efficacy estimates and patient characteristics were sourced from a trial in patients on prior metformin monotherapy, and from a trial in patients on prior combination therapy. Comparative efficacy data for the other interventions were derived from a network meta-analysis. Utility inputs were extracted from a systematic literature review. Costs are presented in Great British Pound (GBP), 2016 values.

Results

In dual and triple therapy, liraglutide 1.2 mg was less costly and more effective compared with dapagliflozin 10 mg, providing a QALY gain of 0.04 and cost savings of GBP 11 per patient in dual therapy, and a QALY gain of 0.06 and cost savings of GBP 71 per patient in triple therapy. For liraglutide 1.8 mg, increased efficacy and costs compared with dapagliflozin 10 mg were observed in both dual and triple therapy. In dual therapy, a QALY gain of 0.07 and additional costs of GBP 888 per patient yielded an ICER of GBP 13,227, whereas in triple therapy a QALY gain of 0.07 and additional cost of GBP 791 per patient gave an ICER of 11,857.

Conclusion

This long-term modelling analysis found that both dosages of liraglutide may be cost-effective treatment alternatives as part of a dual or a triple antidiabetic therapy in patients for whom an SGLT-2i therapy is considered.

Funding

Novo Nordisk.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hex N, Bartlett C, Wright D, Taylor M, Varley D. Estimating the current and future costs of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):855–62.CrossRefPubMed Hex N, Bartlett C, Wright D, Taylor M, Varley D. Estimating the current and future costs of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):855–62.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Scott LJ. Liraglutide: a review of its use in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 2014;74(18):2161–74.CrossRefPubMed Scott LJ. Liraglutide: a review of its use in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 2014;74(18):2161–74.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ashley D, Vega G, Hunt B, Valentine WJ. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the UK. Value Health. 2015;18(7):A606.CrossRefPubMed Ashley D, Vega G, Hunt B, Valentine WJ. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the UK. Value Health. 2015;18(7):A606.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fonseca T, Clegg J, Caputo G, Norrbacka K, Dilla T, Alvarez M. The cost-effectiveness of exenatide once weekly compared with exenatide twice daily and insulin glargine for the treatment of patients with type two diabetes and body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 in Spain. J Med Econ. 2013;16(7):926–38.CrossRefPubMed Fonseca T, Clegg J, Caputo G, Norrbacka K, Dilla T, Alvarez M. The cost-effectiveness of exenatide once weekly compared with exenatide twice daily and insulin glargine for the treatment of patients with type two diabetes and body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 in Spain. J Med Econ. 2013;16(7):926–38.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Huetson P, Palmer JL, Levorsen Ae, Fournier M, Germe M, McLeod E. Cost-effectiveness of once daily GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide compared to bolus insulin both in combination with basal insulin for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes in Norway. J Med Econ. 2015;18(8):573–85.CrossRefPubMed Huetson P, Palmer JL, Levorsen Ae, Fournier M, Germe M, McLeod E. Cost-effectiveness of once daily GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide compared to bolus insulin both in combination with basal insulin for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes in Norway. J Med Econ. 2015;18(8):573–85.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McEwan P, Foos V, Palmer JL, Lamotte M, Lloyd A, Grant D. Validation of the IMS CORE Diabetes Model. Value Health. 2014;17(6):714–24.CrossRefPubMed McEwan P, Foos V, Palmer JL, Lamotte M, Lloyd A, Grant D. Validation of the IMS CORE Diabetes Model. Value Health. 2014;17(6):714–24.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, et al. The CORE Diabetes Model: projecting long-term clinical outcomes, costs and costeffectiveness of interventions in diabetes mellitus (types 1 and 2) to support clinical and reimbursement decision-making. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(Suppl. 1):S5–26.CrossRefPubMed Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, et al. The CORE Diabetes Model: projecting long-term clinical outcomes, costs and costeffectiveness of interventions in diabetes mellitus (types 1 and 2) to support clinical and reimbursement decision-making. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(Suppl. 1):S5–26.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, et al. Validation of the CORE Diabetes Model against epidemiological and clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(sup1):S27–40.CrossRefPubMed Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, et al. Validation of the CORE Diabetes Model against epidemiological and clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(sup1):S27–40.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tzanetakos C, Melidonis A, Verras C, Kourlaba G, Maniadakis N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs in Greece. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1.CrossRef Tzanetakos C, Melidonis A, Verras C, Kourlaba G, Maniadakis N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs in Greece. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pratley RE, Nauck M, Bailey T, et al. Liraglutide versus sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycaemic control with metformin: a 26-week, randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9724):1447–56.CrossRefPubMed Pratley RE, Nauck M, Bailey T, et al. Liraglutide versus sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycaemic control with metformin: a 26-week, randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9724):1447–56.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Zinman B, Gerich J, Buse JB, et al. Efficacy and safety of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide in combination with metformin and thiazolidinedione in patients with type 2 diabetes (LEAD-4 Met + TZD). Diabetes Care. 2009;32(7):1224–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zinman B, Gerich J, Buse JB, et al. Efficacy and safety of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide in combination with metformin and thiazolidinedione in patients with type 2 diabetes (LEAD-4 Met + TZD). Diabetes Care. 2009;32(7):1224–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Lorenzi M, Ploug UJ, Langer J, Skovgaard R, Jansen J. Liraglutide versus SGLT2 inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis. Poster 0226-P presented at the World Diabetes Conference, 30 November–4 December 2015, Vancouver, Canada. Lorenzi M, Ploug UJ, Langer J, Skovgaard R, Jansen J. Liraglutide versus SGLT2 inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis. Poster 0226-P presented at the World Diabetes Conference, 30 November–4 December 2015, Vancouver, Canada.
18.
go back to reference Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, et al. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia. 2004;47(10):1747–59.CrossRefPubMed Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, et al. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia. 2004;47(10):1747–59.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Joint Formulary Committee. British national formulary 71. London: BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press; 2016. Joint Formulary Committee. British national formulary 71. London: BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press; 2016.
23.
go back to reference Beaudet A, Clegg J, Thuresson PO, Lloyd A, McEwan P. Review of utility values for economic modeling in type 2 diabetes. Value Health. 2014;17(4):462–70.CrossRefPubMed Beaudet A, Clegg J, Thuresson PO, Lloyd A, McEwan P. Review of utility values for economic modeling in type 2 diabetes. Value Health. 2014;17(4):462–70.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bagust A, Beale S. Modelling EuroQol health-related utility values for diabetic complications from CODE-2 data. Health Econ. 2005;14(3):217–30.CrossRefPubMed Bagust A, Beale S. Modelling EuroQol health-related utility values for diabetic complications from CODE-2 data. Health Econ. 2005;14(3):217–30.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lauridsen JT, Lonborg J, Gundgaard J, Jensen HH. Diminishing marginal disutility of hypoglycaemic events: results from a time trade-off survey in five countries. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(9):2645–50.CrossRefPubMed Lauridsen JT, Lonborg J, Gundgaard J, Jensen HH. Diminishing marginal disutility of hypoglycaemic events: results from a time trade-off survey in five countries. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(9):2645–50.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Alva ML, Gray A, Mihaylova B, Leal J, Holman RR. The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: new results from the UKPDS (UKPDS 84). Diabet Med. 2015;32(4):459–66.CrossRefPubMed Alva ML, Gray A, Mihaylova B, Leal J, Holman RR. The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: new results from the UKPDS (UKPDS 84). Diabet Med. 2015;32(4):459–66.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Divino V, DeKoven M, Hallinan S, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment patterns among type 2 diabetes patients in six European countries. Diabetes Ther. 2014;5(2):499–520.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Divino V, DeKoven M, Hallinan S, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment patterns among type 2 diabetes patients in six European countries. Diabetes Ther. 2014;5(2):499–520.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Charokopou M, Chuang L, Verheggen B, Gibson D, Grandy S, Kartman B. Cost-effectiveness analysis of exenatide once-weekly versus dulaglutide, liraglutide and lixisenatide for the treatment of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: an analysis from the UK NHS Perspective. Value Health. 2015;18(7):A606.CrossRefPubMed Charokopou M, Chuang L, Verheggen B, Gibson D, Grandy S, Kartman B. Cost-effectiveness analysis of exenatide once-weekly versus dulaglutide, liraglutide and lixisenatide for the treatment of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: an analysis from the UK NHS Perspective. Value Health. 2015;18(7):A606.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Davies MJ, Chubb BD, Smith IC, Valentine WJ. Cost–utility analysis of liraglutide compared with sulphonylurea or sitagliptin, all as add-on to metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2012;29(3):313–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davies MJ, Chubb BD, Smith IC, Valentine WJ. Cost–utility analysis of liraglutide compared with sulphonylurea or sitagliptin, all as add-on to metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2012;29(3):313–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140–9.CrossRefPubMed Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140–9.CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
go back to reference Novo Nordisk. Clinical Trial Report. Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD 4): effect on glycemic control of liraglutide in combination with rosiglitazone plus metformin versus rosiglitazone plus metformin in type 2 diabetes (a twenty-six week double-blind parallel trial to investigate safety and efficacy). Trial Phase: 3a. 1-2-2008. Data on file. Novo Nordisk. Clinical Trial Report. Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD 4): effect on glycemic control of liraglutide in combination with rosiglitazone plus metformin versus rosiglitazone plus metformin in type 2 diabetes (a twenty-six week double-blind parallel trial to investigate safety and efficacy). Trial Phase: 3a. 1-2-2008. Data on file.
36.
go back to reference National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. NICE guideline CG48: MI–secondary prevention; Secondary prevention in primary and secondary care for patients following a myocardial infarcation. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence 2007. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg48. Accessed 1 Dec 2016. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. NICE guideline CG48: MI–secondary prevention; Secondary prevention in primary and secondary care for patients following a myocardial infarcation. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence 2007. Available from: http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​guidance/​cg48. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
37.
go back to reference Cameron CG, Bennett HA. Cost-effectiveness of insulin analogues for diabetes mellitus. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;180(4):400–7.CrossRef Cameron CG, Bennett HA. Cost-effectiveness of insulin analogues for diabetes mellitus. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;180(4):400–7.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Dyer MT, Goldsmith KA, Khan SN, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. Trials. 2008;9:40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dyer MT, Goldsmith KA, Khan SN, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. Trials. 2008;9:40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Youman P, Wilson K, Harraf F, Kalra L. The economic burden of stroke in the United Kingdom. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(1):43–50.CrossRefPubMed Youman P, Wilson K, Harraf F, Kalra L. The economic burden of stroke in the United Kingdom. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(1):43–50.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Chronic kidney disease: early identification and management of chronic kidney disease in adults in primary and secondary care (CG73). National Institute of Health and Care Excellence 2008. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg73. Accessed 1 Dec 2016. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Chronic kidney disease: early identification and management of chronic kidney disease in adults in primary and secondary care (CG73). National Institute of Health and Care Excellence 2008. http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​guidance/​cg73. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
42.
go back to reference Chubb B, Jensen MM, Frier BM. Self-reported frequency and impact of non-severe hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated adults in the UK. Value Health. 2014;17(7):A354–5.CrossRefPubMed Chubb B, Jensen MM, Frier BM. Self-reported frequency and impact of non-severe hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated adults in the UK. Value Health. 2014;17(7):A354–5.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Clarke P, Gray A, Legood R, Briggs A, Holman R. The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: results from the United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKPDS Study No. 65). Diabet Med. 2003;20(6):442–50.CrossRefPubMed Clarke P, Gray A, Legood R, Briggs A, Holman R. The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: results from the United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKPDS Study No. 65). Diabet Med. 2003;20(6):442–50.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Ghatnekar O, Willis M, Persson U. Cost-effectiveness of treating deep diabetic foot ulcers with Promogran in four European countries. J Wound Care. 2002;11(2):70–4.CrossRefPubMed Ghatnekar O, Willis M, Persson U. Cost-effectiveness of treating deep diabetic foot ulcers with Promogran in four European countries. J Wound Care. 2002;11(2):70–4.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Clarke P, Gray A, Holman R. Estimating utility values for health states of type 2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62). Med Decis Mak. 2002;22(4):340–9.CrossRef Clarke P, Gray A, Holman R. Estimating utility values for health states of type 2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62). Med Decis Mak. 2002;22(4):340–9.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Wasserfallen JB, Halabi G, Saudan P, et al. Quality of life on chronic dialysis: comparison between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2004;19(6):1594–9.CrossRef Wasserfallen JB, Halabi G, Saudan P, et al. Quality of life on chronic dialysis: comparison between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2004;19(6):1594–9.CrossRef
48.
49.
go back to reference Fenwick EK, Xie J, Ratcliffe J, et al. The impact of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema on health-related quality of life in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(2):677–84.CrossRef Fenwick EK, Xie J, Ratcliffe J, et al. The impact of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema on health-related quality of life in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(2):677–84.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Lee AJ, Morgan CL, Morrissey M, Wittrup-Jensen K, Kennedy-Martin T, Currie CJ. Evaluation of the association between the EQ-5D index (health-related utility) and body mass index (obesity) in hospital-treated people with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and with no diagnosed diabetes. Diabet Med. 2005;22(11):1482–6.CrossRefPubMed Lee AJ, Morgan CL, Morrissey M, Wittrup-Jensen K, Kennedy-Martin T, Currie CJ. Evaluation of the association between the EQ-5D index (health-related utility) and body mass index (obesity) in hospital-treated people with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and with no diagnosed diabetes. Diabet Med. 2005;22(11):1482–6.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Evans M, Khunti K, Mamdani M, et al. Health-related quality of life associated with daytime and nocturnal hypoglycaemic events: a time trade-off survey in five countries. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Evans M, Khunti K, Mamdani M, et al. Health-related quality of life associated with daytime and nocturnal hypoglycaemic events: a time trade-off survey in five countries. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
go back to reference Nauck M, Frid A, Hermansen K, et al. Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(1):84–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nauck M, Frid A, Hermansen K, et al. Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(1):84–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
go back to reference Bailey CJ, Gross JL, Pieters A, Bastien A, List JF. Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2223–33.CrossRefPubMed Bailey CJ, Gross JL, Pieters A, Bastien A, List JF. Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2223–33.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Bolinder J, Ljunggren O, Kullberg J, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on body weight, total fat mass, and regional adipose tissue distribution in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control on metformin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(3):1020–31.CrossRefPubMed Bolinder J, Ljunggren O, Kullberg J, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on body weight, total fat mass, and regional adipose tissue distribution in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control on metformin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(3):1020–31.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Lambers Heerspink HJ, de ZD, Wie L, Leslie B, List J. Dapagliflozin a glucose-regulating drug with diuretic properties in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(9):853–62.CrossRefPubMed Lambers Heerspink HJ, de ZD, Wie L, Leslie B, List J. Dapagliflozin a glucose-regulating drug with diuretic properties in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(9):853–62.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Liraglutide Versus Dapagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the UK
Authors
Gabriela Vega-Hernandez
Radek Wojcik
Max Schlueter
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0250-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Diabetes Therapy 3/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.