Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Original Research Article

Cost Effectiveness of Intensive Lipid-Lowering Treatment for Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Heart Disease in the US

Authors: Virginia M. Rosen, Douglas C. A. Taylor, Hemangi Parekh, Ankur Pandya, David Thompson, Andreas Kuznik, David D. Waters, Michael Drummond, Milton C. Weinstein

Published in: PharmacoEconomics | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: A recent study found fewer hospitalizations for congestive heart failure (CHF) patients receiving high-dose versus low-dose statin therapy.
Objective: To examine the cost effectiveness of high-dose versus low-dose statin therapy in CHF patients.
Methods: Two scenarios (literature-based [base-case scenario] vs trial-based post-event mortality [alternative scenario]) assessed the cost effectiveness of atorvastatin 80mg/day (A80) versus atorvastatin 10 mg/day (A10) in patients with both CHF and coronary heart disease (CHD) [CHF/CHD], using a lifetime Markov model. The model predicts treatment-specific probabilities of major and minor cardiovascular events and death, based on clinical trial data. The quality of life and costs were literature based. Measures included costs per life-year saved (LYS) and QALY gained. Health consequences and costs were discounted at 3.0% annually. Analyses were conducted from the payer perspective and valued in $US, year 2006–7 values.
Results: Literature-based mortality estimates (base case) increased life-years and QALYs for A80 compared with A10 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios [ICERs]: $US9600 per LYS; $US13 600 per QALY). At a willingness to pay of $US100 000 per QALY, A80 was cost effective in 80% of simulations.
A10 dominated A80 when using trial-based mortality estimates (alternative scenario). At a willingness to pay of $US100 000 per QALY, A80 was cost effective in 48% of simulations.
Conclusions: Intensive A80 treatment may be cost effective versus A10 in cardiovascular prevention in CHF/CHD patients in the US, due to projected gains in life expectancy and health-related quality of life. However, the results are highly sensitive to assumptions about the mortality rate in the model. When using the mortality rate observed in the trial, A10 dominates A80.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference AHA. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2008; 117: e25–146 AHA. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2008; 117: e25–146
2.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention. Heart failure fact sheet. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention. Heart failure fact sheet. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006
3.
go back to reference LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1425–35CrossRef LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1425–35CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Khush KK, Waters DD, Bittner V, et al. Effect of high-dose atorvastatin on hospitalizations for heart failure: subgroup analysis of the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study. Circulation 2007; 115: 576–83CrossRef Khush KK, Waters DD, Bittner V, et al. Effect of high-dose atorvastatin on hospitalizations for heart failure: subgroup analysis of the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study. Circulation 2007; 115: 576–83CrossRef
5.
go back to reference GISSI-HF investigators. Effect of rosuvastatin in patients with chronic heart failure (the GISSI-HF trial): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008 Oct 4; 372: 1231–9CrossRef GISSI-HF investigators. Effect of rosuvastatin in patients with chronic heart failure (the GISSI-HF trial): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008 Oct 4; 372: 1231–9CrossRef
6.
go back to reference GISSI-HF investigators. Effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients with chronic heart failure (the GISSI-HF trial): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008 Oct 4; 372: 1223–30CrossRef GISSI-HF investigators. Effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients with chronic heart failure (the GISSI-HF trial): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008 Oct 4; 372: 1223–30CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kjekshus J, Apetrei E, Barrios V, et al., for the CORONA Group. Rosuvastatin in older patients with systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1–14CrossRef Kjekshus J, Apetrei E, Barrios V, et al., for the CORONA Group. Rosuvastatin in older patients with systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1–14CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF, Ghushchyan V. A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care 2005; 43: 736–49CrossRef Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF, Ghushchyan V. A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care 2005; 43: 736–49CrossRef
9.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics. US life tables 2003. NVSR 54 (14): 2005–1120 National Center for Health Statistics. US life tables 2003. NVSR 54 (14): 2005–1120
10.
go back to reference Mosterd A, Cost B, Hoes AW, et al. The prognosis of heart failure in the general population: the Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 1318–27CrossRef Mosterd A, Cost B, Hoes AW, et al. The prognosis of heart failure in the general population: the Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 1318–27CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rosengren A, Spetz CL, Köster M, et al. Sex differences in survival after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 314–22CrossRef Rosengren A, Spetz CL, Köster M, et al. Sex differences in survival after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 314–22CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dennis MS, Burn JPS, Sandercock PAG, et al. Long-term survival after first-ever stroke: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke 1993; 24: 796–800CrossRef Dennis MS, Burn JPS, Sandercock PAG, et al. Long-term survival after first-ever stroke: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke 1993; 24: 796–800CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Blackledge HM, Tomlinson J, Squire IB. Prognosis for patients newly admitted to hospital with heart failure: survival trends in 12 220 index admissions in Leicestershire 1993–2001. Heart 2003; 89: 615–20CrossRef Blackledge HM, Tomlinson J, Squire IB. Prognosis for patients newly admitted to hospital with heart failure: survival trends in 12 220 index admissions in Leicestershire 1993–2001. Heart 2003; 89: 615–20CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pell JP, Walsh D, Norrie J, et al. Outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the stent era: a prospective study of all 9890 consecutive patients operated on in Scotland over a two year period. Heart 2001; 85: 662–6CrossRef Pell JP, Walsh D, Norrie J, et al. Outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the stent era: a prospective study of all 9890 consecutive patients operated on in Scotland over a two year period. Heart 2001; 85: 662–6CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gwinnutt CL, Columb M, Harris R. Outcome after cardiac arrest in adults in UK hospitals: effect of 1997 guidelines. Resuscitation 2000; 47 (2): 125–35CrossRef Gwinnutt CL, Columb M, Harris R. Outcome after cardiac arrest in adults in UK hospitals: effect of 1997 guidelines. Resuscitation 2000; 47 (2): 125–35CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Capewell S, Livingston BM, MacIntyre K, et al. Trends in case-fatality in 117 718 patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction in Scotland. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1833–40CrossRef Capewell S, Livingston BM, MacIntyre K, et al. Trends in case-fatality in 117 718 patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction in Scotland. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1833–40CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Collins TC, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, et al. Short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term mortality in patients hospitalized for stroke. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 81–7CrossRef Collins TC, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, et al. Short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term mortality in patients hospitalized for stroke. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 81–7CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shahar E, Lee S. Historical trends in survival of hospitalized heart failure patients: 2000 versus 1995. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2007 Jan 16; 7 (2) Shahar E, Lee S. Historical trends in survival of hospitalized heart failure patients: 2000 versus 1995. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2007 Jan 16; 7 (2)
20.
go back to reference Anderson RD, Ohman EM, Holmes DR, et al. Prognostic value of congestive heart failure history in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC 1998; 32 (4): 936–41CrossRef Anderson RD, Ohman EM, Holmes DR, et al. Prognostic value of congestive heart failure history in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC 1998; 32 (4): 936–41CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lampe FC, Whincup SG, Wannamethee AG, et al. The natural history of prevalent ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged men. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1052–62CrossRef Lampe FC, Whincup SG, Wannamethee AG, et al. The natural history of prevalent ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged men. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1052–62CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Red Book. Montvale (NJ): Thomson Healthcare Inc., 2007 Red Book. Montvale (NJ): Thomson Healthcare Inc., 2007
23.
go back to reference DRG Expert 2007. 23rd ed. Clifton Park (NY): Thomson Delmar Learning, 2007 DRG Expert 2007. 23rd ed. Clifton Park (NY): Thomson Delmar Learning, 2007
24.
go back to reference Brown DL, Boden-Albala B, Langa KM, et al. Projected costs of ischemic stroke in the United States. Neurology 2006; 67: 1390–5CrossRef Brown DL, Boden-Albala B, Langa KM, et al. Projected costs of ischemic stroke in the United States. Neurology 2006; 67: 1390–5CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pederson TR, Wilhelmsen L, Faergeman O, et al. Follow-up study of patients randomized in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) of cholesterol lowering. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 257–62CrossRef Pederson TR, Wilhelmsen L, Faergeman O, et al. Follow-up study of patients randomized in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) of cholesterol lowering. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 257–62CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ford I, Murray H, Packard CJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of the west of Scotland coronary prevention study. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1477–86CrossRef Ford I, Murray H, Packard CJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of the west of Scotland coronary prevention study. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1477–86CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993CrossRef Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Waters DD, Guyton JR, Herrington DM, et al. Treating to New Targets (TNT) study: does lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below currently recommended guidelines yield incremental clinical benefit? Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 154–8CrossRef Waters DD, Guyton JR, Herrington DM, et al. Treating to New Targets (TNT) study: does lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below currently recommended guidelines yield incremental clinical benefit? Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 154–8CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gail M, Simon R. Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. Biometrics 1985; 41: 361–72CrossRef Gail M, Simon R. Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. Biometrics 1985; 41: 361–72CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cook JR, Drummond M, Glick H, et al. Assessing the appropriateness of combining economic data from multinational clinical trials. Stat Med 2003; 22: 1955–76CrossRef Cook JR, Drummond M, Glick H, et al. Assessing the appropriateness of combining economic data from multinational clinical trials. Stat Med 2003; 22: 1955–76CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mark DB, Knight JD, Cowper PA, et al. Long-term economic outcomes associated with intensive versus moderate lipid-lowering therapy in coronary artery disease: results from the Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial. Am Heart J 2008; 156 (4): 698–705CrossRef Mark DB, Knight JD, Cowper PA, et al. Long-term economic outcomes associated with intensive versus moderate lipid-lowering therapy in coronary artery disease: results from the Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial. Am Heart J 2008; 156 (4): 698–705CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Taylor DCA, Pandya A, Thompson D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of intensive atorvastatin therapy in secondary cardiovascular prevention in the United Kingdom, Spain, and Germany, based on the Treating toNew Targets study. Eur J Health Econ 2009; 10 (3): 255–65CrossRef Taylor DCA, Pandya A, Thompson D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of intensive atorvastatin therapy in secondary cardiovascular prevention in the United Kingdom, Spain, and Germany, based on the Treating toNew Targets study. Eur J Health Econ 2009; 10 (3): 255–65CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Raina A, Pickering T, Shimbo D. Statin use in heart failure: a cause for concern? Am Heart J 2006; 152: 39–49CrossRef Raina A, Pickering T, Shimbo D. Statin use in heart failure: a cause for concern? Am Heart J 2006; 152: 39–49CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Pedersen TR, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJP, et al. High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 294: 2437–45CrossRef Pedersen TR, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJP, et al. High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 294: 2437–45CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cost Effectiveness of Intensive Lipid-Lowering Treatment for Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Heart Disease in the US
Authors
Virginia M. Rosen
Douglas C. A. Taylor
Hemangi Parekh
Ankur Pandya
David Thompson
Andreas Kuznik
David D. Waters
Michael Drummond
Milton C. Weinstein
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
PharmacoEconomics / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11531440-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

PharmacoEconomics 1/2010 Go to the issue

Adis Pharmacoeconomic Drug Evaluation

Erlotinib