Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Anesthesiology
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Correlation of patient characteristics with arm and finger measurements in Asian parturients: a preliminary study

Authors: Ming Jian Lim, Chin Wen Tan, Hon Sen Tan, Rehena Sultana, Victoria Eley, Ban Leong Sng

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement depends on appropriate cuff size and shape in relation to the arm. Arm dimensions outside the recommended range of cuff sizes or trunco-conical arms may result in inaccurate BP measurements. Measuring BP using finger cuffs is a potential solution. Arm cuff size is based on mid-arm circumference (MAC), and trunco-conicity is quantified by conicity index. We aimed to determine the correlation of MAC, body mass index (BMI), and weight with conicity index.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted in the KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital where third trimester parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery were recruited after obtaining informed consent. Parturients were asked to rate their experience with time taken to obtain BP readings, cuff popping off during measurement, need to move the cuff from the upper arm to lower arm or leg, and need to change to a different cuff. Our primary outcome was the correlation between MAC and conicity index, calculated using Pearson’s correlation. The correlation between BMI and weight with conicity index was also determined.

Results

We enrolled 300 parturients. Moderate correlation was found between left MAC and left conicity index (r = 0.41, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.51), and right MAC and right conicity index (r = 0.39, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.48). Weight (r = 0.35 to 0.39) and BMI (r = 0.41 to 0.43) correlated with conicity index in this study. MAC of 1 parturient fell outside the recommended range for arm cuffs, but all parturients fit into available finger cuffs. Obese parturients had increased problems with arm cuffs popping off and needing a change of cuff.

Conclusions

BMI better correlated with conicity index compared to MAC or weight. Standard finger cuffs were suitable for all parturients studied and may be a suitable alternative.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04012151. Registered 9 Jul 2019
Literature
1.
Knight M., Clarke B., James R. et al. on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers' Care - Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2015-17. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford 2019.
2.
Lowe SA, Bowyer L, Lust K, et al. The SOMANZ guidelines for the Management of Hypertensive Disorders of pregnancy 2014. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55:11–6.CrossRef
3.
Eley VA, Roberts L, Rickards L, et al. Arm and finger measurements in the third trimester: implications for blood pressure measurement. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2018;14:105–9.CrossRef
4.
Palatini P, Asmar R. Cuff challenges in blood pressure measurement. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20:1100–3.CrossRef
5.
O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2003;21:821–48.CrossRef
6.
Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on high blood pressure research. Circulation. 2005;111:697–716.CrossRef
7.
Perloff D, Grim C, Flack J, et al. Human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry. Circulation. 1993;88:2460–70.CrossRef
8.
Marks LA, Groch A. Optimizing cuff width for noninvasive measurement of blood pressure. Blood Press Monit. 2000;5:153–8.CrossRef
9.
Palatini P, Parati G. Blood pressure measurement in very obese patients: a challenging problem. J Hypertens. 2011;29(3):425–9.
10.
Fonseca-Reyes S, de Alba-García JG, Parra-Carrillo JZ, Paczka-Zapata JA. Effect of standard cuff on blood pressure readings in patients with obese arms. How frequent are arms of a 'large circumference'? Blood Press Monit. 2003;8:101–6.CrossRef
11.
Kho CL, Brown MA, Ong SL, Mangos GJ. Blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: the effect of arm circumference and sphygmomanometer cuff size. Obstet Med. 2009;2:116–20.CrossRef
12.
Bonso E, Saladini F, Zanier A, Benetti E, Dorigatti F, Palatini P. Accuracy of a single rigid conical cuff with standard-size bladder coupled to an automatic oscillometric device over a wide range of arm circumferences. Hypertens Res. 2010;33:1186–91.CrossRef
13.
Palatini P, Benetti E, Fania C, Malipiero G, Saladini F. Rectangular cuffs may overestimate blood pressure in individuals with large conical arms. J Hypertens. 2012;30:530–6.CrossRef
14.
Wang J, Thornton JC, Russell M, Burastero S, Heymsfield S, Pierson RN Jr. Asians have lower body mass index (BMI) but higher percent body fat than do whites: comparisons of anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;60:23–8.CrossRef
15.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573–7.CrossRef
16.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Anthropometry Procedures Manual 2007-08. USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007.
17.
Hogan JL, Maguire P, Farah N, Kennelly MM, Stuart B, Turner MJ. Body mass index and blood pressure measurement during pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2011;30:396–400.CrossRef
18.
Cooley SM, Donnelly JC, Walsh T, et al. The relationship between body mass index and mid-arm circumference in a pregnant population. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31:594–6.CrossRef
19.
Wu LW, Lin YY, Kao TW, et al. Mid-arm circumference and all-cause, cardiovascular, and Cancer mortality among obese and non-obese US adults: the National Health and nutrition examination survey III. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2302.CrossRef
20.
Forsberg SA, de Guzman M, Berlind S. Validity of blood pressure measurement with cuff in the arm and forearm. Acta Med Scand. 1970;188:389–96.CrossRef
21.
Pierin AM, Alavarce DC, Gusmão JL, Halpern A, Mion D Jr. Blood pressure measurement in obese patients: comparison between upper arm and forearm measurements. Blood Press Monit. 2004;9:101–5.CrossRef
22.
Schell K, Bradley E, Bucher L, et al. Clinical comparison of automatic, noninvasive measurements of blood pressure in the forearm and upper arm. Am J Crit Care. 2005;14:232–41.CrossRef
23.
Maxwell GF, Pruijt JF, Arntzenius AC. Comparison of the conical cuff and the standard rectangular cuffs. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14:468–72.CrossRef
24.
Executive Summary on National Population Health Survey 2016/17. Singapore: Ministry of Health Singapore and Health Promotion Board. 2017.
25.
Akkermans J, Diepeveen M, Ganzevoort W, van Montfrans GA, Westerhof BE, Wolf H. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, a validation study of Nexfin in a pregnant population. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2009;28:230–42.CrossRef
26.
Ilies C, Bauer M, Berg P, et al. Investigation of the agreement of a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device in comparison with invasive radial artery measurement. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:202–10.CrossRef
27.
Hohn A, Defosse JM, Becker S, Steffen C, Wappler F, Sakka SG. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring with Nexfin does not sufficiently replace invasive measurements in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:178–84.CrossRef
28.
Heslehurst N, Simpson H, Ells LJ, et al. The impact of maternal BMI status on pregnancy outcomes with immediate short-term obstetric resource implications: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2008;9:635–83.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Correlation of patient characteristics with arm and finger measurements in Asian parturients: a preliminary study
Authors
Ming Jian Lim
Chin Wen Tan
Hon Sen Tan
Rehena Sultana
Victoria Eley
Ban Leong Sng
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01131-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020 Go to the issue

Research article

Predictive factors for successful INTELLiVENT-ASV® use: a retrospective observational study

Research article

Supine versus semi-Fowler’s positions for tracheal extubation in abdominal surgery-a randomized clinical trial

Research article

Mild hypercapnia improves brain tissue oxygen tension but not diffusion limitation in asphyxial cardiac arrest: an experimental study in pigs

Research article

Effect of sevoflurane and propofol on tourniquet-induced endothelial damage: a pilot randomized controlled trial for knee-ligament surgery

Research article

Ultrasound measurement of laryngeal structures in the parasagittal plane for the prediction of difficult laryngoscopies in Chinese adults

Correspondence

Accountability, research transparency and data reporting