Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2014

01-09-2014

Correlation between Preoperative Imaging and Intraoperative Risk Assessment in the Prediction of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreatoduodenectomy

Authors: Farshad Frozanpor, Louiza Loizou, Christoph Ansorge, Lars Lundell, Nils Albiin, Ralf Segersvärd

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) can be carried out with the intraoperative assessment of pancreatic consistency (PC) and via pancreatic duct width (iPDW). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) calculated pancreatic remnant volume (PRV) and duct width (rPDW) have also been shown to offer useful information about the risk of POPF.

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of the preoperative radiological features as compared with the intraoperative risk estimation for the subsequent development of POPF.

Method

All patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy between September 2007 and March 2012 at the Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm were included. PRV and rPDW were determined on preoperative CT and in parallel, intraoperative PC and iPDW of the remnant pancreas were independently assessed.

Results

A total of 296 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies were included. POPF occurred in 45 patients (15.2 %). Of those with a preoperatively calculated PRV < 23.0 cm3, 2.8 % developed POPF compared with 25.7 % of those with a corresponding volume > 46.0 cm3. In patients with an rPDW > 7.0 mm, 4.1 % had a POPF as compared with 38.7 % for those with rPDW < 2.0 mm. The POPF risk estimates based on PRV and rPDW and the intraoperative risk assessments were found to be identical (p < 0.001). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, area under the curve was 0.80 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.87) and 0.80 (95 % CI 0.72–0.88) for the CT-based and intraoperative risk prediction models, respectively.

Conclusions

Preoperative CT-based and intraoperative gland risk assessments offer comparable predictive information on the risk of POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy. These results imply that accurate POPF risk estimation can be carried out in the preoperative setting to opt for improved patient selection into relevant research protocols and the availability of surgical expertise and techniques.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P et al (2010) Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 145:634–640PubMedCrossRef Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P et al (2010) Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 145:634–640PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ramacciato G, Mercantini P, Petrucciani N et al (2011) Risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a collective review. Am Surg 77:257–269PubMed Ramacciato G, Mercantini P, Petrucciani N et al (2011) Risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a collective review. Am Surg 77:257–269PubMed
3.
go back to reference Crippa S, Salvia R, Falconi M et al (2007) Anastomotic leakage in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 9:8–15CrossRef Crippa S, Salvia R, Falconi M et al (2007) Anastomotic leakage in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 9:8–15CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23PubMedCrossRef Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dinter DJ, Aramin N, Weiss C et al (2009) Prediction of anastomotic leakage after pancreatic head resections by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). J Gastrointest Surg 13:735–744PubMedCrossRef Dinter DJ, Aramin N, Weiss C et al (2009) Prediction of anastomotic leakage after pancreatic head resections by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). J Gastrointest Surg 13:735–744PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roberts KJ, Hodson, J, Mehrzad, H et al (2013) A preoperative predictive score of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. HBP (Oxford) Nov 8. doi:10.1111/hpb.12186. [Epub ahead of print] Roberts KJ, Hodson, J, Mehrzad, H et al (2013) A preoperative predictive score of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. HBP (Oxford) Nov 8. doi:10.​1111/​hpb.​12186. [Epub ahead of print]
8.
go back to reference Frozanpor F, Albiin N, Linder S et al (2010) Impact of pancreatic gland volume on fistula formation after pancreatic tail resection. J Periodontol 11:439–443 Frozanpor F, Albiin N, Linder S et al (2010) Impact of pancreatic gland volume on fistula formation after pancreatic tail resection. J Periodontol 11:439–443
10.
go back to reference Ansorge C, Strommer L, Andren-Sandberg A et al (2012) Structured intraoperative assessment of pancreatic gland characteristics in predicting complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 99:1076–1082PubMedCrossRef Ansorge C, Strommer L, Andren-Sandberg A et al (2012) Structured intraoperative assessment of pancreatic gland characteristics in predicting complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 99:1076–1082PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Reid-Lombardo KM, Farnell MB, Crippa S et al (2007) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1451–1458PubMedCrossRef Reid-Lombardo KM, Farnell MB, Crippa S et al (2007) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1451–1458PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. J R Stat Soc Meas 32:307–317 Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. J R Stat Soc Meas 32:307–317
15.
go back to reference Pereira FL, Vasques FT, Moricz A et al (2012) Correlation analysis between post-pancreatoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula and pancreatic histology. Rev Col Bras Cir 39:41–47PubMedCrossRef Pereira FL, Vasques FT, Moricz A et al (2012) Correlation analysis between post-pancreatoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula and pancreatic histology. Rev Col Bras Cir 39:41–47PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sakata N, Egawa S, Rikiyama T et al (2011) Computed tomography reflected endocrine function of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 15:525–532PubMedCrossRef Sakata N, Egawa S, Rikiyama T et al (2011) Computed tomography reflected endocrine function of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 15:525–532PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW et al (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW et al (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Adams DB (2009) The pancreatic anastomosis: the danger of a leak, which anastomotic technique is better? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1182–1183PubMedCrossRef Adams DB (2009) The pancreatic anastomosis: the danger of a leak, which anastomotic technique is better? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1182–1183PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yang SH, Dou KF, Sharma N et al (2011) The methods of reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 35:2290–2297. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1159-7 PubMedCrossRef Yang SH, Dou KF, Sharma N et al (2011) The methods of reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 35:2290–2297. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-011-1159-7 PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F et al (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:459–471PubMedCrossRef Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F et al (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:459–471PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Fusai G et al (2012) Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6):CD008370 Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Fusai G et al (2012) Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6):CD008370
22.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW et al (2011) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 98:485–494PubMedCrossRef Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW et al (2011) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 98:485–494PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kirihara Y, Takahashi N, Hashimoto Y et al (2013) Prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatoduodenectomy: the use of preoperative, quantitative computed tomography to measure remnant pancreatic volume and body composition. Ann Surg 257:512–519PubMedCrossRef Kirihara Y, Takahashi N, Hashimoto Y et al (2013) Prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatoduodenectomy: the use of preoperative, quantitative computed tomography to measure remnant pancreatic volume and body composition. Ann Surg 257:512–519PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Correlation between Preoperative Imaging and Intraoperative Risk Assessment in the Prediction of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreatoduodenectomy
Authors
Farshad Frozanpor
Louiza Loizou
Christoph Ansorge
Lars Lundell
Nils Albiin
Ralf Segersvärd
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2556-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

World Journal of Surgery 9/2014 Go to the issue