Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 1/2017

Open Access 01-01-2017 | Review Article

Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects

Authors: G. Cuminetti, S. Gelsomino, S. Curello, R. Lorusso, J. G. Maessen, J. C. A. Hoorntje

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Although the benefits of using the left internal mammary artery to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) have been extensively ascertained, freedom from major cardiovascular events and survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) also correlate with the completeness of revascularisation. Hence, careful selection of the second-best graft conduit is crucial for CABG success. The more widespread use of saphenous vein grafts contrasts with the well-known long-term efficacy of multiple arterial grafting, which struggles to emerge as the procedure of choice due to concerns over increased technical difficulties and higher risk of postoperative complications. Conduit choice is at the discretion of the operator instead of being discussed by the heart team, where cardiologists are not usually engaged in such decisions due to a hypothetical lack of technical knowledge. Furthermore, according to the ESC/EACTS guidelines, traditional CABG remains the gold standard for multi-vessel coronary artery disease with complex LAD stenosis, but hybrid procedures using percutaneous coronary intervention for non-LAD targets could combine the best of two worlds. With the aim of raising the cardiologist’s awareness of the surgical treatment options, we provide a comprehensive overview of the anatomical, functional and clinical aspects guiding the decision-making process in CABG strategy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fanari Z, Weiss SA, Zhang W, et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16:70–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fanari Z, Weiss SA, Zhang W, et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16:70–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Hoffman SN, TenBrook JA, Wolf MP, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1293–304.CrossRefPubMed Hoffman SN, TenBrook JA, Wolf MP, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1293–304.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, et al. Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Circulation. 2010;121:2645–53.CrossRefPubMed Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, et al. Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Circulation. 2010;121:2645–53.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1315–23.CrossRefPubMed Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1315–23.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Weisz G, Moses JW, Teirstein PS, et al. Safety of sirolimus-eluting stenting and its effect on restenosis in patients with unstable angina pectoris (a SIRIUS substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1044–50.CrossRefPubMed Weisz G, Moses JW, Teirstein PS, et al. Safety of sirolimus-eluting stenting and its effect on restenosis in patients with unstable angina pectoris (a SIRIUS substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1044–50.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Petrou P, Dias S. A mixed treatment comparison for short- and long-term outcomes of bare-metal and drug-eluting coronary stents. Int J Cardiol. 2016;202:448–62.CrossRefPubMed Petrou P, Dias S. A mixed treatment comparison for short- and long-term outcomes of bare-metal and drug-eluting coronary stents. Int J Cardiol. 2016;202:448–62.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bhatt DL, Marso SP, Lincoff AM, et al. Abciximab reduces mortality in diabetics following percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:922–8.CrossRefPubMed Bhatt DL, Marso SP, Lincoff AM, et al. Abciximab reduces mortality in diabetics following percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:922–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Feldman DN, Minutello RM, Bergman G, et al. Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients receiving clopidogrel therapy after diagnostic angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:513–24.CrossRefPubMed Feldman DN, Minutello RM, Bergman G, et al. Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients receiving clopidogrel therapy after diagnostic angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:513–24.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Authors/Task Force members, Windecker S, Kolh P, et al. ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularisation: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularisation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541–619. Authors/Task Force members, Windecker S, Kolh P, et al. ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularisation: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularisation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541–619.
10.
go back to reference Cosgrove DM, Loop FD, Lytle BW, et al. Predictors of reoperation after myocardial revascularisation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;92:811–21.PubMed Cosgrove DM, Loop FD, Lytle BW, et al. Predictors of reoperation after myocardial revascularisation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;92:811–21.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Aldea GS, Bakaeen FG, Pal J, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines on arterial conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:801–9.CrossRefPubMed Aldea GS, Bakaeen FG, Pal J, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines on arterial conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:801–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gaudino M, Taggart D, Suma H, et al. The choice of conduits in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1729–37.CrossRefPubMed Gaudino M, Taggart D, Suma H, et al. The choice of conduits in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1729–37.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Locker C, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Improved late survival with arterial revascularisation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:467–74.PubMedPubMedCentral Locker C, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Improved late survival with arterial revascularisation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:467–74.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Otsuka F, Yahagi K, Sakakura K, et al. Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:519–26.PubMedPubMedCentral Otsuka F, Yahagi K, Sakakura K, et al. Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:519–26.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference He GW, Yang CQ. Comparison among arterial grafts and coronary artery. An attempt at functional classification. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:707–15.CrossRefPubMed He GW, Yang CQ. Comparison among arterial grafts and coronary artery. An attempt at functional classification. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:707–15.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference He GW. Arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting: biological characteristics, functional classification, and clinical choice. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:277–84.CrossRefPubMed He GW. Arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting: biological characteristics, functional classification, and clinical choice. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:277–84.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Loop FD. Internal-thoracic-artery grafts. Biologically better coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:263–5.CrossRefPubMed Loop FD. Internal-thoracic-artery grafts. Biologically better coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:263–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference He GW, Liu ZG. Comparison of nitric oxide release and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated hyperpolarisation between human radial and internal mammary arteries. Circulation. 2001;104(Suppl 1):I344–I349.CrossRefPubMed He GW, Liu ZG. Comparison of nitric oxide release and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated hyperpolarisation between human radial and internal mammary arteries. Circulation. 2001;104(Suppl 1):I344–I349.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1–6.CrossRefPubMed Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation. 1998;97:916–31.CrossRefPubMed Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation. 1998;97:916–31.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Canham PB, Finlay HM, Boughner DR. Contrasting structure of the saphenous vein and internal mammary artery used as coronary bypass vessels. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;34(3):557–67.CrossRefPubMed Canham PB, Finlay HM, Boughner DR. Contrasting structure of the saphenous vein and internal mammary artery used as coronary bypass vessels. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;34(3):557–67.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Taggart DP. Current status of arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:427–30.PubMedPubMedCentral Taggart DP. Current status of arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:427–30.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference He GW, Fan L, Grove KL, et al. Expression and function of endothelial nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA and protein are higher in internal mammary than in radial arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:845–50.CrossRefPubMed He GW, Fan L, Grove KL, et al. Expression and function of endothelial nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA and protein are higher in internal mammary than in radial arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:845–50.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dion R, Glineur D, Derouck D, et al. Complementary saphenous grafting: long-term follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:296–304.CrossRefPubMed Dion R, Glineur D, Derouck D, et al. Complementary saphenous grafting: long-term follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:296–304.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cox JL, Chiasson DA, Gotlieb AI. Stranger in a strange land: the pathogenesis of saphenous vein graft stenosis with emphasis on structural and functional differences between veins and arteries. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1991;34:45–68.CrossRefPubMed Cox JL, Chiasson DA, Gotlieb AI. Stranger in a strange land: the pathogenesis of saphenous vein graft stenosis with emphasis on structural and functional differences between veins and arteries. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1991;34:45–68.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lehmann KH, von Segesser L, Muller-Glauser W, et al. Internal-mammary coronary artery grafts: is their superiority also due to a basically intact endothelium? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;37:187–9.CrossRefPubMed Lehmann KH, von Segesser L, Muller-Glauser W, et al. Internal-mammary coronary artery grafts: is their superiority also due to a basically intact endothelium? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;37:187–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ruengsakulrach P, Sinclair R, Komeda M, et al. Comparative histopathology of radial artery versus internal thoracic artery and risk factors for development of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1999;100(Suppl):II139–II144.PubMed Ruengsakulrach P, Sinclair R, Komeda M, et al. Comparative histopathology of radial artery versus internal thoracic artery and risk factors for development of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1999;100(Suppl):II139–II144.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation. 2008;117:2859–64.CrossRefPubMed Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation. 2008;117:2859–64.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Deb S, Cohen EA, Singh SK, et al. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:28–35.CrossRefPubMed Deb S, Cohen EA, Singh SK, et al. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:28–35.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Wildhirt SM, Voss B, von Canal F, et al. Graft function, histopathology and morphometry of radial arteries used as conduits for myocardial revascularisation in patients beyond age 70. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:333–40.CrossRefPubMed Wildhirt SM, Voss B, von Canal F, et al. Graft function, histopathology and morphometry of radial arteries used as conduits for myocardial revascularisation in patients beyond age 70. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:333–40.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Kamiya H, Ushijima T, Kanamori T, et al. Use of the radial artery graft after transradial catheterisation: is it suitable as a bypass conduit? Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1505–9.CrossRefPubMed Kamiya H, Ushijima T, Kanamori T, et al. Use of the radial artery graft after transradial catheterisation: is it suitable as a bypass conduit? Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1505–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Watson T, Pope A, van Pelt N, et al. Evaluation of previously cannulated radial arteries as patent coronary artery bypass conduits. Tex Heart Inst J. 2015;42:448–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Watson T, Pope A, van Pelt N, et al. Evaluation of previously cannulated radial arteries as patent coronary artery bypass conduits. Tex Heart Inst J. 2015;42:448–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Manabe S, Tabuchi N, Tanaka H, et al. Hand circulation after radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting. J Med Dent Sci. 2005;52:101–7.PubMed Manabe S, Tabuchi N, Tanaka H, et al. Hand circulation after radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting. J Med Dent Sci. 2005;52:101–7.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Tranbaugh RF, Dimitrova KR, Friedmann P, et al. Radial artery conduits improve long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1165–72.CrossRefPubMed Tranbaugh RF, Dimitrova KR, Friedmann P, et al. Radial artery conduits improve long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1165–72.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124:e652–e735.CrossRefPubMed Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124:e652–e735.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Suma H, Tanabe H, Takahashi A, et al. Twenty years’ experience with the gastroepiploic artery graft for CABG. Circulation. 2007;116(11 Suppl):I188–I191.PubMed Suma H, Tanabe H, Takahashi A, et al. Twenty years’ experience with the gastroepiploic artery graft for CABG. Circulation. 2007;116(11 Suppl):I188–I191.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Suma H, Tanabe H, Yamada J, et al. Midterm results for use of the skeletonized gastroepiploic artery graft in coronary artery bypass. Circ J. 2007;71:1503–5.CrossRefPubMed Suma H, Tanabe H, Yamada J, et al. Midterm results for use of the skeletonized gastroepiploic artery graft in coronary artery bypass. Circ J. 2007;71:1503–5.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Dietl CA, Benoit CH, Gilbert CL, et al. Which is the graft of choice for the right coronary and posterior descending arteries? Comparison of the right internal mammary artery and the right gastroepiploic artery. Circulation. 1995;92(9 Suppl):II92–II97.CrossRefPubMed Dietl CA, Benoit CH, Gilbert CL, et al. Which is the graft of choice for the right coronary and posterior descending arteries? Comparison of the right internal mammary artery and the right gastroepiploic artery. Circulation. 1995;92(9 Suppl):II92–II97.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Weiss AJ, Zhao S, Tian DH, et al. A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:390–400.PubMedPubMedCentral Weiss AJ, Zhao S, Tian DH, et al. A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:390–400.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Head SJ, Parasca CA, Mack MJ, et al. Differences in baseline characteristics, practice patterns and clinical outcomes in contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting in the United States and Europe: insights from the SYNTAX randomized trial and registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:685–95.CrossRefPubMed Head SJ, Parasca CA, Mack MJ, et al. Differences in baseline characteristics, practice patterns and clinical outcomes in contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting in the United States and Europe: insights from the SYNTAX randomized trial and registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:685–95.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1‑year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2470–81.CrossRefPubMed Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1‑year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2470–81.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Kamiya H, Akhyari P, Martens A, et al. Sternal microcirculation after skeletonized versus pedicled harvesting of the internal thoracic artery: a randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:32–7.CrossRefPubMed Kamiya H, Akhyari P, Martens A, et al. Sternal microcirculation after skeletonized versus pedicled harvesting of the internal thoracic artery: a randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:32–7.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Toeg H, Al-Atassi T, Labinaz M, et al. Hybrid approach for coronary artery revascularisation: where do we stand? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2014;29:534–41.CrossRefPubMed Toeg H, Al-Atassi T, Labinaz M, et al. Hybrid approach for coronary artery revascularisation: where do we stand? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2014;29:534–41.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference de Canniere D, Jansens JL, Goldschmidt-Clermont P, et al. Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with ‘on-pump’ double bypass grafting. Am Heart J. 2001;142:563–70.CrossRefPubMed de Canniere D, Jansens JL, Goldschmidt-Clermont P, et al. Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with ‘on-pump’ double bypass grafting. Am Heart J. 2001;142:563–70.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Navia D, Vrancic M, Piccinini F, et al. Is the second internal thoracic artery better than the radial artery in total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? A propensity score-matched follow-up study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:632–8.CrossRefPubMed Navia D, Vrancic M, Piccinini F, et al. Is the second internal thoracic artery better than the radial artery in total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? A propensity score-matched follow-up study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:632–8.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Ruttmann E, Fischler N, Sakic A, et al. Second internal thoracic artery versus radial artery in coronary artery bypass grafting: a long-term, propensity score-matched follow-up study. Circulation. 2011;124:1321–9.CrossRefPubMed Ruttmann E, Fischler N, Sakic A, et al. Second internal thoracic artery versus radial artery in coronary artery bypass grafting: a long-term, propensity score-matched follow-up study. Circulation. 2011;124:1321–9.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Glineur D. Importance of the third arterial graft in multiple arterial grafting strategies. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:475–80.PubMedPubMedCentral Glineur D. Importance of the third arterial graft in multiple arterial grafting strategies. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:475–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference Grandjean JG, Boonstra PW, den Heyer P, et al. Arterial revascularisation with the right gastroepiploic artery and internal mammary arteries in 300 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:1309–15, discussion 15–6.PubMed Grandjean JG, Boonstra PW, den Heyer P, et al. Arterial revascularisation with the right gastroepiploic artery and internal mammary arteries in 300 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:1309–15, discussion 15–6.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Parsa CJ, Daneshmand MA, Gaca JG, et al. Arterial bypass grafting of the coronary circulation. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2011;3:227–34.PubMedPubMedCentral Parsa CJ, Daneshmand MA, Gaca JG, et al. Arterial bypass grafting of the coronary circulation. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2011;3:227–34.PubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Sabik JF 3rd, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, et al. Comparison of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:544–51, discussion –51.CrossRefPubMed Sabik JF 3rd, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, et al. Comparison of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:544–51, discussion –51.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Suzuki T, Asai T, Matsubayashi K, et al. In off-pump surgery, skeletonized gastroepiploic artery is superior to saphenous vein in patients with bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1159–64.CrossRefPubMed Suzuki T, Asai T, Matsubayashi K, et al. In off-pump surgery, skeletonized gastroepiploic artery is superior to saphenous vein in patients with bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1159–64.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Goldman S, Sethi GK, Holman W, et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2011;305:167–74.CrossRefPubMed Goldman S, Sethi GK, Holman W, et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2011;305:167–74.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Hayward PA, Buxton BF. The Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial: design, intermediate term results and future direction. Heart Lung Circ. 2011;20:187–92.CrossRefPubMed Hayward PA, Buxton BF. The Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial: design, intermediate term results and future direction. Heart Lung Circ. 2011;20:187–92.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Hwang HY, Cho KR, Kim KB. Equivalency of right internal thoracic artery and right gastroepiploic artery composite grafts: five-year outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:2061–8.CrossRefPubMed Hwang HY, Cho KR, Kim KB. Equivalency of right internal thoracic artery and right gastroepiploic artery composite grafts: five-year outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:2061–8.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Harskamp RE, Alexander JH, Ferguson TB Jr., et al. Frequency and predictors of internal mammary artery graft failure and subsequent clinical outcomes: insights from the PREVENT IV trial. Circulation. 2016;133:131–8.CrossRefPubMed Harskamp RE, Alexander JH, Ferguson TB Jr., et al. Frequency and predictors of internal mammary artery graft failure and subsequent clinical outcomes: insights from the PREVENT IV trial. Circulation. 2016;133:131–8.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Sabik JF 3rd. Should Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Be Performed in Patients With Moderate Stenosis of the LAD? Circulation. 2016;133:111–3.CrossRefPubMed Sabik JF 3rd. Should Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Be Performed in Patients With Moderate Stenosis of the LAD? Circulation. 2016;133:111–3.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects
Authors
G. Cuminetti
S. Gelsomino
S. Curello
R. Lorusso
J. G. Maessen
J. C. A. Hoorntje
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0919-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Netherlands Heart Journal 1/2017 Go to the issue