Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Breast

Computer-aided evaluation as an adjunct to revised BI-RADS Atlas: improvement in positive predictive value at screening breast MRI

Authors: Hye Mi Gweon, Nariya Cho, Mirinae Seo, A Jung Chu, Woo Kyung Moon

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate whether kinetic features via magnetic resonance (MR)-computer-aided evaluation (CAE) can improve the positive predictive value (PPV) of morphological descriptors for suspicious lesions at screening breast MRI.

Methods

One hundred and sixteen consecutive, suspiciously enhancing lesions detected at contralateral breast MRI screening in 116 women with newly-diagnosed breast cancers were included. Morphological descriptors according to the revised BI-RADS Atlas and kinetic features from MR-CAE were analysed. The PPV of each descriptor was analysed to identify subgroups in which PPV could be improved by the addition of MR-CAE.

Results

When biopsy recommendations were downgraded to follow-up in cases where there were both the absence of enhancement at a 50 % threshold and the absence of delayed washout, PPV increased from 0.328 (95 % CI, 0.249-0.417) to 0.500 (95 % CI, 0.387- 0.613). Two ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions were missed. Application of downgrading criteria to foci or masses led to increased PPV from 0.310 (95 % CI, 0.216-0.419) to 0.437 (95 % CI, 0.331-0.547) without missing cancers.

Conclusions

MR-CAE has the potential to improve the PPV of breast MR imaging by reducing the number of false positives. When suspicious mass lesions do not show enhancement at a 50 % threshold nor delayed washout, follow-up rather than biopsy can be considered.

Key Points

• MR-CAE has the potential to increase PPV at breast MRI screening.
•Lesions without enhancement at 50 % threshold and washout might be downgraded.
•DCIS non-mass lesions might be false-negative cases at MR-CAE.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD et al (2007) Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 244:381–388PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD et al (2007) Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 244:381–388PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kuhl CK (2007) Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 244:672–691PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK (2007) Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 244:672–691PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292:1317–1325PubMedCrossRef Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292:1317–1325PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P et al (2005) Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 103:1898–1905PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P et al (2005) Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 103:1898–1905PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722PubMedCrossRef Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M et al (2010) False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1658–1663PubMedCrossRef Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M et al (2010) False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1658–1663PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pinker K, Bickel H, Helbich TH et al (2013) Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the “Breast Imaging Reporting and Data system” for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 23:1791–1802PubMedCrossRef Pinker K, Bickel H, Helbich TH et al (2013) Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the “Breast Imaging Reporting and Data system” for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 23:1791–1802PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:210–217PubMedCrossRef Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:210–217PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 256:64–73PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 256:64–73PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, Chen X (2006) A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:51–56PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, Chen X (2006) A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:51–56PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2007) Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 244:94–103PubMedCrossRef Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2007) Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 244:94–103PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wang LC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:826–831PubMedCrossRef Wang LC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:826–831PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Blume JD, DeMartini WB, Hylton NM, Herman B, Schnall MD (2013) Accuracy and interpretation time of computer-aided detection among novice and experienced breast MRI readers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:W683–W689PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Blume JD, DeMartini WB, Hylton NM, Herman B, Schnall MD (2013) Accuracy and interpretation time of computer-aided detection among novice and experienced breast MRI readers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:W683–W689PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston
17.
go back to reference Cho N, Kim SM, Park JS et al (2012) Contralateral lesions detected by preoperative MRI in patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer: application of MR CAD in differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Eur J Radiol 81:1520–1526PubMedCrossRef Cho N, Kim SM, Park JS et al (2012) Contralateral lesions detected by preoperative MRI in patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer: application of MR CAD in differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Eur J Radiol 81:1520–1526PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (2003) BI-RADS: MRI, 1st edn. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston American College of Radiology (2003) BI-RADS: MRI, 1st edn. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston
19.
go back to reference Comstock C, Sung JS (2013) BI-RADS 3 for magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 21:561–570PubMedCrossRef Comstock C, Sung JS (2013) BI-RADS 3 for magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 21:561–570PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Greenwood HI, Heller SL, Kim S, Sigmund EE, Shaylor SD, Moy L (2013) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: review of MR imaging features. Radiographics 33:1569–1588PubMedCrossRef Greenwood HI, Heller SL, Kim S, Sigmund EE, Shaylor SD, Moy L (2013) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: review of MR imaging features. Radiographics 33:1569–1588PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kim JA, Son EJ, Youk JH et al (2011) MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1450–1456PubMedCrossRef Kim JA, Son EJ, Youk JH et al (2011) MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1450–1456PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:994–1000PubMedCrossRef Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:994–1000PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Computer-aided evaluation as an adjunct to revised BI-RADS Atlas: improvement in positive predictive value at screening breast MRI
Authors
Hye Mi Gweon
Nariya Cho
Mirinae Seo
A Jung Chu
Woo Kyung Moon
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3166-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

European Radiology 8/2014 Go to the issue