Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 5/2022

Open Access 01-05-2022 | Computed Tomography | Original Article

18F-FDG PET/CT as predictive and prognostic factor in esophageal cancer treated with combined modality treatment

Authors: Marco Krengli, Eleonora Ferrara, Riccardo Guaschino, Erinda Puta, Lucia Turri, Ilaria Luciani, Gian Mauro Sacchetti, Pierfrancesco Franco, Marco Brambilla

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

[18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F] FDG-PET/CT) is used for diagnosis, staging, response assessment and prognosis prediction in different tumors, but its role in esophageal cancer is still debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of semiquantitative baseline PET parameters as possible prognostic and predictive factors in a series of esophageal carcinomas treated with combined modalities.

Methods

43 patients with esophageal carcinoma were treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery in 20 cases and underwent pre-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Semiquantitative PET parameters were evaluated including Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax e SUVmean), Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV) and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) with isocontour of 41 and 50%. Further variables analyzed were gender, primary tumor site, histological type, use of surgery, achievement of a radical resection and the type of chemotherapy regimen. The correlation of all variables with treatment response, loco-regional control (LR), Overall survival (OS) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was evaluated.

Results

SUVmax, SUVmean50 and SUVmean41 were significantly higher in node-positive cases and in squamous cell carcinomas. With respect to prognostic factors, MTV was found to be correlated with OS: patients with MTV41 < 11.32 cm3 and MTV50 < 8.07 cm3 (both p values = 0.04) showed better 3-year OS rates (33 vs. 20%). Further factors predicting a better prognosis were the use of surgery and radical resection (R0) (both p values < 0.01).

Conclusions

Pre-treatment MTV values were significant prognostic factors for OS, together with the use of surgery and R0 resection in esophageal cancers treated with multimodal therapies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rustgi AK, El-Serag HB. Esophageal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2499–509.CrossRef Rustgi AK, El-Serag HB. Esophageal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2499–509.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, et al. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v50–7.CrossRef Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, et al. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v50–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Polednak A. Trends in survival for both histologic types of esophageal cancer in US surveillance, epidemiology and end results areas. Int J Cancer. 2003;105(1):98–100.CrossRef Polednak A. Trends in survival for both histologic types of esophageal cancer in US surveillance, epidemiology and end results areas. Int J Cancer. 2003;105(1):98–100.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vendrely V, Launay V, Najah H, et al. Prognostic factors in esophageal cancer treated with curative intent. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50(10):991–6.CrossRef Vendrely V, Launay V, Najah H, et al. Prognostic factors in esophageal cancer treated with curative intent. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50(10):991–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bouvier AM, Binquet C, Gagnaire A, et al. Management and prognosis of esophageal cancers: has progress been made? Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:228–33.CrossRef Bouvier AM, Binquet C, Gagnaire A, et al. Management and prognosis of esophageal cancers: has progress been made? Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:228–33.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, Triboulet JP. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Ann Surg. 2008;247:365–71.CrossRef Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, Triboulet JP. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Ann Surg. 2008;247:365–71.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Krengli M, Milia M, Turri L, et al. FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and target volume delineation in conformal radiotherapy of anal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2010;5(10):1186–93. Krengli M, Milia M, Turri L, et al. FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and target volume delineation in conformal radiotherapy of anal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2010;5(10):1186–93.
10.
go back to reference Deantonio L, Krengli M, Turri L, et al. Does baseline [18F] FDG-PET/CT correlate with tumor staging, response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and prognosis in patients with rectal cancer? Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(211):211–7.CrossRef Deantonio L, Krengli M, Turri L, et al. Does baseline [18F] FDG-PET/CT correlate with tumor staging, response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and prognosis in patients with rectal cancer? Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(211):211–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Barber TW, Duong CP, Leong T, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT has a high impact on patient management and provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of esophageal cancer: a prospective study with mature survival data. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(6):864–71.CrossRef Barber TW, Duong CP, Leong T, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT has a high impact on patient management and provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of esophageal cancer: a prospective study with mature survival data. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(6):864–71.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goel R, Subramaniam RM, Wachsmann JW. PET/Computed tomography scanning and precision medicine: esophageal cancer. PET Clin. 2017;12(4):373–91.CrossRef Goel R, Subramaniam RM, Wachsmann JW. PET/Computed tomography scanning and precision medicine: esophageal cancer. PET Clin. 2017;12(4):373–91.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Meyers B, Downey R, Decker P, et al. The utility of positron emission tomography in staging of potentially operable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: results of the American college of surgeons oncology group Z0060 trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(3):738–45.CrossRef Meyers B, Downey R, Decker P, et al. The utility of positron emission tomography in staging of potentially operable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: results of the American college of surgeons oncology group Z0060 trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(3):738–45.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Levine E, Farmer M, Clark P, et al. Predictive value of 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in the identification of responders to chemoradiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;243(4):472–8.CrossRef Levine E, Farmer M, Clark P, et al. Predictive value of 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in the identification of responders to chemoradiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;243(4):472–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hong J, Kim H, Han E, et al. Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor for locally advanced esophageal cancer. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(1):39–46.CrossRef Hong J, Kim H, Han E, et al. Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor for locally advanced esophageal cancer. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(1):39–46.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Omloo J, van Heijl M, Hoekstra O, et al. FDG-PET parameters as prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients: a review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(12):3338–52.CrossRef Omloo J, van Heijl M, Hoekstra O, et al. FDG-PET parameters as prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients: a review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(12):3338–52.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schroer-Gunther M, Scheibler F, Wolff R, et al. The role of PET and PET-CT scanning in assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal carcinoma. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(33):545–52.PubMedPubMedCentral Schroer-Gunther M, Scheibler F, Wolff R, et al. The role of PET and PET-CT scanning in assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal carcinoma. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(33):545–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Chhabra A, Ong LT, Kuk D, et al. Prognostic significance of PET assessment of metabolic response to therapy in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2015;2015(113):1658–66.CrossRef Chhabra A, Ong LT, Kuk D, et al. Prognostic significance of PET assessment of metabolic response to therapy in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2015;2015(113):1658–66.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hoseok L, Kim K, Kim SJ, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic volume measured by F-18 FDG PET-CT in patients with esophageal cancer. Thoracic Cancer. 2012;3:255–61.CrossRef Hoseok L, Kim K, Kim SJ, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic volume measured by F-18 FDG PET-CT in patients with esophageal cancer. Thoracic Cancer. 2012;3:255–61.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Li Y, Zschaeck S, Lin Q, et al. Metabolic parameters of sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT predict overall survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with (chemo-) radiation. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1):35.CrossRef Li Y, Zschaeck S, Lin Q, et al. Metabolic parameters of sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT predict overall survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with (chemo-) radiation. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1):35.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hyun SH, Choi JY, Shim YM, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:115–22.CrossRef Hyun SH, Choi JY, Shim YM, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:115–22.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lee HY, Hyun SH, Lee KS, et al. Volume-based parameter of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in malignant pleural mesothelioma: prediction of therapeutic response and prognostic implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2787–94.CrossRef Lee HY, Hyun SH, Lee KS, et al. Volume-based parameter of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in malignant pleural mesothelioma: prediction of therapeutic response and prognostic implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2787–94.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dibble EH, Alvarez AC, Truong MT, et al. 18F-FDG metabolic tumor volume and total glycolytic activity of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: adding value to clinical staging. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:709–15.CrossRef Dibble EH, Alvarez AC, Truong MT, et al. 18F-FDG metabolic tumor volume and total glycolytic activity of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: adding value to clinical staging. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:709–15.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Amin B, Edge S, Green F, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2017.CrossRef Amin B, Edge S, Green F, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2017.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):328–54.CrossRef Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):328–54.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Vesselle H, Schmidt RA, Pugsley JM, et al. Lung cancer proliferation correlates with (F-18) florodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:3837.PubMed Vesselle H, Schmidt RA, Pugsley JM, et al. Lung cancer proliferation correlates with (F-18) florodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:3837.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Sonoda A, Yoshida N, Shiraishi S, et al. Total lesion glycolysis ratio in positron emission tomography/ computed tomography images during neoadjuvant chemotherapy can predict pathological tumor regression grade and prognosis in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:167–74.CrossRef Sonoda A, Yoshida N, Shiraishi S, et al. Total lesion glycolysis ratio in positron emission tomography/ computed tomography images during neoadjuvant chemotherapy can predict pathological tumor regression grade and prognosis in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:167–74.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Borggreve AS, Goense L, van Rossum PSN, et al. Preoperative prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer using 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106:998–1009.CrossRef Borggreve AS, Goense L, van Rossum PSN, et al. Preoperative prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer using 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106:998–1009.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
18F-FDG PET/CT as predictive and prognostic factor in esophageal cancer treated with combined modality treatment
Authors
Marco Krengli
Eleonora Ferrara
Riccardo Guaschino
Erinda Puta
Lucia Turri
Ilaria Luciani
Gian Mauro Sacchetti
Pierfrancesco Franco
Marco Brambilla
Publication date
01-05-2022
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-022-01733-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 5/2022 Go to the issue