Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Medical Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Computed Tomography | Research

The CT assessment of uncovertebral joints degeneration in a healthy population

Authors: Tianji Huang, Jie Qin, Weiyang Zhong, Ke Tang, Zhengxue Quan

Published in: European Journal of Medical Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A retrospective study investigated the degeneration trend of uncovertebral joints in a healthy population based on CT assessment.

Methods

A total of 200 males and 160 females, aged 21–79 years old (50.82 ± 17.06), who underwent CT examination in our hospital from September 2020 to March 2021 were enrolled. Sixty patients were included in each age group. According to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification and CT was used to evaluate the uncovertebral joints degeneration in different groups.

Results

With the increase of age, the degeneration of each segment was gradually aggravated. The uncovertebral joints started degenerating in the 20 s, and the C5–6 is the most degenerative segment, followed by the C4–5 and C6–7. Significant degeneration occurred in each segment between the 40 s and 60 s and became more severe after the 70 s.

Conclusions

The modified Kellgren and Lawrence classification based on CT scan could provide a quantitative assessment of uncovertebral joints degeneration in a healthy population and could provide more details for artificial cervical arthroplasty.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Kang H, Park P, La Marca F, et al. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5–6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28(6):E9.CrossRef Kang H, Park P, La Marca F, et al. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5–6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28(6):E9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chung SB, Muradov JM, Lee SH, et al. Uncovertebral hypertrophy is a significant risk factor for the occurrence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement: survivorship analysis of Bryan disc for single-level cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir. 2012;154(6):1017–22.CrossRef Chung SB, Muradov JM, Lee SH, et al. Uncovertebral hypertrophy is a significant risk factor for the occurrence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement: survivorship analysis of Bryan disc for single-level cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir. 2012;154(6):1017–22.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cao S, Pan SF, Sun Y, et al. The correlation between the severity of uncovertebral joints degeneration and heterotopic ossification after single-level artificial cervical disc replacement. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020;100(45):3578–83.PubMed Cao S, Pan SF, Sun Y, et al. The correlation between the severity of uncovertebral joints degeneration and heterotopic ossification after single-level artificial cervical disc replacement. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020;100(45):3578–83.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Tubbs RS, Rompala OJ, Verma K, et al. Analysis of the uncinate processes of the cervical spine: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(4):402–7.CrossRef Tubbs RS, Rompala OJ, Verma K, et al. Analysis of the uncinate processes of the cervical spine: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(4):402–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, et al. Contribution of disc degeneration to osteophyte formation in the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(5):977–84.CrossRef Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, et al. Contribution of disc degeneration to osteophyte formation in the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(5):977–84.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(8):1886–93.CrossRef Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(8):1886–93.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dvorak J, Sutter M, Herdmann J. Cervical myelopathy: clinical and neurophysiological evaluation. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(Suppl 2):S181-7.CrossRef Dvorak J, Sutter M, Herdmann J. Cervical myelopathy: clinical and neurophysiological evaluation. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(Suppl 2):S181-7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lee SH, Son DW, Lee JS, et al. Relationship between endplate defects, modic change, facet joint degeneration, and disc degeneration of cervical spine. Neurospine. 2020;17(2):443–52.CrossRef Lee SH, Son DW, Lee JS, et al. Relationship between endplate defects, modic change, facet joint degeneration, and disc degeneration of cervical spine. Neurospine. 2020;17(2):443–52.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chen J, Li J, Qiu G, et al. Incidence and risk factors of axial symptoms after cervical disc arthroplasty: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11(1):103.CrossRef Chen J, Li J, Qiu G, et al. Incidence and risk factors of axial symptoms after cervical disc arthroplasty: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11(1):103.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wang QL, Tu ZM, Hu P, et al. Long-term results comparing cervical disc arthroplasty to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):16–30.CrossRef Wang QL, Tu ZM, Hu P, et al. Long-term results comparing cervical disc arthroplasty to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):16–30.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pescatori L, Tropeano MP, Visocchi M, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: when and why the cervical corpectomy? World Neurosurg. 2020;140:548–55.CrossRef Pescatori L, Tropeano MP, Visocchi M, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: when and why the cervical corpectomy? World Neurosurg. 2020;140:548–55.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Moghaddamjou A, Badhiwala JH, Fehlings MG. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: changing frontiers. World Neurosurg. 2020;135:377–8.CrossRef Moghaddamjou A, Badhiwala JH, Fehlings MG. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: changing frontiers. World Neurosurg. 2020;135:377–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wilson JR, Barry S, Fischer DJ, et al. Frequency, timing, and predictors of neurological dysfunction in the nonmyelopathic patient with cervical spinal cord compression, canal stenosis, and/or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 2013;38(22 Suppl 1):S37-54.CrossRef Wilson JR, Barry S, Fischer DJ, et al. Frequency, timing, and predictors of neurological dysfunction in the nonmyelopathic patient with cervical spinal cord compression, canal stenosis, and/or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 2013;38(22 Suppl 1):S37-54.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The CT assessment of uncovertebral joints degeneration in a healthy population
Authors
Tianji Huang
Jie Qin
Weiyang Zhong
Ke Tang
Zhengxue Quan
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
European Journal of Medical Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2047-783X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00619-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

European Journal of Medical Research 1/2021 Go to the issue