Skip to main content
Top
Published in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 2/2020

01-08-2020 | Computed Tomography | Original Article

Single-use, patient-specific instrumentation technology in knee arthroplasty: a comparative study between standard instrumentation and PSI efficiency system

Authors: S. Giannotti, F. Sacchetti, C. Citarelli, V. Bottai, N. Bianchi, G. Agostini, R. Capanna

Published in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Patient-specific instrumentation is a surgical technique that was created to improve the accuracy of implantation, surgical time and workflow in total knee arthroplasty. This study is a single-center, single-surgeon randomized clinical trial. The aim of this work was to evaluate clinical efficacy of PSI versus standard surgical instrumentation in malalignment risk and blood loss reduction. From April 2015 to September 2016, 40 patients for a total of 40 knees were included in the randomization process. Each patient underwent CT scan of the lower limb including hip, knee and ankle joint with the realization of the PSI system and the TKA with Medacta GMK Primary®. Patients were evaluated 1 month after surgery with X-ray and after 2 months with clinical examination and assessment by Knee Society Score (KSS). Blood loss was detected by adding the values calculated in the operative room and the blood loss in the vacuum systems. In the study group, mean value of KSS was 85.2 (IC 95% 81.2–88.5), mean blood loss was 657 ml (IC 95% 580.6–735.4), and mean value of femorotibial angle was 178.8° (IC 95% 178.5–179.3). In the control group, mean value of KSS was 87.2 (IC 95% 85.3–89.4), mean blood loss was 866.5 ml (IC 95% 763.3–972.5), and mean value of femorotibial angle was 178.9°(IC 95% 177.6–180.3). The Student t test detected a significant difference in blood loss between groups (p < 0.05), and no differences were found between KSS. The single-use instrumentation should improve precision, operative time, turnover time, sterilization and maintenance costs and could help to reduce infection risks. Our results confirm only the improvement on reducing blood loss. In our opinion, this technique should be used in selected patients when the surgeon could have some difficulties to perform femoral cuts on coronal plane or when patients need to have a very little blood loss due to other conditions.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13CrossRef Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ng VY, Declaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BCRT, Lombardi AV Jr (2012) Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:99–107CrossRef Ng VY, Declaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BCRT, Lombardi AV Jr (2012) Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:99–107CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nam D, Mcarthur MDBA, Mayman DJ, Haas MDSB, Cross MB, Pearle AD (2012) Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg 25:213–219CrossRef Nam D, Mcarthur MDBA, Mayman DJ, Haas MDSB, Cross MB, Pearle AD (2012) Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg 25:213–219CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Ford AD, Foreman K, Nunley RM (2012) Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg 94(11):95–99CrossRef Barrack RL, Ford AD, Foreman K, Nunley RM (2012) Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg 94(11):95–99CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Calbiyik M (2017) Clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty performed using patient-specific cutting guides. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res 2:6168–6173 Calbiyik M (2017) Clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty performed using patient-specific cutting guides. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res 2:6168–6173
13.
go back to reference Nizam I, Batra AV (2018) Accuracy of bone resection in total knee arthroplasty using CT assisted-3D printed patient speci fi c cutting guides. SICOT-J 4(29):5 Nizam I, Batra AV (2018) Accuracy of bone resection in total knee arthroplasty using CT assisted-3D printed patient speci fi c cutting guides. SICOT-J 4(29):5
14.
go back to reference Stolarczyk A, Nagraba L, Mitek T, Stolarczyk M, Jakucinski M (2018) Does patient-specific instrumentation improve femoral and tibial component alignment in total knee arthroplasty? A prospective randomized study Stolarczyk A, Nagraba L, Mitek T, Stolarczyk M, Jakucinski M (2018) Does patient-specific instrumentation improve femoral and tibial component alignment in total knee arthroplasty? A prospective randomized study
15.
go back to reference Thienpont E, Grosu I, Schwab FPP (2015) The use of patient-specific instruments does not reduce blood loss during minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2055–2060CrossRef Thienpont E, Grosu I, Schwab FPP (2015) The use of patient-specific instruments does not reduce blood loss during minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2055–2060CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Voleti PB, Hamula MJ, Baldwin KD et al (2014) Current data do not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:1709–1712CrossRef Voleti PB, Hamula MJ, Baldwin KD et al (2014) Current data do not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:1709–1712CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A (1996) GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 28(1):1–11CrossRef Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A (1996) GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 28(1):1–11CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dell’Osso G et al (2016) Single-use instrumentation technologies in knee arthroplasty: state of the art. Orthopaedic Surgery surgical technology international XXVIII. Surg Technol Int 28:243–246PubMed Dell’Osso G et al (2016) Single-use instrumentation technologies in knee arthroplasty: state of the art. Orthopaedic Surgery surgical technology international XXVIII. Surg Technol Int 28:243–246PubMed
19.
go back to reference Mattei L et al (2016) Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a state of the art. Cto hospital, città della salute e della scienza, turin, Italy. Ann Transl Med 4(7):126CrossRef Mattei L et al (2016) Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a state of the art. Cto hospital, città della salute e della scienza, turin, Italy. Ann Transl Med 4(7):126CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sassoon A, Nam D, Nunley R et al (2015) Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(1):151–158CrossRef Sassoon A, Nam D, Nunley R et al (2015) Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(1):151–158CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sadoghi P (2015) Current concepts in total knee arthroplasty: patient specific instrumentation Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz. Austria. World J Orthop 6(6):446–448CrossRef Sadoghi P (2015) Current concepts in total knee arthroplasty: patient specific instrumentation Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz. Austria. World J Orthop 6(6):446–448CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mont MA, Johnson AJ, Issa K et al (2013) Single-use instrumentation, cutting blocks, and trials decrease contamination during total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of navigated and non-navigated cases. J Knee Surg 26(4):285–290CrossRef Mont MA, Johnson AJ, Issa K et al (2013) Single-use instrumentation, cutting blocks, and trials decrease contamination during total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of navigated and non-navigated cases. J Knee Surg 26(4):285–290CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Renson L, Poilvache P, Van den Wyngaert H (2014) Improved alignment and operating room efficiency with patient-specific instrumentation for TKA. Knee. 21(6):1216–1220CrossRef Renson L, Poilvache P, Van den Wyngaert H (2014) Improved alignment and operating room efficiency with patient-specific instrumentation for TKA. Knee. 21(6):1216–1220CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Conteduca F, Iorio R, Mazza D, Caperna L, Bolle G, Argento G et al Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation Conteduca F, Iorio R, Mazza D, Caperna L, Bolle G, Argento G et al Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation
27.
go back to reference Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson JA et al (2014) Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty provides no improvement in component alignment. J Arthroplasty 29:1705–1708CrossRef Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson JA et al (2014) Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty provides no improvement in component alignment. J Arthroplasty 29:1705–1708CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jones GG, Clarke KLS, Collins R, Jaere RCM, Harris S, Cobb SHJP (2018) Do patient-specific instruments (PSI) for UKA allow non-expert surgeons to achieve the same saw cut accuracy as expert surgeons? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(11):1601–1608CrossRef Jones GG, Clarke KLS, Collins R, Jaere RCM, Harris S, Cobb SHJP (2018) Do patient-specific instruments (PSI) for UKA allow non-expert surgeons to achieve the same saw cut accuracy as expert surgeons? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(11):1601–1608CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Single-use, patient-specific instrumentation technology in knee arthroplasty: a comparative study between standard instrumentation and PSI efficiency system
Authors
S. Giannotti
F. Sacchetti
C. Citarelli
V. Bottai
N. Bianchi
G. Agostini
R. Capanna
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 2035-5106
Electronic ISSN: 2035-5114
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00612-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 2/2020 Go to the issue