Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Computed Tomography | Emergency Radiology

Revised Atlanta classification for CT pancreatic and peripancreatic collections in the first month of acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement

Authors: Neesmah Badat, Ingrid Millet, Lucie Corno, Wassef Khaled, Isabelle Boulay-Coletta, Marc Zins

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess interobserver agreement when using the revised Atlanta classification (RAC) to categorize pancreatic and peripancreatic collections during the first month of acute pancreatitis (AP), and to correlate type of collection to outcome.

Material and methods

This retrospective study of 115 consecutive patients admitted for 123 AP episodes, 178 CTs performed within the first month showed peripancreatic abnormalities. Each AP episode was classified as mild, moderately severe, or severe based on the RAC. Two radiologists, blinded to clinical data, used RAC criteria to retrospectively categorize the collections as acute peripancreatic fluid collections (APFC) or acute necrotic collections (ANC). Interobserver agreement was assessed based on Cohen’s κ statistics and compared according to CT timing.

Results

Interobserver agreement for categorizing peripancreatic collections was moderate (κ = 0.45) and did not improve with time to CT (κ values, 0.53 < day 3, 0.34 on days 3–6, and 0.43 ≥ day 7). For detecting parenchymal necrosis, interobserver agreement was also moderate (κ = 0.45). AP was less severe in patients with APFC versus ANC (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Our finding of moderate interobserver agreement when using the RAC to categorize pancreatic and peripancreatic collections by CT indicates that the accurate diagnosis of APFC or ANC by CT in the first 4 weeks after symptom onset is often challenging.

Key Points

• Interobserver agreement was moderate for categorizing peripancreatic collections.
• Interobserver agreement did not improve with time from onset to CT.
• Interobserver agreement was moderate for detecting parenchymal necrosis.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bradley EL 3rd (1992) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128:586–590 Bradley EL 3rd (1992) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128:586–590
3.
go back to reference Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Bollen TL et al (2006) Describing computed tomography findings in acute necrotizing pancreatitis with the Atlanta classification: an interobserver agreement study. Pancreas 33:331–335CrossRefPubMed Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Bollen TL et al (2006) Describing computed tomography findings in acute necrotizing pancreatitis with the Atlanta classification: an interobserver agreement study. Pancreas 33:331–335CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference da Costa DW, Boerma D, van Santvoort HC et al (2014) Staged multidisciplinary step-up management for necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 101:e65–e79CrossRefPubMed da Costa DW, Boerma D, van Santvoort HC et al (2014) Staged multidisciplinary step-up management for necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 101:e65–e79CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shyu JY, Sainani NI, Sahni VA et al (2014) Necrotizing pancreatitis: diagnosis, imaging, and intervention. Radiographics 34:1218–1239CrossRefPubMed Shyu JY, Sainani NI, Sahni VA et al (2014) Necrotizing pancreatitis: diagnosis, imaging, and intervention. Radiographics 34:1218–1239CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C et al (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62:102–111CrossRefPubMed Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C et al (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62:102–111CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Thoeni RF (2012) The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment. Radiology 262:751–764CrossRefPubMed Thoeni RF (2012) The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment. Radiology 262:751–764CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Murphy KP, O’Connor OJ, Maher MM (2014) Updated imaging nomenclature for acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:W464–W469CrossRefPubMed Murphy KP, O’Connor OJ, Maher MM (2014) Updated imaging nomenclature for acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:W464–W469CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Bakker OJ, van Santvoort H, Besselink MG et al (2013) Extrapancreatic necrosis without pancreatic parenchymal necrosis: a separate entity in necrotising pancreatitis? Gut 62:1475–1480CrossRefPubMed Bakker OJ, van Santvoort H, Besselink MG et al (2013) Extrapancreatic necrosis without pancreatic parenchymal necrosis: a separate entity in necrotising pancreatitis? Gut 62:1475–1480CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wang M, Wei A, Guo Q et al (2016) Clinical outcomes of combined necrotizing pancreatitis versus extrapancreatic necrosis alone. Pancreatology 16:57–65CrossRefPubMed Wang M, Wei A, Guo Q et al (2016) Clinical outcomes of combined necrotizing pancreatitis versus extrapancreatic necrosis alone. Pancreatology 16:57–65CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bollen TL (2016) Acute pancreatitis: international classification and nomenclature. Clin Radiol 71:121–133CrossRefPubMed Bollen TL (2016) Acute pancreatitis: international classification and nomenclature. Clin Radiol 71:121–133CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sternby H, Verdonk RC, Aguilar G et al (2016) Significant inter-observer variation in the diagnosis of extrapancreatic necrosis and type of pancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis - an international multicenter evaluation of the revised Atlanta classification. Pancreatology 16:791–797CrossRefPubMed Sternby H, Verdonk RC, Aguilar G et al (2016) Significant inter-observer variation in the diagnosis of extrapancreatic necrosis and type of pancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis - an international multicenter evaluation of the revised Atlanta classification. Pancreatology 16:791–797CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Singh VK, Bollen TL, Wu BU et al (2011) An assessment of the severity of interstitial pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:1098–1103CrossRefPubMed Singh VK, Bollen TL, Wu BU et al (2011) An assessment of the severity of interstitial pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:1098–1103CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Morgan DE, Baron TH, Smith JK, Robbin ML, Kenney PJ (1997) Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology 203:773–778CrossRefPubMed Morgan DE, Baron TH, Smith JK, Robbin ML, Kenney PJ (1997) Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology 203:773–778CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kamal A, Singh VK, Akshintala VS et al (2015) CT and MRI assessment of symptomatic organized pancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic duct disruption: an interreader variability study using the revised Atlanta classification 2012. Abdom Imaging 40:1608–1616CrossRefPubMed Kamal A, Singh VK, Akshintala VS et al (2015) CT and MRI assessment of symptomatic organized pancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic duct disruption: an interreader variability study using the revised Atlanta classification 2012. Abdom Imaging 40:1608–1616CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Yadav AK, Sharma R, Kandasamy D et al (2015) Perfusion CT: can it predict the development of pancreatic necrosis in early stage of severe acute pancreatitis? Abdom Imaging 40:488–499CrossRefPubMed Yadav AK, Sharma R, Kandasamy D et al (2015) Perfusion CT: can it predict the development of pancreatic necrosis in early stage of severe acute pancreatitis? Abdom Imaging 40:488–499CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tsuji Y, Yamamoto H, Yazumi S et al (2007) Perfusion computerized tomography can predict pancreatic necrosis in early stages of severe acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1484–1492CrossRefPubMed Tsuji Y, Yamamoto H, Yazumi S et al (2007) Perfusion computerized tomography can predict pancreatic necrosis in early stages of severe acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1484–1492CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tsuji Y, Takahashi N, Fletcher JG et al (2014) Subtraction color map of contrast-enhanced and unenhanced CT for the prediction of pancreatic necrosis in early stage of acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W349–W356CrossRefPubMed Tsuji Y, Takahashi N, Fletcher JG et al (2014) Subtraction color map of contrast-enhanced and unenhanced CT for the prediction of pancreatic necrosis in early stage of acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W349–W356CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Marin D, Boll DT, Mileto A, Nelson RC (2014) State of the art: dual-energy CT of the abdomen. Radiology 271:327–342CrossRefPubMed Marin D, Boll DT, Mileto A, Nelson RC (2014) State of the art: dual-energy CT of the abdomen. Radiology 271:327–342CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Spanier BW, Nio Y, van der Hulst RW, Tuynman HA, Dijkgraaf MG, Bruno MJ (2010) Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch Observational Multicenter Study. Pancreatology 10:222–228 Spanier BW, Nio Y, van der Hulst RW, Tuynman HA, Dijkgraaf MG, Bruno MJ (2010) Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch Observational Multicenter Study. Pancreatology 10:222–228
Metadata
Title
Revised Atlanta classification for CT pancreatic and peripancreatic collections in the first month of acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement
Authors
Neesmah Badat
Ingrid Millet
Lucie Corno
Wassef Khaled
Isabelle Boulay-Coletta
Marc Zins
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5906-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

European Radiology 5/2019 Go to the issue