Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Computed Tomography | Urogenital

Protocol analysis of dual-energy CT for optimization of kidney stone detection in virtual non-contrast reconstructions

Authors: Matthias Lazar, Helmut Ringl, Pascal Baltzer, Daniel Toth, Christian Seitz, Bernhard Krauss, Ewald Unger, Stephan Polanec, Dietmar Tamandl, Christian J. Herold, Michael Toepker

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Previous studies have shown that split-bolus protocols in virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions of dual-energy computed tomography (DE-CT) significantly decrease radiation dose in patients with urinary stone disease. To evaluate the impact on kidney stone detection rate of stone composition, size, tube voltage, and iodine concentration for VNC reconstructions of DE-CT.

Methods

In this prospective study, 16 kidney stones of different sizes (1.2–4.5 mm) and compositions (struvite, cystine, whewellite, brushite) were placed within a kidney phantom. Seventy-two scans with nine different iodine contrast agents/saline solutions with increasing attenuation (0–1400 HU) and different kilovoltage settings (70 kV/150 kV; 80 kV/150 kV; 90 kV/150 kV; 100 kV/150 kV) were performed. Two experienced radiologists independently rated the images for the presence and absence of stones. Multivariate classification tree analysis and descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance.

Results

Classification tree analysis revealed a higher detection rate of renal calculi > 2 mm in size compared with that of renal calculi < 2 mm (84.7%; 12.7%; p < 0.001). For stones with a diameter > 2 mm, the best results were found at 70 kV/Sn 150 kV and 80 kV/Sn 150 kV in scans with contrast media attenuation of 600 HU or less, with sensitivity of 99.6% and 96.0%, respectively. A higher luminal attenuation (> 600 HU) resulted in a significantly decreased detection rate (91.8%, 0–600 HU; 70.7%, 900–1400 HU; p < 0.001). In our study setup, the detection rates were best for cystine stones.

Conclusion

Scan protocols in DE-CT with lower tube current and lower contrast medium attenuation show excellent results in VNC for stones larger than 2 mm but have limitations for small stones.

Key Points

• The detection rate of virtual non-contrast reconstructions is highly dependent on the surrounding contrast medium attenuation at the renal pelvis and should be kept as low as possible, as at an attenuation higher than 600 HU the VNC reconstructions are susceptible to masking ureteral stones.
• Protocols with lower tube voltages (70 kV/Sn 150 kV and 80 kV/Sn 150 kV) improve the detection rate of kidney stones in VNC reconstructions.
• The visibility of renal stones in virtual non-contrast of dual-energy CT is highly associated with the size, and results in a significantly lower detection rate in stones below 2 mm.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Worster A, Preyra I, Weaver B, Haines T (2002) The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 40:280–286CrossRef Worster A, Preyra I, Weaver B, Haines T (2002) The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 40:280–286CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Graser A, Johnson TR, Hecht EM et al (2009) Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? Radiology 252:433–440CrossRef Graser A, Johnson TR, Hecht EM et al (2009) Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? Radiology 252:433–440CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Toepker M, Moritz T, Krauss B et al (2012) Virtual non-contrast in second-generation, dual-energy computed tomography: reliability of attenuation values. Eur J Radiol 81:e398–e405CrossRef Toepker M, Moritz T, Krauss B et al (2012) Virtual non-contrast in second-generation, dual-energy computed tomography: reliability of attenuation values. Eur J Radiol 81:e398–e405CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mangold S, Thomas C, Fenchel M et al (2012) Virtual nonenhanced dual-energy CT urography with tin-filter technology: determinants of detection of urinary calculi in the renal collecting system. Radiology 264:119–125CrossRef Mangold S, Thomas C, Fenchel M et al (2012) Virtual nonenhanced dual-energy CT urography with tin-filter technology: determinants of detection of urinary calculi in the renal collecting system. Radiology 264:119–125CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Frauenfelder T et al (2007) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of urinary stone disease. Invest Radiol 42:823–829CrossRef Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Frauenfelder T et al (2007) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of urinary stone disease. Invest Radiol 42:823–829CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Takahashi N, Vrtiska TJ, Kawashima A et al (2010) Detectability of urinary stones on virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT. Radiology 256:184–190CrossRef Takahashi N, Vrtiska TJ, Kawashima A et al (2010) Detectability of urinary stones on virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT. Radiology 256:184–190CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Toepker M, Kuehas F, Kienzl D et al (2014) Dual energy computerized tomography with a split bolus-a 1-stop shop for patients with suspected urinary stones? J Urol 191:792–797CrossRef Toepker M, Kuehas F, Kienzl D et al (2014) Dual energy computerized tomography with a split bolus-a 1-stop shop for patients with suspected urinary stones? J Urol 191:792–797CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086CrossRef Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yeo YJ, Kim SH, Kim MJ, Kim YH, Cho SH, Lee EJ (2015) Diagnostic efficiency of split-bolus dual-energy computed tomography for patients with suspected urinary stones. J Comput Assist Tomogr 39:25–31CrossRef Yeo YJ, Kim SH, Kim MJ, Kim YH, Cho SH, Lee EJ (2015) Diagnostic efficiency of split-bolus dual-energy computed tomography for patients with suspected urinary stones. J Comput Assist Tomogr 39:25–31CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Toepker M, Euller G, Unger E et al (2013) Stenosis quantification of coronary arteries in coronary vessel phantoms with second-generation dual-source CT: influence of measurement parameters and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W227–W234CrossRef Toepker M, Euller G, Unger E et al (2013) Stenosis quantification of coronary arteries in coronary vessel phantoms with second-generation dual-source CT: influence of measurement parameters and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W227–W234CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hesse A, Kruse R, Geilenkeuser WJ, Schmidt M (2005) Quality control in urinary stone analysis: results of 44 ring trials (1980-2001). Clin Chem Lab Med 43:298–303CrossRef Hesse A, Kruse R, Geilenkeuser WJ, Schmidt M (2005) Quality control in urinary stone analysis: results of 44 ring trials (1980-2001). Clin Chem Lab Med 43:298–303CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wu W, Ou L, Liang Y, Yuan J (2014) Interconversion of stone composition profiles from two recurrent stone episodes in stone formers. Clin Chem Lab Med 52:1019–1024PubMed Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wu W, Ou L, Liang Y, Yuan J (2014) Interconversion of stone composition profiles from two recurrent stone episodes in stone formers. Clin Chem Lab Med 52:1019–1024PubMed
15.
go back to reference Karlo CA, Gnannt R, Winklehner A et al (2013) Split-bolus dual-energy CT urography: protocol optimization and diagnostic performance for the detection of urinary stones. Abdom Imaging 38:1136–1143CrossRef Karlo CA, Gnannt R, Winklehner A et al (2013) Split-bolus dual-energy CT urography: protocol optimization and diagnostic performance for the detection of urinary stones. Abdom Imaging 38:1136–1143CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chen CY, Hsu JS, Jaw TS et al (2015) Split-bolus portal venous phase dual-energy CT urography: protocol design, image quality, and dose reduction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:W492–W501CrossRef Chen CY, Hsu JS, Jaw TS et al (2015) Split-bolus portal venous phase dual-energy CT urography: protocol design, image quality, and dose reduction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:W492–W501CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Takahashi N, Hartman RP, Vrtiska TJ et al (2008) Dual-energy CT iodine-subtraction virtual unenhanced technique to detect urinary stones in an iodine-filled collecting system: a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1169–1173CrossRef Takahashi N, Hartman RP, Vrtiska TJ et al (2008) Dual-energy CT iodine-subtraction virtual unenhanced technique to detect urinary stones in an iodine-filled collecting system: a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1169–1173CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 52:1610–1631CrossRef Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 52:1610–1631CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT et al (2010) Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? Radiographics 30:1037–1055CrossRef Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT et al (2010) Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? Radiographics 30:1037–1055CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M et al (2007) Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 17:1510–1517CrossRef Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M et al (2007) Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 17:1510–1517CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yu L, Primak AN, Liu X, McCollough CH (2009) Image quality optimization and evaluation of linearly mixed images in dual-source, dual-energy CT. Med Phys 36:1019–1024CrossRef Yu L, Primak AN, Liu X, McCollough CH (2009) Image quality optimization and evaluation of linearly mixed images in dual-source, dual-energy CT. Med Phys 36:1019–1024CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bellin MF, Renard-Penna R, Conort P et al (2004) Helical CT evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary tract calculi with a discriminant analysis of CT-attenuation values and density. Eur Radiol 14:2134–2140CrossRef Bellin MF, Renard-Penna R, Conort P et al (2004) Helical CT evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary tract calculi with a discriminant analysis of CT-attenuation values and density. Eur Radiol 14:2134–2140CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M et al (2010) Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with X-ray diffraction. Radiology 257:394–401CrossRef Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M et al (2010) Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with X-ray diffraction. Radiology 257:394–401CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, Heisey D, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak M (2000) Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 55:816–819CrossRef Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, Heisey D, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak M (2000) Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 55:816–819CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG et al (2017) Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3:17001CrossRef Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG et al (2017) Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3:17001CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Knoll T, Bach T, Humke U et al (2016) S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium. Urologe A 55:904–922CrossRef Knoll T, Bach T, Humke U et al (2016) S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium. Urologe A 55:904–922CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Grosse Hokamp N, Lennartz S, Salem J et al (2020) Dose independent characterization of renal stones by means of dual energy computed tomography and machine learning: an ex-vivo study. Eur Radiol 30:1397–1404CrossRef Grosse Hokamp N, Lennartz S, Salem J et al (2020) Dose independent characterization of renal stones by means of dual energy computed tomography and machine learning: an ex-vivo study. Eur Radiol 30:1397–1404CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Edwards TJ, Dickinson AJ, Natale S, Gosling J, McGrath JS (2006) A prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield resulting from the attendance of 4020 patients at a protocol-driven haematuria clinic. BJU Int 97:301–305 discussion 305CrossRef Edwards TJ, Dickinson AJ, Natale S, Gosling J, McGrath JS (2006) A prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield resulting from the attendance of 4020 patients at a protocol-driven haematuria clinic. BJU Int 97:301–305 discussion 305CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Protocol analysis of dual-energy CT for optimization of kidney stone detection in virtual non-contrast reconstructions
Authors
Matthias Lazar
Helmut Ringl
Pascal Baltzer
Daniel Toth
Christian Seitz
Bernhard Krauss
Ewald Unger
Stephan Polanec
Dietmar Tamandl
Christian J. Herold
Michael Toepker
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06806-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

European Radiology 8/2020 Go to the issue