Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Insights into Imaging
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Computed Tomography | Original Article

CT density of cervical thymus, in comparison with mediastinal thymus

Authors: Anitha Sen, Jiji Valsalamony, Jubie Raj

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Cervical component of thymus is noted more in children and young adults than in older age group. CT texture (lobules of soft tissue interspersed with fat), similarity with CT density of mediastinal thymus and continuity with mediastinal thymus on sagittal/coronal images, are given as the criteria for diagnosis of the cervical thymus. But CT densities of cervical and mediastinal components of the thymus may vary. The purpose of our study was to compare CT densities of cervical and mediastinal parts of the thymus, in cases where ultrasonography correlation was available.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 22 patients who had undergone CT between May 2015 and May 2017 and in whom ultrasonography (USG) correlation was available. CT densities of cervical and mediastinal components of thymus were measured.

Results

1.
CT density of cervical thymus is lower than the CT density of mediastinal thymus by ~ 25 HU.
 
2.
There is a moderate positive correlation between CT densities of cervical and mediastinal parts of the thymus.
 
3.
CT densities of both cervical and mediastinal thymus were found to reduce with age, but the reduction was statistically significant only in the cervical thymus in this study.
 

Conclusions

  • CT densities of cervical and mediastinal components of the thymus may vary, with CT density of cervical thymus being lower. There is a positive correlation between CT densities of cervical and mediastinal parts of the thymus.
  • CT density of cervical thymus reduces with age.
Understanding these may help avoid confusion on CT and avoid the need for correlative USG, saving time and effort.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Prabhu AV, Kale HA, Branstetter BF 4th (2015) Residual cervical thymus: a normal CT finding that may be present throughout patients’ lives. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(8):1525–1528CrossRef
2.
Costa NS, Laor T, Donnelly LF (2010) Superior cervical extension of the thymus: a normal finding that should not be mistaken for a mass. Radiology 256:238–242CrossRef
3.
Liu ME, Branstetter BF 4th, Whetstone J, Escott EJ (2006) Normal CT appearance of the distal thoracic duct. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(6):1615–1620CrossRef
4.
Bansal AG, Oudsema R, Masseaux JA, Rosenberg HK (2018) US of pediatric superficial masses of the head and neck. Radiographics. 38(4):1239–1263CrossRef
5.
Dua SG, Purandare NC, Shah S, Maitra R, Rangarajan V (2010) Cervical extension of the thymus mimicking metastatic recurrence of Ewing sarcoma on PET/CT. Indian J Nucl Med 25(4):176PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Han BK, Babcock DS, Oestreich AE (1989) Normal thymus in infancy: sonographic characteristics. Radiology. 170(2):471–474CrossRef
7.
Han BK, Yoon HK, Suh YL (2001) Thymic ultrasound. II. Diagnosis of aberrant cervical thymus. Pediatr Radiol 31(7):480–487CrossRef
8.
Nasseri F, Eftekhari F (2010) Clinical and radiologic review of the normal and abnormal thymus: pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics. 30(2):413–428CrossRef
9.
Zielke AM, Swischuk LE, Hernandez JA (2007) Ectopic cervical thymic tissue: can imaging obviate biopsy and surgical removal? Pediatr Radiol 37(11):1174–1177CrossRef
10.
Kissin CM, Husband JE, Nicholas D, Eversman W (1987) Benign thymic enlargement in adults after chemotherapy: CT demonstration. Radiology 163:67–70CrossRef
11.
Araki T, Nishino M, Gao W et al (2016) Normal thymus in adults: appearance on CT and associations with age, sex, BMI and smoking. Eur Radiol 26(1):15–24CrossRef
12.
Araki T, Sholl LM, Gerbaudo VH, Hatabu H, Nishino M (2014) Imaging characteristics of pathologically proven thymic hyperplasia: identifying features that can differentiate true from lymphoid hyperplasia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(3):471–478CrossRef
13.
Ackman JB, Kovacina B, Carter BW et al (2013) Sex difference in normal thymic appearance in adults 20-30 years of age. Radiology. 268(1):245–253CrossRef
14.
Araki T, Sholl LM, Gerbaudo VH, Hatabu H, Nishino M (2014) Thymic measurements in pathologically proven normal thymus and thymic hyperplasia: intraobserver and interobserver variabilities. Acad Radiol 21(6):733–742CrossRef
Metadata
Title
CT density of cervical thymus, in comparison with mediastinal thymus
Authors
Anitha Sen
Jiji Valsalamony
Jubie Raj
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0781-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Insights into Imaging 1/2019 Go to the issue

Educational Review

Updated WHO nomenclature of head and neck lesions and associated imaging findings

Statement

Interventional radiology in European radiology departments: a joint survey from the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE)

Educational Review

Cancer genome landscape: a radiologist’s guide to cancer genome medicine with imaging correlates

Pictorial Review

Multimodality imaging of indolent B cell lymphoma from diagnosis to transformation: what every radiologist should know

Original Article

Gender discrepancy in research activities during radiology residency

Pictorial Review

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvic floor—a pictorial review