Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Computed Tomography | Case report

Case report: Fabrication of a dental implant guide based on tetrahedron positioning technology

Authors: Jie Lin, Zhenxiang Lin, Zhiqiang Zheng

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Conventional static computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS) requires special equipment, such as 3D printers or computer numerical control (CNC) lathes. We present a low-cost workflow for manufacturing dental implant guides based on tetrahedron positioning technology (TPT). The aim of this case report was to use a surgical guide technique for dental implant placement using tetrahedron positioning technology.

Case presentation

A 28-year-old man consulted for the treatment of a missing right first mandibular molar by implant placement. The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data were imported into medical image processing software for analysis, and the implant design was simulated. The implant design on CBCT was transferred to the mandibular model using TPT, and the implant surgical guide was made to guide the dental implant operation. CBCT was performed postoperatively and compared with the preoperative design to check the accuracy. The central deviation of the implant head was 0.31 mm, the central deviation of the implant apex was 0.93 mm, and the implant angular deviation was 2.45°.

Conclusion

The use of tetrahedral positioning technology based on CBCT data is a new method for making implant guides. It is a promising technique offering a highly predictable outcome and lower risk of iatrogenic damage. However, these results should be interpreted with care since they are based on limited evidence from a case report. Larger population studies with longer follow-up periods and standardized experimental studies are required.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim T, Lee S, Kim GB, Hong D, Kwon J, Park JW, et al. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(2):195-201.e2.CrossRef Kim T, Lee S, Kim GB, Hong D, Kwon J, Park JW, et al. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(2):195-201.e2.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yeung M, Abdulmajeed A, Carrico CK, Deeb GR, Bencharit S. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(6):821–8.CrossRef Yeung M, Abdulmajeed A, Carrico CK, Deeb GR, Bencharit S. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(6):821–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Joda T, Derksen W, Wittneben JG, Kuehl S. Static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) analysing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), economics and surgical complications: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):359–73.CrossRef Joda T, Derksen W, Wittneben JG, Kuehl S. Static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) analysing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), economics and surgical complications: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):359–73.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Evans C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):416–35. CrossRef Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Evans C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):416–35. CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tattan M, Chambrone L, González-Martín O, Avila-Ortiz G. Static computer-aided, partially guided, and free-handed implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(10):889–916.CrossRef Tattan M, Chambrone L, González-Martín O, Avila-Ortiz G. Static computer-aided, partially guided, and free-handed implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(10):889–916.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tatakis DN, Chien HH, Parashis AO. Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. Periodontol 2000. 2019;81(1):194–208. Tatakis DN, Chien HH, Parashis AO. Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. Periodontol 2000. 2019;81(1):194–208.
9.
go back to reference Schimmel M, Janner SFM, Joda T, Wittneben JG, McKenna G, Brägger U. Mandibular implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses on implants with ultrashort and standard length: A pilot treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 28:S0022-3913(20)30293-6. Schimmel M, Janner SFM, Joda T, Wittneben JG, McKenna G, Brägger U. Mandibular implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses on implants with ultrashort and standard length: A pilot treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 28:S0022-3913(20)30293-6.
10.
go back to reference Monaco C, Arena A, Corsaletti L, Santomauro V, Venezia P, Cavalcanti R, Di Fiore A, Zucchelli G. 2D/3D accuracies of implant position after guided surgery using different surgical protocols: a retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(4):424–30.CrossRef Monaco C, Arena A, Corsaletti L, Santomauro V, Venezia P, Cavalcanti R, Di Fiore A, Zucchelli G. 2D/3D accuracies of implant position after guided surgery using different surgical protocols: a retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(4):424–30.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):121–33. D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):121–33.
12.
go back to reference Al Yafi F, Camenisch B, Al-Sabbagh M. Is digital guided implant surgery accurate and reliable? Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63(3):381–97.CrossRef Al Yafi F, Camenisch B, Al-Sabbagh M. Is digital guided implant surgery accurate and reliable? Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63(3):381–97.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fauroux MA, De Boutray M, Malthiéry E, Torres JH. New innovative method relating guided surgery to dental implant placement. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;119(3):249–53.CrossRef Fauroux MA, De Boutray M, Malthiéry E, Torres JH. New innovative method relating guided surgery to dental implant placement. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;119(3):249–53.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(2):394–401.CrossRef Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(2):394–401.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ling JY, Wong RW. Dental arch widths of Southern Chinese. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(1):54–63.CrossRef Ling JY, Wong RW. Dental arch widths of Southern Chinese. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(1):54–63.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Case report: Fabrication of a dental implant guide based on tetrahedron positioning technology
Authors
Jie Lin
Zhenxiang Lin
Zhiqiang Zheng
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01694-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Oral Health 1/2021 Go to the issue