Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2022

Open Access 16-06-2022 | Computed Tomography | Contrast Media

Machine learning-based prediction of insufficient contrast enhancement in coronary computed tomography angiography

Authors: R. R. Lopes, T. P. W. van den Boogert, N. H. J. Lobe, T. A. Verwest, J. P. S. Henriques, H. A. Marquering, R. N. Planken

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Patient-tailored contrast delivery protocols strongly reduce the total iodine load and in general improve image quality in CT coronary angiography (CTCA). We aim to use machine learning to predict cases with insufficient contrast enhancement and to identify parameters with the highest predictive value.

Methods

Machine learning models were developed using data from 1,447 CTs. We included patient features, imaging settings, and test bolus features. The models were trained to predict CTCA images with a mean attenuation value in the ascending aorta below 400 HU. The accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and precision-recall curves (AUPRC). Shapley Additive exPlanations was used to assess the impact of features on the prediction of insufficient contrast enhancement.

Results

A total of 399 out of 1,447 scans revealed attenuation values in the ascending aorta below 400 HU. The best model trained using only patient features and CT settings achieved an AUROC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73–0.83) and AUPRC of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.58–0.71). With the inclusion of the test bolus features, it achieved an AUROC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81–0.87), an AUPRC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.66–0.76), and a sensitivity of 0.66 and specificity of 0.88. The test bolus’ peak height was the feature that impacted low attenuation prediction most.

Conclusion

Prediction of insufficient contrast enhancement in CT coronary angiography scans can be achieved using machine learning models. Our experiments suggest that test bolus features are strongly predictive of low attenuation values and can be used to further improve patient-specific contrast delivery protocols.

Key Points

• Prediction of insufficient contrast enhancement in CT coronary angiography scans can be achieved using machine learning models.
• The peak height of the test bolus curve is the most impacting feature for the best performing model.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CAG et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323CrossRef Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CAG et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al (2001) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103:2535–2538CrossRef Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al (2001) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103:2535–2538CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Meijboom WB, Meijs MFL, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144CrossRef Meijboom WB, Meijs MFL, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357:599–603CrossRef Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357:599–603CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mihl C, Maas M, Turek J, et al (2017) Contrast media administration in coronary computed tomography angiography–a systematic review. In: RöFo-Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG, pp 312–325 Mihl C, Maas M, Turek J, et al (2017) Contrast media administration in coronary computed tomography angiography–a systematic review. In: RöFo-Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG, pp 312–325
9.
go back to reference Tan SK, Ng KH, Yeong CH et al (2019) Personalized administration of contrast medium with high delivery rate in low tube voltage coronary computed tomography angiography. Quant Imaging Med Surg 9:552CrossRef Tan SK, Ng KH, Yeong CH et al (2019) Personalized administration of contrast medium with high delivery rate in low tube voltage coronary computed tomography angiography. Quant Imaging Med Surg 9:552CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Isogai T, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y et al (2011) Body weight-tailored contrast material injection protocol for 64-detector row computed tomography coronary angiography. Jpn J Radiol 29:33–38CrossRef Isogai T, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y et al (2011) Body weight-tailored contrast material injection protocol for 64-detector row computed tomography coronary angiography. Jpn J Radiol 29:33–38CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nakaura T, Awai K, Yauaga Y et al (2008) Contrast injection protocols for coronary computed tomography angiography using a 64-detector scanner: comparison between patient weight-adjusted-and fixed iodine-dose protocols. Invest Radiol 43:512–519CrossRef Nakaura T, Awai K, Yauaga Y et al (2008) Contrast injection protocols for coronary computed tomography angiography using a 64-detector scanner: comparison between patient weight-adjusted-and fixed iodine-dose protocols. Invest Radiol 43:512–519CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kanao S et al (2007) Coronary angiography by 64-detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser: influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:272–280CrossRef Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kanao S et al (2007) Coronary angiography by 64-detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser: influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:272–280CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bae KT, Tran HQ, Heiken JP (2004) Uniform vascular contrast enhancement and reduced contrast medium volume achieved by using exponentially decelerated contrast material injection method. Radiology 231:732–736CrossRef Bae KT, Tran HQ, Heiken JP (2004) Uniform vascular contrast enhancement and reduced contrast medium volume achieved by using exponentially decelerated contrast material injection method. Radiology 231:732–736CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stekhoven DJ, Bühlmann P (2012) MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28:112–118CrossRef Stekhoven DJ, Bühlmann P (2012) MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28:112–118CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830 Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830
18.
go back to reference Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. Proc 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int Conf Knowl Discov Data Min 785–794 Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. Proc 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int Conf Knowl Discov Data Min 785–794
19.
go back to reference Lundberg SM, Lee S-I (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on neural information processing systems. pp 4768–4777 Lundberg SM, Lee S-I (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on neural information processing systems. pp 4768–4777
20.
go back to reference Eberhard M, Alkadhi H (2020) Machine learning and deep neural networks: applications in patient and scan preparation, contrast medium, and radiation dose optimization. J Thorac Imaging 35:S17–S20CrossRef Eberhard M, Alkadhi H (2020) Machine learning and deep neural networks: applications in patient and scan preparation, contrast medium, and radiation dose optimization. J Thorac Imaging 35:S17–S20CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zhu X, Zhu Y, Liu W et al (2016) Improved image-quality consistency in coronary CT angiography using a test-bolus-based individually tailored contrast medium injection protocol. Clin Radiol 71:1113–1119CrossRef Zhu X, Zhu Y, Liu W et al (2016) Improved image-quality consistency in coronary CT angiography using a test-bolus-based individually tailored contrast medium injection protocol. Clin Radiol 71:1113–1119CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kidoh M, Nakaura T, Nakamura S et al (2014) Novel contrast-injection protocol for coronary computed tomographic angiography: contrast-injection protocol customized according to the patient’s time-attenuation response. Heart Vessels 29:149–155CrossRef Kidoh M, Nakaura T, Nakamura S et al (2014) Novel contrast-injection protocol for coronary computed tomographic angiography: contrast-injection protocol customized according to the patient’s time-attenuation response. Heart Vessels 29:149–155CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yin W-H, Yu Y-T, Zhang Y et al (2020) Contrast medium injection protocols for coronary CT angiography: should contrast medium volumes be tailored to body weight or body surface area? Clin Radiol 75:395–e17CrossRef Yin W-H, Yu Y-T, Zhang Y et al (2020) Contrast medium injection protocols for coronary CT angiography: should contrast medium volumes be tailored to body weight or body surface area? Clin Radiol 75:395–e17CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Machine learning-based prediction of insufficient contrast enhancement in coronary computed tomography angiography
Authors
R. R. Lopes
T. P. W. van den Boogert
N. H. J. Lobe
T. A. Verwest
J. P. S. Henriques
H. A. Marquering
R. N. Planken
Publication date
16-06-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08901-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2022

European Radiology 10/2022 Go to the issue