Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiation Oncology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Computed Tomography | Research

Evaluation of a new software prototype for frameless radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations

Authors: Daniel Schmidhalter, Dominik Henzen, Evelyn Herrmann, Werner Volken, Paul-Henry Mackeprang, Ekin Ermis, Hossein Hemmatazad, Jonas Honegger, Benjamin Haas, Michael K. Fix, Peter Manser

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In order to locate an arteriovenous malformation, typically, a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is carried out. To use the DSA for target definition an accurate image registration between CT and DSA is required. Carrying out a non-invasive, frameless procedure, registration of the 2D-DSA images with the CT is critical. A new software prototype is enabling this frameless procedure. The aim of this work was to evaluate the prototype in terms of targeting accuracy and reliability based on phantom measurements as well as with the aid of patient data. In addition, the user’s ability to recognize registration mismatches and quality was assessed.

Methods

Targeting accuracy was measured with a simple cubic, as well as with an anthropomorphic head phantom. Clearly defined academic targets within the phantoms were contoured on the CT. These reference structures were compared with the structures generated within the prototype. A similar approach was used with patient data, where the clinically contoured target served as the reference structure.
An important error source decreasing the target accuracy comes from registration errors between CT and 2D-DSA. For that reason, the tools in BC provided to the user to check these registrations are very important. In order to check if the user is able to recognize registration errors, a set of different registration errors was introduced to the correctly registered CT and 2D-DSA image data sets of three different patients. Each of six different users rated the whole set of registrations within the prototype.

Results

The target accuracy of the prototype was found to be below 0.04 cm for the cubic phantom and below 0.05 cm for the anthropomorphic head phantom. The mean target accuracy for the 15 patient cases was found to be below 0.3 cm.
In the registration verification part, almost all introduced registration errors above 1° or 0.1 cm were detected by the six users. Nevertheless, in order to quantify and categorize the possibility to detect mismatches in the registration process more data needs to be evaluated.

Conclusion

Our study shows, that the prototype is a useful tool that has the potential to fill the gap towards a frameless procedure when treating AVMs with the aid of 2D-DSA images in radiosurgery. The target accuracy of the prototype is similar to other systems already established in clinical routine.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Raffa SJ, Chi YY, Bova FJ, Friedman WA. Validation of the radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation score in a large linear accelerator radiosurgery experience. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(4):832–9.CrossRef Raffa SJ, Chi YY, Bova FJ, Friedman WA. Validation of the radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation score in a large linear accelerator radiosurgery experience. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(4):832–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sun DQ, Carson KA, Raza SM, Batra S, Kleinberg LR, Lim M, Huang J, Rigamonti D. The radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations: obliteration, morbidities, and performance status. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(2):354–61.CrossRef Sun DQ, Carson KA, Raza SM, Batra S, Kleinberg LR, Lim M, Huang J, Rigamonti D. The radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations: obliteration, morbidities, and performance status. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(2):354–61.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference van Bejnum J, van der Worp HB, Buis DR, Al-Shahi Salman R, Kapelle LJ, Rinnkel GJ, van der Sprenkel JW, Vandertop WP, Algra A, Klijn CJ. Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2011;306(18):2011–9.CrossRef van Bejnum J, van der Worp HB, Buis DR, Al-Shahi Salman R, Kapelle LJ, Rinnkel GJ, van der Sprenkel JW, Vandertop WP, Algra A, Klijn CJ. Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2011;306(18):2011–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Andrade-Souza YM, Ramani M, Scora D, Tsao MN, TerBrugge K, Schwartz ML. Radiosurgical treatment for rolandic arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:689–97.CrossRef Andrade-Souza YM, Ramani M, Scora D, Tsao MN, TerBrugge K, Schwartz ML. Radiosurgical treatment for rolandic arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:689–97.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zhang XQ, Shirato H, Aoyama H, Ushikoshi S, Nishioka T, Zang DZ, Miyasaka K. Clinical significance of 3D reconstruction of arteriovenous malformation using digital subtraction angiography and its modification with CT information in stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(5):1392–9.CrossRef Zhang XQ, Shirato H, Aoyama H, Ushikoshi S, Nishioka T, Zang DZ, Miyasaka K. Clinical significance of 3D reconstruction of arteriovenous malformation using digital subtraction angiography and its modification with CT information in stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(5):1392–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Clinical research in stereotactic radiosurgery: lessons learned from over 10,000 cases. Neurol Res. 2011;33:792–802.CrossRef Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Clinical research in stereotactic radiosurgery: lessons learned from over 10,000 cases. Neurol Res. 2011;33:792–802.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zabel A, Milker-Zabel S, Huber P, Schulz-Ertner D, Schlegel W, Debus J. Treatment outcome after linac-based radiosurgery in cerebral arteriovenous malformations: retrospective analysis of factors affecting obliteration. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77:105–10.CrossRef Zabel A, Milker-Zabel S, Huber P, Schulz-Ertner D, Schlegel W, Debus J. Treatment outcome after linac-based radiosurgery in cerebral arteriovenous malformations: retrospective analysis of factors affecting obliteration. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77:105–10.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fokas E, Henzel M, Wittig A, Grund S, Engenhart-Cabillic R. Stereotactic radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: long-term follow-up in 164 patients of a single institution. J Neurol. 2013;260:2156–62.CrossRef Fokas E, Henzel M, Wittig A, Grund S, Engenhart-Cabillic R. Stereotactic radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: long-term follow-up in 164 patients of a single institution. J Neurol. 2013;260:2156–62.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kano H, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations after embolization: a case-control study. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:265–75.CrossRef Kano H, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations after embolization: a case-control study. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:265–75.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zacest AC, Caon J, Roos DE, Potter AE, Sullivan T. LINAC radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a single Centre prospective analysis and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;21:241–5.CrossRef Zacest AC, Caon J, Roos DE, Potter AE, Sullivan T. LINAC radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a single Centre prospective analysis and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;21:241–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lu XQ, Mahadevan A, Mathiowitz G, Lin PJP, Thomas A, Kasper EM, Floyd SR, Holupka E, La Rosa S, Wang F, Stevenson MA. Frameless angiogram-based stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of Arteriovenous malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:274–82.CrossRef Lu XQ, Mahadevan A, Mathiowitz G, Lin PJP, Thomas A, Kasper EM, Floyd SR, Holupka E, La Rosa S, Wang F, Stevenson MA. Frameless angiogram-based stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of Arteriovenous malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:274–82.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hristov D, Liu L, Adler JR, Gibbs IC, Moore T, Sarmiento M, Chang SD, Dodd R, Marks M, Do HM. Technique for targeting arterioveneous malformations using frameless image-guided robotic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79:1232–40.CrossRef Hristov D, Liu L, Adler JR, Gibbs IC, Moore T, Sarmiento M, Chang SD, Dodd R, Marks M, Do HM. Technique for targeting arterioveneous malformations using frameless image-guided robotic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79:1232–40.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Steenbeke F, et al. Analysis of the targeting uncertainty of a frameless radiosurgery technique for anteriovenous malformation. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113(3):371–3.CrossRef Steenbeke F, et al. Analysis of the targeting uncertainty of a frameless radiosurgery technique for anteriovenous malformation. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113(3):371–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a new software prototype for frameless radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations
Authors
Daniel Schmidhalter
Dominik Henzen
Evelyn Herrmann
Werner Volken
Paul-Henry Mackeprang
Ekin Ermis
Hossein Hemmatazad
Jonas Honegger
Benjamin Haas
Michael K. Fix
Peter Manser
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1422-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Radiation Oncology 1/2019 Go to the issue