Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Debate

Complex intervention modelling should capture the dynamics of adaptation

Authors: James Greenwood-Lee, Penelope Hawe, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre, Alan Shiell, Deborah A. Marshall

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Complexity has been linked to health interventions in two ways: first as a property of the intervention, and secondly as a property of the system into which the intervention is implemented. The former recognizes that interventions may consist of multiple components that act both independently and interdependently, making it difficult to identify the components or combinations of components (and their contexts) that are important mechanisms of change. The latter recognizes that interventions are implemented in complex adaptive systems comprised of intelligent agents who modify their behaviour (including any actions required to implement the intervention) in an effort to improve outcomes relative to their own perspective and objectives. Although an intervention may be intended to take a particular form, its implementation and impact within the system may deviate from its original intentions as a result of adaptation. Complexity highlights the challenge in developing interventions as effective health solutions. The UK Medical Research Council provides guidelines on the development and evaluation of complex interventions. While mathematical modelling is included in the guidelines, there is potential for mathematical modeling to play a greater role.

Discussion

The dynamic non-linear nature of complex adaptive systems makes mathematical modelling crucial. However, the tendency is for models of interventions to limit focus on the ecology of the system - the ‘real-time’ operation of the system and impacts of the intervention. These models are deficient by not modelling the way the system reacts to the intervention via agent adaptation. Complex intervention modelling needs to capture the consequences of adaptation through the inclusion of an evolutionary dynamic to describe the long-term emergent outcomes that result as agents respond to the ecological changes introduced by intervention in an effort to produce better outcomes for themselves. Mathematical approaches such as those found in economics in evolutionary game theory and mechanism design can inform the design and evaluation of health interventions. As an illustration, the introduction of a central screening clinic is modeled as an example of a health services delivery intervention.

Summary

Complexity necessitates a greater role for mathematical models, especially those that capture the dynamics of human actions and interactions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Trickett EJ, Kelly JG, Vincent TA. The spirit of ecological enquiry in community research. In: Susskind EC, Klein DC, editors. Community Research Methods, Paradigms and Applications. New York: Preager; 1985. p. 283–333. Trickett EJ, Kelly JG, Vincent TA. The spirit of ecological enquiry in community research. In: Susskind EC, Klein DC, editors. Community Research Methods, Paradigms and Applications. New York: Preager; 1985. p. 283–333.
2.
go back to reference McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–77.CrossRefPubMed McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–77.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Commers M, Smerecnik C. The ecological approach in health promotion programs: a decade later. Am J Health Promot. 2008;22(6):437–42.CrossRefPubMed Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Commers M, Smerecnik C. The ecological approach in health promotion programs: a decade later. Am J Health Promot. 2008;22(6):437–42.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe S, Macintyre S, Mitchie S, Petticrew S. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:1665. Craig P, Dieppe S, Macintyre S, Mitchie S, Petticrew S. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:1665.
5.
go back to reference Plesk P, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323:625–8.CrossRef Plesk P, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323:625–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L. Complex interventions or compex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ. 2008;1281-1283(336). Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L. Complex interventions or compex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ. 2008;1281-1283(336).
7.
go back to reference Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;43(3–4):267–76.CrossRefPubMed Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;43(3–4):267–76.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Trickett EJ, Beehler S, Deutsch C, Green LW, Hawe P, McLeroy K, et al. Advancing the science of community-level interventions. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):1410–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trickett EJ, Beehler S, Deutsch C, Green LW, Hawe P, McLeroy K, et al. Advancing the science of community-level interventions. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):1410–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Cooper C, et al. Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(2):101–2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Cooper C, et al. Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(2):101–2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2015;350:h1258. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2015;350:h1258.
13.
go back to reference De Silva MJ, Breuer E, Lee L, Asher L, Chowdhary N, Lund C, et al. Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council’s framework for complex interventions. Trials. 2014;15. De Silva MJ, Breuer E, Lee L, Asher L, Chowdhary N, Lund C, et al. Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council’s framework for complex interventions. Trials. 2014;15.
14.
go back to reference Rogers P. Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions. Evaluation. 2008;14:29–48.CrossRef Rogers P. Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions. Evaluation. 2008;14:29–48.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Funnell CRP. Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons; 2011. Funnell CRP. Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons; 2011.
16.
17.
go back to reference Buxton MJ, Drummond MF, Van Hout BA, Prince RL, Sheldon TA, Szucs T, et al. Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. Health Econ. 1997;6(3):217–27.CrossRefPubMed Buxton MJ, Drummond MF, Van Hout BA, Prince RL, Sheldon TA, Szucs T, et al. Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. Health Econ. 1997;6(3):217–27.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Roberts J. The Epistemology of Mathematical and Statistical Modleling. A Quiet Methodological Revolution. American Psychology. 2010;65(1):1–12.CrossRef Roberts J. The Epistemology of Mathematical and Statistical Modleling. A Quiet Methodological Revolution. American Psychology. 2010;65(1):1–12.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Proudlove NC, Black S, Fletcher A. OR and the challenge to improve the NHS: modelling for insight and improvement in in-patient flows. J Oper Res Soc. 2007;58(2):145–58. Proudlove NC, Black S, Fletcher A. OR and the challenge to improve the NHS: modelling for insight and improvement in in-patient flows. J Oper Res Soc. 2007;58(2):145–58.
20.
go back to reference Bayer S. Simulation modelling and resource allocation in complex services. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(5):353–5.CrossRefPubMed Bayer S. Simulation modelling and resource allocation in complex services. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(5):353–5.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, Ijzerman MJ, Crown W, Padula WV, Wong PK, et al. Selecting a dynamic simulation modeling method for health care delivery research-part 2: report of the ISPOR Dynamic Simulation Modeling Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2015;18(2):147–60.CrossRefPubMed Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, Ijzerman MJ, Crown W, Padula WV, Wong PK, et al. Selecting a dynamic simulation modeling method for health care delivery research-part 2: report of the ISPOR Dynamic Simulation Modeling Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2015;18(2):147–60.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, Ijzerman MJ, Osgood ND, Padula WV, Higashi MK, et al. Applying dynamic simulation modeling methods in health care delivery research-the SIMULATE checklist: report of the ISPOR simulation modeling emerging good practices task force. Value Health. 2015;18(1):5–16.CrossRefPubMed Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, Ijzerman MJ, Osgood ND, Padula WV, Higashi MK, et al. Applying dynamic simulation modeling methods in health care delivery research-the SIMULATE checklist: report of the ISPOR simulation modeling emerging good practices task force. Value Health. 2015;18(1):5–16.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Caplin A, Eliaz K. AIDS policy and psychology: a mechanism-design approach. Rand J Econ. 2003;34(4):531–46.CrossRefPubMed Caplin A, Eliaz K. AIDS policy and psychology: a mechanism-design approach. Rand J Econ. 2003;34(4):531–46.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Djawadi BM, Fahr R, Turk F. Conceptual model and economic experiments to explain nonpersistence and enable mechanism designs fostering behavioral change. Value Health. 2014;17(8):814–22.CrossRefPubMed Djawadi BM, Fahr R, Turk F. Conceptual model and economic experiments to explain nonpersistence and enable mechanism designs fostering behavioral change. Value Health. 2014;17(8):814–22.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Clancy D, Green N. Optimal intervention for an epidemic model under parameter uncertainty. Math Biosci. 2007;205(2):297–314.CrossRefPubMed Clancy D, Green N. Optimal intervention for an epidemic model under parameter uncertainty. Math Biosci. 2007;205(2):297–314.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Magombedze G, Mukandavire Z, Chiyaka C, Musuka G. Optimal Control of a Sex-Structured HIV/AIDS Model with Condom Use. Math Model Anal. 2009;14(4):483–94.CrossRef Magombedze G, Mukandavire Z, Chiyaka C, Musuka G. Optimal Control of a Sex-Structured HIV/AIDS Model with Condom Use. Math Model Anal. 2009;14(4):483–94.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lee S, Chowell G, Castillo-Chavez C. Optimal control for pandemic influenza: the role of limited antiviral treatment and isolation. J Theor Biol. 2010;265(2):136–50.CrossRefPubMed Lee S, Chowell G, Castillo-Chavez C. Optimal control for pandemic influenza: the role of limited antiviral treatment and isolation. J Theor Biol. 2010;265(2):136–50.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Dolan J. Multi-criteria clinical decision support: A primer on the use ofmultiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient. 2010;3(4):229–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dolan J. Multi-criteria clinical decision support: A primer on the use ofmultiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient. 2010;3(4):229–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Marsh K, Dolan P, Kempster J, Lugon M. Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013;35(3):460–6.CrossRef Marsh K, Dolan P, Kempster J, Lugon M. Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013;35(3):460–6.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Abo-Hamad W, Arisha A. Multi-criteria approach using simulation-based balanced scorecard for supporting decisions in health-care facilities: an emergency department case study. Health Systems. 2014;3:43–59.CrossRef Abo-Hamad W, Arisha A. Multi-criteria approach using simulation-based balanced scorecard for supporting decisions in health-care facilities: an emergency department case study. Health Systems. 2014;3:43–59.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Vaskalis CS B, Kuramoto L, Levy A. A simulation study of scheduling clinic appointments in surgical care: individual surgeon versus pooled lists. J Oper Res Soc. 2011;58:202–11. Vaskalis CS B, Kuramoto L, Levy A. A simulation study of scheduling clinic appointments in surgical care: individual surgeon versus pooled lists. J Oper Res Soc. 2011;58:202–11.
32.
go back to reference Greenwood-Lee JWG, Marshall DA. Improving accessibility through referral management: setting targets for specialist care. Health Systems. In press. Greenwood-Lee JWG, Marshall DA. Improving accessibility through referral management: setting targets for specialist care. Health Systems. In press.
Metadata
Title
Complex intervention modelling should capture the dynamics of adaptation
Authors
James Greenwood-Lee
Penelope Hawe
Alberto Nettel-Aguirre
Alan Shiell
Deborah A. Marshall
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0149-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2016 Go to the issue