Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 3/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

Comparison of tube-guided and guideless videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation during chest compression in a manikin: a randomized crossover trial

Authors: Daisuke Okada, Nobuyasu Komasawa, Shunsuke Fujiwara, Toshiaki Minami

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have shown the utility of indirect glottis viewing videolaryngoscopes for tracheal intubation during chest compression, but the efficacy of a videolaryngoscope with tube guide has not been sufficiently validated. We compared the utility of two videolaryngoscopes, the KingVISION® (KingV) with or without tube guide blade and Pentax-AWS Airwayscope® (AWS), which contain tube guide function, during chest compressions on an adult manikin.

Methods

Twenty-five novice doctors and 22 experienced anesthesiologists performed tracheal intubation on an adult manikin using the AWS and KingV with or without chest compressions. The KingV trials were performed either with a tube guide ‘channeled blade’ (KingV-Guided) or without, using a ‘standard blade’ (KingV-Guideless).

Results

In the KingV-Guideless trial, all novice doctors successfully secured the airway without chest compressions but seven failed with chest compressions (p < 0.05), while no experienced doctors failed without chest compression and two did during chest compression. In the AWS and KingV-Guided trials, all participants succeeded both with and without chest compressions performed by both novice doctors and experienced anesthesiologists. Intubation time was lengthened significantly by chest compressions in the KingV-Guideless trial (p < 0.05), but not in the AWS or KingV-Guided trials performed by both novice doctors and experienced anesthesiologists. The intubation time for KingV-Guided during chest compression was significantly smaller by experienced anesthesiologists compared to by novice doctors.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the AWS and KingV-Guided devices are more effective than the KingV-Guideless for airway management with chest compressions in adult simulations, especially performed by novice doctors. The tube guide function may contribute to successful airway management during chest compression by the added videolaryngoscopy function.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Deakin C, Koster RW, Wyllie J, Böttiger B. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation, 2010 section 1. Exec summ Resusc. 2010;81:1219–76. Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Deakin C, Koster RW, Wyllie J, Böttiger B. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation, 2010 section 1. Exec summ Resusc. 2010;81:1219–76.
2.
go back to reference Deakin CD, Nolan JP, Soar J, Sunde K, Koster RW, Smith GB, Perkins GD. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2010 section 4. Adult adv life support Resusc. 2010;81:1305–52. Deakin CD, Nolan JP, Soar J, Sunde K, Koster RW, Smith GB, Perkins GD. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2010 section 4. Adult adv life support Resusc. 2010;81:1305–52.
3.
go back to reference Asai T, Liu EH, Matsumoto S, Hirabayashi Y, Seo N, Suzuki A, Toi T, Yasumoto K, Okuda Y. Use of the Pentax-AWS in 293 patients with difficult airways. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:898–904.PubMedCrossRef Asai T, Liu EH, Matsumoto S, Hirabayashi Y, Seo N, Suzuki A, Toi T, Yasumoto K, Okuda Y. Use of the Pentax-AWS in 293 patients with difficult airways. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:898–904.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nomura H, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y. Evaluation of tracheal intubation in several positions by the Pentax-Aws Airway Scope: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2010;24:908–12.PubMedCrossRef Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nomura H, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y. Evaluation of tracheal intubation in several positions by the Pentax-Aws Airway Scope: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2010;24:908–12.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Komasawa N, Ueki R, Nomura H, Itani M, Kaminoh Y. Comparison of tracheal intubation by Macintosh laryngoscope and Pentax-AWS (Airway Scope) during chest compression: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2010;24:306–8.PubMedCrossRef Komasawa N, Ueki R, Nomura H, Itani M, Kaminoh Y. Comparison of tracheal intubation by Macintosh laryngoscope and Pentax-AWS (Airway Scope) during chest compression: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2010;24:306–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Koyama J, Iwashita T, Okamoto K. Comparison of three types of laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during rhythmic chest compressions: a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1172–4.PubMedCrossRef Koyama J, Iwashita T, Okamoto K. Comparison of three types of laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during rhythmic chest compressions: a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1172–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gaszynska E, Samsel P, Stankiewicz-Rudnicki M, Wieczorek A, Gaszynski T. Intubation by paramedics using the ILMA or AirTraq, KingVISION, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in vehicle-entrapped patients: a manikin study. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014;21:61–4.PubMedCrossRef Gaszynska E, Samsel P, Stankiewicz-Rudnicki M, Wieczorek A, Gaszynski T. Intubation by paramedics using the ILMA or AirTraq, KingVISION, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in vehicle-entrapped patients: a manikin study. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014;21:61–4.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gaszynska E, Gaszynski T. Endotracheal intubation using the Macintosh laryngoscope or KingVISION Video Laryngoscope during uninterrupted chest compression. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:250820.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gaszynska E, Gaszynski T. Endotracheal intubation using the Macintosh laryngoscope or KingVISION Video Laryngoscope during uninterrupted chest compression. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:250820.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y. Validation of Pentax-AWS Airwayscope utility for intubation device during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the ground. J Anesth. 2010;24:582–6.PubMedCrossRef Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y. Validation of Pentax-AWS Airwayscope utility for intubation device during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the ground. J Anesth. 2010;24:582–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Komasawa N, Ueki R, Kohama H, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y. Comparison of Pentax-AWS Airwayscope video laryngoscope, Airtraq optic laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope during cardiopulmonary resuscitation under cervical stabilization: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2011;25:898–903.PubMedCrossRef Komasawa N, Ueki R, Kohama H, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y. Comparison of Pentax-AWS Airwayscope video laryngoscope, Airtraq optic laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope during cardiopulmonary resuscitation under cervical stabilization: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2011;25:898–903.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation. 2002;105:645–9.PubMedCrossRef Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation. 2002;105:645–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yu T, Weil MH, Tang W, Sun S, Klouche K, Povoas H, Bisera J. Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation. 2002;106:368–72.PubMedCrossRef Yu T, Weil MH, Tang W, Sun S, Klouche K, Povoas H, Bisera J. Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation. 2002;106:368–72.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Helm M, Hossfeld B, Schafer S, Hoitz J, Lampl L. Factors influencing emergency intubation in the pre-hospital setting—a multicentre study in the German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:67–71.PubMedCrossRef Helm M, Hossfeld B, Schafer S, Hoitz J, Lampl L. Factors influencing emergency intubation in the pre-hospital setting—a multicentre study in the German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:67–71.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ueshima H, Asai T. Tracheal intubation in daylight and in the dark: a randomised comparison of the Airway Scope, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscope in a manikin. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:684–7.PubMedCrossRef Ueshima H, Asai T. Tracheal intubation in daylight and in the dark: a randomised comparison of the Airway Scope, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscope in a manikin. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:684–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Asai T. Tracheal intubation with restricted access: a randomised comparison of the Pentax-Airway Scope and Macintosh laryngoscope in a manikin. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:1114–7.PubMedCrossRef Asai T. Tracheal intubation with restricted access: a randomised comparison of the Pentax-Airway Scope and Macintosh laryngoscope in a manikin. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:1114–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Komasawa N, Fujiwara S, Mihara R, Minami T. Comparison of McGrath® and Pentax-AWS Airwayscope® for tracheal intubation by anaesthesiologists during chest compression in a manikin: a randomized crossover trial. Eur J Anaesth. 2014 (in press). Komasawa N, Fujiwara S, Mihara R, Minami T. Comparison of McGrath® and Pentax-AWS Airwayscope® for tracheal intubation by anaesthesiologists during chest compression in a manikin: a randomized crossover trial. Eur J Anaesth. 2014 (in press).
17.
go back to reference Shin DH, Choi PC, Han SK. Tracheal intubation during chest compressions using Pentax-AWS®, GlideScope®, and Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized crossover trial using a mannequin. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:733–9.PubMedCrossRef Shin DH, Choi PC, Han SK. Tracheal intubation during chest compressions using Pentax-AWS®, GlideScope®, and Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized crossover trial using a mannequin. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:733–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ng I, Hill AL, Williams DL, Lee K, Segal R. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath videolaryngoscope with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope in intubating adult patients with potential difficult airways. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:439–43.PubMedCrossRef Ng I, Hill AL, Williams DL, Lee K, Segal R. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath videolaryngoscope with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope in intubating adult patients with potential difficult airways. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:439–43.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wetsch WA, Spelten O, Hellmich M, Schier R, Böttiger BW, Hinkelbein J. Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial. Resuscitation. 2012;83:740–5.PubMedCrossRef Wetsch WA, Spelten O, Hellmich M, Schier R, Böttiger BW, Hinkelbein J. Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial. Resuscitation. 2012;83:740–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gatward JJ, Thomas MJ, Nolan JP, Cook TM. Effect of chest compressions on the time taken to insert airway devices in a manikin. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:351–6.PubMedCrossRef Gatward JJ, Thomas MJ, Nolan JP, Cook TM. Effect of chest compressions on the time taken to insert airway devices in a manikin. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:351–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of tube-guided and guideless videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation during chest compression in a manikin: a randomized crossover trial
Authors
Daisuke Okada
Nobuyasu Komasawa
Shunsuke Fujiwara
Toshiaki Minami
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1936-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Journal of Anesthesia 3/2015 Go to the issue