Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 9/2012

01-09-2012 | Scientific Article

Comparison of positions of the trochlear groove line and the vertical midline of the pericondylar rectangle on axial computed tomography: a retrospective pilot study

Author: Dinko Nizić

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 9/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To compare the positions of the trochlear groove (TG) line and the vertical midline of the pericondylar rectangle on axial computed tomography (CT).

Materials and methods

A retrospective pilot study was conducted in February and March 2011 comprising 14 knees in 9 consecutive patients with patellofemoral pain, a normal trochlear angle (124°–145°), and no medical record of prior knee surgery. After the axial CT image displaying the center of the trochlear groove (“reference cut”) with a normal trochlear angle was identified, the pericondylar rectangle was drawn and located in the first quadrant of the Cartesian rectangular coordinate system. The x-coordinates of the vertical lines passing through the most posterior point of the trochlear groove (TG line) and the midpoints of the horizontal sides of the pericondylar rectangle (vertical midline) were obtained at 2-week intervals and statistically analyzed as matched pairs for differences (Wilcoxon signed rank test), agreements (Bland–Altman plot, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) and relative variations (coefficient of variation [CV]).

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between matched pairs (2-tailed p from 0.583 to 0.641) whereas the agreements were substantial (bias = −0.37 and −0.45 respectively, ICC = 0.688 and 0.670 respectively) to almost perfect for duplicate measurements (bias = 0.11 and 0.04 respectively, ICC = 0.975 and 0.998 respectively), with much less relative variation with regard to the vertical midline (CV = 1.22% to CV = 0.34% respectively).

Conclusion

The positions of the TG line and the vertical midline of the pericondylar rectangle on axial CT were identical. The latter was identified regardless of trochlear morphology.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Donell S. (IV) Patellofemoral dysfunction—extensor mechanism malalignment. Curr Orthop. 2006;20:103–11.CrossRef Donell S. (IV) Patellofemoral dysfunction—extensor mechanism malalignment. Curr Orthop. 2006;20:103–11.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dejour D, Vasconcelos W, Tavernier T. Patellofemoral osteoarthritis. In: Bonnin M, Chambat P, eds. Osteoarthritis of the knee. Surgical treatment. Paris: Springer, 2008:24. Dejour D, Vasconcelos W, Tavernier T. Patellofemoral osteoarthritis. In: Bonnin M, Chambat P, eds. Osteoarthritis of the knee. Surgical treatment. Paris: Springer, 2008:24.
3.
go back to reference Hašpl M, Dubravčić-Šimunjak S, Bojanić I, Pećina M. Anterior knee pain in the sport and work. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2001;52(4):441–9.PubMed Hašpl M, Dubravčić-Šimunjak S, Bojanić I, Pećina M. Anterior knee pain in the sport and work. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2001;52(4):441–9.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sillanpää P. Radiographs of the patellofemoral joint. In: Traumatic patellar dislocation and clinical significance of medial patellofemoral ligament injury. Academic dissertation. Tampere: Faculty of Medicine of the University of Tampere, 2009:36–7. Sillanpää P. Radiographs of the patellofemoral joint. In: Traumatic patellar dislocation and clinical significance of medial patellofemoral ligament injury. Academic dissertation. Tampere: Faculty of Medicine of the University of Tampere, 2009:36–7.
5.
go back to reference Montserrat F. Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. In: Bentley G. ed. European instructional lectures. 11th EFORT Congress, Madrid, Spain. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010:169–70. Montserrat F. Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. In: Bentley G. ed. European instructional lectures. 11th EFORT Congress, Madrid, Spain. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010:169–70.
6.
go back to reference Manaster BJ. Section IV. Angles and measurements. Knee/leg, angles and measurements. Lateral translation: TT–TG method. In: Manaster BJ, Crim J, Rosenberg ZS. Diagnostic and surgical imaging anatomy. Knee, ankle, foot. Salt Lake City: Amirsys; 2007:5. Manaster BJ. Section IV. Angles and measurements. Knee/leg, angles and measurements. Lateral translation: TT–TG method. In: Manaster BJ, Crim J, Rosenberg ZS. Diagnostic and surgical imaging anatomy. Knee, ankle, foot. Salt Lake City: Amirsys; 2007:5.
7.
go back to reference Beaconsfield T, Pintore E, Maffulli N, Petri GJ. Radiological measurements in patellofemoral disorders. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;308:18–28.PubMed Beaconsfield T, Pintore E, Maffulli N, Petri GJ. Radiological measurements in patellofemoral disorders. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;308:18–28.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Fulkerson JP. Imaging the patellofemoral joint. Performing patellofemoral CT. In: Disorders of the patellofemoral joint. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004:89. Fulkerson JP. Imaging the patellofemoral joint. Performing patellofemoral CT. In: Disorders of the patellofemoral joint. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004:89.
9.
go back to reference Dawson B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics. 4th ed. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 1994. p. 138–9. Dawson B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics. 4th ed. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 1994. p. 138–9.
10.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Burmann RC, Locks R, Pozzi JFA, Konkewicz ER, de Souza MP. Evaluation of predisposing factors in patellofemoral instabilities. Acta Ortop Bras. 2011;19(1):37–40.CrossRef Burmann RC, Locks R, Pozzi JFA, Konkewicz ER, de Souza MP. Evaluation of predisposing factors in patellofemoral instabilities. Acta Ortop Bras. 2011;19(1):37–40.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pietsch M, Hofmann S. Value of radiographic examination of the knee joint for the orthopedic surgeon. Radiologe. 2006;46(1):55–64.PubMedCrossRef Pietsch M, Hofmann S. Value of radiographic examination of the knee joint for the orthopedic surgeon. Radiologe. 2006;46(1):55–64.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Julliard R, Ligeon R. Major dysplasia of the trochlea. Contribution to the measurement of the A.T. T.G. value. Proposal for a CT examination procedure. J Radiol. 1992;73(6–7):403–7.PubMed Julliard R, Ligeon R. Major dysplasia of the trochlea. Contribution to the measurement of the A.T. T.G. value. Proposal for a CT examination procedure. J Radiol. 1992;73(6–7):403–7.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Saudan M, Fritschy D. AT-TG (anterior tuberosity-trochlear groove): interobserver variability in CT measurements in subjects with patellar instability. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86(3):250–5.PubMed Saudan M, Fritschy D. AT-TG (anterior tuberosity-trochlear groove): interobserver variability in CT measurements in subjects with patellar instability. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86(3):250–5.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of positions of the trochlear groove line and the vertical midline of the pericondylar rectangle on axial computed tomography: a retrospective pilot study
Author
Dinko Nizić
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1346-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2012

Skeletal Radiology 9/2012 Go to the issue