Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 3/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Article

Comparison of polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulphate vs sodium biphosphonate by efficacy in bowel cleansing and patients’ tolerability: a randomised trial

Authors: Z. Heetun, R. Crowley, F. Zeb, D. Kearns, M. H. Brennan, C. O’Connor, G. Courtney, A. R. Aftab

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Adequate bowel preparation is necessary for a complete colonoscopy. Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte oral solution (PEG-EOS), sodium picosulphate (SS) and sodium biphosphonate (SP) are the three most commonly used purgative agents. We aimed to determine their efficacy and tolerability compared to each other in a randomised study.

Methods

313 patients were randomly assigned to receive either PEG-EOS, SS or SP. Patients completed a tolerability score pre-colonoscopy. A cleanliness score was used to document adequacy of bowel preparation. A separate group of patients completed taste scores for the three cathartic agents before and after addition of flavour.

Results

PEG-EOS was the worst-tolerated regimen but achieved the highest rates of right colonic cleansing and the lowest rate of incomplete colonoscopies. There were no statistical differences in the rates of rectosigmoid and mid-gut cleansing among the three agents. SS was by far the preferred purgative in the taste assessment study. Addition of flavour increased significantly taste scores for PEG-EOS.

Conclusion

For adequate bowel cleansing PEG-EOS is the most effective but is the least tolerated and least preferred among patients. Addition of flavour increases significantly patients’ acceptance of PEG-EOS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wexner SD et al (2006) A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 63(7):894–909CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD et al (2006) A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 63(7):894–909CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ell C et al (2003) A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*). Endoscopy 35(4):300–304CrossRefPubMed Ell C et al (2003) A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*). Endoscopy 35(4):300–304CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jansen SV et al (2011) Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(10):897–902CrossRefPubMed Jansen SV et al (2011) Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(10):897–902CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kastenberg D et al (2007) Tolerability and patient acceptance of sodium phosphate tablets compared with 4-L PEG solution in colon cleansing: combined results of 2 identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase 3 trials. J Clin Gastroenterol 41(1):54–61CrossRefPubMed Kastenberg D et al (2007) Tolerability and patient acceptance of sodium phosphate tablets compared with 4-L PEG solution in colon cleansing: combined results of 2 identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase 3 trials. J Clin Gastroenterol 41(1):54–61CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Renaut AJ et al (2008) A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and acceptability of phospo-soda buffered saline (Fleet) with sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate (Picoprep) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Colorectal Dis 10(5):503–505CrossRefPubMed Renaut AJ et al (2008) A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and acceptability of phospo-soda buffered saline (Fleet) with sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate (Picoprep) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Colorectal Dis 10(5):503–505CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Schmidt LM et al (2004) Picoprep-3 is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations. Dis Colon Rectum 47(2):238–242CrossRefPubMed Schmidt LM et al (2004) Picoprep-3 is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations. Dis Colon Rectum 47(2):238–242CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan M, Tagkalidis PP (2006) Oral sodium phosphate (Fleet) is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Picopre (sodium picosulfate-based preparation). Dis Colon Rectum 49(5):616–620CrossRefPubMed Tjandra JJ, Chan M, Tagkalidis PP (2006) Oral sodium phosphate (Fleet) is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Picopre (sodium picosulfate-based preparation). Dis Colon Rectum 49(5):616–620CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mathus-Vliegen EM, Kemble UM (2006) A prospective randomized blinded comparison of sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for safe bowel cleansing. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23(4):543–552CrossRefPubMed Mathus-Vliegen EM, Kemble UM (2006) A prospective randomized blinded comparison of sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for safe bowel cleansing. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23(4):543–552CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lai EJ et al (2009) The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 69(3 Pt 2):620–625CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lai EJ et al (2009) The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 69(3 Pt 2):620–625CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Rostom A, Jolicoeur E (2004) Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 59(4):482–486CrossRefPubMed Rostom A, Jolicoeur E (2004) Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 59(4):482–486CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gupta M, Holub JL, Eisen G (2010) Do indication and demographics for colonoscopy affect completion? A large national database evaluation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22(5):620–627CrossRefPubMed Gupta M, Holub JL, Eisen G (2010) Do indication and demographics for colonoscopy affect completion? A large national database evaluation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22(5):620–627CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Froehlich F et al (2005) Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European panel of appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 61(3):378–384CrossRefPubMed Froehlich F et al (2005) Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European panel of appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 61(3):378–384CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Aljarallah B, Alshammari B (2011) Colonoscopy completion rates and reasons for incompletion. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 5(2):102–107 Aljarallah B, Alshammari B (2011) Colonoscopy completion rates and reasons for incompletion. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 5(2):102–107
15.
go back to reference El Sayed AM et al (2003) A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 58(1):36–40CrossRefPubMed El Sayed AM et al (2003) A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 58(1):36–40CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Marmo R et al (2010) Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions. Gastrointest Endosc 72(2):313–320CrossRefPubMed Marmo R et al (2010) Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions. Gastrointest Endosc 72(2):313–320CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ell C et al (2008) Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 103(4):883–893CrossRefPubMed Ell C et al (2008) Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 103(4):883–893CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulphate vs sodium biphosphonate by efficacy in bowel cleansing and patients’ tolerability: a randomised trial
Authors
Z. Heetun
R. Crowley
F. Zeb
D. Kearns
M. H. Brennan
C. O’Connor
G. Courtney
A. R. Aftab
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1320-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 3/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.