Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2016

01-07-2016

Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy

Authors: Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh, Mark H. Hanna, Joseph C. Carmichael, Alessio Pigazzi, Michael J. Stamos, Steven Mills

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The utilization of minimally invasive surgery is increasing in colorectal surgery. We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent elective open, laparoscopic, and robotic total abdominal colectomy.

Methods

The NIS database was used to examine the clinical data of patients who underwent an elective total colectomy procedure during 2009–2012. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to compare the three surgical approaches.

Results

We sampled a total of 26,721 patients who underwent elective total colectomy. Of these, 16,780 (62.8 %) had an open operation, while 9934 (37.2 %) had a minimally invasive approach (9614 laparoscopic surgery, and 326 robotic surgery). The most common indication for an operation was ulcerative colitis (31 %). Patients who underwent open surgery had significantly higher mortality and morbidity compared to laparoscopic (AOR 2.48, 1.30, P < 0.01) and robotic approaches (AOR 1.04, 1.30, P < 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively). There was no significant difference in mortality and morbidity between the laparoscopic and robotic approaches (AOR 0.96, 1.03, P = 0.10, P = 0.78). However, conversion rate of laparoscopic surgery to open was significantly higher than that of robotic approach (13.3 vs. 1.5 %, P < 0.01). Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had significantly lower total hospital charges compared to patients who underwent open surgery (mean difference = $21,489, P < 0.01). Also, total hospital charges for a robotic approach were significantly higher than for a laparoscopic approach (mean difference = $15,595, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Minimally invasive approaches to total colectomy are safe, with the advantage of lower mortality and morbidity compared to an open approach. Although there was no significant difference in the morbidity between minimally invasive approaches, robotic surgery had a significantly lower conversion rate compared to laparoscopic approach. Total hospital charges are significantly higher in robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fowler DL, White SA (1991) Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):183–188PubMed Fowler DL, White SA (1991) Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):183–188PubMed
2.
go back to reference Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150PubMed
3.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ (2015) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome? World J Surg 39(5):1240–1247CrossRefPubMed Masoomi H, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ (2015) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome? World J Surg 39(5):1240–1247CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim WR, Baek SJ, Kim CW et al (2014) Comparative study of oncologic outcomes for laparoscopic vs. open surgery in transverse colon cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res 86(1):28–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim WR, Baek SJ, Kim CW et al (2014) Comparative study of oncologic outcomes for laparoscopic vs. open surgery in transverse colon cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res 86(1):28–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Kitajima M (2001) Oncologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 48(41):1248–1251PubMed Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Kitajima M (2001) Oncologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 48(41):1248–1251PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cho JH, Lim DR, Hur H et al (2012) Oncologic outcomes of a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: results of a 3-year follow-up. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28(1):42–48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cho JH, Lim DR, Hur H et al (2012) Oncologic outcomes of a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: results of a 3-year follow-up. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28(1):42–48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB (1998) Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12(8):1091CrossRefPubMed Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB (1998) Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12(8):1091CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen JG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2006) Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc 20(5):730–733CrossRefPubMed Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen JG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2006) Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc 20(5):730–733CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, Brunaud L, Boissel P (2005) Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 19(9):1200–1203CrossRefPubMed Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, Brunaud L, Boissel P (2005) Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 19(9):1200–1203CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50(11):1825–1830CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50(11):1825–1830CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Zerey M, Hawver LM, Awad Z et al (2013) SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27(1):1–10CrossRefPubMed Zerey M, Hawver LM, Awad Z et al (2013) SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27(1):1–10CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Da Luz Moreira A, Mor I, Geisler DP, Remzi FH, Kiran RP (2011) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 25(1):278–283CrossRefPubMed Da Luz Moreira A, Mor I, Geisler DP, Remzi FH, Kiran RP (2011) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 25(1):278–283CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Azuma T et al (2011) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15(8):1375–1385CrossRefPubMed Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Azuma T et al (2011) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15(8):1375–1385CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH (2014) Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18(4):816–830CrossRefPubMed Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH (2014) Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18(4):816–830CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bertani E, Chiappa A, Ubiali P, Cossu ML, Arnone P, Andreoni B (2013) Robotic colectomy: is it necessary? Minerva Chir 68(5):445–456PubMed Bertani E, Chiappa A, Ubiali P, Cossu ML, Arnone P, Andreoni B (2013) Robotic colectomy: is it necessary? Minerva Chir 68(5):445–456PubMed
21.
go back to reference Kaiser AM, Katkhouda N (2002) Laparoscopic management of the perforated viscus. Semin Laparosc Surg 9(1):46–53CrossRefPubMed Kaiser AM, Katkhouda N (2002) Laparoscopic management of the perforated viscus. Semin Laparosc Surg 9(1):46–53CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Agresta F, De Simone P, Bedin N (2004) The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: a single-center 10-year experience. JSLS 8(1):25–30PubMedPubMedCentral Agresta F, De Simone P, Bedin N (2004) The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: a single-center 10-year experience. JSLS 8(1):25–30PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
25.
go back to reference Juo YY, Hyder O, Haider AH, Camp M, Lidor A, Ahuja N (2014) Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches? First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching. JAMA Surg 149(2):177–184CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Juo YY, Hyder O, Haider AH, Camp M, Lidor A, Ahuja N (2014) Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches? First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching. JAMA Surg 149(2):177–184CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum. Surg Endosc 26(1):1–11CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum. Surg Endosc 26(1):1–11CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R et al (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 14(4):e134–e156CrossRefPubMed Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R et al (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 14(4):e134–e156CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O et al (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25(11):1467–1477PubMed Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O et al (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25(11):1467–1477PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy
Authors
Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh
Mark H. Hanna
Joseph C. Carmichael
Alessio Pigazzi
Michael J. Stamos
Steven Mills
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4552-8

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2016 Go to the issue