Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research

Comparison of Ferguson’s δ and the Gini coefficient used for measuring the inequality of data related to health quality of life outcomes

Authors: Hsien-Yi Wang, Willy Chou, Yang Shao, Tsair-Wei Chien

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ferguson’s δ and Gini coefficient (GC) are defined as contrasting statistical measures of inequality among members within populations. However, the association and cutting points for these two statistics are still unclear; a visual display is required to inspect their similarities and differences.

Methods

A simulation study was conducted to illustrate the pertinent properties of these statistics, along with Cronbach’s α and dimension coefficient (DC) to assess inequality. We manipulated datasets containing four item lengths with two number combinations (0 and 33%) in item length if two domains exist. Each item difficulty with five-point polytomous responses was uniformly distributed across a ± 2 logit range. A simulated response questionnaire was designed along with known different structures of true person scores under Rasch model conditions. This was done for 20 normally distributed sample sizes. A total of 320 scenarios were administered. Four coefficients (Ferguson’s δ, GC, test reliability Cronbach’s α, and DC) were simultaneously calculated for each simulation dataset. Box plots were drawn to examine which of these presented the correct property of inequality on data. Two examples were illustrated to present the index on Google Maps for securing the discriminatory power of individuals.

Results

We found that 1-Ferguson’s δ coefficient has a high correlation (0.95) with GC. The cutting points of Ferguson’s δ, GC, test reliability Cronbach’s α, and the DC are 0.15, 0.50, 0.70, and 0.67, respectively. Two applications are shown on Google Maps with GCs of 0.14 and 0.42, respectively. Histogram legends and Lorenz curves are used to display the results.

Conclusion

The GC is recommended to readers as an index for measuring the extent of inequality (or lower discrimination power) in a given dataset. It can also show the study results of person measures to determine the inequality in the health-related quality of life outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Parkin PC, Macarthur C, Saunders NR, Diamond SA, Winders PM. Development of a clinical asthma score for use in hospitalized children between 1 and 5 years of age. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(8):821–5.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Friedman JN, Goldman RD, Srivastava R, Parkin PC. Development of a clinical dehydration scale for use in children between 1 and 36 months of age. J Pediatr. 2004;145(2):201–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Hankins M. Discrimination and reliability: equal partners? Understanding the role of discriminative instruments in HRQoL research: can Ferguson's Delta help? A response. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:83.PubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Costa-Tutusaus L, Guerra-Balic M. Development and psychometric validation of a scoring questionnaire to assess healthy lifestyles among adolescents in Catalonia. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Bazzo S, Battistella G, Riscica P, Moino G, Dal Pozzo G, Bottarel M, Geromel M, Czerwinsky L. Reliability of a self-report Italian version of the AUDIT-C questionnaire, used to estimate alcohol consumption by pregnant women in an obstetric setting. Riv Psichiatr. 2015;50(2):89–94.PubMed
12.
Riley GA, Fisher G, Hagger BF, Elliott A, Le Serve H, Oyebode JR. The Birmingham relationship continuity measure: the development and evaluation of a measure of the perceived continuity of spousal relationships in dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(2):263–74.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Guilford JP. Psychometric methods (2nd ed., p. 407). New York: McGraw Hil, 1954.
14.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.CrossRef
15.
Gini C. Concentration and dependency ratios (in Italian). English translation in Rivista di Politica Economica. 1997;87:769–89.
16.
Chien TW, Shao Y, Jen DH. Development of a Microsoft excel tool for applying a factor retention criterion of a dimension coefficient to a survey on patient safety culture. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):216.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Linacre JM. How to simulate Rasch data. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 2007;21(3):1125.
18.
Smith RM. Person response maps for rating scale. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1994;8(3):372.
19.
20.
Lorenz MO. Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publications of the American Statistical Association. Publ Am Stat Assoc. 1905;9(70):209–19.
21.
Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37:830–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Feldt LS, Brennan RL. Reliability. In: Linn RL, editor. Educational measurement, 3rd Ed. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan; 1989.
23.
van der Heijden PG, van Buuren S, Fekkes M, Radder J, Verrips E. Unidimensionality and reliability under Mokken scaling of the Dutch language version of the SF-36. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(2):189–98.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006;119(166):e7–166.
25.
26.
Biancotti C. A polarization of inequality? The distribution of national Gini coefficients 1970–1996. J Econ Inequal. 2006;4:1–32.CrossRef
27.
28.
29.
Chien TW. Association of Rasch Person Reliability with Cronbach’s alpha, Ferguson’s Delta and Gini coefficients. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 2016;29(4):1551–2.
30.
Chien TW, Djaja N. Using Rasch simulation data to verify whether Ferguson’s Delta coefficient can report students' abilities are equal in a class. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 2014;28(3):1484–5.
31.
Henson RK, Roberts JK. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(3):393–416.CrossRef
32.
Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand oaks, California : sage, 2017. Publications. .
33.
Chien TW. Cronbach’s alpha with the dimension coefficient to jointly assess a Scale’s quality. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 2012;26(3):1379.
34.
Dasgupta S, Vaughan AS, Kramer MR, Sanchez TH, Sullivan PS. Use of a Google Map Tool Embedded in an Internet Survey Instrument: Is it a Valid and Reliable Alternative to Geocoded Address Data? JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Apr 10;3(2):e24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Kobayashi S, Fujioka T, Tanaka Y, Inoue M, Niho Y, Miyoshi A. A geographical information system using the Google map API for guidance to referral hospitals. J Med Syst. 2010 Dec;34(6):1157–60.PubMedCrossRef
36.
37.
38.
39.
Sadoughi F, Valinejadi A, Shirazi MS, Khademi R. Social network analysis of Iranian researchers on medical parasitology: a 41 year co-authorship survey. Iran J Parasitol. 2016;11(2):204–12.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Osareh F, Khademi R, Rostami MK, Shirazi MS. Co-authorship network structure analysis of Iranian researchers’ scientific outputs from 1991 to 2013 based on the social science citation index (SSCI). Collnet J Scientometr Info Manag. 2014;8(2):263–71.CrossRef
41.
Liu X, Bollen J, Nelson ML, Van de Sompel H. Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Inf Process Manag. 2005;41(6):1462–80.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Ferguson’s δ and the Gini coefficient used for measuring the inequality of data related to health quality of life outcomes
Authors
Hsien-Yi Wang
Willy Chou
Yang Shao
Tsair-Wei Chien
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01356-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2020 Go to the issue

Review

Comparisons of quality of life between patients underwent peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research

Assessing whether ad hoc clinician-generated patient questionnaires provide psychometrically valid information

Research

Global mapping of interventions to improve the quality of life of patients with cardiovascular diseases during 1990–2018

Research

A new integrated approach for adolescent health and well-being: the AVATAR project

Research

Validation of the Greek translation of the multicultural quality of life index (MQLI-gr)

Research

Health-related quality of life and associated factors among cervical cancer patients at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia