Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2013

01-04-2013 | Letter to the Editor

Comparison of Breast Augmentation Incisions and Common Complications

Author: Thomas C. Wiener

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The recent article by Stutman et al, regarding the comparison of breast augmentation incisions and complications was reviewed with emphasis on capsular contracture. In contrast to other articles in the literature, the authors did not find a difference in contracture rates between the inframammary, periareolar, and transaxillary incisions. The patient data used, however, did not include a key issue regarding contracture—the use of breast pocket irrigation, which has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of contracture. The authors’ conclusion that surgeons may proceed without worry that there is a difference in complication rates between incisions is contrary to mounting evidence.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stutman RL, Codner M, Mahoney A, Amei A (2012) Comparison of breast augmentation incisions and common complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:1096–1104PubMedCrossRef Stutman RL, Codner M, Mahoney A, Amei A (2012) Comparison of breast augmentation incisions and common complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:1096–1104PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wiener TC (2008) Relationship of incision choice to capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:303–306PubMedCrossRef Wiener TC (2008) Relationship of incision choice to capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:303–306PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jacobson JM, Gatti ME, Schaffner AD, Hill LM, Spear SL (2012) Effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 32:456–462PubMedCrossRef Jacobson JM, Gatti ME, Schaffner AD, Hill LM, Spear SL (2012) Effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 32:456–462PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Adams WP (2012) Commentary on effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 32:463–464PubMedCrossRef Adams WP (2012) Commentary on effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 32:463–464PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wiener TC (2007) The role of betadine irrigation in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:12–15PubMedCrossRef Wiener TC (2007) The role of betadine irrigation in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:12–15PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Adams WP, Rios JL, Smith SJ (2006) Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:30–36PubMed Adams WP, Rios JL, Smith SJ (2006) Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:30–36PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Breast Augmentation Incisions and Common Complications
Author
Thomas C. Wiener
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-0050-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2013 Go to the issue