Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2012

01-10-2012 | Original Article

Comparison of Breast Augmentation Incisions and Common Complications

Authors: Ross L. Stutman, Mark Codner, Amy Mahoney, Amei Amei

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Incisions for insertion of breast implants are most commonly placed in the inframammary fold, areola, or axilla. Previous studies have evaluated selection of incision location preoperatively and for nipple–areola complex sensation retention after primary augmentation mammaplasty. This study compares the most common postoperative complications for each incision location in patients who underwent primary breast augmentation.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed on 619 patients who underwent primary breast augmentation, excluding simultaneous mastopexy, within a single group practice from July 1994 to June 2009. Incision location, postoperative complications (capsular contracture, hematoma formation, rippling, infection, and rupture), and total reoperation rates were recorded. Incision locations were also compared with respect to implant fill type (saline or silicone gel) and pocket location (subglandular or submuscular).

Results

A statistically significant association was identified between total reoperation and incision location (p = 0.0054). The highest rate of total reoperation occurred when using an inframammary fold incision compared to either the transaxillary or periareolar. This relationship with total reoperation was not attributed to the five complications analyzed, but rather with patient desire for size/style change, asymmetry, or ptosis. No statistically significant association was observed between incision location and specific complications such as capsular contracture, rippling, implant rupture, hematoma, or infection.

Conclusions

None of the five complications analyzed correlated with incision location. The data generated from this study will assure the surgeon that all three incision locations are safe. Preoperative examination, patient preference, and surgeon comfort should remain the mainstays of incision planning in augmentation mammaplasty.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors at www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
2.
Spear SL, Bulan EJ, Venturi ML (2004) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(5):73e–81ePubMed
3.
Hoehler H (1973) Breast augmentation: the trans-axillary approach. Br J Plast Surg 26:371
4.
Jones FR, Taura AP (1973) A periareolar incision for augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 51(6):641–644PubMedCrossRef
5.
McKinney P, Shedbalker AR (1974) Augmentation mammaplasty using a non-inflatable prosthesis through a circum-areolar incision. Br J Plast Surg 27(1):35–38PubMedCrossRef
6.
Pacella SJ, Codner MA (2009) The transaxillary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 36(1):49–61, vi
7.
Tebbetts J, Adams W (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision process. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7S):35S–45SPubMed
8.
Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1976) Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 58(1):1–13PubMedCrossRef
9.
Mofid MM, Klatsky SA, Singh NK et al (2006) Nipple–areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: a comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(6):1694–1698PubMedCrossRef
10.
Okwueze MI, Spear ME, Zwyghuizen AM et al (2006) Effect of augmentation mammaplasty on breast sensation. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(1):73–83PubMedCrossRef
11.
Alpert BS, Lalonde DH (2008) MOC-PSSM CME Article: breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):1–7PubMed
12.
Hildago DA (2000) Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(6):2202–2216CrossRef
13.
Adams WP (2008) The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(6):1892–1900PubMedCrossRef
14.
Wiener TC (2008) Relationship of incision choice to capsular contracture. Aesthet Plast Surg 32(2):303–306CrossRef
15.
Bengston BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK et al (2007) Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(Suppl 1):40S
16.
Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS; Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Study Group (2007) Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(Suppl 1):8S–16S; discussion 17S–18S
17.
Cunningham BL (2007) The Mentor core study on silicone MemoryGel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(Suppl 1):19S–29SPubMed
18.
Cunningham B, McCue J (2009) Safety and effectiveness of Mentor’s MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthet Plast Surg 33(3):439–444CrossRef
19.
Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J et al (2006) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(3):757–767PubMedCrossRef
20.
Hipps CJ, Raju DR, Straith RE (1978) Influence of some operative and postoperative factors on capsular contracture around breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 61(3):384–389PubMedCrossRef
21.
Reece EM, Ghavami A, Hoxworth RE et al (2009) Primary breast augmentation today: a survey of current breast augmentation practice patterns. Aesthet Surg J 29(2):116–121PubMedCrossRef
22.
Fanous N, Tawilé C, Brousseau VJ (2008) Minimal inframammary incision for breast augmentation. Can J Plast Surg 16(1):14–17PubMed
23.
Allen S (2004) FDA breast implant consumer handbook—2004. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC
24.
25.
26.
Puckett CL, Croll GH, Reichel CA, Concannon MJ (1987) A critical look at capsular contracture in subglandular versus subpectoral mammary augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 11(1):23–28CrossRef
27.
Biggs TM, Yarish RS (1990) Augmentation mammaplasty: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(3):368–372PubMedCrossRef
28.
Barnsley PG, Sigurdson LJ, Barnsley SE (2006) Textured-surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(7):2182–2190PubMedCrossRef
29.
McCurdy JA Jr (2009) Capsular contracture following augmentation mammaplasty: etiology and pathogenesis. In: Shiffman MA (ed) Breast augmentation principles and practice, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 525–540CrossRef
30.
Snell L, Brown M (2009) Breast implant capsules and subclinical infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(4S):38
31.
Tran VT, Del Pozo JL, Petty PM et al (2009) Bacteria on breast implants are associated with capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(4S):38–39
32.
Adams WP Jr (2009) Capsular contracture: What is it? What causes it? How can it be prevented and managed? Clin Plast Surg 36:119–126PubMedCrossRef
33.
Tamboto H, Vickery K, Deva AK (2010) Subclinical (biofilm) infection causes capsular contracture in a porcine model following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(3):835–842PubMedCrossRef
34.
Pajkos A, Deva AK, Vickery K et al (2003) Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(5):1605–1611PubMedCrossRef
35.
Wong C, Samuel M, Tan B et al (2006) Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(5):1224–1236PubMedCrossRef
36.
Schaub T, Ahmad J, Rohrich RJ (2010) Capsular contracture with breast implants in the cosmetic patient: saline versus silicone—a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2140–2149PubMedCrossRef
37.
Araco A, Caruso R, Araco F et al (2009) Capsular contracture: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1808–1819PubMedCrossRef
38.
Burkhardt BR, Eades E (1995) The effect of Biocell texturing and povidone-iodine irrigation on capsular contracture around saline-inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(6):1317–1325PubMedCrossRef
39.
Al-Sabounchi S, De Mey AM, Eder H (2006) Textured saline-filled breast implants for augmentation mammoplasty: Does overfilling prevent deflation? A long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(1):215–222PubMedCrossRef
40.
Handel N, Jensen JA, Black Q et al (1995) The fate of breast implants: a critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(7):1521–1533PubMedCrossRef
41.
Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB et al (2011) A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1300–1310PubMedCrossRef
42.
Nahabedian M, Patel K (2008) Management of common and uncommon problems after primary breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 36:127–138CrossRef
43.
Cunningham B (2007) The Mentor study on contour profile gel silicone MemoryGel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(7):33S–39SPubMed
44.
Cunningham BL, Lokeh A, Gutowski KA (2000) Saline-filled breast implant safety and efficacy: a multicenter retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(6):2143–2149PubMedCrossRef
45.
Walker PS, Walls B, Murphy DK (2009) Natrelle saline-filled breast implants: a prospective 10-year study. Aesthet Surg J 29:19–25PubMedCrossRef
46.
Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F et al (2007) Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentations: a single-center review of 3,002 patients. Aesthet Plast Surg 31(4):325–329CrossRef
47.
Collis N, Sharpe DT (2000) Silicone gel-filled breast implant integrity: a retrospective review of 478 consecutively explanted implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:1979PubMedCrossRef
48.
Collis N, Sharpe DT (2000) Recurrence of subglandular breast implant capsular contracture: anterior versus total capsulectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:792PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Breast Augmentation Incisions and Common Complications
Authors
Ross L. Stutman
Mark Codner
Amy Mahoney
Amei Amei
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9918-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2012 Go to the issue

Original Article

Inferior Pole Length and Long-term Aesthetic Outcome after Superior and Inferior Pedicled Reduction Mammaplasty

Original Article

Is Topical Vitamin C an Effective Post-Fraxel Laser Regimen for Asians?

Original Article

e-Flap Nipple Reconstruction in Amputation Mammaplasty

Case Report

Development of Eczematous Symptoms by the Implanted Breast Prosthesis

Case Report

Management of Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty While Receiving Anticoagulant Therapy

Review

Refreshing Labioplasty Techniques for Plastic Surgeons