Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical Oncology 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Original Paper

Comparison of 1p and 19q status of glioblastoma by whole exome sequencing, array-comparative genomic hybridization, and fluorescence in situ hybridization

Authors: Jongmin Sim, Do-Hyun Nam, Yuil Kim, In-Hee Lee, Jung Won Choi, Jason K. Sa, Yeon-Lim Suh

Published in: Medical Oncology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

According to the 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system, detecting 1p/19q co-deletion became essential in clinical neuropathology for gliomas with oligodendroglioma-like morphology. Here, we assessed genomic profiles of glioblastoma in 80 cases including 1p/19q status using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and/or whole exome sequencing (WES). Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were subjected to FISH analysis, and the corresponding frozen tissues from the same tumors were evaluated for aCGH and/or WES for 1p/19q co-deletion and other genetic parameters, which included IDH1-R132H, ATRX, TP53, CIC, and NOTCH1 mutations and MGMT methylation status. We also evaluated correlations between 1p/19q co-deletion status and molecular markers or clinical outcomes. The FISH analyses revealed 1p/19q co-deletion in two cases, isolated deletion of 1p in six cases, and 19q in two cases, whereas the aCGH and WES results showed isolated deletion of 19q in four cases and 19 monosomy in only one case. Eleven cases showed discordant 1p/19q results between aCGH/WES and FISH analysis, and in most of them, 1p and/or 19q deletion on FISH analysis corresponded to the partial deletions at 1p36 and/or 19q13 on aCGH/WES. Our cohort exhibited IDH1-R132H mutations (5.4%), MGMT promotor methylation (34.6%), and mutations in ATRX (9.5%), TP53 (33.3%), and NOTCH1 (3.8%) but not in CIC (0%). In addition, MGMT methylation and ATRX mutation were significantly associated with clinical prognosis. In glioblastomas, partial deletions of 1p36 and/or 19q13 were uncommon, some of which appeared as 1p and/or 19q deletions on FISH analysis.
Literature
19.
go back to reference Cowell JK, Barnett GH, Nowak NJ. Characterization of the 1p/19q chromosomal loss in oligodendrogliomas using comparative genomic hybridization arrays (CGHa). J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004;63(2):151–8.CrossRefPubMed Cowell JK, Barnett GH, Nowak NJ. Characterization of the 1p/19q chromosomal loss in oligodendrogliomas using comparative genomic hybridization arrays (CGHa). J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004;63(2):151–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Molinari C, Iorio P, Medri L, Ballardini M, Guiducci G, Cremonini AM, et al. Chromosome 1p and 19q evaluation in low-grade oligodendrogliomas: a descriptive study. Int J Mol Med. 2010;25(1):145–51.PubMed Molinari C, Iorio P, Medri L, Ballardini M, Guiducci G, Cremonini AM, et al. Chromosome 1p and 19q evaluation in low-grade oligodendrogliomas: a descriptive study. Int J Mol Med. 2010;25(1):145–51.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Ambros PF, Ambros IM. Pathology and biology guidelines for resectable and unresectable neuroblastic tumors and bone marrow examination guidelines. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001;37(6):492–504.CrossRefPubMed Ambros PF, Ambros IM. Pathology and biology guidelines for resectable and unresectable neuroblastic tumors and bone marrow examination guidelines. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001;37(6):492–504.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Schmidt MC, Antweiler S, Urban N, Mueller W, Kuklik A, Meyer-Puttlitz B, et al. Impact of genotype and morphology on the prognosis of glioblastoma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61(4):321–8.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt MC, Antweiler S, Urban N, Mueller W, Kuklik A, Meyer-Puttlitz B, et al. Impact of genotype and morphology on the prognosis of glioblastoma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61(4):321–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of 1p and 19q status of glioblastoma by whole exome sequencing, array-comparative genomic hybridization, and fluorescence in situ hybridization
Authors
Jongmin Sim
Do-Hyun Nam
Yuil Kim
In-Hee Lee
Jung Won Choi
Jason K. Sa
Yeon-Lim Suh
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Medical Oncology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Electronic ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1119-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Medical Oncology 5/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.