Top

Published in:

01-12-2021 | Study protocol

Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol

Authors: Monica Eftedal, Torill H. Tveito, Ulrik Gensby, M. Kamrul Islam, Stein Atle Lie, Gro Aasland, Svein Kostveit, Chris Jensen

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs) are the most frequent reasons for long-term sick leave and work disability. Occupational rehabilitation programs are used to help employees return to work (RTW). However, knowledge regarding the effect of these programs is scarce, and even less is known about which programs are best suited for which patients. This study aims to compare the RTW results of two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs in Norway, as well as to examine the delivery and reception of the two programs and explore the active mechanisms of the participants’ RTW processes.

Methods/design

We will use a mixed-method convergent design to study the main outcome. Approximately 600 participants will be included in the study. Eligible study participants will be aged 18–60 years old and have been on sick leave due to MSDs, CMDs, or both for at least 6 weeks. Interdisciplinary teams at both participating clinics will deliver complex occupational rehabilitation programs. The inpatient rehabilitation program has a duration of 4 weeks and is full time. The outpatient program has a duration of 3 months and involves weekly sessions. The primary outcome is RTW. Secondary outcomes are differences in the incremental cost for an averted sick leave day, cost utility/benefit, and differences between the programs regarding improvements in known modifiable obstacles to RTW. Subgroup analyses are planned. The researchers will be blinded to the intervention groups when analyzing the quantitative RTW data.

Discussion

This study aims to provide new insights regarding occupational rehabilitation interventions, treatment targets, and outcomes for different subgroups of sick-listed employees and to inform discussions on the active working mechanisms of occupational rehabilitation and the influence of context in the return-to-work process.

Trial registration

Current controlled trials ISRCTN12033424, 15.10.2014, retrospectively registered.

Available only for authorised users

OECD. Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. In: A Synthesis of Findings across OECD Countries: OECD Publishing; 2010. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264088856-en.

Kalstø ÅM, Kann C. Færre på helserelaterte ytelser - friskere befolkning? Arbeid og Velferd [Internet]. 2018;(4) Available from: http://arbeidogvelferd.nav.no/journal/2018/4/m-03/Færre_på_helserelaterte_ytelser_friskere_befolkning.

Nav. Legemeldt sykefravær etter diagnose og bosted. 3. Kvartal: Nav; 2020 [Available from: https://www.nav.no/no/nav-og-samfunn/statistikk/sykefravar-statistikk/sykefravar]. Accessed 30 Jan 2021.

Øyeflaten I, Hysing M, Eriksen HR. Prognostic factors associated with return to work following multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(7):548–54.PubMedCrossRef

Lagerveld SE, Bültmann U, Franche RL, van Dijk FJ, Vlasveld MC, vdF-C CM, et al. Factors associated with work participation and work functioning in depressed workers: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):275–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Øyeflaten I, Lie SA, Ihlebaek CM, Eriksen HR. Multiple transitions in sick leave, disability benefits, and return to work. - A 4-year follow-up of patients participating in a work-related rehabilitation program. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):748.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Foreman P, Murphy G, Swerrisen H. Barriers and facilitators to return to work: A literature review. A Report prepared for the South Australian WorkCover Corporation. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Primary Care, La Trobe University; 2006. [updated 2006. Available from: http://www.tavrp.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/LaTrobeRTWReview0706.pdf

Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, Smeets RJ, Ostelo RW, Guzman J, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD000963.

Nieuwenhuijsen K, Faber B, Verbeek JH, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Hees HL, Verhoeven AC, et al. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD006237.

10.

Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

11.

Kraemer HC. Discovering, comparing, and combining moderators of treatment on outcome after randomized clinical trials: a parametric approach. Stat Med. 2013;32(11):1964–73.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Waddell G, Burton AK, Kendall NAS. Vocational rehabilitation: what works, for whom, and when? UK: TSO; 2008. [updated 2008. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/209474/hwwb-vocational-rehabilitation.pdf

13.

Nasjonal kompetansetjeneste for arbeidsrettet rehabilitering. Veileder for arbeidsrettet rehabilitering i spesialisthelsetjenesten: Nasjonal kompetansetjeneste for arbeidsrettet rehabilitering; 2020 [cited 2020 03.09.]. Available from: https://arbeidoghelse.no/fagveileder/om-arr/arr-i-spesialisthelsetjenesten/definisjon/.

14.

Waddell G, Burton K. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of common health problems. London: TSO; 2004. Available from: http://kendallburton.com/Resources/Concepts_of_rehabilitation.pdf

15.

Costa-Black KM. Core components of return-to-work interventions. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of work disability prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 427–40.CrossRef

16.

Wade DT. What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(5):571–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

17.

Squires H, Rick J, Carroll C, Hillage J. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to return employees to work following long-term sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012;34(1):115–24.CrossRef

18.

Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, Clay F, Gensby U, Jennings PA, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Haldorsen EM, Grasdal AL, Skouen JS, Risa AE, Kronholm K, Ursin H. Is there a right treatment for a particular patient group? Comparison of ordinary treatment, light multidisciplinary treatment, and extensive multidisciplinary treatment for long-term sick-listed employees with musculoskeletal pain. Pain. 2002;95(1–2):49–63.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Poulsen OM, Aust B, Bjorner JB, Rugulies R, Hansen JV, Tverborgvik T, et al. Effect of the Danish return-to-work program on long-term sickness absence: results from a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40(1):47–56.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Nystuen P, Hagen K. Solution-focused intervention for sick listed employees with psychological problems or muscle skeletal pain: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN39140363]. BMC Public Health. 2006;6(1):69.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

22.

Reme SE, Grasdal AL, Lovvik C, Lie SA, Overland S. Work-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy and individual job support to increase work participation in common mental disorders: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72(10):745–52.PubMedCrossRef

23.

van Oostrom SH, van MW, Terluin B, de Vet HC, Knol DL, Anema JR. A workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with distress: results of a randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(9):596–602.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Stapelfeldt C, Christiansen D, Jensen O, Nielsen C, Petersen K, Jensen C. Subgroup analyses on return to work in sick-listed employees with low back pain in a randomised trial comparing brief and multidisciplinary intervention. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12(1):112.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

25.

Jensen C, Nielsen CV, Jensen OK, Petersen KD. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of a multidisciplinary intervention compared with a brief intervention to facilitate return to work in sick-listed patients with low back pain. Spine. 2013;38(13):1059–67.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Vermeulen SJ, Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Knol DL, van MW, van der Beek AJ. A participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):313–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

27.

Jensen IB, Bergstrom G, Ljungquist T, Bodin L, Nygren AL. A randomized controlled component analysis of a behavioral medicine rehabilitation program for chronic spinal pain: are the effects dependent on gender? Pain. 2001;91(1–2):65–78.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Skouen JS, Grasdal A, Haldorsen EM. Return to work after comparing outpatient multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment in general practice for patients with chronic widespread pain. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(2):145–52.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Martin M, Nielsen M, Rugulies R. Stability of return to work after a coordinated and tailored intervention for sickness absence compensation beneficiaries with mental health problems: results of a two-year follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(22):2107–13.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Noordik E, van der Klink JJ, Geskus RB, de Boer MR, van Dijk FJ, Nieuwenhuijsen K. Effectiveness of an exposure-based return-to-work program for workers on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39(2):144–54.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Wagner S, White M, Schultz I, Murray E, Bradley SM, Hsu V, et al. Modifiable worker risk factors contributing to workplace absence: a stakeholder-centred best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Work. 2014;49(4):541–58.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Black O, Keegel T, Sim MR, Collie A, Smith P. The effect of self-efficacy on return-to-work outcomes for workers with psychological or upper-body musculoskeletal injuries: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):16–27.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Bethge M, Spanier K, Peters E, Michel E, Radoschewski M. Self-reported work ability predicts rehabilitation measures, disability pensions, other welfare benefits, and work participation: longitudinal findings from a sample of German employees. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(3):495–503.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ, Biscardi M, Ammendolia C, Myburgh C, et al. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

35.

Braathen TN, Eftedal M, Tellnes G, Haugli L. Work inclusion: self-perceived change in work ability among persons in occupational rehabilitation. Vulnerable Groups Inclusion. 2015;6(1):3–18.

36.

White M, Wagner S, Schultz IZ, Murray E, Bradley SM, Hsu V, et al. Modifiable workplace risk factors contributing to workplace absence across health conditions: a stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Work. 2013;45(4):1–12.CrossRef

37.

Harvey SB, Modini M, Joyce S, Milligan-Saville JS, Tan L, Mykletun A, et al. Can work make you mentally ill? A systematic meta-review of work-related risk factors for common mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74(4):301–10.PubMedCrossRef

38.

White C, Green RA, Ferguson S, Anderson SL, Howe C, Sun J, et al. The influence of social support and social integration factors on return to work outcomes for individuals with work-related injuries: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29:636–59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

39.

Black O, Sim MR, Collie A, Smith P. Early-claim modifiable factors associated with return-to-work self-efficacy among workers injured at work: are there differences between psychological and musculoskeletal injuries? J Occup Environ Med. 2017;59(12):e257–e62.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Shaw W, Hong QN, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):2–15.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Schultz IZ. Gatchel (eds.) RJ. Handbook of return to work. From research to practice. New York: Springer; 2016.CrossRef

42.

White MI, Wagner SL, Schultz IZ, Murray E, Bradley SM, Hsu V, et al. Non-modifiable worker and workplace risk factors contributing to workplace absence: a stakeholder-centred synthesis of systematic reviews. Work. 2015;52(2):353–73.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Boot CR, Hogg-Johnson S, Bultmann U, Amick BC III, van der Beek AJ. Differences in predictors for return to work following musculoskeletal injury between workers with and without somatic comorbidities. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014.

44.

Halonen JI, Kivimaki M, Vahtera J, Pentti J, Virtanen M, Ervasti J, et al. Childhood adversity, adult socioeconomic status and risk of work disability: a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74(9):659–66.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Lydell M, Grahn B, Mansson J, Baigi A, Marklund B. Predictive factors of sustained return to work for persons with musculoskeletal disorders who participated in rehabilitation. Work. 2009;33(3):317–28.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Hara KW, Bjorngaard JH, Jacobsen HB, Borchgrevink PC, Johnsen R, Stiles TC, et al. Biopsychosocial predictors and trajectories of work participation after transdiagnostic occupational rehabilitation of participants with mental and somatic disorders: a cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1014.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

47.

Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis FJ. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):462–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

48.

Zwarenstein M. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ Br Med J (Clinical research ed ). 2008;337:a2390.CrossRef

49.

Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

50.

Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2011.

51.

Gensby U, Braathen TN, Jensen C, Eftedal M. Designing a process evaluation to examine mechanisms of change in return to work outcomes following participation in occupational rehabilitation: a theory-driven and interactive research approach. Int J Disabil Manag. 2018;13:e1.CrossRef

52.

Pawson R, Tilley N. Realist Evaluation. 2004. Available from: http://www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.pdf.

53.

Folketrygdloven. Lov om folketrygd (LOV-1997-02-28-19). 1997.

54.

Kvaal A, Gensby U, Eftedal M. Etablering av program for arbeidsrettet rehabilitering i poliklinisk praksis - En implementeringsanalyse. Rauland, Norge; 2015. Available from: https://arbeidoghelse.no/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/statusrapport_080315.pdf

55.

Aasdahl L, Pape K, Vasseljen O, Johnsen R, Gismervik S, Halsteinli V, et al. Effect of inpatient multicomponent occupational rehabilitation versus less comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation on sickness absence in persons with musculoskeletal- or mental health disorders: a randomized clinical trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):170–9.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Tuomi KIJ, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work Ability Index. 2nd revised edn. Helsinki; 1998.

58.

Shaw WS, Reme SE, Linton SJ, Huang YH, Pransky G. Development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire - psychometric properties and predictive validity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(2):109.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Nøttingnes C, Fersum, Reme SE, Moe-Nilssen R, Morken T. Jobbrelatert mestringstro ved muskel- og skjelettplager – et spørreskjema 2019 [7.08.2019:[Available from: https://tidsskriftet.no/2019/08/originalartikkel/jobbrelatert-mestringstro-ved-muskel-og-skjelettplager-et-sporreskjema.CrossRef

60.

Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52(2):157–68.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire: methodological aspects of the Norwegian version. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(6):346–53.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Eriksen HR, Ihlebaek C, Ursin H. A scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC). Scand J Public Health. 1999;27(1):63–72.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Horne R, Cameron LD, D. B. The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health. 2002;17(1):16.CrossRef

64.

Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245–58.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Skogstad A, Knardahl S, Lindström K, Elo A, Dallner M, Gamberale F, et al. Brukerveiledning QPSNordic. Generelt spørreskjema for psykologiske og sosiale faktorer i arbeid. 2001.

66.

Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1(1):27–41.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71(3):500–7.CrossRef

68.

Undersøkelse om pasienters erfaringer fra rehabiliteringsinstitusjoner [Internet]. Kunnskapssenteret for helsetjenesten. 2009. Available from: http://www.kunnskapssenteret.no/verktoy/sporreskjemabanken/voksne-erfaringer-med-rehabiliteringsinstitusjoner.

69.

Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med. 2002;21(19):2917–30.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Lie SA, Eriksen HR, Ursin H, Hagen EM. A multi-state model for sick-leave data applied to a randomized control trial study of low back pain. Scand J Public Health. 2008;36(3):279–83.PubMedCrossRef

71.

Helsedirektoratet. Økonomisk evaluering av helsetiltak - en veileder. 2012; 2020(21.11.). Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/veiledere/okonomisk-evaluering-av-helsetiltak.

72.

Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42(9):851–9.PubMedCrossRef

73.

Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences: National Institutes of Health; 2011. Available from: https://obssr.od.nih.gov/training/online-training-resources/mixed-methods-research/.CrossRef

74.

Maxwell JA. The importance of qualitative research for causal explanation in education. Qual Inq. 2012;18(8):655–61.CrossRef

75.

Albright K, Gechter K, Kempe A. Importance of mixed methods in pragmatic trials and dissemination and implementation research. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(5):400–7.PubMedCrossRef

76.

Zwarenstein M, Treweek S. What kind of randomised trials do patients and clinicians need? Evid Based Med. 2009;14(4):101–3.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, Hunter DJ, Drazen JM. Statistics in medicine--reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2189–94.PubMedCrossRef

78.

WMA Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, vol. 2018; 1964.

Title: Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol
Authors: Monica Eftedal
Torill H. Tveito
Ulrik Gensby
M. Kamrul Islam
Stein Atle Lie
Gro Aasland
Svein Kostveit
Chris Jensen
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03994-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol

Abstract

Background

Methods/design

Discussion

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods/design

Discussion

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Short-term effectiveness of precise safety decompression via double percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective cohort study

Treatment of the fresh central slip avulsion of the extensor tendon by bone tunnel-tendon suture: a prospective cohort study

Effects of core stabilization exercise and strengthening exercise on proprioception, balance, muscle thickness and pain related outcomes in patients with subacute nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

Associations of overweight, obesity and osteoporosis with ankle fractures

Association between syndesmophyte and metabolic syndrome in patients with psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis: a cross-sectional study

Association between lipid biomarkers and osteoporosis: a cross-sectional study