Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 3/2018

01-06-2018 | Review Article

Comparative efficacy of antiepileptic drugs for patients with generalized epileptic seizures: systematic review and network meta-analyses

Authors: Marília Silveira de Almeida Campos, Lorena Rocha Ayres, Manuela Roque Siane Morelo, Fabiana Angelo Marques Carizio, Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background Valproate is a widely prescribed antiepileptic drug for generalized epilepsies, due to the extensive knowledge on its efficacy since it is on the market for many decades. However, a large number of new antiepileptic medicines was introduced into clinical practice and may be better options for treatment, considering that these medicines differ in terms of efficacy spectrum. Despite extensive research, questions regarding which medicine would constitute the first option for the monotherapy treatment of generalized epilepsy remain. Aim of the Review To compare the relative efficacy of all available antiepileptic drugs in the monotherapy treatment of generalized epileptic seizures; and also to compare all antiepoileptig drugs with valproate, which is the current first-line treatment for generalized epilepsy. Methods A systematic review for randomized controlled clinical trials was performed. Network meta-analyses used Bayesian random effects model. Sensitivity analyses determined the results´ robustness. The relative probability of two efficacy outcomes (“Seizure free” and “Therapeutic inefficacy”) to happen for each medcicine was calculated using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve. Results Seven papers (1809 patients) studied the efficacy of valproate, lamotrigine, phenytoin, carbamazepine, topiramate, levetiracetam, and phenobarbital in the treatment of generalized tonicclonic, tonic, and clonic seizures. Phenytoin demonstrated to be inferior to valproate in leaving the patient free of these seizures types [OR: 0.50 (95% CrI 0.27, 0.87)]. Lamotrigine (61%) showed the highest probability of presenting the outcome “Seizure free”, followed by levetiracetam (47%), topiramate (44%), and valproate (38%) in the treatment of generalized tonic–clonic, tonic, and clonic seizures. Meanwhile, valproate exhibited greater chance of presenting the outcome “Therapeutic inefficacy” (62%). Regarding absence seizures itself, there was no difference in the efficacy of lamotrigine and ethosuximide when compared to valproate. However, the ranking indicates that ethosuximide (52%) and valproate (47%) are both more likely than lamotrigine to keep the patient free of seizures. Conclusions Lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate are as effective as valproate for treating generalized tonic–clonic, tonic, and clonic seizures. Meanwhile, valproate and ethosuximide are the best options for the treatment of absence seizures promoting better control of seizures, which is the primary goal of pharmacotherapy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ngugi AK, Bottomley C, Kleinschmidt I, Sander JW, Newton CR. Estimation of the burden of active and life-time epilepsy: a meta-analytic approach. Epilepsia. 2010;51(5):883–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ngugi AK, Bottomley C, Kleinschmidt I, Sander JW, Newton CR. Estimation of the burden of active and life-time epilepsy: a meta-analytic approach. Epilepsia. 2010;51(5):883–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Shorvon SD. Epidemiology, classification, natural history, and genetics of epilepsy. Lancet. 1990;336:93–6.CrossRefPubMed Shorvon SD. Epidemiology, classification, natural history, and genetics of epilepsy. Lancet. 1990;336:93–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lhatoo SD, Johnson AL, Goodridge DM, MacDonald BK, Sander JW, Shorvon SD. Mortality in epilepsy in the first 11–14 years after diagnosis: multivariate analysis of a long-term, prospective, population-based cohort. Ann Neurol. 2001;49(3):336–44.CrossRefPubMed Lhatoo SD, Johnson AL, Goodridge DM, MacDonald BK, Sander JW, Shorvon SD. Mortality in epilepsy in the first 11–14 years after diagnosis: multivariate analysis of a long-term, prospective, population-based cohort. Ann Neurol. 2001;49(3):336–44.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rugg-Gunn FJ, Sander JW. Management of chronic epilepsy. BMJ. 2012;345:1–7.CrossRef Rugg-Gunn FJ, Sander JW. Management of chronic epilepsy. BMJ. 2012;345:1–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Perucca E, Beghi E, Dulac O, Shorvon S, Tomson T. Assessing risk to benefit ratio in antiepileptic drug therapy. Epilepsy Res. 2000;41(2):107–39.CrossRefPubMed Perucca E, Beghi E, Dulac O, Shorvon S, Tomson T. Assessing risk to benefit ratio in antiepileptic drug therapy. Epilepsy Res. 2000;41(2):107–39.CrossRefPubMed
6.
8.
go back to reference Shorvon SD, Perucca E, Enge J. Handbook of epilepsy treatment. 3a Edição. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. ISBN 978-1-4051-9818-9. Shorvon SD, Perucca E, Enge J. Handbook of epilepsy treatment. 3a Edição. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. ISBN 978-1-4051-9818-9.
9.
go back to reference Mattson RH. Medical management of epilepsy in adults. Neurology. 1998;51(5):15–20.CrossRef Mattson RH. Medical management of epilepsy in adults. Neurology. 1998;51(5):15–20.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Emilio P, Torbjörn T. The pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:446–56.CrossRef Emilio P, Torbjörn T. The pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:446–56.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Savi MGM, Silva EL. Information flow in the clinical practice of resident physicians: an analysis from an evidence-based medicine perspective. Ciência Inf. 2009;38(3):177–91.CrossRef Savi MGM, Silva EL. Information flow in the clinical practice of resident physicians: an analysis from an evidence-based medicine perspective. Ciência Inf. 2009;38(3):177–91.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed 1 May 2015. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.​cochrane-handbook.​org. Accessed 1 May 2015.
13.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6):e1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6):e1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Chadwick D, Guerreiro C, et al. ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. 2006;47(7):1094–120.CrossRefPubMed Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Chadwick D, Guerreiro C, et al. ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. 2006;47(7):1094–120.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JC. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2005;25(20):3443–57.CrossRef Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JC. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2005;25(20):3443–57.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cipriani A, Higgins JP, Geddes JR, Salanti G. Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(2):130–7.CrossRefPubMed Cipriani A, Higgins JP, Geddes JR, Salanti G. Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(2):130–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23:3105–24.CrossRefPubMed Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23:3105–24.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010;29(7–8):932–44.CrossRefPubMed Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010;29(7–8):932–44.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–71.CrossRefPubMed Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–71.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Schmid CH. Quantitative syntesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(9):820–6.CrossRefPubMed Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Schmid CH. Quantitative syntesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(9):820–6.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Brodie MJ, Richens A, Yuen AW. Double-blind comparison of lamotrigine and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Lancet. 1995;345(8948):476–9.CrossRefPubMed Brodie MJ, Richens A, Yuen AW. Double-blind comparison of lamotrigine and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Lancet. 1995;345(8948):476–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Callaghan N, O’Hare J, O’Driscoll D, O’Neill B, Daly M. Comparative study of ethosuximide and sodium valproate in the treatment of typical absence seizures (petit mal). Dev Med Child Neurol. 1982;24(6):830–6.PubMed Callaghan N, O’Hare J, O’Driscoll D, O’Neill B, Daly M. Comparative study of ethosuximide and sodium valproate in the treatment of typical absence seizures (petit mal). Dev Med Child Neurol. 1982;24(6):830–6.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Callaghan N, Kenny RA, O’Neill B, Crowley M, Goggin T. A prospective study between carbamazepine, phenytoin and sodium valproate as monotherapy in previously untreated and recently diagnosed patients with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48(7):639–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Callaghan N, Kenny RA, O’Neill B, Crowley M, Goggin T. A prospective study between carbamazepine, phenytoin and sodium valproate as monotherapy in previously untreated and recently diagnosed patients with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48(7):639–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Coppola G, Auricchio G, Federico R, Carotenuto M, Pascotto A. Lamotrigine versus valproic acid as first-line monotherapy in newly diagnosed typical absence seizures: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study. Epilepsia. 2004;45(9):1049–53.CrossRefPubMed Coppola G, Auricchio G, Federico R, Carotenuto M, Pascotto A. Lamotrigine versus valproic acid as first-line monotherapy in newly diagnosed typical absence seizures: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study. Epilepsia. 2004;45(9):1049–53.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Frank LM, Enlow T, Holmes GL, Manasco P, Concannon S, Chen C, et al. Lamictal (lamotrigine) monotherapy for typical absence seizures in children. Epilepsia. 1999;40(7):973–9.CrossRefPubMed Frank LM, Enlow T, Holmes GL, Manasco P, Concannon S, Chen C, et al. Lamictal (lamotrigine) monotherapy for typical absence seizures in children. Epilepsia. 1999;40(7):973–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Glauser TA, Cnaan A, Shinnar S, Hirtz DG, Dlugos D, Masur D, et al. Ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in childhood absence epilepsy: initial monotherapy outcomes at 12 months. Epilepsia. 2013;54(1):141–55.CrossRefPubMed Glauser TA, Cnaan A, Shinnar S, Hirtz DG, Dlugos D, Masur D, et al. Ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in childhood absence epilepsy: initial monotherapy outcomes at 12 months. Epilepsia. 2013;54(1):141–55.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Marson AG, Al-Kharusi AM, Alwaidh M, Appleton R, Baker GA, Chadwick DW, et al. The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9566):1016–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marson AG, Al-Kharusi AM, Alwaidh M, Appleton R, Baker GA, Chadwick DW, et al. The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9566):1016–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Ramsay RE, Wilder BJ, Murphy JV, Holmes GL, Uthman B, Slateret J, et al. Efficacy and safety of valproic acid versus phenytoin as sole therapy for newly diagnosed primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. J Epilepsy. 1992;5(1):55–60.CrossRef Ramsay RE, Wilder BJ, Murphy JV, Holmes GL, Uthman B, Slateret J, et al. Efficacy and safety of valproic acid versus phenytoin as sole therapy for newly diagnosed primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. J Epilepsy. 1992;5(1):55–60.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Rastogi P, Mehrotra TN, Agarwala RK, Singh VS. Comparison of sodium valproate and phenytoin as single drug treatment in generalised and partial epilepsy. J Assoc Physicians India. 1991;39(8):606–8.PubMed Rastogi P, Mehrotra TN, Agarwala RK, Singh VS. Comparison of sodium valproate and phenytoin as single drug treatment in generalised and partial epilepsy. J Assoc Physicians India. 1991;39(8):606–8.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Richens A, Davidson DL, Cartlidge NE, Easter DJ. A multicentre comparative trial of sodium valproate and carbamazepine in adult onset epilepsy. Adult EPITEG Collaborative Group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(6):682–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Richens A, Davidson DL, Cartlidge NE, Easter DJ. A multicentre comparative trial of sodium valproate and carbamazepine in adult onset epilepsy. Adult EPITEG Collaborative Group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(6):682–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Steiner TJ, Dellaportas CI, Findley LJ, Gross M, Gibberd FB, Perkin GD, et al. Lamotrigine monotherapy in newly diagnosed untreated epilepsy: a double-blind comparison with phenytoin. Epilepsia. 1999;40(5):601–7.CrossRefPubMed Steiner TJ, Dellaportas CI, Findley LJ, Gross M, Gibberd FB, Perkin GD, et al. Lamotrigine monotherapy in newly diagnosed untreated epilepsy: a double-blind comparison with phenytoin. Epilepsia. 1999;40(5):601–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Steinhoff BJ, Ueberall MA, Siemes H, Kurlemann G, Schmitz B, Bergmann L. The LAM-SAFE Study: lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults. Seizure. 2005;14(8):597–605.CrossRefPubMed Steinhoff BJ, Ueberall MA, Siemes H, Kurlemann G, Schmitz B, Bergmann L. The LAM-SAFE Study: lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults. Seizure. 2005;14(8):597–605.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Thilothammal N, Banu K, Ratnam RS. Comparison of phenobarbitone, phenytoin with sodium valproate: randomized, double-blind study. Indian Pediatr. 1996;33(7):549–55.PubMed Thilothammal N, Banu K, Ratnam RS. Comparison of phenobarbitone, phenytoin with sodium valproate: randomized, double-blind study. Indian Pediatr. 1996;33(7):549–55.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Trinka E, Marson AG, Van Paesschen W, Kälviäinen R, Marovac J, Duncan B, et al. KOMET: an unblinded, randomised, two parallel-group, stratified trial comparing the effectiveness of levetiracetam with controlled-release carbamazepine and extended-release sodium valproate as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(10):1138–47.CrossRefPubMed Trinka E, Marson AG, Van Paesschen W, Kälviäinen R, Marovac J, Duncan B, et al. KOMET: an unblinded, randomised, two parallel-group, stratified trial comparing the effectiveness of levetiracetam with controlled-release carbamazepine and extended-release sodium valproate as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(10):1138–47.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Turnbull DM, Howel D, Rawlins MD, Chadwick DW. Which drug for the adult epileptic patient: phenytoin or valproate? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;290(6471):815–9.CrossRef Turnbull DM, Howel D, Rawlins MD, Chadwick DW. Which drug for the adult epileptic patient: phenytoin or valproate? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;290(6471):815–9.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wilder BJ, Ramsay RE, Murphy JV, Karas BJ, Marquardt K, Hammond EJ. Comparison of valproic acid and phenytoin in newly diagnosed tonic-clonic seizures. Neurology. 1983;33(11):1474–6.CrossRefPubMed Wilder BJ, Ramsay RE, Murphy JV, Karas BJ, Marquardt K, Hammond EJ. Comparison of valproic acid and phenytoin in newly diagnosed tonic-clonic seizures. Neurology. 1983;33(11):1474–6.CrossRefPubMed
38.
39.
go back to reference Campos MSA, Ayres LR, Morelo MR, Marques FA, Pereira LR. Efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs in patients with focal epilepsy: systematic review and network meta-analyses. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36(12):1255–71.CrossRefPubMed Campos MSA, Ayres LR, Morelo MR, Marques FA, Pereira LR. Efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs in patients with focal epilepsy: systematic review and network meta-analyses. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36(12):1255–71.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–71.CrossRefPubMed Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–71.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Sato S, White BG, Penry JK, Dreifuss FE, Sackellares JC, Kupferberg HJ. Valproate versus ethosuximide in the treatment of absence seizures. Neurology. 1982;32:157–63.CrossRefPubMed Sato S, White BG, Penry JK, Dreifuss FE, Sackellares JC, Kupferberg HJ. Valproate versus ethosuximide in the treatment of absence seizures. Neurology. 1982;32:157–63.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Guerreiro C, Kälviäinen R, et al. Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. 2013;54(3):551–63.CrossRefPubMed Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Guerreiro C, Kälviäinen R, et al. Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. 2013;54(3):551–63.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative efficacy of antiepileptic drugs for patients with generalized epileptic seizures: systematic review and network meta-analyses
Authors
Marília Silveira de Almeida Campos
Lorena Rocha Ayres
Manuela Roque Siane Morelo
Fabiana Angelo Marques Carizio
Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0641-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 3/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.