Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Comparative analysis of two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology for the orthodontic mini-implants placement

Authors: Elena Riad Deglow, Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho, Héctor González Menéndez, Juan Lorrio Castro, Agustín Galparsoro Catalán, Georgia Tzironi, Ana Belén Lobo Galindo, Luis Óscar Alonso Ezpeleta, Sofía Hernández Montero

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Abstract

To analyze and compare the accuracy and root contact prevalence, comparing a conventional freehand technique and two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology for the orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement.

Methods Two hundred and seven orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants were placed using either a conventional freehand technique (FHT) and two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology (AR TOOTH and AR SCREWS). Accuracy across different dental sectors was also analyzed. CBCT and intraoral scans were taken both prior to and following orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement. The deviation angle and horizontal were then analyzed; these measurements were taken at the coronal entry point and apical endpoint between the planned and performed orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants. In addition, any complications resulting from mini-implant placement, such as spot perforations, were also analyzed across all dental sectors.

Results The statistical analysis showed significant differences between study groups with regard to the coronal entry-point (p < 0.001), apical end-point(p < 0.001) and angular deviations (p < 0.001). Furthermore, statistically significant differences were shown between the orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement site at the coronal entry-point (p < 0.0001) and apical end-point (p < 0.001). Additionally, eight root perforations were observed in the FHT group, while there were no root perforations in the two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology.

Conclusions The navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology has an effect on the accuracy of orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement and results in fewer intraoperative complications, comparing to the conventional free-hand technique. The AR TOOTH augmented reality technique showed more accurate results between planned and placed orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants, comparing to the AR SCREWS and conventional free-hand techniques. The navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology showed fewer intraoperative complications, comparing to the conventional free-hand technique.

Papadopoulos MA, Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP. Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2011;90:969–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511409236.CrossRefPubMed

Chen Y, Lee JW, Cho WH, Kyung HM. Potential of self-drilling orthodontic microimplants under immediate loading. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;137:496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.030.CrossRef

Papadopoulos MA, Tarawneh F. The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:e6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.022.CrossRefPubMed

Casaña-Ruiz MD, Bellot-Arcís C, Paredes-Gallardo V, García-Sanz V, Almerich-Silla JM, Montiel-Company JM. Risk factors for orthodontic mini-implants in skeletal anchorage biological stability: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62838-7.CrossRef

Bufalá PM, O’Connor EM, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Riad Deglow E, Hernández Montero S, Abella Sans F, Albaladejo Martínez A. Novel digital technique to analyze the influence of the operator experience on the accuracy of the orthodontic micro-screws placement. Appl Sci. 2021;11:400. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010400.CrossRef

Pithon MM, Figueiredo DSF, Oliveira D. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71:479–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.10.002.CrossRefPubMed

Qamruddin I, Nazir M. Shahid F Factors that contribute to the failure of orthodontic mini-implants: A literature review. Pak Orthod J. 2010;2:76–81 Retrieved from https://poj.org.pk/index.php/poj/article/view/8.

Consolaro A, Romano FL. Reasons for mini-implants failure: Choosing installation site should be valued. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014;19:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.2.018-024.oin.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ono A, Motoyoshi M, Shimizu N. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:334–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.01.005.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2007;22:779–84.

11.

Jung YR, Kim SC, Kang KH, Cho JH, Lee EH, Chang NY, Chae JM. Placement angle effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants and other factors with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143:173–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.011.CrossRef

12.

Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung H-M, Yamamoto TT. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;131:S68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.017.CrossRef

13.

Santiago RC, De Paula FO, Fraga MR, Assis NMSP, Vitral RWF. Correlation between miniscrew stability and bone mineral density in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136:243–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.031.CrossRef

14.

Daokar S, Gauri G, Mahesh L. Orthodontic implant failure: a systematic review. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res. 2016;7:1–6. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1144.CrossRef

15.

Kyung H-M, Park H-S, Bae S-M, Sung J-H, Kim I-B. Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2003;37:321–8.PubMed

16.

Park JH, Chae J-M, Bay RC, Kim M-J, Lee K-Y, Chang N-Y. Evaluation of factors influencing the success rate of orthodontic microimplants using panoramic radiographs. Korean J Orthod. 2018;48:30–8. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.1.30.CrossRefPubMed

17.

D’Haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol. 2000;2017(73):121–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12175.CrossRef

18.

Choi W, Nguyen BC, Doan A, Girod S, Gaudilliere B, Gaudilliere D. Freehand versus guided surgery: factors influencing accuracy of dental implant placement. Implant Dent. 2017;26:500–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000620.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Torres PR, Gil ST, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Pérez MB, Deglow ER, Tzironi G, Martínez AA, Montero SH. Influence of the computer-aided static navigation technique on the accuracy of the orthodontic micro-screws placement: an in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2021;10(18):4127. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184127.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Berryman DR. Augmented reality: a review. Med Ref Serv Q. 2012;31(2):212–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2012.670604.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Durham M, Engel B, Ferrill T, Halford J, Singh TP, Gladwell M. Digitally augmented learning in implant dentistry. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2019.03.003.CrossRefPubMed

22.

RiadDeglow E, Toledano Gil S, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Bufalá Pérez M, Rodríguez Torres P, Tzironi G, Albaladejo Martínez A, López Román A, Hernández Montero S. Influence of the computer-aided static navigation technique and mixed reality technology on the accuracy of the orthodontic micro-screws placement. An in vitro study. J Pers Med. 2021;11(10):964. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11100964.CrossRef

23.

Cozzani M, Nucci L, Lupini D, Dolatshahizand H, Fazeli D, Barzkar E, Naeini E, Jamilian A. The ideal insertion angle after immediate loading in Jeil, Storm, and Thunder miniscrews: a 3D-FEM study. Int Orthod. 2020;18(3):503–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2020.03.003.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Kivovics M, Takács A, Pénzes D, Németh O, Mijiritsky E. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2022;119:104070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104070.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Jiang W, Ma L, Zhang B, Fan Y, Qu X, Zhang X, Liao H. Evaluation of the 3D augmented reality-guided intraoperative positioning of dental implants in edentulous mandibular models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(6):1219–28. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6638.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Pellegrino G, Mangano C, Mangano R, Ferri A, Taraschi V, Marchetti C. Augmented reality for dental implantology: a pilot clinical report of two cases. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0853-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Lin YK, Yau HT, Wang IC, Zheng C, Chung KH. A novel dental implant guided surgery based on integration of surgical template and augmented reality. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(3):543–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12119.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ma L, Jiang W, Zhang B, Qu X, Ning G, Zhang X, Liao H. Augmented reality surgical navigation with accurate CBCT-patient registration for dental implant placement. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019;57(1):47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1861-9.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Katić D, Spengler P, Bodenstedt S, Castrillon-Oberndorfer G, Seeberger R, Hoffmann J, Dillmann R, Speidel S. A system for context-aware intraoperative augmented reality in dental implant surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015;10(1):101–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1005-0.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Motoyoshi M, Uchida Y, Matsuoka M, Inaba M, Iwai H, Karasawa Y, Shimizu N. Assessment of damping capacity as an index of root proximity in self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:321–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0965-8.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Gintautaitė G, Kenstavičius G, Gaidytė A. Dental roots’ and surrounding structures’ response after contact with orthodontic mini implants: a systematic literature review. Stomatologija. 2018;20:73–81.PubMed

33.

Perillo L, Jamilian A, Shafieyoon A, Karimi H, Cozzani M. Finite element analysis of miniscrew placement in mandibular alveolar bone with varied angulations. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(1):56–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju006.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Comparative analysis of two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology for the orthodontic mini-implants placement
Authors: Elena Riad Deglow
Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho
Héctor González Menéndez
Juan Lorrio Castro
Agustín Galparsoro Catalán
Georgia Tzironi
Ana Belén Lobo Galindo
Luis Óscar Alonso Ezpeleta
Sofía Hernández Montero
Publication date: 01-12-2023
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03261-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Comparative analysis of two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology for the orthodontic mini-implants placement

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Deep learning-based prediction of osseointegration for dental implant using plain radiography

Factors influencing treatment outcomes assessed by the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS)

Influence of high-irradiance light curing on the marginal integrity of composite restorations in primary teeth

Barriers and enablers for oral health promotion programs amongst primary healthcare stakeholders in Qatar – a qualitative investigation

Vitamin E ameliorates oral mucositis in gamma-irradiated rats (an in vivo study)

In vitro evaluation of dental color stability using various aesthetic restorative materials after immersion in different drinks